Download 104_ETP_Economics_-_HW1(Cha_2,3)

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Balance of trade wikipedia , lookup

Effects of the car on societies wikipedia , lookup

Protectionism wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
ETP Economics HW1
(due date: 6 October ,2015)
1. Draw a circular-flow diagram. Identify the parts of the model that
correspond to the flow of goods and services and the flow of dollars
for each of the following activities.
a. Selena pays a storekeeper $1 for a quart of milk.
b. Stuart earns $4.50 per hour working at a fast-food resturrant.
c. Shanna spends $30 to get a haircut.
d. Sally earns $10,000 from her 10 percent ownership of Acme
Industrial.
2. Imagine a society that produces military goods and consumer goods,
which we’ll call “guns” and “butter.”
a. Draw a production possibilities frontier for guns and butter. Using
the concept of opportunity cost, explain why it most likely has a
bowed-out shape.
b. Show a point that is impossible for the economy to achieve. Show a
point that is feasible but inefficient.
c. Imagine that the society has two political parties, called the Hawks
(Who want a strong military) and the Doves (who want a smaller
military). Show a point on your production possibilities frontier that
the Hawks might choose and a point the Doves might choose.
d. Imagine that an aggressive neighboring country reduce the size of
its military. As a result, both the Hawks and the Doves reduce their
desired production of guns by the same amount. Which party would
get the bigger “peace dividend,” measured by the increase in butter
production? Explain.
3. Classify the following topics as relating to microeconomics or
macroeconomics.
a. Susan’s decision about how much income to save.
b. the impact of a decrease national saving on a country’s economic
growth.
c. the impact of an increase in the price of computer chips on the
market for personal computers.
d. the impact of an increase in government purchases on the
unemployment rate.
e. the decision by McDonald’s to hire fewer workers because of an
increase in the minimum wage.
4. Classify each of the following statements as positive or normative.
Explain.
a. An increase in inflation temporarily reduces unemployment.
b. The government should increase the rate of inflation in order to
reduce the unemployment rate.
c. The government should increases taxes to pay for universal health
care.
d. An increase in taxes causes people to work fewer hours.
e. The price of a new car is too high.
5. American and Japanese workers can each produce 4 cars a year. An
American worker can produce 10 tons of grain a year, whereas a
Japanese worker can produce 5 tons of grain a year. To keep things
simple, assume that each country has 100 million workers.
a. For this situation, construct a table with information of the amount
of cars and grain produced a year and the time needed to make one
unit of cars and grain for America and Japan.
b. Graph the production possibilities frontier of the American and
Japanese economies.
c. For the United States, what is the opportunity cost of a car? Of grain?
For Japan, what is the opportunity of cost of a car? Of grain? Put this
information in a table.
d. Which country has an absolute advantage in producing cars? In
producing grain?
e. Which country has a comparative advantage in producing cars? In
producing grain?
f. Without trade, half of each country’s workers produce cars and half
produce grain. What quantities of cars and grain does each country
produce?
g. Starting from a position without trade, give an example in which
trade makes each country better off.
6. Are the following statements true or false? Explain in each case.
a. “Two countries can achieve gains from trade even if one of the
countries has an absolute advantage in the production of all goods.”
b. “Certain very talented people have a comparative advantage in
everything they do.”
c. “If a certain trade is good for one person, it can’t be good for the
other one.”
d. “If a certain trade is good for one person, it’s always good for the
other one.”