Download Chapter 4 - Constitutional Authority to Regulate Business

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Assignment (law) wikipedia , lookup

Uniform Commercial Code wikipedia , lookup

Stipulatio wikipedia , lookup

Carlill v Carbolic Smoke Ball Co wikipedia , lookup

Australian contract law wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
BLTS-9e
Sample Answer for End-of-Chapter
Hypothetical Question with Sample Answer
Chapter 9: Agreement in Traditional and E-Contracts
8.2 Hypothetical Question with Sample Answer
Chernek, the sole owner of a small business, has a large piece of used farm
equipment for sale. He offers to sell the equipment to Bollow for $10,000.
Discuss the legal effects of the following events on the offer:
1 Chernek dies prior to Bollow’s acceptance, and at the time she accepts, Bollow
is unaware of Chernek’s death.
2 The night before Bollow accepts, a fire destroys the equipment.
3 Bollow pays $100 for a thirty-day option to purchase the equipment. During this
period, Chernek dies, and Bollow accepts the offer, knowing of Chernek’s death.
4 Bollow pays $100 for a thirty-day option to purchase the equipment. During this
period, Bollow dies, and Bollow’s estate accepts Chernek’s offer within the
stipulated time period.
Sample Answer:
1 Death of either the offeror or the offeree prior to acceptance automatically
terminates a revocable offer. The basic legal reason is that the offer is personal
to the parties and cannot be passed on to others, not even to the estate of the
deceased. This rule applies even if the other party is unaware of the death.
Thus, Cherneck’s offer terminates on Cherneck’s death, and Bollow’s later
acceptance does not constitute a contract.
2 An offer is automatically terminated by the destruction of the specific subject
matter of the offer prior to acceptance. Thus, Bollow’s acceptance after the fire
does not constitute a contract.
3 When the offer is irrevocable, under an option contract, death of the offeror
does not terminate the option contract, and the offeree can accept the offer to
sell the equipment, binding the offeror’s estate to performance. Performance is
not personal to Cherneck, as the estate can transfer title to the equipment.
Knowledge of the death is immaterial to the offeree’s right of acceptance. Thus,
Bollow can hold Cherneck’s estate to a contract for the purchase of the
equipment.
4 When the offer is irrevocable, under an option contract, death of the offeree
also does not terminate the offer. Because the option is a separate contract, the
contract survives and passes to the offeree’s estate, which can exercise the
option by acceptance within the option period. Thus acceptance by Bollow’s
estate binds Cherneck to a contract for the sale of the equipment.