Download Name of Program - Bethune

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts
no text concepts found
Transcript
BETHUNE-COOKMAN UNIVERSITY
Name of Program
2014-15 ANNUAL PLANNING &
ASSESSMENT REPORT
for Academic Programs
Department Chair
[Select date from the calendar]
Bethune-Cookman University
Description of the Program
[Enter program description]
Mission
[Enter mission]
Program Student Learning Outcomes (PSLOs)
[List the Program Student learning Outcomes]
Curriculum Map
Program Curriculum Map
Course 7
Course 6
Course 5
Course 4
Course 3
Course 2
Course 1
Program Name_______________________________________________________________________
PSLO 1
PSLO 2
PSLO 3
PSLO 4
PSLO 5
Bethune-Cookman University
Page 1
Assessment Map
Program Assessment Map
Assessment 7
Assessment 6
Assessment 5
Assessment 4
Assessment 3
Assessment 2
Assessment 1
Program Name_________________________________________________________________________
PSLO
1
PSLO
2
PSLO
3
PSLO
4
PSLO
5
Bethune-Cookman University
Page 2
Annual Planning, Budgeting, and Assessment 2014-15 (Analysis Grid)
B-CU’s Mission Statement: The mission of Bethune-Cookman University is to develop global leaders committed to service, lifelong learning and diversity by providing a faith-based environment of academic excellence and transformative experiences.
Targeted Strategic Goal(s): Enhance Academic Enterprise, Promote Student Success
Targeted Academic Affairs Key Performance Indicators:
Institutional Student Learning Outcome(s) addressed:
Student
Learning
Outcomes
(PSLOs)
Expected Level
of
Achievement
Bethune-Cookman University
Measure/Tool
Results
Use of Results (to include
analysis and Action Plan)
Met
Not
Met
Budgetary Considerations
Page 3
Other
Programmatic
Outcomes
Expected Level
of
Achievement
Bethune-Cookman University
Measure/Tool
Results
Use of Results
Met
Not
Met
Budgetary Considerations
Page 4
Annual Planning and Assessment for 2015-16
B-CU’s Mission Statement: The mission of Bethune-Cookman University is to develop global leaders committed to
service, life-long learning and diversity by providing a faith-based environment of academic excellence and
transformative experiences.
Targeted Strategic Goal(s): Enhance Academic Enterprise, Promote Student Success
Targeted Academic Affairs Key Performance Indicators:
Institutional Student Learning Outcome(s) addressed:
Student Learning Outcomes (PSLOs)
Expected Level of Achievement
Measure/Tool
Other Programmatic Outcomes
Expected Level of Achievement
Measure/Tool
Bethune-Cookman University
Page 5
Assessment Plan (Methods and Procedures)
[Describe the methods and procedures used to assess the program.]
Program Data Collection
Data Requested
Name of 5 peer
institutions used for
program comparison
Who
What is remarkable about
this institution?
1
2
3
4
5
Percentage of courses
taught by full-time
faculty
Percentage of courses
taught by part-time
faculty
Bethune-Cookman University
Page 5
Rubric for Assessing Annual Assessment Report
Implementation
Assessment Planning
(Each academic and non-academic unit is required to submit an annual plan/assessment report. The reports include assessments of students learning and other programmatic improvements)
Criteria
Excellent (3)
Basic (2)
Needs Improvement (1)
Outcome (S.M.A.R.T.)

specific,

measurable,

attainable,

relevant,

time bound
The outcome statement clearly focuses on
what students know, are able to do and/or
identifies attitudes developed. The
outcome uses action verbs and is relevant
to the program and attainable in the timeframe specified (usually one year).
Expected Level of Achievement

Appropriate (not too high not too low)
The expected level of achievement is
appropriate and aligned with best practices
– other institutions.
At least two measures are identified and
the measures match the outcomes.
Measure/Tool

Multiple assessments (at least two for each PSLO)

The assessment must match the outcome
Results

Data must be linked to the outcome

Data must be collected using the measure/tool identified

Each outcome is rated Met, Partially met or Unmet
Closing the Loop
Use of Results

The data must drive program improvement – clearly
articulate what the data tell you and what actions the
data prompt you to take.

Analysis

Action Plan
Bethune-Cookman University
The outcome statement
attempts to focus on what
students know are able to do,
and/or attitudes developed;
however, it is clouded by the lack
of action verbs. In addition, the
outcome lacks focus because it is
“bundled.”
The expected level of
achievement is either too low or
too high.
One measure is identified and
the measure is not clearly
matching the outcome.
Not all data are collected, or not
enough detail is provided;
however, where data are
collected measures proposed are
used.
The outcome statement
lacks focus and/ or is
unrelated to the program. In
addition, action verbs are
not used and the unit has no
control over the attainment
of the outcome.
A detailed plan for how data will be used to
drive programmatic improvement is
provided.
A plan is provided articulating
how data will be used to drive
improvement; however, that
plan lacks detail.
The plan is inadequate to
drive programmatic
improvement.
Rich detail and examples are provided as to
how results of assessment are used to make
programmatic improvement or
improvement to student learning. The
discussion is focused on curriculum –
scoping and sequencing, deletion, addition
of courses, course development, addition
/deletion of programs.
An action plan is provided for each outcome
that is Met, Partially met or Unmet.
Discussion includes how results
of assessment are used to make
programmatic improvement or
improvement to student
learning. The discussion is not
detailed, nor are examples
provided.
The discussion is poorly
developed and does not
clearly address how results
of assessment are used to
make programmatic
improvement or
improvement to student
learning.
An action plan is not
provided for each target.
Data are clearly identified and collected
using the measures proposed.
An action plan is provided for
each outcome that is Met,
Partially met or Unmet; however,
the plan is not specific.
The expected level of
achievement is not
identified.
No measures are identified.
Data is missing or
insufficient.
Page 6