Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Summer 2012 Xiamen University Rui Zhao Emory Advanced Topics in Macroeconomics Asset Pricing This course will start the model with uncertainty and its application in asset pricing. All class related materials can be downloaded from userwww.service.emory.edu/~rzhao9/xiamen/ References Ljunqvist, L. and T. Sargent. Recursive Macroeconomic Theory. Second edition, MIT Press. Stokey, N., R. Lucas Jr., with E. Prescott. Recursive Methods for Economic Dynamics. Harvard University Press. John Cochrane. Asset Pricing. Princeton University Press. Darrell Duffle. Dynamic Asset Pricing Theory. Princeton University Press. Reading list 1. Markov Chain Ljunqvist and Sargent, Chapter 2. Time series. Stokey, Lucas, with Prescott, Chapter 11, p319-334. Markov Chain. Stokey, Lucas, with Prescott, Chapter 8. Markov Processes. 2. Asset Pricing Ljunqvist and Sargent, Chapter 8. Competitive Equilibrium with Complete Markets. Ljunqvist and Sargent, Chapter 12. Recursive Competitive Equilibria. Ljunqvist and Sargent, Chapter 13. Asset Pricing. Lucas, R. Jr. (1978) Asset Prices in an Exchange Economy. Econometrica, 46(6): 14291445. Hansen, L. and K. Singleton (1982) Generalized Instrumental Variables Estimation of Nonlinear Rational Expectations Models. Econometrica, 50(5): 1269-1286. Hansen, L. and K. Singleton (1983) Stochastic Consumption, Risk Aversion, and the Temporal Behavior of Asset Returns. Journal of Political Economy, 91(2), 249-265. Mehra, R. and E. Prescott. (1985) The Equity Premium: A puzzle. Journal of Monetary Economics, 15: 145-161. Weil, P. (1989) The Equity Premium Puzzle and the Risk-Free Rate Puzzle. Journal of Monetary Economics, 24: 401-421. Hansen, L. and R. Jagannathan. (1991) Implication of Security Market Data for Models of Dynamic Economies. Journal of Political Economy, 99(2): 225-262.