Download Knowledge in Action Seminar

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts
no text concepts found
Transcript
Knowledge in Action Seminar
Topics for Short Talks
Summer 2007
Topics
References
1 (1) STRIPS & PDDL
09.05.07 - Marian
[FN71, McD98, FL03]
2 (2) SatPlan & Blackbox
16.05.07 - Martin, Peter
[KS92, KS96, KMS96, KS99]
3a (2) Planning as Satisfiability and QBF
[RHN05, Rin04a, Rin04b]
[Rin03, EMW97, Rin99]
23.05.07 - Roland, Kristine
3b (2) Planning with QBF
[RHN05, Rin04a, Rin04b]
[Rin03, EMW97, Rin99]
30.05.07 Saskia, Friederike
4 (2) Action Languages
06.06.07 - Falko, Nikolas
[GL98]
5 (2) CCalc
13.06.07 - Robert, Andrea
[MT98, MT97, GLL+ 04]
6 (1) C+ and MAD
20.06.07 - Oliver
[LL03, LR06]
7 (2) ASP Encoding of Action Languages
27.06.07 - Mario, Andrej
[LT99, Lif02, GL93]
8 (2) ASP Planning: dlv K
04.07.07 - Jens, Christian A.
[EFL+ 00, EFL+ 03]
9 (1) Preferences in Action Languages
11.07.07 - Ajybek
[SP04a, BM05b, BM05a, SP04b]
10 (3) Applications in Bioinformatics
18.07.07 - Torsten, Christian D., Max
[BCT+ 04, GSS06, TBNJ05]
References
[BCT+ 04] Chitta Baral, Karen Chancellor, Nam Tran, Nhan Tran,
A. Joy, and M. Berens. A knowledge based approach
for representing and reasoning about signaling networks.
In ISMB/ECCB (Supplement of Bioinformatics), pages
15–22, 2004. 2
[BM05a]
M. Bienvenu and S. McIlraith. Qualitative dynamical
preferences in the situation calculus. In Proceedings of
the IJCAI-05 Multidisciplinary Workshop on Advances
in Preference Handling, 2005. 2
[BM05b] M. Bienvenu and S. McIlraith. Specifying and generating
preferred plans. In Working Notes of the Seventh International Symposium on Logical Formalizations of Commonsense Reasoning, Kerkyra, Greece, 2005. 2
[EFL+ 00] T. Eiter, W. Faber, N. Leone, G. Pfeifer, and A. Polleres.
Planning under incomplete knowledge. Lecture Notes in
Computer Science, 2000. 2
[EFL+ 03] T. Eiter, W. Faber, N. Leone, G. Pfeifer, and A. Polleres.
A logic programming approach to knowledge-state planning. Artificial Intelligence, 144(1-2):157–211, 2003. 2
[EMW97] Michael Ernst, Todd D. Millstein, and Daniel S. Weld.
Automatic SAT-compilation of planning problems. In
IJCAI, pages 1169–1177, 1997. 2
[FL03]
Maria Fox and Derek Long. pddl2.1 : An extension to
pddl for expressing temporal planning domains. Journal
of Artificial Intelligence Research, pages 61–124, 2003. 2
[FN71]
R. Fikes and N. Nilsson. STRIPS: A new approach to
the application of theorem proving to problem solving.
Artificial Intelligence, 2:189–208, 1971. 2
[GL93]
M. Gelfond and V. Lifschitz. Representing action and
change by logic programs. Journal of Logic Programming,
17(2-4):301–321, 1993. 2
[GL98]
M. Gelfond and V. Lifschitz. Action languages. Electronic
Transactions on Artificial Intelligence, 3(6), 1998. 2
[GLL+ 04] E. Giunchiglia, J. Lee, V. Lifschitz, N. McCain, and
H. Turner. Nonmonotonic causal theories. Artificial Intelligence, 153:49–104, 2004. 2
[GSS06]
S. Grell, T. Schaub, and J. Selbig. Modelling biological
networks by action languages via answer set programming. In J. Dix and A. Hunter, editors, Proceedings of
the Eleventh International Workshop on Nonmonotonic
Reasoning (NMR’06), number IFI-06-04 in Technical Report Series, pages 275–283. Clausthal University of Technology, Institute for Informatics, 2006. 2
[KMS96] H. Kautz, D. McAllester, and B. Selman. Encoding plans
in propositional logic. In Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on the Principle of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (KR’96), pages 374–384, 1996.
2
[KS92]
H. Kautz and B. Selman. Planning as satisfiability. In
Proceedings of the Tenth European Conference on Artificial Intelligence (ECAI’92), pages 359–363, 1992. 2
[KS96]
H. Kautz and B. Selman. Pushing the envelope: Planning, propositional logic, and stochastic search. In National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI’96),
pages 1194–1201, Portland, Oregon, 1996. AAAI Press.
2
[KS99]
H. Kautz and B. Selman. Unifying SAT-based and graphbased planning. In J. Minker, editor, Workshop on LogicBased Artificial Intelligence, Washington, DC, June 14–
16, 1999, College Park, Maryland, 1999. Computer Science Department, University of Maryland. 2
[Lif02]
V. Lifschitz. Answer set programming and plan generation. Artificial Intelligence, 138(1-2):39–54, 2002. 2
[LL03]
J. Lee and V. Lifschitz. Describing additive fluents in action language C+. Proceedings of the International Joint
Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 2003. 2
[LR06]
V. Lifschitz and W. Ren. A modular action description
language. Proceedings of the National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI), 2006. 2
[LT99]
Vladimir Lifschitz and Hudson Turner. Representing
transition systems by logic programs. In Logic Programming and Non-monotonic Reasoning, pages 92–106, 1999.
2
[McD98]
D. McDermott. Pddl — the planning domain definition
language, 1998. 2
[MT97]
Norman McCain and Hudson Turner. Causal theories
of action and change. In Proceedings of the Thirteenth
National Conference on Artificial Intelligence and the
Eighth Innovative Applications of Artificial Intelligence
Conference, pages 460–465. AAAI Press, 1997. 2
[MT98]
N. McCain and H. Turner. Satisfiability planning with
causal theories. In A. Cohn, L. Schubert, and S. Shapiro,
editors, KR’98: Principles of Knowledge Representation
and Reasoning, pages 212–223. Morgan Kaufmann, San
Francisco, California, 1998. 2
[RHN05] J. Rintanen, K. Heljanko, and I. Niemelä.
Planning as satisfiability: parallel plans and algorithms for
plan search. Technical Report 216, Albert-LudwigsUniversität Freiburg, Institut für Informatik, 2005. 2
[Rin99]
Jussi Rintanen. Constructing conditional plans by a
theorem-prover. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 10:323–352, 1999. 2
[Rin03]
J. Rintanen. Symmetry reduction for sat representations
of transition systems. Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Automated Planning and Scheduling, pages 32–40, 2003. 2
[Rin04a]
J. Rintanen. Evaluation strategies for planning as satisfiability. Proceedings of the 16th European Conference on
Artificial Intelligence, IOS Press, 2004. 2
[Rin04b]
J. Rintanen. Phase transitions in classical planning: an
experimental study. Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning: Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference (KR 2004), 710–719. AAAI Press.,
2004. 2
[SP04a]
T. Son and E. Pontelli. Planning with preferences in logic
programming. In V. Lifschitz and I. Niemelä, editors,
Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on
Logic Programming and Nonmonotonic Reasoning (LPNMR’04), volume 2923 of Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, pages 247–260. Springer-Verlag, 2004. 2
[SP04b]
T. Son and E. Pontelli. Reasoning about actions and
planning with preferences using prioritized default theory. Computational Intelligence, 20(2):358–404, 2004. 2
[TBNJ05] Nam Tran, Chitta Baral, Vinay Nagaraj, and Lokesh
Joshi. Knowledge-based integrative framework for hypothesis formation in biochemical networks. Proc. of the
2nd International Workshop on Data Integration in the
Life Sciences (DILS’05), pages 121–136, 2005. 2
Related documents