Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Microelectronics Reliability 64 (2016) 84–87 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Microelectronics Reliability journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/microrel Crack-guided effect on dynamic mechanical stress for foldable low temperature polycrystalline silicon thin film transistors Sang Myung Lee, Chuntaek Park, Ilgu Yun ⁎ Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Yonsei University, Seoul, Republic of Korea a r t i c l e i n f o Article history: Received 26 June 2016 Accepted 7 July 2016 Available online 18 September 2016 Keywords: Foldable device Crack guidance Dynamic mechanical stress test Reliability a b s t r a c t In the thin film transistors (TFTs) device research for foldable display, the degradation effect by the mechanical stress is crucial. Here, the crack position is critical for TFT reliability. However, it is difficult to characterize the crack position due to the random generation of the crack by mechanical stress. In this paper, the crack-guided low temperature polycrystalline silicon (LTPS) TFT test structures are fabricated and the crack-guided effects on mechanical stress of the tested TFT structure are analyzed. To strain on the foldable LTPS TFTs, 50,000 cycles of tensile and parallel direction dynamic mechanical stresses were applied with 2.5-mm bending radius. Based on the results, the generating crack position can be guided and controlled and also TFT reliability for foldable display can be enhanced. © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. 1. Introduction 2. Experiments and measurements The low temperature polycrystalline silicon (LTPS) thin film transistor (TFT) is the attractive active material for the use in foldable display because of the high mobility characteristic and low fabrication temperature. To use this foldable TFT device in the industry, the stress tests are required to guarantee the device reliability. Here, the mechanical stress is one of the main stresses, which can impact on the foldable device operation, and it can generate cracks on the foldable TFT resulted in a device failure. These effects are critical because they can generate defects or cracks in TFTs that degrade operation characteristics and reliability. Many studies have focused on the influence of compressive [1] or tensile [2] stress on the TFTs with a single type of a mechanical stress direction. However, the crack is randomly generated on the foldable TFT. Especially, a crack which generated on TFT area makes degradation or failure of the device characteristic. If the crack position is controlled, the TFT reliability can be enhanced. However, previously the control methodology of the position for randomly generated cracks on the foldable TFT has not been investigated. In this paper, the crack-guided tested LTPS TFT structures are fabricated to examine the effect of crack guidance on the TFT reliability. To confirm the effect, the results of the dynamic mechanical stress test on the tested LTPS TFTs are analyzed. A guideline for reliable circuit design is then proposed based on the results of these tests. 2.1. Device structure and measurement conditions ⁎ Corresponding author. E-mail address: [email protected] (I. Yun). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.microrel.2016.07.056 0026-2714/© 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. The tested n-type LTPS TFTs in this work are fabricated on a polyimide (PI) substrate with Cu/MoTi used as the gate. Here, a SiO2 layer is used as a gate insulator and the polycrystalline silicon active layer is formed on bottom of the SiO2 layer. Finally, the Cu/MoTi source and drain electrodes are deposited. The width/length ratio for the tested TFTs is 0.152, which indicates the test structure has much longer channel length because longer channel length device has higher possibility to generate cracks on the channel than short channel length device during the mechanical stress which is parallel direction strain. This based on beam theory, and the length dependent critical strain can be known as the following Eq. (1) [3]: 2 εcritical ¼ π2 hs : 12L ð1Þ where hs is the substrate thickness. If the device forced high strain which over the critical strain, the crack will be generated. According to the Eq. (1), channel length increases, the critical strain is decreased. Therefore, if the devices have the same structure except the channel length, the crack is easily generated on the longer channel length due to the small critical strain value. Fig. 1 shows the schematic diagram of the tested n-type LTPS TFTs with top-gate, top-contact structure. The current-voltage (I–V) characteristics of TFTs are measured using a Keithley 236 source measure unit (SMU). The measurement is performed when the drain voltage (VDS) is 2.1 V, the gate voltage (VGS) is swept from − 10 V to 15 V. S.M. Lee et al. / Microelectronics Reliability 64 (2016) 84–87 Fig. 1. Schematic structure of the tested LTPS TFTs. Here, VDS is set to be 2.1 V in this experiment since the drain voltage of 2.1 V shows clear differences on the degraded device operation characteristics by the mechanical stress test compared with the low drain voltage. 2.2. Mechanical stress and crack guidance The dynamic mechanical stress is applied using the flexible materials tester of Hansung systems incorporation shown in Fig. 2(a). In this work, 2.5-mm bending radius (2.5R) with 50,000 bending cycles is used for the dynamic mechanical stress experiment, and the applied strain is tensile and parallel direction to the current path. To calculate the strain of the stress on the foldable TFTs, we assume that the strain is applied to the tested TFT where a neutral plane is formed in the middle of the total thickness. Using this approximation, the strain on the TFT device can be calculated as the following equation [4]: ε¼ t substrate þ t TFT ; 2R ð2Þ Fig. 2. (a) Dynamic mechanical stress tester; (b) pencil hardness tester. where ε is strain on the tested device, tsubstrate is thickness of the substrate, tTFT is the total stacked thickness of the TFT, and R is the bending radius. With this Eq. (2), the calculated strain for this dynamic mechanical stress on the tested TFT is 0.37%. The crack guidance is formed using the pencil hardness tester of Ocean Science Company shown in Fig. 2(b). To generate crack guidance with this equipment, the ISO-15184 instruction is followed in general. The gold material tip is used for the pencil and the 100-gram weight is used for the pattern generation to avoid film destruction by the gold material tip. 3. Result and discussion The dynamic mechanical stress causes device failure due to the generated crack on the TFTs. Generally, the cracks are randomly generated, and that generated cracks usually cannot be controlled the position. To analyze the effects of the crack guidance, the dynamic mechanical stress test had done first without crack-guided structure on tested TFTs. That result is shown in Fig. 3. To analyze the experiment results, the on-current (Ion), the turn-on voltage (Von), the mobility (μFE), and the subthreshold swing (Ssub) are calculated with the normalized average and the standard deviation. In this paper, the on-current is defined as the drain current corresponding Fig. 3. The dynamic mechanical stress results without crack guidance. 85 86 S.M. Lee et al. / Microelectronics Reliability 64 (2016) 84–87 to the VGS = 15 V and VDS = 2.1 V. Also, to the field effect mobility in the linear region is calculated as [5]: μ¼ LGm : WC i V DS ð3Þ The threshold voltage cannot be calculated with degraded data after mechanical stress. Therefore, the turn-on voltage was used for an electrical characteristic analyzing. The normalized on-current is calculated as: N Ion ¼ Ion;Bending ; Ion;Initial ð4Þ where N_Ion is normalized on-current, Ion,Initial is the on-current without the mechanical stress, and Ion,Bending is the on-current following bending cycles. The other normalized parameters are also calculated with this method. In this mechanical stress test, the strain direction is parallel to current path, and channel length is much longer than channel width. Therefore, the crack generation is much easier. The generated crack on the device disturbs current flow on the channel and it degrades the device characteristics [6]. For that reasons, the dynamic mechanical stress test result also shows degraded characteristics of the TFTs in Fig. 3. After the dynamic mechanical stress tests without crack-guided structure, the same experiment was repeated with a crack-guided structure on the TFT device. The dynamic mechanical stress test result with generated crack guidance is shown in Fig. 4. The bold line is crack guidance, and the thin three lines are generated crack. In the result, crack was generated around crack guidance and there were not cracks on the TFT device. In the dynamic mechanical stress test result without crack guidance, the on-current decreased about 10% due to the generated crack on the TFT. Also, turn-on voltage also increased. However, there is almost no degradation on crack guidance device and that result shown in Fig. 5. The other parameters have also the same tendency. It indicates that the device with the crack guidance is not degraded with the dynamic mechanical stress test. The reason is crack guidance become a crack seed, and the stress intensity factor at any point along the crack front in a finite thickness plate can be expressed with followed Eq. (5) [7]: rffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi a K ¼ St þ H j Sb π Fj Q ð5Þ where K is the stress intensity factor, St is the remote uniform tension stress, Hj is the bending multiplier on stress intensity for remote bending, Sb is the remote bending stress on outer fiber, a is the depth of Fig. 5. The dynamic mechanical stress results with crack guidance. crack, Q is the shape factor for elliptical crack, and Fj is the boundarycorrection factor on stress intensity for remote tension. It can be concluded that around crack guidance, the stress intensity is higher than the TFT area resulted in the reduction of a probability of the crack generation on the TFT. In addition, increasing the bending cycles of dynamic mechanical stress causes deeper crack generation on the substrate with followed Eq. (6) [8]: da ¼ CΔK n dN ð6Þ where a is the depth of surface crack, N is the number of cycles, C is the crack growth coefficient, and K is the stress intensity factor. Therefore, if the crack-guided structure is placed on the foldable display circuit on the uncritical area, the probability of the crack generation on TFTs will be reduced. Finally, the reliability of the foldable TFT by the mechanical stress is enhanced with the crack guidance. 4. Conclusion In this paper, reliability characteristics of the foldable TFT were analyzed with different crack generating conditions. To strain on the foldable LTPS TFT, the 50,000 cycles of the dynamic mechanical stress with the tensile and parallel direction were applied with 2.5-mm radius. The results of the dynamic mechanical stress tests without crack guidance generated cracks on the TFTs resulted in the degradation of the TFT characteristics. On the other hand, the TFT test structure with the crack-guided test pattern did not degrade the device operation, and crack generated only around crack guidance. Based on the result, the reliability of the foldable TFTs can be enhanced with the crack-guided structure. However, the controlled crack guidance structure should be further studied such as its shape, depth, and width, which remains as a future work. Acknowledgements Fig. 4. The crack guidance result of the 2.5R curvature dynamic mechanical stress test on the LTPS TFTs (Inset: microscopic magnifying view of the crack-guided area). This research was supported by the LG Display (2014-11-1905). This work was also supported by Institute of BioMed-IT, Energy-IT and Smart-IT Technology (BEST), a Brain Korea 21 plus program, Yonsei University (2016-11-0007). S.M. Lee et al. / Microelectronics Reliability 64 (2016) 84–87 References [1] M. Wang, T. Chang, P.-T. Liu, S. Tsao, Y. Lin, J. Chen, The instability of a-Si: H TFT under mechanical strain with high frequency ac bias stress, Electrochem. Solid-State Lett. 10 (10) (2007) J113–J116. [2] M. Ito, M. Kon, C. Miyazaki, N. Ikeda, M. Ishizaki, R. Matsubara, Y. Ugajin, N. Sekine, Amorphous oxide TFT and their applications in electrophoretic displays, Phys. Status Solidi A 205 (8) (2008) 1885–1894. [3] S.P. Timoshenko, J.M. Gere, Theory of Elastic Stability, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1961. [4] J.-M. Kim, T. Nam, S. Lim, Y. Seol, N.-E. Lee, D. Kim, H. Kim, Atomic layer deposition ZnO: N flexible thin film transistors and the effects of bending on device properties, Appl. Phys. Lett. 98 (14) (2011) 142113. 87 [5] D. Gupta, M. Katiyar, D. Gupta, Mobility Estimation Incorporating the Effects of Contact Resistance and Gate Voltage Dependent Mobility in Top Contact Organic Thin Film Transistors, Proceedings of the Asian Symposium on Information Display 2006, pp. 425–428. [6] N. Münzenrieder, C. Zysset, L. Petti, T. Kinkeldei, G.A. Salvatore, G. Tröster, Flexible double gate a-IGZO TFT fabricated on free standing polyimide foil, Solid State Electron. 84 (2013) 198–204. [7] J. Newman, I. Raju, Stress-Intensity Factor Equations for Cracks in three-Dimensional Finite Bodies, Fracture Mechanics: Fourteenth Symposium—Volume I: Theory and Analysis, ASTM International, 1983. [8] J. Newman, I. Raju, An empirical stress-intensity factor equation for the surface crack, Eng. Fract. Mech. 15 (1–2) (1981) 185–192.