Download 18.2??Seagrasses: angiosperms adapted to sea floors 18.2.1

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Anoxic event wikipedia , lookup

Habitat wikipedia , lookup

Primary production wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
Published on Plants in Action (http://plantsinaction.science.uq.edu.au/edition1)
Home > Printer-friendly PDF > Printer-friendly PDF
18.2??Seagrasses: angiosperms adapted to sea
floors
Seagrasses are angiosperms adapted to life on shallow ocean beds. A suite of special ecophysiological
features allows seagrasses to colonise saline and often anaerobic marine sediments; these will be
discussed in an evolutionary context leading to Case study 18.3. Common features shared by seagrasses
and higher land plants subjected to submergence point to some funda-mental questions about plant
response to inundation.
18.2.1??Evolution of seagrasses
Primitive plants evolved in the Silurian (about 450 million years ago) from green algae, particularly the
Charophytes (Figure 18.7). A variety of terrestrial plant groups evolved over the next several hundred
million years, for example lycopods, bryophytes, ferns, gymnosperms, yet it was not until 100 million
years ago that angiosperms evolved and reinvaded the sea. Mangroves and saltmarsh plants colonise
intertidal zones of marine environments (Section 17.3) but only seagrasses live in total submersion.
Curiously, all vascular plants inhabiting marine environments are angiosperms.
[1]
Figure 18.7 Evolution of seagrasses from algae. Algal evolution in the Silurian was followed by appearance of
the first land plants which diversified by developing higher plant characteristics such as woodiness and
sexual reproduction. During the Cretaceous, marine angiosperms evolved, characterised by mangroves and
salt-marsh plants in intertidal zones and seagrasses as the dominant submerged macrophyte. (Courtesy W.C.
Dennison)
Limited seagrass fossils combined with taxonomic and evolutionary studies indicate at least four
taxonomically distinct seagrass families: Hydrocharitaceae, Posidoniaceae, Cymodoceaceae and
Zosteraceae. These families are so unrelated that they probably arose from at least four separate
reinvasions of the sea. However, each seagrass family shares a common environment, rooting into soft
substrates of shallow oceans. Characteristic conditions are low and unpredictable light, nutrient reserves
in anaerobic sediments, slow diffusion of inorganic carbon to the photosynthetic apparatus and, of
course, high salinity. Yet the relatively limited number of seagrass species adapted to these stringent
environmental conditions have colonised all the major oceans and form extensive meadows along the
world’s coastlines. Not surprisingly, sea-grasses exhibit a spectacular suite of survival mechanisms to
deal with submergence.
18.2.2??Ecophysiology of seagrasses
(a)??Low and unpredictable light
Plants living in deep water receive low and unpredictable amounts of light. Light reaching seagrasses is
attenuated by atmospheric (e.g. clouds, dust) and marine (e.g. suspended particles, colour, water
absorption) factors. Even when light reaches seagrass leaves, it can be further attenuated by epiphytes
such as bacteria, algae and sponges growing on leaf surfaces. Heavy growth of epiphytic algae can
reduce light levels reaching chloroplasts so severely that plants succumb to carbohydrate shortage. For
example, epiphyte growth induced by nutrient enrichment has led to loss of seagrass meadows through
light deprivation in Cockburn Sound, Western Australia. Light attenuation occurs over different time
periods depending on the screening agent: wind might raise turbidity transiently while the plume of a
flooding river can persist for weeks. Chloroplasts of seagrasses are found predominantly in epi-dermal
cells as an adaptation to low light, contrasting with terrestrial plants where chloroplasts are found in
leaf mesophyll (Chapter 2). Epidermal chloroplasts capture light and exchange gases free from the
barriers imposed on chloroplasts in sub-epidermal tissues. Seagrasses have diminished leaf mesophyll
with little structural material, so that most of the shoot is photosynthetic. Thus seagrass leaves have
photosynthetic rates and photosynthesis–irradiance relationships consistent with plants adapted to low
light levels: light compensation intensities (Ic), light saturation intensities (Ik) and maximal
photosynthetic rates (Imax) are all low. As a hedge against periods of low light (e.g. during turbidity),
below-ground stems (rhizomes) store carbohydrate as starch and sugar which are mobilised when
required to satisfy respiratory demands. Some seagrasses even grow in prolonged darkness for months
using these carbo-hydrate reserves (e.g. Posidonia), while others are affected after a few days of low
light (e.g. Halophila).
Waves and ocean currents are a unique influence on leaf canopies in marine environments. While
seagrass meadows and terrestrial forests can both have epiphytes and dense canopies producing heavy
self-shading, light environments in the two canopies differ. In forests, sunflecks moving across the
forest floor are important for survival of shade plants in the understorey (Section 12.1.4). Under the sea,
waves and currents buffet the canopy backwards and forwards, exposing seagrasses and associated
marine plants to alternating high and low light intensities. Such canopy movement achieves a more
uniform exposure to light throughout the seagrass canopy than on a forest floor and selects for the
formation of isobilateral leaves in seagrasses (identical top and bottom surfaces).
(b)??Nutrients contained in sediments
Oceanic waters generally contain low concentrations of dissolved nutrients, partly due to rapid nutrient
uptake into microscopic algae, or phytoplankton. Eventual deposition of plankton to the sea floor, along
with inputs of organic matter from rivers, results in accumulation of organic material in nearshore soft
sediments. Microbial degradation of this organic material leads to remineralisation of nutrients from
sediments. Resupply of nutrients into bulk seawater is slowed by sorption of nutrients to sediment
particles and by slow diffusion of nutrients through the tortuous path between sediment particles. Thus,
nutrient concentrations are much higher in marine sediments than in bulk seawater.
Seagrasses draw on nutrients in both seawater and sediments via uptake into leaves and roots. Roots are
believed to play a major role in nutrient acquisition because high nutrient concentrations are often
found in sediments. Nevertheless, sea-water moving through a seagrass canopy provides a renewable
source of dissolved nutrients for uptake via leaves. Water movement through a seagrass canopy also
helps replenish nutrient de-position to underlying sediments through leaf blades acting as baffles to
water motion and increasing deposition of organic material into sediments. As in terrestrial plants,
nutrients taken up from external sources are effectively redistributed, helping ef?ciency of nutrient use.
Seagrasses also ?x dissolved nitrogen gas through microbial associations. Nitrogen ?xation by bacteria
attached to root surfaces sometimes contributes to plant nitrogen status. Labelling studies have shown
that nitrogen ?xed by bacteria on seagrass roots rapidly enters plants, probably in exchange for
dissolved organic material from seagrass roots sustaining the bacteria. Interestingly, the tropical
seagrass species that ?x nitrogen most rapidly are also preferentially consumed by dugongs, ensuring
adequate protein intake for these animals.
Individual nutrients can become limiting factors for seagrass growth, as observed in terrestrial plants.
For example, seagrasses growing in carbonate sediments of marine origin are primarily limited by
availability of nitrogen, phosphorus and iron. In contrast, seagrasses growing in silica-based sediments
of terrestrial origin are generally limited by nitrogen availability.
(c)??Chronically anoxic sediments
[2]
Figure 18.8 O2 is transported to rhizomes and roots of
seagrasses during periods of light when photosynthesis releases
O2 into aerenchyma. Note the formation of an oxidised zone
around roots and radial O2 loss into surrounding anoxic
sediments. Both leaves and roots contain airspaces, configured,
however, very differently through which O2 can diffuse. By
night, almost all O2transport ceases because seawater
surrounding the leaves becomes the only source of O2
and alcoholic fermentation commences in roots. (Courtesy
W.C. Dennison)
Microbial degradation of organic material in sediments results in rapid consumption of O2 and other
electron acceptors. The rate of O2 diffusion is often so slow that O2 levels in soft nearshore sediments
become depleted by respiration and reducing conditions are established. Therefore, while nutrients are
relatively abundant in soft sediments, seagrasses must contend with the chronically anoxic nature of
nutrient-laden sediments. Seagrasses have several morphological and physio-logical adaptations to
anoxia. Plants form extensive networks of internal gas spaces (lacunae), similar to the aerenchyma of
terrestrial plants, acting as conduits for diffusive and/or advective transport of O2 from leaves to roots
(Figure 18.8). These lacunae are interrupted by a series of single-cell-thick diaphragms containing small
pores able to let gases but not water pass. Thus the entire internal gas spaces cannot be flooded. Gas
flowing from leaves to roots contains ap-proximately 35% O2, supporting aerobic metabolism in roots
embedded in highly reducing sediments. Radial O2 loss into surrounding sediments (Section 18.1.1)
oxidises sediments as well as roots, thereby improving the redox status and lowering toxicity of
surrounding sediments. Transported O2 is derived from photosynthesis, hence transport virtually ceases
within 15 minutes of darkness.
Seagrasses in darkness rely on anaerobic metabolism to generate ATP. As for terrestrial plants,
anaerobic pathways yield ATP inef?ciently but are able to sustain energy requirements for maintenance
of anaerobic cells. One short-term metabolic response to anoxia by seagrasses is the reversible
conversion of glutamate and glutamine into alanine and g-aminobutyric acid (GABA), producing ATP
but reducing the capacity for nitrogen assimilation. Longer term survival of anaerobic con-ditions is
achieved through ethanol production by alcoholic fermentation (Section 18.1.1(c) and Figure 18.8).
Seagrass roots shift to alcoholic fermentation after 2–3 h of darkness, losing ethanol by diffusion into
surrounding sediments. These adaptive mechanisms operate at different time scales, providing
seagrasses with an integrated response to chronically anoxic sediments and ensuring their survival.
(d)??Slow diffusion rates
Universally slow diffusion of gases through water (Section 18.1.1) affects O2 and CO2 exchange in
leaves of aquatic plants. O2 is only available to aerobic respiration as a dissolved gas, carried to leaf
surfaces by mass flow of seawater then diffusing mainly through stomata.
On the contrary, inorganic carbon is present in water as dissolved CO2 gas and bicarbonate ions (HCO3
–). Freshwater plants in fast-moving water with low pH or high natural carbonate levels can derive
enough CO2 to photosynthesise but the relatively high pH of seawater (about 8.2) and high salinity
mean that about 90% of inorganic carbon in seawater is present as bicarbonate ions. CO2 concentration
in seawater is therefore well below that required to achieve maximum rates of ?xation by the dark
reaction so mechanisms have evolved that exploit bicarbonate as an inorganic carbon source. Plants
using both carbon sources have much lower CO2 com-pensation points and higher half-saturations (Km
) for CO2 ?xation than expected from simple diffusive entry of CO2. Active import of bicarbonate by
leaves appears to be energised by a protonmotive force and is sometimes stimulated by cations (e.g. in
Zostera). Once bicarbonate enters leaves, carbonic anhydrase in the periplasmic space converts it
rapidly to CO2, providing a substrate for Rubisco. Such CO2-concentrating mechanisms allow plants to
achieve photosynthetic rates much greater than might be expected in a carbon-poor environment and
underpin the high growth rates observed in many submerged aquatic macrophytes.
Diffusion of bicarbonate ions through boundary layers immediately adjacent to seagrass leaves and
hence to sites of assimilation can be a rate-limiting process for seagrass photo-synthesis. Diffusion rates
are governed by (1) boundary layer thickness, which is largely a function of water turbulence around
the leaf and (2) the bicarbonate concentration gradient from surrounding seawater to the site of
photosynthesis. The process of active uptake of bicarbonate into leaves described above reduces
bicarbonate concentrations within leaves and enhances diffusion from bulk water to sites of
assimilation.
Seagrasses have further adaptations to acquire carbon for growth. Lacunae in seagrasses are enriched in
CO2 and provide leaves with an effective mechanism for CO2 recycling. In fact, CO2 is so effectively
recycled that photosynthesis in seagrasses ?xes carbon with similar ef?ciency to terrestrial plants with C
4 photosynthesis (Section 2.1; Feature essay 2.1). However, these ef?ciencies are achieved in seagrasses
solely through morphological adaptations (lacunae) — CO2 is ?xed in seagrasses by the action of
Rubisco in the C3 pathway.
Highly ef?cient CO2 recycling can be demonstrated through estimates of natural carbon isotope
discrimination based on ?13C values (Chapter 2): less negative ?13C values indicate less discrimination
against the heavier 13C isotope hence more effective CO2 recycling. Seagrasses have ?13C values
ranging from –3.6 to –23.8, in contrast to marine algae (–8.8 to –35), C4 terrestrial plants (–9 to –18)
and C3 terrestrial plants (–23 to –34). Relatively high values in sea-grasses are evidence that they have
the most ef?cient CO2 recycling of any plants in response to the strictures imposed by an underwater
habitat. These mechanisms of extracting carbon from a scarce source against high diffusive resistance
have, along with ef?cient nutrient acquisition, allowed seagrasses to occupy the sea floor with little
competition from other macrophytes.
case study 18.3??Seagrasses: successful marine
macrophytes
A.J. McComb and W.C. Dennison
Figure 1 Distribution of seagrasses along the Australian
coastline, distinguishing temperate form tropical (grazed and
ungrazed) species. More specific ecosystems are identified such
as the estuarine seagrasses of south-eastern Australia. Relative
sized of the main genera are depicted, ranging from the smallstatured, grazed species to the tall temperate seagrass genera of
southern Australia. (Courtesy W.C. Dennison)
Australia has a high diversity of seagrasses in its coastal waters, with 38 species out of a worldwide
total of 66 species (Larkum et al. l989). Most intertidal and subtidal habitats contain at least one
seagrass species. Broadly speaking, sea-grasses can be categorised as tropical (grazed and ungrazed)
and temperate (Figure 1).
Seagrasses of tropical Australia
Large herbivores such as dugongs (Dugong dugong) and green sea turtles (Chelonia mysas) graze on
some tropical seagrass meadows heavily, feeding on leaves and/or rhizomes. Repeated grazing
promotes seagrass communities dominated by small, fast-growing genera with high reproductive
potential for rapid recolonisation (e.g. Halophila, Halodule). Such seagrass communities are common
in the tropics; herbivores are only excluded from intertidal areas, turbid water or areas without access to
deep water. In those tropical waters without herbivores, larger, slow-growing genera dominate (e.g.
Enhalus, Thalassia, Cymodocea, Syringodium).
Australia’s tropical waters fall into three major zones: the northwest coast, Gulf of Carpenteria and
Great Barrier Reef. The northwest coast has large tides and turbid waters, and thus seagrass
communities are sparse and generally restricted to intertidal pools or lagoons. The Gulf of Carpenteria
has extensive seagrass beds, particularly on the western side, which are regularly affected by cyclones.
The Great Barrier Reef has extensive deepwater seagrass beds dominated by Halophila spp. growing
between reefs. There are also scattered intertidal and shallow subtidal seagrasses along the coast or on
reef flats. Extensive seagrass meadows are also found in Shark Bay on the west coast and Hervey Bay,
Queensland; both bays are transitional between tropical and temperate waters.
Seagrasses of temperate Australia
Temperate seagrasses in Australia are rarely affected by grazing. Large, robust and relatively slowgrowing genera occur around southern, temperate Australia, most notably in the genera Posidonia and
Amphibolis (Figure 1). These genera, as well as another common temperate seagrass, Zostera, support
large epiphyte communities that contribute to productivity of southern seagrass communities. Detritus
to support epiphytes comes from slow decomposition of very ?brous leaves typical of Posidonia,
Amphibolis and Zostera. Temperate regions extend across the southwest, south and southeast coasts of
Australia. The southwest coast, extending from Shark Bay to the Great Australian Bight, has a series of
offshore limestone reefs which provide protected waters ideal for seagrass meadows. This region is
especially species rich and is considered a centre for relatively recent speciation in some genera.
Several species of Posidonia and two endemic species of Amphibolis have centres of diversity in this
southwest region. Seagrasses along the south coast of mainland Australia and Tasmania are restricted to
bays and waters protected by headlands from Southern Ocean storms. For example, Spencer Gulf in
South Australia is a vast protected embayment and contains extensive seagrass meadows. Southeast
Australia has a series of estuaries with seagrasses growing in the saline waters vulnerable to human
impacts.
Seagrass productivity
Seagrasses have low rates of photosynthesis per unit of leaf material but have dense leaf canopies,
making them highly productive ecosystems. Seagrass meadows generate biomass about three times
faster than an average crop system, placing them alongside tropical and temperate forests as the most
productive ecosystems known (Whittaker 1975). High productivity is achieved in seagrass meadows
through mechanisms such as those described in Section 18.2.2 — for example CO2 recycling, nutrient
capture from suspended detritus particles and reduced self-shading in dense canopies as a result of
water turbulence. Seagrass meadows and fast-growing forests have as much as 20 m2 of leaf surface to
each square metre of seabed or earth, contrasting with agricultural crops where leaf area indices fall in
the range 1–10 m2 m–2.
Rapid leaf turnover and propagation of new individuals both contribute to high productivity of seagrass
communities, particularly the fastest-growing, small-statured seagrass species. Individual plants
produce a new leaf about every 7 d, followed by elongation of the leaf at a rate of 2–5 cm d–1. Hence
productivity of seagrass meadows, converted to daily carbon increment, reaches 4 g carbon m–2 d–1.
By turning over leaves rapidly, seagrasses avoid excessive epiphyte loads that would otherwise restrict
light harvesting. As old leaves decay, inorganic nutrients are ef?ciently reabsorbed to sustain new
growth. Reduced carbon from detritus and organic matter excreted from photosynthesising leaves and
anaerobic roots stimulate recycling by providing substrates for microbes in sediments.
Reproduction
Reproductive capacity, identi?ed as a feature of the success of seagrasses, is achieved through a suite of
vegetative and sexual mechanisms. Asexual (vegetative) reproduction gives rise to new clonal
individuals through rhizome growth, akin to that in many wetland species. Once new shoots (ramets)
initiated at nodes on a rhizome become photosynthetically autonomous, the rhizome decays leaving a
new individual to extend the colony.
[4]
Figure 2. Pollen release under water from male flowers of
Halophila capricornia, showing the pollen assemblage that
rises from self-association of individual pollen grains.
(Photograph courtesy Seagrass Ecology Group, Northern
Fisheries Centre, Queensland Department of Primary
Industries)
However, genetic analysis shows that seagrass colonies are not entirely clonal, suggesting that a degree
of sexual re-production occurs. Indeed very small flowers can be found with some dif?culty on
seagrasses, often dioecious (separate male and female flowers) and therefore heavily outcrossing.
Pollen is a threadlike structure about 2 mm long (Figure 2) which adheres to a water-insoluble matrix
on the receptive female stigma to achieve fertilisation. The mechanisms by which this thread of pollen
reaches a flower constitute exquisite adaptations to the marine environment. Three modes of transport
have been reported.
First is surface water pollination which occurs within a few hours during the year’s lowest tide.
Buoyant pollen is released, floats to the water surface and forms an interconnected raft which attaches
to any female stigma at the surface. The second mechanism of fertilisation entails pollen threads
associating at the surface of the sediment in a strand up to a metre long; if this strand encounters a
stigma, fertilisation can take place. A third mechanism (hydrophilous pollination) involves release of
pollen into the water surrounding seagrass plants and occasional, random fertilisation when pollen drifts
onto flowers. The chances of hydrophilous pollination are therefore low.
Sexual reproduction combines with dispersal of seagrass seeds to produce genetic diversity. Seeds are
carried in water currents, float through buoyancy conferred by attached bubbles and pass through the
gut of grazing animals. Seeds can then germinate in a new colony or lie dormant, providing a seed bank
for later recruitment. In this way, seagrasses have devel-oped a robust reproductive strategy ensuring
that new individuals with some degree of genetic diversity are perpetually being added to a seagrass
community.
References
Larkum, A.W.D., McComb, A.J. and Shepherd S.A. (eds) (1989). Biology of the Seagrasses. A Treatise
on the Biology of Seagrasses with Special Reference to the Australian Region, Elsevier: Amsterdam
Whittaker, R.H. (1975). Communities and Ecosystems, 2nd edn, Macmillan: New York
Source URL: http://plantsinaction.science.uq.edu.au/edition1/?q=content/18-2-seagrasses-angiosperms-adapted-seafloors
Links:
[1] http://plantsinaction.science.uq.edu.au/edition1//?q=figure_view/892
[2] http://plantsinaction.science.uq.edu.au/edition1//?q=figure_view/893
[3] http://plantsinaction.science.uq.edu.au/edition1//?q=figure_view/895
[4] http://plantsinaction.science.uq.edu.au/edition1//?q=figure_view/896