* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download The Paleozoic/Mesozoic tectonic evolution of Eastern Australia
Survey
Document related concepts
Transcript
The Paleozoic/Mesozoic tectonic evolution of Eastern Australia Simon Williams, Jonathan Aitchison, Dietmar Müller The geology of Eastern Australia records a series of orogenic events along the margin of the supercontinent Gondwanaland. Musgrave and Cayley [1] used GPlates to develop a new model for the tectonic evolution of this area during the SilurianDevonian. Magnetic anomaly maps [2] help to define the major Paleozoic-age geological provinces and the shear zones that disrupt them – reconstructions are constrained by bringing the anomalies that define these provinces into their original alignment. One key question is: Which Eastern Australian “accretionary” belts are allochthonous and which are autochthonous to the margin? 520 Or d l Si 485 455 340 v De 530 510 320 360 545 425 380 300 Carb 280 260 405 Reconstruction of Eastern Australia in the Silurian (left), and revised APWP (right) Previous Apparent Polar Wander Paths (APWPs) for Gondwana during the mid-Paleozoic have relied on paleomagnetic data from the tectonically active parts of Eastern Australia. By incorporating available paleomagnetic data into the GPlates reconstruction, Musgrave and Cayley [1] revised this APWP taking these tectonic motions into account. The project will involve acquiring various software and database skills, including GPLates, including spatio-temporal data mining, Arc GIS, the Generic Mapping Tools, and dealing with fossil and paleomagnetic databases. The SUCOGG Honours courses (www.sucogg.org/honours.html) that go with these projects are Computational Tectonics, Data Processing & Plotting using the Generic Mapping Tools (GMT), Advanced GMT methods and Introduction to plate reconstruction and spatio-temporal data mining with GPlates. This project will involve collaboration with the Geological Survey of NSW, and prepare students both for working in the exploration industry as well as for a researchoriented career in government agencies or universities. 1. Musgrave, R. and Cayley, R., 2011. Unfolding an orocline restores Australian Siluro-Devonian paleomagnetic poles. AGU Fall Meeting, San Francisco, GP11A-0991. 2. Milligan, P.R., Franklin, R., Minty, B.R.S., Richardson, L.M. and Percival, P.J., 2010, Magnetic Anomaly Map of Australia (Fifth Edition), 1:15 000 000 scale, Geoscience Australia, Canberra. The Mesozoic evolution of the Panthalassa “super ocean” Dietmar Müller and Maria Seton Everybody knows about supercontinents. However, there are superoceans as well (Whittaker et al., 2008), and Panthalassa (Veevers et al., 1997;Arias, 2008), the ocean basin which surrounded the supercontinent Pangaea, is probably the most famous one. The problem is, we do not know much about its history. Recently, van der Meer et al. (2012) suggested a bold approach to use very simple assumptions to use the mantle structure imaged underneath the Pacific Ocean basin to reconstruct Panthalassa’s plate boundary configurations through time. However, this model is extremely simplistic, and has not been tested with geological data preserved along the Pacific rim, nor was it determined whether the plate boundary configurations suggested in their paper are actually feasible given the rules of plate tectonics. Panthalassa at present and 200 million years ago. From van der Meer et al. (2012). This project is not for the faint-hearted. It aims at producing the first self-consistent model for the Mesozoic evolution of the Panthalassa Superocean, by amalgamating information from accreted terranes, ophiolites, igneous rocks documenting ridge subduction through time, and 3D mantle images from underneath the Pacific Ocean, using the latest, not yet released version of the GPlates software, developed by the EarthByte Group and its international collaborators. This brand new version of GPlates allows the interactive 3D volume visualisation of seismic tomography with evolving plate boundaries overlain (see poster display outside of GPlates Office 402). The project will focus on the proto-Pacific’s Asian and North American boundaries, which provide a rich record of subduction, back-arc basin formation and destruction, mid-ocean ridge subduction and ophiolite obduction, providing constraints on the evolution of Panthalassa. It will aim to construct a model for the evolution of this vast ocean basin, and evaluate how Panthalassa spreading rates through time may have influenced mantle convection, subduction rates, and regional sea level. The project will involve acquiring various software and database skills, including GPLates, spatio-temporal data mining, Arc GIS, the Generic Mapping Tools, seismic tomography models and shell scripting The SUCOGG Honours courses (www.sucogg.org/honours.html) that go with these projects are Computational Tectonics, Data Processing & Plotting using the Generic Mapping Tools (GMT), Advanced GMT methods and Introduction to plate reconstruction and spatio-temporal data mining with GPlates. This challenging project will prepare the student to do anything afterwards. References Arias, C.: Palaeoceanography and biogeography in the Early Jurassic Panthalassa and Tethys Oceans, Gondwana Res., 14, 306-315, 2008. van der Meer, D., Torsvik, T., Spakman, W., van Hinsbergen, D., and Amaru, M.: Intra-Panthalassa Ocean subduction zones revealed by fossil arcs and mantle structure, Nature Geoscience, 2012. Veevers, J., Walter, M., and Scheibner, E.: Neoproterozoic tectonics of Australia-Antarctica and Laurentia and the 560 Ma birth of the Pacific Ocean reflect the 400 my Pangean supercycle, The Journal of Geology, 105, 225-242, 1997. Whittaker, J. M., Müller, R. D., Roest, W. R., Wessel, P., and Smith, W. H. F.: How supercontinents and superoceans affect seafloor roughness, Nature, 458, 1-4, 2008. The Earth’s Paleozoic/Mesozoic tectonic and paleogeographic evolution Dietmar Müller, Nicolas Flament, and Maria Seton Continents and sedimentary basins through time have recorded fundamental Earth system cycles, reflecting environmental change, migration of fauna and flora and shifting coastlines. It was originally thought that successive advances and retreats of shallow inland seas mainly reflect global sea level variations (eustasy). However, it is now well established that largescale surface morphology such as the high topography of the East African Rift, the low-lying Amazon River Basin and the southwest to northeast tilt of the Australian continent are strongly controlled by processes deep within the Earth. Quantifying the magnitude and timedependence of mantle-driven topography requires integrating geological data with coupled models of the plate-mantle system. In turn, these models need to be validated with observational data, such as published paleogeographic maps and paleobiology data. The overarching aim of these projects is to understand the deep-seated driving forces of largescale topographic change, providing dynamic models of the Earth’s subduction history, deep plume sources and dynamic topography for the Paleozoic-Mesozoic periods. The Paleozoic follows the breakup of the supercontinent Rodinia after the end of the so-called Snowball Earth period. Throughout the early Paleozoic, the Earth's landmass was broken up into a substantial number of continents. Towards the end of the era, continents gathered together into the supercontinent Pangaea. We offer two Honours projects focussed on building models for the Paleozoic/Mesozoic Earth using the software GPlates, and using geological observations to test geodynamic models, which predict mantle convection patterns and surface uplift/subsidence through time: Project 1: The evolution of proto-Atlantic/Indian ocean basins and marginal seas in the Cambrian to Devonian Project 2: The evolution of proto-Atlantic/Indian ocean basins and marginal seas in the Carboniferous to Jurassic They will address the following questions: How were ocean basins, including back-arc basins, created and destroyed between the Cambrian and Jurassic periods? How have the fundamentally different plate tectonic configurations before and during/after the assembly of the supercontinent Pangea affected subduction history, the history of midocean ridge system evolution, mantle convection patterns and ultimately regional sea level fluctuations? The projects will involve acquiring various software and database skills, including GPLates, including spatio-temporal data mining, Arc GIS, the Generic Mapping Tools, shell scripting, dealing with the paleobiology database, as well as learning the basics of geodynamic modelling. The SUCOGG Honours courses (www.sucogg.org/honours.html) that go with these projects are Computational Tectonics, Data Processing & Plotting using the Generic Mapping Tools (GMT), Advanced GMT methods and Introduction to plate reconstruction and spatio-temporal data mining with GPlates. These projects will prepare students both for working in the exploration industry as well as for a research-oriented career in government agencies or universities. Establishing the geological connections between Australia and its neighbours in Rodinia using geochemical and geophysical data Supervisors: Dr Tom Landgrebe, Dr Derek Wyman, Dr Simon Williams Several Rodinia-era tectonic plate reconstruction models have been proposed based on a variety of datasets, consistently showing close spatial relationships between Australia and continents such as North America and South China. In this project promising candidate continental pairs are to be studied in conjunction with geophysical and aged geochemical datasets assembled in the vicinity of the pertinent crustal elements. After reconstruction of all the data, the next step is to establish whether the neighbouring cratons share common geological settings based on geochemical and geophysical data coherency. Such a process would investigate various alternative Rodinia models (e.g. SWEAT, AUSWUS, AUSMEX, the 'Missing Link' model) and discriminating between these models, as well as suggesting possible local modifications to plate alignments. The final outcome of this project will be a detailed analysis of how different Rodinia reconstructions can reconcile the studied geochemical and geophysical data, and of the implications that these shared geological settings may suggest, such as those pertaining to mineral systems. The project will make use of the frontier GPlates plate reconstruction software, together with a number of advanced spatial data analysis and data mining tools for visualising, interacting-with and quantitatively analysing the various datasets. Geodynamic controls on ore-deposit formation Supervisors: Dr Tom Landgrebe, Dr Simon Williams, Dr Derek Wyman (EarthByte Group) Relationships between metal deposits and both divergent and convergent margin processes have been known for many decades. However, the challenge still remains to understand the way in which "geodynamic niches" such as slab windows, rapid convergence, or phases of flatslab subduction, control the formation of ore deposits. The project will make use of the Earthbyte Group’s global plate model and plate tectonic reconstruction software ‘GPlates’. In particular, new methodologies being developed within GPlates to model continental deformation and apply data mining methodologies to analyse the relationship between ore deposit formation and the geodynamic evolution around the eastern margins of the Pacific (Andes and North American convergent margins).