Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Unstable Isotopes / Explosive Burning Victoria UW Belfast UMinnesota UW Madison MIT MSU Stony Brook Argonne UCB UCSC ND UOhio Princeton UCSB LANL Caltech ASU UTennessee NC State UNC Chapel Hill Clemson UofA Core Institution Senior Investigator Institution Collaborator Institution UAlabama UT Austin Monash JINA-CEE is having a major impact over the entire stellar mass range. papers 70 250 35 0 citations 500 2015 Through April 2016 0 2015 Through April 2016 refereed papers only. estimated accuracy ~20%. 16 h-index 15000 8 7500 0 0 reads odels al M c i am yn d H-Burn mo he Chemical A1.1 He-Burn A1.2 C-Burn A1.3 Supernovae A3.5 Screening A1.4 Weak Reactions A1.5 r- and νp-process A3.3 First Stars A3.1 Observations A2.1 Neutron Production A1.6 ions vat ser Ob i-process A3.2 Str a t e gic A re a ics phys o r t As ar l l e St Early Stars A3.4 2- Strate gic Are a4 Evolution A4.1 Strat egi cA rea 1- sics Phy ar cle Nu -C Research Topics - MA1 S t r a teg ic A r ea 3 - Outline evolution to white dwarfs i-process r-process weak reactions supernova pipeline How do the properties of CO white dwarfs, evolved from the main-sequence, vary with respect to the composite uncertainties in the reaction rates? ∑ !(reaction rates) = ? The first Monte Carlo stellar evolution studies that use complete stellar models and probability density functions for the reaction rates. log (Tc/ K) 8.072 8.064 3 M⊙ △M1TP = 0.02 M⊙ △t1TP = 12 Myr △12C = 0.39 8.056 Dominate: 12 C(α,γ) Triple-α 14 N(p,γ) 8.048 −4 A1.2 A3.5 MESA_49.net 15 Nuclear theory Sulfur STARLIB rates Phosphorus Nuclear experiment Silicon JINA rates Aluminum Magnesium Sodium 10 Neon Fluorine Oxygen Nitrogen Carbon 5 Observations M Final (M⊙) proton number A1.1 −2 0 2 log (3α samp/ 3α med)/ log f.u. Astrophysical models 1.0 4 NGC 2516 NGC 3532 NGC 2287 NGC 2099 Sirius B This Work 0.8 0.6 Boron Beryllium Lithium Helium Hydrogen 0 0 5 10 15 20 0.0 1.5 3.0 4.5 6.0 7.5 JINA-CEE enables undergraduates to be competitive for National Fellowships. Carl Fields 2016 NSF Graduate Research Fellowship 2016 Ford Foundation Predoctoral Fellowship See Micha Kilburn’s talk s-process i-process r-process 50 82 50 28 i-process sites at low metallicity include the He-core flash, (S)AGB stars, and rapidly accreting white dwarfs. 103 104 Hydrogen burning convective He burn 105 1.2 M⊙ ρ (g/cc) Temperature CO 106 0.6 M⊙ 12 C(p,γ)13N(β+)13C(α,n)16O 22 -2 -1 PPMstar JINA-CEE is conducting a world-leading integrated effort on the i-process. Astrophysical models A2.1 A3.2 A3.4 A4.1 Nuclear experiment β-Oslo technique for (n,") with SuN calorimeter Observations Ge Se Nuclear theory As Sr Zr Mo Ru Pd Cd Rb Y Nb Tc Te Ba Ce NdSm Gd Dy Er Yb Hf W Os Pt Hg Pb La Pr Ag Eu Tm Lu Ir HD 94028 Sum of three processes r−process i−process s−process 2 1 log ε A1.6 nuclear level density + "-ray strength function (n,") variations increase away from stability 0 −1 −2 reliable nuclear physics is essential for decomposition! 40 50 60 70 80 GW150914 … … and forthcoming friends can constrain the merger rate of neutron stars thus one promising origin site for the r-process. range of observing period 2 . 10 1.5ZO ZO 0.75ZO 0.5ZO 0.25ZO 0.1ZO . . . 1 10 . . Merger Rate Density [yr−1Gpc−3] GW150914 BH - BH 1 0 1 2 3 4 5 z See Sanjay Reddy’s talk on EOS and JINA-CEE is conducting an enterprise level, consolidated undertaking on the r-process. A1.5 A1.6 A2.1 A3.1 A3.3 A3.4 A3.5 Neutron star merger A4.1 Nuclear experiment Astrophysical models Nuclear theory Observations Star 4 in Ret 2 UFD Star in Seg 2 UFD Relative flux CH 100 Co(β-)70Ni 70 Intensity (%) 80 CS 22892−052 (r−process−rich halo giant) CH CH CH CH CH CH 1 Zr I Sm II Ce II Nd II Zr II Zr II Y II Eu II 0 60 CH 4200 4205 Ce II Gd II Sr II 4210 4215 4220 °) Wavelength (A 40 Exp - SuN Exp - SuN + Pn=7% 20 Exp - SuN uncertainty QRPA - Moller 0 See Jason Clark’s talk on See Tim Beer’s and Anna Frebel’s JINA-CEE is delivering new state-of-the-art weak reaction data & tools to the community. 50 28 = Z 40 N Proton Number 50 30 50 30 40 Astrophysical models A1.6 A2.1 A3.1 A3.3 A3.4 A3.5 Nuclear experiment Nuclear theory = Z 28 N Proton Number 50 40 20 30 28 82 8 20 Stable FFN ODA LMP LMSH Approx. No rate 20 2 10 8 2 0 0 20 www.jinaweb.org/weakrates 40 50 60 70 Neutron Number −4 −3 80 90 Good example of a JINA-CEE triggered and enabled student/postdoc exchange. Nuclearspectroscopictelescopearray NuSTAR 50 50 −5 Observations 70 60 log10|ΔYee| 20 20 20 A1.5 82 28 60 80 100 120 The Crab as an FLASH JINA-CEE is providing leadership on the growth of a massive star’s iron core, up to and including collapse and the resulting nucleosynthesis. Astrophysical models A1.3 A1.4 A1.5 A1.6 A2.1 A3.3 A3.5 A4.1 Nuclear theory Nuclear experiment Observations NuSTAR 44Ti Mass Fraction Injection into protoplanetary disks High-precision abundances Nucleosynthesis Injection into molecular clouds Chemical evolution Pre-solar Grains Galaxy Hydro & Large Scale Structure Nuclear Physics Stellar Model Stellar Hydro Modules for Experiments in Stellar Astrophysics Simple Stellar Population Model Stellar Yields for Galactic Modeling Applications Galaxy Model One-Zone Model for the Evolution of GAalaxies Merger-Tree Model Galaxy Assembly with Merger-trees Modeling Abundances JINA-CEE and NuGrid are leading the charge on an integrated numerical pipeline from dynamic nuclear physics input to transformative comparisons with observations, and loop back. Pipeline example: following the cosmic evolution of pristine gas FLASH 3D hydro simulations of “primordial metals” from Pop III SN correlate well with CEMP Milky Way halo stars. See Brian O’Shea’s talk for Advice / Suggestions Herwig Truran Van Rossum Scielzo Reddy Woodward Savard Perdikakis Couder Clark Frebel Estrade Aprahamian Wiescher Beers Goerres Carollo Simon Placco Berg Tan Surman Roberston Beard Couch Schatz Spyrou O'Shea Zegers Roederer BrownA Liddick Montes Hager Burrows Pignatari Martinez-Pinedo Brune Froehlich McLaughlin Ott Timmes Scannapieco Karakas Heger Lugaro Mueller Fryer Blackmon See Lena Simon’s talk for additional communication results.