Download S02 Techno2 Hard Gelatin Capsules

Hard Gelatin Capsules
Definition


A capsule is an edible package made from gelatin or other suitable
material and filled with a drug(s) to produce a unit dosage, mainly
for oral use.
Hard gelatin capsules: or two-piece capsules which are
composed of two pieces in the form of cylinders closed at one end.
The shorter piece, called the “cap”, fits over the open end of the
longer piece, called the “body”.

Gelatin is the most commonly used material for capsule
manufacturing.

There is no pharmacopoeial (USP) restriction on the use of other
suitable materials for capsule making. In recent years
hydroxypropyl methylcellulose (HPMC) have been used in
manufacturing hard capsules (Vegicap) in order to produce a shell
with low moisture content.
Composition of Hard Gelatin
Capsule shell:

Hard gelatin capsule shell contain the following ingredients:
 Gelatin.
 Colourants.
 Wetting
agents.
 Preservatives.
Gelatin


Gelatin is a substance of natural origin. However, it does not occur
as such in nature. It is prepared by the hydrolysis of collagen which
is the main protein constituent of connective tissues.
There are two types of gelatin depending on the preparation
method:
 Type A: Derived from acid hydrolysis of collagen. It is
manufactured mainly from pork skin

Type B: Derived from alkali hydrolysis of collagen. It is
manufactured mainly from animal bones (calf or beef bones)
Gelatin

Gelatin has been used for more than a hundred years in the
manufacture of capsules. Its widespread popularity is probably due
to:
 Safety:
it is non toxic, widely used in foodstuffs and
acceptable for use worldwide.
 Solubility: it is readily soluble in biological fluids at body
temperature.
 Film forming properties: it is capable of producing
strong flexible films (Thickness of the wall of a hard
gelatin capsule is about 100m).
Gelatin

Quality Control of Gelatin:
 Viscosity: solution viscosity of a gelatin solution is
dependent on the ratio of the two types of gelatin in
the solution.
 Bloom
Strength: It is the load in grams required to
push a standard plunger 4 mm into a gel.
It is a measure of the gel rigidity and is measured on a
standard gel (6.66 %W/V) after maturing it at 10oC.
Gelatin

Bloom strength is a test that is borrowed from
the food industry where it is used to quantify the
rigidity of many gels in foodstuff production.

Gelatin used in the manufacture of hard gelatin
capsules has a bloom strength value of (200250 gm) while that used in the manufacture of
soft gelatin capsules has a value of ~ 150 gm.
Gelatin
Standard probes for gelatin testing as shown above, are available for
the assessment of Bloom strength/Gel strength.
Colourants


The colourants are used to give the capsules their
distinct appearance.
Colourants used in gelatin capsules can be either:




Water soluble dyes
Water insoluble pigments
To prepare the range of colours seen in the capsules,
dyes and pigments are mixed together in solutions or
suspensions.
Titanium dioxide is used as an opacifier to make the
capsule opaque.
Wetting agent

According to USNF sodium lauryl sulphate is used at a
level of not more than 0.15% w/w as a wetting agent in
hard gelatin capsule to ensure that the lubricated metal
moulds are uniformly covered when dipped in the gelatin
solution.
o Preservatives !!!
• Preservatives were formerly added to hard capsules as an inprocess aid to prevent microbial contamination.
• Hard gelatin capsules contain between 13 and 16% w/v of
moisture.
• Because the moisture is strongly bound to the gelatin
molecules, gelatin usually doesn’t support microbial growth.
• Manufacturers operating their plants in compliance with GMP
do not have to include preservatives.
Properties
1. Capsule Sizes
For human use, eight sizes of capsules are available. The capacity of each size
varies according to the combination of drugs and their apparent densities.
Capsules are available as clear gelatin capsules or in a variety of colors.
Empty Hard Gelatin Capsule Physical Specifications
Size
Outer
Diamete
r (mm)
Height
or
Locked
Length
(mm)
Actual
Volume
(mL)
Typical Fill Weights
(mg) 0.70 Powder
Density
000
9.91
26.14
1.37
960
00
8.53
23.30
0.95
665
0
7.65
21.70
0.68
475
1
6.91
19.40
0.50
350
2
6.35
18.00
0.37
260
3
5.82
15.90
0.30
210
4
5.31
14.30
0.21
145
5
4.91
11.10
0.13
90
Capsule Sizes

For a powder, the fill weight is calculated by multiplying
the body volume by the tapped density.

For liquids, the fill weight is calculated by multiplying the
specific gravity of the liquid by the capsule body volume
by 0.8.
2. Shape

The usual shape of the capsule end is round.

To ensure reliable closing of the filled capsules, capsule shells
with locking grooves (or indentations) have been prepared. The
two grooves fit into each other for tight closing and prevent
accidental separation (or splitting) of the capsules.

These capsules have a series of indentations on the inside of
the cap and on the external surface of the body which, when
the capsule is closed after filling, form an interference fit
sufficient to hold them together during mechanical handling.
Capsule Shape
Traditional,
non-inetrlocking
Prefit
Locked
3. Moisture content: Normally, empty capsules have
significant amount (13-16%) of moisture that can act as a
placticizer. At low relative humidity, moisture is lost and the
capsule become brittle. Hygroscopic formulations can
absorb water out of the shell leading to brittleness and
drying-out of the shell.
4. Solubility: Gelatin is soluble at temperature above 30 C.
Below 30 C, hard gelatin capsule absorb water, swell and
distort. In body fluids or during dissolution at 37 C the
shell dissolves and ultimately disappear. It is worth
mentioning that vegicaps made of HPMC are soluble at
temperature as low as 10 C.
Capsule Filling

Hard gelatin capsules can be filled with a large variety of
materials of different physicochemical properties.

Limitation in properties of materials for filling into
capsules:



Must not react with gelatin (e.g. formaldehyde causes
crosslinking reaction that makes the capsule insoluble).
Must not interfere with the integrity of the shell (materials with
high level of free water, that can be absorbed by gelatin causing
it to soften and distort).
The volume of the unit dose must not exceed the size of capsule
available.
Capsule Filling

Type of materials for filling into hard gelatin capsules:
 Dry solids:
• Powders
• Pellets
• Granules
• Tablets
 Semisolids:
• Thermosoftening mixtures (during filling are in the molten
state and fluid enough to be pumped and filled. On standing
solidification happens. E.g. PEG 4000, solid fat.
• Thixotropic mixtures: thin with low viscosity upon shearing
by mixing and form hard mass with high viscosity upon
standing when shearing ceases. During filling they are fluid
and semisolid during shelf life.
• Pastes
 Liquids:
• Non-aqueous liquids: requires sealing by applying gealting
solution at the cap-body joint to form sealing galatin band
upon drying. If not sealed leakage at the joint will happen
during handling. Sealing also reduces oxygen permeation
into the content, protecting them from oxidation.
Filling of Powder Formulations
Bench-scale filling

Used for small quantities of capsules ranging from 50 to 10 000
in number.

Usually in community pharmacies, hospital pharmacies or even
in the industry for special prescriptions or trials.

They consist of sets of plastic plates with predrilled holes to take
from 30-100 capsules of a specific size.

Empty capsules are fed into the device either manually or with a
simple loading device.
Filling of Powder Formulations
Bench-scale filling
 The
bodies are locked in their plate by means of a screw
and the caps in their plate are removed.
 The powder is placed onto the surface of the body plate
and is spread with a spatula so that it is filled into the
bodies.
 The cap plate is then repositioned over the body one and
the capsules are rejoined using manual pressure.
 The uniformity of fill weight is very dependent upon good
flow properties of the powder.
Filling of Powder Formulations
Filling of Powder Formulations

Industrial scale filling:
 Machines
for industrial scale filling of hard gelatin
capsules come in great variety of shapes and sizes.
The output ranges from 5000-15000/ hour. They
vary from semi- to fully automatic.
 They
can be continuous in motion like a rotary
tablet press or intermittent where the machine
performs its function on one set of capsules at a
time.
Filling of Powder Formulations

The dosing systems in the industrial scale filling machines may be
divided into two groups:
 Dependent
systems: which use the capsule body
directly to measure the powder. Uniformity of the fill
weight can be achieved if the capsule is filled
completely.
 Independent systems: where the powder is
measured independently of the body in a special
measuring device. Weight uniformity is not dependent
on filling the body completely and the capsule can be
part filled.
Filling of Powder Formulations
Dependent dosing (Auger) Systems: Consists of three
stations
Station 1 : For capsule feeding and
Opening. Two rings with holes or bores (upper for caps
and lower for bodies) are combined and placed under
capsule holding hopper. the capsules are sucked by
vacuum into the bores and vacuum is also used for
separating capsule cap and body in a way capsule cap
can stay in upper holding ring and capsule body can
stay in lower holding ring. During feeding, the ring
holders are rotated to allow for row-by-row capsule
filling.

Station 2: Powder filling station
The holding rings are separated, and then the lower
(body) holding ring is positioned on the rotary table. The
powder hopper is pulled over the lower (body) holding
ring, then auger inside powder hopper (compulsory
feeder, such as rotating screw) is started to run and fill
powder into the capsule body. Upon the lower holding
ring turns one circle, the powder hopper is pushed to its
original position away from the ring. Upon filling, the
bodies should be completely filled for minimal weight
variation and thus uniformity of fill weight is achieved only
if the capsules are filled completely. Accordingly, the
semiautomatic machines is classified as dosing
dependent system meaning the system use the capsule
body to measure the filled powder. Maximum total fill
weight (with minimal weight variation) can be achieved at
the lowest rotation al speed of the turntable and vice
versa. More than one rotational cycle can be applied to
ensure complete filling of the capsules.
Filling of Powder Formulations
Hopper
Auger
An Auger capsule filling
machine using the ring
system
Capsule
body plate
Filling of Powder Formulations
 The
weight of powder filled into the body is
dependent on the time the body is underneath the
hopper during the revolution of the plate holder.
 The
dependent dosing systems are semiautomatic
in operation, requiring an operator to transfer the
capsule holder from one operation to the next.
 The
output from such machines varies between
15,000 and 25,000 per hour and is dependent on
the skill of the operator.
Station 3: for capsule closing
and ejection
The upper holding ring and lower holding ring are put together,
and then the holding rings are attached ahead of ejector. The
closing plate is moved 180 degree to that shown in Figure 4 into
the closing position. The ejector is aimed at the bores of holding
ring, into which air pressure is applied to press capsules for
closing. Afterward, air pressure is released and then the closing
plate is restored to its original position. Air pressure is applied
again to expel the capsules through the upper portion of the ring.
Visit
Instead of compressed air, pins can be used for closing and
http://www.you
ejection. The capsules upon ejection are collected through the
tube.com/watch chute into a collector. Palletized or granular material can be filled
?v=r2FYbmwV_iU on this machine, however, it is desirable to remove the auger from
For video
the hopper in order to avoid crushing. It may also desirable to
perform closing in a position other than the vertical position, such
as the use of horizontal ejector. In vertical position, pellets or
granules may escape from the body ring and this may cause
damage to capsules.
Filling of Powder Formulations

Independent dosing systems:
 Fully
automatic systems.
 Use a dosing mechanism that forms a ‘plug’ of
powder that is transferred then to the capsule shell.
 Plugs are soft compacts formed at low compression
forces (10-100 N).
 Plugs are soft because they are not the final
dosage form, unlike tablets, as they will be
contained inside a capsule shell.
Filling of Powder Formulations

There are two types of plug forming machines:
 Dosators.
 Tamping
finger and dosing disc system.
Filling of Powder Formulations

Dosator systems:
 These consist of a dosing tube inside which there
is a movable spring-loaded piston, thus forming a
variable-volume chamber in the bottom of the
cylinder.
Filling of Powder Formulations
 The
tube is lowered open end first into a bed of
powder.
 As the powder enter the tube and fill the chamber it
forms the plug. The plug may be further consolidated
by applying a compression force with the piston.
 The assembly is then raised from the powder bed and
is positioned over the capsule body.
 The plug is then ejected by lowering the piston.
 The weight of the fill can be adjusted by altering the
position of the piston inside the tube (i.e. increasing or
decreasing the volume) and by changing the depth of
the powder bed.
 The
dosator system
is the most commonly
used capsule filling
system.
 Output

could reach
up to 150 000 / hour.
Filling of Powder Formulations

Tamping finger and dosing disc:
 In this system a dosing disc forms the bottom of a
revolving powder hopper.
 The dosing disc has a series of accurately drilled
holes in which powder plugs are formed by several
sets of tamping fingers.
 Sets of tamping fingers (stainless steel rods) are
lowered into them through the powder bed to
compress the plug.
Filling of Powder Formulations
 At
each position the fingers push material into the
holes, building up a plug before they index on to the
next position.
 At the last position the finger pushes the plug through
the disc into a capsule body.
 The powder fill weight can be varied by the amount of
insertion of the fingers into the disc, by changing the
thickness of the dosing disc, and by adjusting the
amount of powder in the hopper.
Formulation of Capsule Fillings
A. Drug

Low-dose potent drugs are the easiest to formulate for capsule
filling. In this case the drug occupies only a small percentage of
the total formulation (<20%) and so the properties of the mixture
will be governed by the excipients chosen.

On the other hand, in case of high dose drugs (500mg of an
antibiotic), the excipients must be chosen carefully to exert their
effect at low concentrations (<5%) and the properties of the
mixture will be governed by that of the active ingredient.
Powder Formulations:
B. Diluent:
 Give plug forming properties. Should have the following ideal
properties
 Good flow: obtainable using free flowing diluents and
glidants.
 No adhesion: obtainable using lubricants.
 Cohesion: important for plug formation, using compressible
diluents.
 For drugs that are readily soluble are best mixed with
insoluble diluents such as starch, microcrystalline
cellulose, or calcium sulfate, because they help the
powder mass to break up without interfering with their
solubility in the medium.


For water insoluble hydrophobic drugs, water soluble diluents,
such as lactose is chosen, because it will improve drug dissolution
and bioavailability.
This was studied for phenytoin (a
hydrophobic drug). When it was
formulated with lactose and given as
capsules for n days, high plasma
concentrations were achieved. When
the same drug was given to the same
patients but using calcium sulfate as a
diluent, the plasma concentrations
continuously dropped. When the
former formulation using lactose was
given for the rest of the study, the
drug plasma concentrations were
restored to their higher values
gradually.
Powder Formulations:
C. Glidants
 Uniform
filling of capsule bodies is mainly dependent
on good powder flow.
 Glidants reduce inter-particulate friction, such as
colloidal anhydrous silica, and talc.
 Low dose actives can be made to flow well by mixing
them with free-flowing diluents. And thus glidant is
usualy not necessary
 For high dose drugs, because little space is available
for diluent addition, and flaowbility is governed by the
drug, gildant addition is usually a must.
Powder Formulations:
D: Lubricants: reduce powder to metal adhesion, such as magnesium
stearate. They exert their effect by coating the surface of other ingredients.
Lubricants are usually hydrophobic materials that achieve their
activity by coating the surface of pharmaceutical powders. At high
levels they can reduce the solid mass wetability and thus reduce
dissolution rate and drug release from pharmaceutical solids.
 However, lubricants are not always disadvantageous. They
were shown to increase the dissolution rate of micronized
powders. This is due to reduction in cohesiveness of the small
particles, thus spreading more rapidly through the dissolution
medium than the unlubricated particles.
 Studies have shown that the inclusion of an optimized level of
magnesium stearate increased the dissolution rate. This was
correlated to reduction in the hardness of the powder plug
(softer plug, therefore easier to break a part).
Effect of lubricant on drug dissolution from capsules
This was demonstrated for the
effect of magnesium stearate
(MS) on rifampicin dissolution at
different particle sizes (Figure to
the right). The addition of MS
reduced drug dissolution from
coarse particles (180-355 m)
due to reduction of wetability.
However, for smaller particles
(less than 75 m), an increased in
dissolution rate was obtained.
This was explained as due to
reduction of particle cohesiveness
leading to faster deagglumeration
and spreading in the dissolution
medium.
Effect of lubricant on drug dissolution from
capsules

In another study the effect of magnesium
stearate on hydrochlorthiazide was
studied by measuring the time for 60%
drug release (t60%). It was found that as
the lubricant concentration increased up
to 1%, t60% was continuously reduced
meaning dissolution was enhanced.
However, further increase in lubricant
concentration beyond1% led resulted in
relatively longer t60% (dissolution
retardation). The declining portion of the
plot was attributed to plug softening that
dominated hydrophobic barrier action.
The 2nd portion was attributed to
hydrophobic coating and poor wetting.
When t60% was plotted versus plug
hardness high positive correlation was
obtained meaning as the plug is harder
dissolution rate becomes slower.
Disniegrants



Disntegrants are required to break filled powder mass
into primary powder particles. Disintegrants acting as
wicks, attract water into the plug
Because a plug is less compacted than a tablet,
starch can swell to disrupt it.
Superdisintegrants are more effective, used at much
lower concentration than starch and are best in
breaking the capsule plug.
A. Na Starch glycolate: Primojel®, Explotab®
B. Croscarmellose: Ac-Di-Sol®
C. Cross linked PVP: Crospovidone®
Wetting agents

Are used when the drug is poorly soluble and
hydrophobic. They reduced interfacial tension between
drug particles and the aqueous dissolution medium,
promoting solvent penetration and wetability.

Sodium lauryl sulphate at levels of 1% in combinatio
with water soluble diluent has been to increase
dissolution rate of poorly soluble drugs.