Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
CHAPTER 9 THE ECONOMIC, SOCIAL, AND POLITICAL SITUATION IN CHINA By the mid-1990s, China had accomplished unprecedented achievements in economic development. The Chinese economy expanded more than fourfold between 1978 and 1995. In that period, Chinese GDP per capita grew at the blistering rate of 8 percent a year and 200 million Chinese were lifted out of absolute poverty. 1 Despite the fact that China’s inflation (measured by the retail price index) rose to a 21.7 percent record high in 1994 due to double-digit growth rates during 1992-94, by the end of 1996 inflation was brought down to 6.1 percent, with only a small reduction in economic growth, which was still 9.7 percent for 1996. In economic parlance, the Chinese economy achieved a “soft landing.” Nonetheless, a 1997 World Bank report pointed out that China’s rapid growth and structural changes, while resolving many problems, created new challenges: periods of macroeconomic instability stemming from partially completed reforms, increased unemployment, and income insecurity; mounting environmental pressures, especially in urban areas; rising costs of food self-sufficiency; growing inequality and relatively high poverty levels, particular in remote areas; and a prickly occasionally hostile world environment. In addition, the report highlighted that the risks the Chinese economy faces in the future are complex, immediate, and fundamental. What is more, several risks are 1 World Bank, China 2020: Development Challenges in the New Century (Washington, D.C.: World Bank, 1997), pp. 1-2. 294 interrelated and could derail the economy. First is the link between banks and state enterprises. Second is the nexus between state enterprise reforms, labor markets, and equality. Third, delayed enterprise reforms could slow growth and hamper efforts to clean up the environment. Fourth is the government’s fiscal position and the system of intergovernmental transfers.2 Nicholas Lardy warned that the current stage of reform is in many ways more difficult than earlier stages of reform. Economically it is more complex since it requires closely coordinated reforms of state enterprises, the financial system, and tax administration. Politically it is extremely challenging because future reforms would lead to a staggering unemployment rate and reduce the real incomes of a significant portion of the population, at least on a transitory basis.3 China’s economic development has benefited greatly by integrating itself into the world economy as discussed in the Chapter 8, while the world economy in turn influences Chinese economic development and reforms. In 1997-99, the AFC not only negatively influenced China’s economy but also sent a warning to China’s leaders concerning the country’s financial situation. Furthermore, although China’s entry into the WTO4 will contribute to long-term efficiency and economic growth, China will first have to pay substantial, short-term transitional costs. The AFC is a catalyst for China to accelerate its domestic reforms and the WTO is the convergence point where China’s domestic agenda and external reforms meet. Beijing must take into consideration both international economic constraints and opportunities when designing its domestic economic agenda. 2 3 4 World Bank, China 2020: Development Challenges in the New Century (Washington, D.C.: World Bank, 1997), pp. 2, 99. Nicholas R. Lardy, China’s Unfinished Economic Revolution (Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press, 1998), p. 221. China formally became a member of the WTO on December 12, 2001. 295 In addition to the above challenges, the Chinese government faces a serious threat of rampant official corruption and inflation (macro-economic instability), which were two major issues fueling widespread social discontent and the demonstrations of 1989. In light of the fall of Suharto’s Indonesian regime in 1998, Pei Minxin warned that growth-based legitimacy is very unreliable since the Indonesian economy maintained one of the highest rates of growth in the world in the post-World War II period. He argues that due to Suharto’s family engaging in corruption activities, the shakiness of his support became clear only when, barely eight months into Indonesia’s worst economic crisis in three decades, angry citizens and the country’s armed forces – supposedly the mainstay of the Suharto regime – forced the leader out of office. He argues that “a leadership split, an economic crisis, or an external setback should set off a chain reaction leading to a Suharto-type collapse in China.”5 The prospect of the Chinese economy overcoming these challenges is not optimistic. Pei Minxin warns that the Chinese government’s ability to overcome these short-term difficulties is not assured because of the inherent weaknesses of the current Chinese political system and accumulated social and political stresses in Chinese society. 6 In early 2001, Kenneth Lieberthal also warned: “Current challenges may overwhelm the capacities of the Chinese system and produce fundamental instability. This possibility looms especially large over the next four years.”7 The following sections will further examine the interlocking economic, social, environmental, and political challenges China faced in the late-1990s. 5 6 7 Minxin Pei, “Asia’s Political Lessons,” China Business Review, September-October 1999, p. 10. Minxin Pei, “Will China Become Another Indonesia?,” Foreign Policy, Fall 1999, p. 108. Minxin Pei, “Future Shock: The WTO and Political Change in China,” Carnegie Endowment for International Peace Policy Brief, vol. 1, no. 3 (February 2001), p. 1. Kenneth Lieberthal, U.S. Policy Toward China, Brookings Institution Policy Brief #72 (March 2001), http://www.brookings.edu/comm/policybriefs/pb072/pb072.htm, accessed March 5, 2001, p. 2-4 of 8. 296 I. The Fiscal Constraint of the Chinese Government Over the past two decades, the resources available to the Chinese state to tackle the staggering challenges ahead have been declining in terms of both the share of state budget and the share of disposable revenue8 for the central government compared to its GDP. State fiscal revenues declined from 28.4 percent of GDP in 1979 to 10.7 percent in 1995, and then rose slightly to 14 percent in 1999. State expenditures declined from 31.8 percent of GDP in 1979 to 11.7 percent of GDP in 1995 and then up to 16.1 percent in 1999, well below the developing country average of 32 percent. 9 In particular, the share of resources controlled by the Chinese central government in terms of GDP has been declining rapidly. Despite the shares of collected revenue of the Chinese central government maintained at around 5-7 percent of GDP in the 1980s and 1990s, the share of its expenditure to GDP declined sharply, from 16.2 percent in 1979 to 3.2 percent in 1996, then up slightly to 5.1 percent in 1999. (See Table 9.1.)10 Table 9.1. China’s Fiscal Position, 1979-99 Period State Revenue (RMB billion) Share of GDP (%) State Expenditure (RMB billion) 1979 114.6 28.4 128.2 1988 235.7 15.8 249.1 8 1994 521.8 11.2 579.3 1995 624.2 10.7 682.4 1996 740.8 10.9 793.8 1997 1998 1999 865.1 987.6 1144.4 11.6 12.4 14.0 923.4 1079.8 1318.8 Disposable revenue is the sum of centrally-collected revenue and remittances from the provinces, through revenue sharing, minus regime subsidies and tax return from the central government to local governments. See further discussion in Chapter 10. 9 World Bank, China 2020: Development Challenges in the New Century (Washington, D.C.: World Bank, 1997), pp. 24-25. 10 Before state-owned enterprise (SOE) reforms, SOE investment was accounted as the expenditure of the central government. Now, the central government is no longer responsible for that investment. Therefore, in addition to other reasons, this change also contributes to the reduction of overall expenditure of the central government. 297 Share of GDP (%) Collected revenue by the central government (RMB billion) Share of GDP (%) Expenditure of the central government (RMB billion) Share of GDP (%) 31.8 23.1 16.7 77.5 12.4 290.7 11.7 325.7 11.7 366.1 12.4 422.7 13.6 489.2 16.1 584.9 5.7 65.5 5.2 84.5 6.2 175.4 5.6 199.5 5.4 215.1 5.7 253.3 6.2 312.6 7.1 415.2 16.2 5.7 3.8 3.4 3.2 3.4 3.9 5.1 Note: 1. The state revenue refers to revenue actually collected by the central and local governments. 2. Revenue in this table does not include revenue from domestic and foreign borrowings, and expenditure does not include the payment of the principal and interest of domestic and foreign debts and the expenditure for capital construction using foreign loans. Source: National Bureau of Statistics (PRC), China Statistical Yearbook, no. 19 (2000) (Beijing: China Statistics Press, 2000), pp. 256, 267, 268. This situation has greatly limited Beijing’s ability to respond to the inevitable need to spend more on economic development, social reforms, and environmental protection. According to the 1997 World Bank report, the overall annual expenditure shortfall in the high-priority areas, such as spending on health, education, poverty alleviation, pensions, infrastructure, and environment protection, has been estimated at 4.6 percent of GDP or 135 percent of the 1997 total expenditure of the central government.11 According to Nicholas Lardy’s estimate, total annual social expenditure financed by enterprises that should be shifted to fiscal financing might amount to 3.3 percent of GDP.12 The World Bank estimates that between 1995 and 2004 China would need to invest $744 billion, about RMB 6 trillion, or 103 percent of its 1995 GDP, in electric power, telecommunications, transportation, and water and sanitation infrastructure.13 11 World Bank, China 2020: Development Challenges in the New Century (Washington, D.C.: World Bank, 1997), pp. 102-103. 12 Nicholas R. Lardy, China’s Unfinished Economic Revolution (Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press, 1998), p. 161. 13 World Bank, Infrastructure Development in East Asia and Pacific: Towards a New Public-Private Partnership (Washington, D.C.: World Bank, 1995), p. 4. 298 The above estimate is very conservative because it does not include extra spending to support future economic reforms – such as payments for laid-off workers of state-owned enterprises (SOEs), monetizing housing benefits, or the costs of reforming the banking system. For example, in early 1999, Chen Qingtai, vice minister of the State Economic and Trade Commission, pointed out that the direct cost for reforming SOEs in the next three years would range from RMB 600 billion to 800 billion (more than twice the 1998 total central government expenditures).14 In 2001, Dai Xianglong, governor of the People’s Bank of China (the central bank), admitted that China’s non-performing loans (NPLs) were as high as RMB 3,549 billion or about 40 percent of its GDP in 2000, including NPLs transferred to the asset management companies (AMCs). 15 According to Pieter Bottelier, the aggregate stock of remaining NPLs plus those transferred to the AMCs may have ranged from RMB 4,000 to 4,500 billion by the end of 2000. Including losses accumulated elsewhere in the public financial system, Bottelier estimates that total irrecoverable losses in the state financial sector are RMB 3,700-4,250 billion (US$ 450-510 billion or 45-50 percent of GDP). These losses ultimately need to be paid by the central government. 16 Furthermore, to maintain the necessary economic growth rate after 1997, the government resorted to fiscal expansion to boost domestic demand. The State Council issued RMB 100 billion treasury bonds in 1998, RMB 110 billion in 1999, and RMB 150 billion in 2000, to finance investment to improve the country’s infrastructure. In addition, 14 15 16 “Reform of State-Owned Enterprises Needs 800 Billion Yuan in Next 3 Years” (in Chinese), Hong Kong Ming Pao, November 11, 1998, p. b15, in FBIS-CHI-98-317. Zhang-rong Kang, “Dai Xianglong: Commercial Banks’ NPLs Account for 25%,” Gongshang Shibao [Commerce Times], March 27, 2001. Pieter Bottelier, “China’s Domestic Debts: Will They Interfere with Financial Sector Liberalization and WTO Commitments? Issues and Strategies,” Discussion paper for Wilton Park Conference #654 on Economic and Enterprise Reform in China: the Challenges for Government and Business, November 5-8, 2001, pp. 5-6. 299 in 1998 the State Council also issued RMB 270 billion of special treasury bonds to recapitalize four major state-owned commercial banks. The central government also provided RMB 18 billion for reform of SOEs and for supporting post-flood rehabilitation. According to Chinese Finance Minister Xiang Huaicheng, implementation of a pro-active fiscal policy has stimulated economic growth by 1.5 percentage points in 1998, 2.0 percentage points in 1999, and 1.7 percentage points in 2000. These bonds totaled RMB 648 billion and were equal to more than two times the 1998 total expenditures of the central government. This huge borrowing reflects Beijing’s extremely limited resources and the significance of maintaining rapid economic growth for China. If this practice continues for a sustained period, this will generate enormous fiscal burdens in the future, as these bonds will have to be serviced.17 More specifically, while faced with ballooning demand for expenditures, the central government faces a serious difficulty in raising additional revenues. For instance, the Ministry of Finance proposed amending the Highway Law by replacing ad hoc automobile and road fees collected by provincial and local governments with a uniform national fuel tax, which would generate about RMB 100 billion of tax revenue, an increase of 20 percent in central government collected revenues. A vote on the amendment was postponed twice and in spring 1999 this proposal was voted down by the Standing Committee of the National People’s Congress (NPC) because of strong local opposition.18 In addition, some local authorities often maximize their revenues at the 17 18 Chu-yuan Cheng, “China’s Economy: Recent Development and Long-Term Prospects,” Issues & Studies, vol. 36, no. 5 (September/October 2000), pp. 130-132. “Major Decision, Successful Practice – State Planning Commission Official Answers Reporter’s Questions on Three-year Treasury Bond Investments” (in Chinese), Beijing Xinhua Domestic Service, December 29, 2000, in FBIS-CHI-2000-1229. “Xiang Huaicheng on PRC’s ‘Pro-Active Fiscal Policy’ in Report to NPC,” Beijing Xinhua, March 6, 2001, in FBIS-CHI-2001-0306. Nicholas R. Lardy, “When Will China’s Financial System Meet China’s Needs?,” presented at the Conference on Policy Reform in China, Center for Research on Economic Development and Policy 300 expense of tax contributions to the central government. Local authorities often grant local SOEs generous exemptions from the taxes that are shared with the central government, but preserve their own portion of tax revenues mostly untouched.19 Since the requirements for central government expenditures have exceeded available funds considerably and continue to increase, the Chinese government has incurred an increasingly large fiscal deficit and debt. The budget deficit increased from RMB 1.4 billion (0.3 percent of GDP) in 1980, to RMB 65.5 billion (1.0 percent) in 1996, and then jumped to RMB 259.8 billion (2.9 percent) in 2000. (See Table 9.2.) Table 9.2. The Fiscal Deficit of the Chinese Central Government, 1980-2000 Deficit (RMB billion) Deficit/GDP (%) 1980 1.4 0.3 1984 4.8 0.7 1988 19.4 1.3 1992 23.1 0.9 1994 67.6 1.5 1996 65.5 1.0 1998 95.8 1.2 1999 179.7 2.2 2000 259.8 2.9 Note: Fiscal deficit = total debt incurred – total payments for the debts. Source: National Bureau of Statistics (PRC), China Statistical Yearbook, no. 18 (1999) (Beijing: China Statistics Press, 1999), pp. 266, 284. Xinhua, quoting financial minister reports to the National People’s Congress, 2000-2001. The 2000 figure almost reaches the internationally accepted alarm level of three percent. 20 As a matter of fact, Chinese official figures gravely underestimate the seriousness of the fiscal problem in China for two reasons: First, the World Bank argues that more accurate representation of government activities is provided by the concept of the consolidated government deficit. This consists of the fiscal deficit plus the part of the People’s Bank of China (central bank) lending to the financial system that finances the 19 20 Reform, Stanford University, November 18-20, 1999, pp. 12-13. Chi Lo, “China’s Fiscal Time Bomb,” China Business Review, September/October 1999, p. 17. Junrong Tian, “Continue to Arose Nongovernmental Investment” (in Chinese), Beijing Renmin Ribao, 301 government-directed expenditure of the SOEs. Consequently, between 1986 and 1994 the consolidated deficit may have averaged from 4.9 to 5.7 percent of GDP – more than triple the 1.5 percent deficit in the 1994 official budget.21 In addition, Nicholas Lardy estimates that by the mid-1990s, the broader public sector non-financial deficit had been running at an unsustainable level of over 10 percent of GDP for almost a decade.22 Second, the Chinese government expenditures significantly depend on debt financing. The Chinese government incurred only RMB 3.5 billion (0.9 percent of GDP) of debt in 1979 and RMB 27.1 billion (1.8 percent of GDP) in 1988. Beginning in 1994, however, the government was precluded from borrowing from the central bank to finance its budget deficit. As a result, debt incurred by the government jumped from RMB 73.9 billion (2.1 percent of GDP) in 1994, to RMB 371.5 billion (4.5 percent of GDP) in 1999. Thus, the stock of outstanding treasury bonds leaped from RMB 157.2 billion (4.5 percent of GDP) in 1994 to RMB 996.5 billion (12.2 percent of GDP) in 1999. (See Table 9.3.) According to Pei Minxin, the Chinese central government borrowed 55.2 cents for every dollar it spent in 1997.23 According to Nicholas Lardy, by 1999 about 70 percent of central government expenditure was financed by debt.24 Table 9.3. The Fiscal Situation of the Chinese Central Government, 1979-99 Period Debt incurred (RMB billion) Debt incurred/GDP (%) Balance of cumulative government bonds (RMB billion) 21 22 23 24 1979 3.5 0.9 n.a. 1988 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 27.1 73.9 117.5 155.0 196.7 247.7 331.1 371.5 1.8 2.1 2.5 2.7 2.9 3.3 4.2 4.5 n.a. 157.2 257.8 355.9 462.0 550.9 786.2 996.5 April 20, 1999, p. 1, in FBIS-CHI-1999-0426. World Bank, China 2020: Development Challenges in the New Century (Washington, D.C.: World Bank, 1997), p. 28. Nicholas R. Lardy, China’s Unfinished Economic Revolution, (Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press, 1998), p. 5. Minxin Pei, “Will China Become Another Indonesia?,” Foreign Policy, Fall 1999, p. 100. David M. Lampton, “Rapporteur’s Summary,” in Dick Clark (ed.), U.S.-China Relations (Washington, D.C.: Aspen Institute, 1999), p. 7. 302 Government bonds/GDP (%) n.a. n.a. 4.5 5.5 6.2 6.8 7.5 10.1 12.2 Note: Government bonds include sovereign bonds, state investment bonds, and state investment company bonds. Source: National Bureau of Statistics (PRC), China Statistical Yearbook, no. 19 (2000) (Beijing: China Statistics Press, 2000), p. 259. Haocheng Gong and Guoqing Dai (eds.), 2000 Zhongguo Jinrong Fazhan Baogao [2000 China’s Financial Development Report] (Shanghai: Shanghai Caijin Daxue Chubanshe, 2000), p. 25. In addition, Nicholas Lardy estimated that the balance of outstanding non-treasury government bonds, mostly issued by the State Development Bank, at year-end 1998 was RMB 532.2 billion (7 percent of GDP). Inclusive of these bonds, according to Lardy, by year-end 1998 explicit government debt was RMB 1606.1 billion (20.5 percent of GDP), almost five times the level of 1993.25 According to World Bank’s estimate, Chinese domestic public sector debt, including treasury bonds, policy financial bonds, and other financial bonds, increased from 12.3 percent of GDP in 1997, to 16.4 percent in 1998, and 20.7 percent in 1999.26 This estimate excludes corporate bonds issued by state-owned manufacturing firms, as well as other contingent or implicit government liabilities such as non-performing loans extended by state-owned banks, pension arrears of the government and government-owned firms, and unfunded pension liabilities of current employees of the government and government-owned firms. It also excludes implicit liabilities of local governments. For example, Nicholas Lardy argues that any serious attempt to recapitalize the financial system will immediately push government debt to a level of over 50 percent 25 26 Nicholas R. Lardy, “When Will China’s Financial System Meet China’s Needs?,” presented at the Conference on Policy Reform in China, Center for Research on Economic Development and Policy Reform, Stanford University, November 18-20, 1999, pp. 14-19. World Bank, “China,” China Quarterly, September 18, 2000, p.15. 303 of output.27 According to a World Bank estimate, the implicit state pension debt was about 50 percent of GDP in 1994.28 According to Pieter Bottelier’s estimate, the aggregate of registered, implicit, and contingency state debt – sovereign and non-sovereign; foreign and domestic – was about 133-192 percent of GDP in 2000. “Contingency debt” includes government guaranteed debt, the unfunded “old” pension debt, the non-performing loan portfolio of state banks (now partially transferred to state-owned AMCs), and under-capitalization of state banks and enterprises. Sovereign state debt -- external and internal -- accounts for 21 percent of GDP; domestic bonds issued by AMCs and State Policy banks, 25 percent; contingent NPL debt, 37-44 percent of GDP; the present value of unfunded future state pension liabilities, 45-95 percent; the present value of the funds to recapitalize SOEs, 5-7 percent.29 According to another estimate by the World Bank, China’s explicit and implicit debt was over 173 percent of GDP in 2000. Furthermore, new hidden debt in the form of the under-capitalization of the financial system is being accumulated in state-owned banks and enterprises at a conservatively estimated rate of 2 percent of GDP annually.30 Moreover, the government’s increasing reliance on debt financing for its spending needs make the payment and servicing of the public debt a mounting concern. In 1998, debt servicing and repayment accounted for RMB 235.3 billion, or over 70 percent of new government debt incurred, rising from RMB 49.9 billion, or 42.5 percent in 1994. 27 28 29 30 Nicholas R. Lardy, “When Will China’s Financial System Meet China’s Needs?,” presented at the Conference on Policy Reform in China, Center for Research on Economic Development and Policy Reform, Stanford University, November 18-20, 1999, pp. 20-37. World Bank, China: Pension System Reform (Washington, D.C.: World Bank, 1996), pp. ix, 2, 15, 26 Pieter Bottelier, “China’s Domestic Debts: Will They Interfere with Financial Sector Liberalization and WTO Commitments? Issues and Strategies,” Discussion paper for Wilton Park Conference #654 on Economic and Enterprise Reform in China: the Challenges for Government and Business, November 5-8, 2001, pp. 8-9. World Bank, “China,” issued on September 27, 2001. 304 (See Table 9.4.) The share of fiscal revenue spent on debt service and repayment rose to 24 percent of total government fiscal revenue in 1998, from less than 3 percent in 1989. According to Nicholas Lardy’s estimate, interest payments on treasury debt in 1999 were estimated to be RMB 83 billion, compared to RMB 5.2 billion in 1992, a 16-fold increase in 7 years. Interest burden, a percent of central government outlays exclusive of transfers to local governments, has quadrupled from less than 4 percent in 1993 to an estimated 19 percent in 1998, and 17 percent in 1999. Therefore, China cannot continue to service its debt for long by simply issuing more. Worse still, if bond investors are worried about the government’s credit or political instability, they will demand sharply higher interest rates, causing government debt to spiral.31 Table 9.4. Chinese Government Debt Finance, 1985-99 1985 Total debt incurred (RMB billion) 9.0 Total payment for the debts (RMB billion) 4.0 Ratio of total payment for the debts to debt incurred 44.4 (%) 1990 37.5 19.0 50.7 1994 117.5 49.9 42.5 1995 155.0 87.8 56.7 1996 196.7 131.1 66.7 1997 247.7 191.8 77.4 1998 331.1 235.3 71.1 1999 371.5 192.3 51.8 Source: National Bureau of Statistics (PRC), China Statistical Yearbook, no. 19 (2000) (Beijing: China Statistics Press, 2000), pp. 259, 266. Overall, China’s long-term fiscal sustainability is heavily threatened by the contingent liabilities of the banking sector, the fiscal obligations arising from reform of SOEs and the social security system, and mounting debts. Escalating fiscal pressures pose a danger of renewed inflation if the government is tempted to monetize new debt. At this 31 Chi Lo, “China’s Fiscal Time Bomb,” China Business Review, September/October 1999, p. 18. Nicholas R. Lardy, “When Will China’s Financial System Meet China’s Needs?,” presented at the Conference on Policy Reform in China, Center for Research on Economic Development and Policy Reform, Stanford University, November 18-20, 1999, pp. 14-17. William Gamble, “The Middle Kingdom Runs Dry,” Foreign Affairs, vol. 79, no. 6 (November/December 2000), p. 20. 305 moment, the Chinese state obviously does not have sufficient resources to address necessary economic and social reforms and environmental protection. This could trigger a downward spiral between economic development and social stability, which in turn jeopardizes political legitimacy. These connected challenges for the Chinese government will be further analyzed in the following sections. II. State-owned Enterprise Reforms By 1997, there were over 300,000 State-Owned Enterprises (SOEs) in China’s economy, including those in the service sector. With a total of 120 million workers, the SOE sector employs 17.2 percent of total employed persons, and accounts for 65 percent of total urban employment. Most SOEs provide an extensive range of social services to their employees -- such as housing, education, pensions, and medical care. Of 300,000 SOEs, there were over 118,000 industrial SOEs, including 4,700 large enterprises and 11,000 medium enterprises. Despite the fact that between 1978 and 1996, the SOEs’ share of total industrial output fell from 78 percent to 30 percent, SOEs still accounted for over one-half of total assets, two-thirds of urban employment and almost three-quarters of investment in China. In addition, SOEs continue to absorb more than three-fourths of domestic credit, and their borrowing comprises about 60 percent of the total nonfinancial public-sector deficit.32 In 2000, outstanding loans by all financial institutions to SOEs still accounted for more than 50 percent of the total loan portfolio.33 Despite the dramatic reduction of their share of total industrial output, SOEs are still 32 International Monetary Fund, IMF Staff Country Report, no. 97/72, pp. 5-8. World Bank, China’s Management of Enterprise Assets: The State as Shareholder (Washington, D.C.: World Bank, 1997), p. xi. 306 the primary sources of tax revenue for all government levels in China, from the center to the urban localities. In 1978, profits and taxes handed over to the state by SOEs accounted for about 87 percent of the state revenue. In recent years, the Chinese government’s continued dependence upon SOEs for fiscal revenue is striking. For instance, in 1995, SOEs produced only 35 percent of China’s industrial output value but still contributed 71 percent of state revenue, and in 1998 the level was still as high as 55 percent.34 The Inefficiency and Losses of State-Owned Enterprises However, the majority of SOEs are inefficient and unprofitable. The profits of industrial SOEs have declined precipitously from RMB 73.8 billion (8.2 percent of GDP) in 1985 to only RMB 41.3 billion (0.6 percent of GDP) in 1996. The ratio of pre-tax profits to total SOE fixed assets significantly declined from 22.4 percent in 1985 to 7.9 percent in 1996. (See Table 9.5.) In addition, according to a 1999 official survey on the production capacity of more than 900 major industrial products, the utilization ratio of production capacity for two thirds of SOEs was under 50 percent.35 Table 9.5. The Financial Indicators of Chinese State-Owned Enterprises, 1985-96 Unit: RMB billion Year 33 34 35 Total fixed assets Total profits Total loss Total tax Ratio of pre-tax profits World Bank, “China,” September 27, 2001. Edward S. Steinfeld, Forging Reform in China: The Fate of State-Owned Industry (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1998), p. 17. Jiao Ran and Zhenjun, “State-Owned Enterprises as Viewed From National Conditions” (in Chinese), Beijing Xinhua Domestic Service, September 17, 1999, in FBIS-CHI-1999-0918. Lo Mei, “Jiang Reported to Steer State Firm Reform” (in Chinese) Hong Kong Kuang Chiao Ching, no. 322, July 16, 1999, in FBIS-CHI-1999-0805. International Monetary Fund, IMF Staff Country Report, no. 97/72, pp. 6-8. 307 1985 1990 1992 1994 1996 595.6 1161.0 1567.0 2310.2 3476.5 73.8 38.8 53.5 82.9 41.3 3.2 34.9 36.9 48.3 79.1 59.6 111.5 140.9 204.7 232.4 to total fixed assets (%) 22.4 12.9 12.4 12.5 7.9 Source: National Bureau of Statistics (PRC), China Statistical Yearbook (1997), no. 16 (Beijing: China Statistics Press, 1997). As a result of inefficiency and uncompetitiveness, many SOEs are generating enormous losses.36 In 1985, 9.6 percent of all industrial SOEs declared losses. The share of loss-making SOEs has risen steadily. In 1998, 45 percent of SOEs were operating at a loss, even under generous PRC accounting standards. The SOE losses jumped from RMB 3.2 billion (0.4 percent of GDP) in 1985 to RMB 79.1 billion (1.2 percent of GDP) in 1996, and further up to RMB 102.3 billion (1.3 percent of GDP) in 1998. In 1996, for the first time since 1949, the SOE sector as a whole generated a loss, which means that, other than taxes, the state was not receiving any net return from its massive investment in the state sector. Even large and medium SOEs were no exception. In 1997, about 42 percent or 6,599 of 15,700 large and medium-sized SOEs were making losses. As of March 1999, about 30 percent or 2,300 of 7,600 large and medium-sized SOEs were running at a loss. These losses were absorbed by government subsidies, inter-firm debts, and, more importantly, state bank loans.37 36 37 There is no proper accounting system on SOE profits and revenues. Sometimes SOEs might overstate profits for managers to get the credit of achievement; sometimes SOEs might overstate debts in order to get loans from state banks. As a result, the declared losses of the SOEs were not very reliable. Edward S. Steinfeld, Forging Reform in China: The Fate of State-Owned Industry (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1998), p. 18. Yuh-jiun Lin, “The Significance of China’s Entry into the WTO for State-Owned Enterprise Reform,” http://ww.dsis.org.tw/peaceforum/papers/2000-01/ME9912002e.htm, accessed November 8, 2000, p. 1 of 5. “China Industrial Firms Profits Down 17 Pct in 1998,” Reuters, February 26, 1998, 3:43 am Eastern Time. Chen Jing and Chen Jian, “Accelerating Development Is the Fundamental Way Out” (in Chinese), Renmin Ribao [People’s Daily] (Overseas edition), March 18, 2000, p. 3. Tian Zhu, “Restructuring China’s State-Owned Enterprises: A Corporate Governance Perspective,” in Baizhu Chen, J. Kimball 308 The Chinese government claimed that, by the end of 2000, the 6,599 loss-making large and medium-sized SOEs in 1997 had been cut by more than 70 percent. However, during these three years, according to Chinese officials, “the factor of state’s policy support, indeed, played an important role,” including discount interest rates for technical transformation, debt-to-equity swap, interest rate reduction, and tax refund. In particular, much of the improvement of the performance of many loss-making SOEs claimed by the Chinese government resulted from the AMCs’ debt-for-equity swap program, which has significantly reduced the interest expense for the SOEs.38 Furthermore, there has been an extraordinary build up of unsold and unsaleable inventories over the past decade. According to Chinese statistics, the inventory of goods increased by RMB 460 billion, or 6.6 percent of GDP in 1996. From 1990 to 1998, China’s additions to inventories averaged 5.7 percent of GDP per year. By 1997 the World Bank reports that in some years stagnant SOE inventories exceeded 10 percent of GDP. In comparison, in the United States and Japan, inventory was only 0.5 percent on average. This problem was exacerbated by the easing of credit since 1997 in an attempt to boost growth. Investment by state-owned units in 1998 was more than RMB 2,210 billion, an increase of 19.5 percent. As a result, more than 70 percent of Chinese commodities are oversupplied despite a 9.6 percent real growth in total retail sales in 1998.39 38 39 Dietrich, and Yi Fang (eds.), Financial Market Reform in China: Progress, Problems, and Prospects (Boulder, Colorado: Westview, 2000), pp. 349-350. Si Liang, “This Year China Actively Opens Up New Prospects for Reform of State-Owned Enterprises” (in Chinese), Hong Kong Zhongguo Tongxun She, March 14, 1999, in FBIS-CHI-1999-0329. Nicholas R. Lardy, China’s Unfinished Economic Revolution (Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press, 1998), pp. 34-38. “PRC State Development Planning Commission’s Zeng Peiyan to NPC on SOE Reform,” Beijing Xinhua, March 6, 2001, in FBIS-CHI-2001-0306. Szu Liang, “Perspective of China’s Economic Issues in the New Century (Part 6)” (in Chinese), Hong Kong Zhongguo Tongxun She, February 20, 2001, in FBIS-CHI-2001-0220. Moody’s Investors Service Global Credit Research, “China: Banking System Outlook,” August 2000, p. 9. Zhong Min, “China Pursues an Appropriate Monetary Policy” (in Chinese), Hong Kong Zhongguo Tongxun She, February 20, 1999, in FBIS-CHI-1999-0223. Raymond J. Blanchard, “The Heart of Economic Reform,” China Business Review, January-February 1997, p. 24. Nicholas R. Lardy, 309 Financing State-Owned Enterprises A large number of SOEs are heavily indebted due to huge losses. Increasingly, SOEs have been borrowing money not only to purchase equipment and other inputs, and to make capital investments, as in the past, but also to pay salaries, and to meet social welfare needs and pension and tax obligations. Because the return on assets had plummeted, by 1996 the proportion of their investment that SOEs could finance from their after-tax retained earnings had dropped to only one-tenth. Thus, these firms have become ever more dependent on credit to finance their activities. Despite the rapid fall in their share of GDP, between 1990 and 1998 SOE borrowing hovered at around 81 percent of outstanding state bank loans. In 1998, the borrowing of SOEs stood at RMB 5,516 billion, or 81 percent of all outstanding state bank loans.40 As a result, SOEs are highly leveraged in debt. In 1995, according to Nicholas Lardy, the liability-asset ratios of China’s SOEs increased to 85 percent compared to an average of 18.7 percent in 1980. A liability-asset ratio of 85 percent is the equivalent of a debt-to-equity ratio of well over 500 percent. Pieter Bottelier estimates that as of 1998 the average SOE debt-to-equity ratio was probably in the range of 400-700 percent. Thus, the 40 “Permanent Normal Trade Relations for China,” Brookings Institution Policy Brief no. 58 (May 2000), <hhtp://www.brookings.edu/comm./policybriefs/pb058/pb58.htm>, accessed May 1, 2000, p. 2 of 6. Shuqing Guo, Economy and Policy in 1996-1998 (in Chinese) (Guiyang, Guizhou: Guizhou Renmin Chubanshe, 1999), p. 358. The Economist Intelligence Unit, Country Profile 2000: China, November 3, 2000, <hhtp://db.eiu.com/reports.asp?title=Country+Profile+China&Valname=CPACNB&doc_id=677130>, accessed February 5, 2001, p. 2 of 3. “PRC Sees 70 Percent of Commodities Oversupplied,” Beijing Xinhua, March 19, 1999, in FBIS-CHI-1999-0319. Nicholas R. Lardy, China’s Unfinished Economic Revolution (Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press, 1998), p. 4. Haocheng Gong and Guoqing Dai (eds.), 2000 Zhongguo Jinrong Fazhan Baogao [2000 China’s Financial Development Report] (Shanghai: Shanghai Caijin Daxue Chubanshe, 2000), pp. 102-103. 310 average SOE was even more leveraged than the Korean chaebols before their 1997-99 crises, which were notorious for their high ratios of 300 to 400 percent. In comparison, a normal ratio for large U.S. corporations is about 100-150 percent. Therefore, SOEs are so highly leveraged that an economic slowdown could create liquidity problems for banks and SOEs are very vulnerable to possible increases in interest rates.41 Since most SOEs are inefficient and lose money, China faces a considerable threat of SOE bankruptcy and thus of a financial crisis. According to the World Bank, only 8 percent of industrial SOEs were fundamentally viable enterprises in the mid-1990s. As of 1997, more than 2,000 SOEs applied for bankruptcy, of which half had already declared bankrupt, leaving an estimated RMB 62.1 billion ($7.5 billion) in uncollectible debt by the four policy banks. In turn, these bad loans given to SOEs have seriously undermined a weak state-dominated banking system. As of 1997, 15-20 percent of the loans SOEs received from banks were used to refinance SOE interest payments. The most serious threat to the safety of China’s financial system is the possibility that a large number of SOEs would become unable to pay any interest on their bank debts, precipitating a grave liquidity crisis. In such a crisis, China’s total financial losses would amount to more than 20 percent of GDP and over four times the country’s current bank capital.42 Beijing’s Task and Difficulties The stagnant SOEs have created serious concerns for Beijing with respect to 41 42 Nicholas R. Lardy, China’s Unfinished Economic Revolution (Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press, 1998), p. 43. Pieter Bottelier, “How Stable Is China? An Economic Perspective,” in David Shambaugh (ed.), Is China Stable?: Assessing the Factors (Washington, D.C.: George Washington University, 1998), p. 69. Raymond J. Blanchard, “The Heart of Economic Reform,” The China Business Review, January-February 1997, pp. 17-24. 311 macro-economic stability. During the period of 21.7 percent inflation in 1994, fixed-investment loans to SOEs by the four policy banks increased by 32 percent that year, while lending to the private sector nominally declined by 42 percent and loans to urban collectives went down by 7 percent. During the AFC, the government’s budgetary support of SOEs reached almost 40 percent of the central government expenditures in 1997 and 1998 -- around RMB 100 billion in 1997 and around RMB 120 billion in 1998.43 All this has the effect of starving the most efficient sectors of the economy for capital.44 In addition, inter-enterprise debt rose steadily in the 1990s by roughly RMB 100 billion per year to a level of over RMB 1 trillion (near four times the central government expenditures, or 13 percent of GDP) by the end of 1997. By spilling over to the fiscal and financial sector, these debts and budgetary support jeopardize other critical elements of the government’s economic reform program, undermine resource allocation and macroeconomic stability, and significantly undermine the effectiveness of government monetary and fiscal policy.45 Beijing faces a very difficult decision. Pushing through fundamental reform of SOEs is fraught with risks because of a rising unemployment and under-developed social security system. SOE bankruptcies and lay-offs will generate unprecedented levels of unemployment. According to official Chinese estimates, the labor surplus in SOEs stood at 21.5 million persons at the late 1990s. According to the estimate by Kao Charng, the labor surplus in SOEs was between 26.9 and 32.3 million persons. Given the current defective social security system in China, this huge potential unemployment could lead to 43 44 45 Government’s budgetary support includes subsidies, turning enterprise debts into state capital and writing off banks’ debts through recapitalizing banks. Raymond J. Blanchard, “The Heart of Economic Reform,” The China Business Review, January-February 1997, p. 17. “The Product Inventory of Chinese Enterprises Reaches 3 Trillion,” China Daily, March 25, 1998. 312 social instability or even turmoil.46 Delaying or slowing the current reforms might mitigate some of the adverse social and political consequences of reform, but such a delay would probably force China to give up the opportunity to create a more efficient system of resource allocation and utilization, which is necessary for sustainable rapid economic growth. As a matter of fact, the Chinese leadership may have few alternatives but to push its current reform agenda aggressively and herein lies the answer to why it pushed ahead with WTO entry under stringent conditions in 1999-2001. For example, delayed reforms and misdirected state investments are responsible for massive excess capacity in many sectors of the economy, which largely contributes to the deflationary pressures in 1997-2000, low returns on capital, and serious weaknesses in the financial system. As NPLs accounted for at least 25 percent of total bank loans, increasing SOE demand to borrow money may soon bring down the whole banking system. In addition, budgetary support for SOEs has drained very limited state revenues. Furthermore, a growing number of firms have discontinued or delayed making contributions to local pension pools in the 1990s. Beijing needs to transfer pension, health, and education obligations from state enterprises to government bodies before the crisis bursts.47 46 47 Central Intelligence Agency, China’s Economy in 1995-97, APLA 97-10008, December 1997, p. 6. Charng Kao, “Unemployment and Underemployment in Urban Areas of Mainland China,” Yuanjing Jikan [Prospect Quarterly] (Taipei), vol. 1, no. 4 (October 2000), p. 75. Pieter Bottelier, “China’s Economic Transition and the Significance of WTO membership,” The First Huang Lian Memorial Lecture, Center for Research on Economic Development and Policy Reform, Stanford University, November 17, 1999, pp. 3-4. Nicholas R. Lardy, “Sources of Macro Economic Instability in China,” in David Shambaugh (ed.), Is China Unstable? Assessing the Factors (Washington D.C.: George Washington University, 1998), p. 56. Chu-yuan Cheng, “China’s Economy: Recent Development and Long-Term Prospects,” Issues & Studies, vol. 36, no. 5 (September/October 2000), p. 134. Nicholas R. Lardy, “When Will China’s Financial System Meet China’s Needs?,” presented at the Conference on Policy Reform in China, Center for Research on Economic Development and Policy Reform, Stanford University, November 18-20, 1999, pp. 19-20. 313 Beijing has recognized the seriousness of its SOE problems. President Jiang Zemin repeatedly emphasized that there must be a “heightened sense of urgency.” The CCP adopted a “decision” at the 4th Plenum of the 15th CCP Central Committee on September 22, 1999, stating, “The transformation of the SOEs’ system and their structural readjustments have reached a crucial stage, with some deep-rooted contradictions and all the problems having emerged…. It is imperative to take practical and effective measures to solve these problems, which has a vital bearing not only on the success or failure of SOE reforms, but also on the success or failure of the overall economic restructuring.”48 The task ahead is arduous and immense for Beijing. The Chinese government targeted 2,000 to 3,000 enterprises for bankruptcy, merger, or acquisition in 1998 – a year when 49 percent of large and medium-size state enterprises suffered losses. In early 1999, Vice Minister Chen Qingtai pointed out that in the next three years 4,000 large and medium-sized enterprises operating in deficit would either be bankrupt or be merged with others, and 8 to 10 million employees would be laid off. In addition, the SOE and pertinent reforms need enormous funds, but the Chinese government does not have the sufficient cash. Vice Minister Chen estimated that the direct cost for reforming SOEs in next three years will range from RMB 600 billion to 800 billion (more than twice the 1998 total central government expenditures).49 48 49 Lo Mei, “Jiang Reported to Steer State Firm Reform” (in Chinese) Hong Kong Kuang Chiao Ching, no. 322, July 16, 1999, in FBIS-CHI-1999-0805. "The Decision of the Central Committee of the Chinese Communist Party on Major Issues Concerning the Reform and Development of State-Owned Enterprises" (in Chinese), Renmin Ribao [People’s Daily] (Overseas edition), September 27, 1999, p. 1. World Bank, China: Weathering the Storm and Learning the Lessons (Washington, D.C.: World Bank, 1999), p. 30. “Reform of State-Owned Enterprises Needs 800 Billion Yuan in Next 3 Years” (in Chinese), Hong Kong Ming Pao, November 11, 1998, p. b15, in FBIS-CHI-98-317. 314 III. Financial Reforms The Inefficiency and Non-Performing Loans of State-owned Banks As of 1996, China’s four state-owned commercial banks (SOCBs) together accounted for more than 90 percent of bank assets and two-thirds of financial assets. At the end of 2000, four SOCBs still accounted for over 70 percent of total banking system assets. Nevertheless, these four banks are very inefficient. The rate of return on assets of China’s four SOCBs fell from 1.4 percent in 1985 to only 0.2 percent in 1997. In addition, there is a mountain of non-performing loans [buliang daikuan, NPLs], including past due loans, doubtful loans, and bad debt, for these four state banks. According to Dai Xianglong, governor of the People’s Bank of China, NPLs as a share of their total loans increased from 20 percent at year-end 1994 to 22 percent at year-end 1995, and then to 25 percent at year-end 1997. The 2000 estimate by the research department of China’s central bank put the aggregate NPL problem at about RMB 2,236 billion ($270 billion) or close to 30 percent of GDP. In March 2001, Dai Xianglong admitted that, without transferring NPLs to the AMCs, China’s NPLs were as high as 35 percent of state banks’ total loans, or about RMB 3,549 billion (about 40 percent of its GDP) in 2000. 50 And, there are questions about how lax China’s definition of NPLs is in the first place. 50 Nicholas R. Lardy, “When Will China’s Financial System Meet China’s Needs?,” presented at the Conference on Policy Reform in China, Center for Research on Economic Development and Policy Reform, Stanford University, November 18-20, 1999, p. 6. Nicholas R. Lardy, “The Challenge of Bank Restructuring in China,” in Bank of International Settlements (ed.), Strengthening the Banking System in China: Issues and Experience (Basel, Switzerland: Bank of International Settlements, 1999), p. 26. Shalendra D. Sharma, “Weathering the Asian Financial Crisis: China’s Economic Strengths, Weaknesses, and Survivability,” Issues & Studies, vol. 36, no. 6 (November/December 2000), p. 100. Pieter Bottelier, “The Impact of WTO-Membership on China’s Domestic Economy,” speech at Johns Hopkins University School of Advanced International Studies, China Forum, November 14, 2000, pp. 6-7. Zhang-rong Kang, “Dai Xianglong: Commercial Banks’ NPLs Account for 25%,” Gongshang Shibao [Commerce Times], 315 In May 2001, president of Bank of China, which is the most prestigious and third largest of the SOCBs, said in public that the bank’s NPLs amounted to 28.8 percent of assets, after 20 percent of the bank’s loan portfolio had been transferred to the Dongfang asset management company. 51 According to Pieter Bottelier, the aggregate stock of remaining NPLs in four SOCBs plus those transferred to the AMCs may range from RMB 4,000 to 4,500 billion (45-50 percent of GDP) at the end of 2000.52 Moreover, non-bank financial institutions as a group, which includes not only trust and investment companies but also credit cooperatives, finance companies, and leasing companies, as early as 1996 had non-performing assets equal to 50 percent of their total assets. Over the first half of 1999 the reported capital of rural credit cooperatives plunged from RMB 34,370 million to a negative RMB 7,480 million. The risks that this insolvency poses are substantial since rural citizens have more than RMB one trillion deposited in savings accounts in these institutions.53 Equally alarming is that, according to Ma Jun, by the end of 1997, about 90 percent of the trust and investment corporations in China were effectively insolvent.54 China’s four SOCBs as a group have also a negative net worth and thus are insolvent by Western accounting standards. For example, the total net worth of these banks at year-end 1995, including paid-in capital, surpluses, and retained profits, stood at only RMB 269 billion, while the 1995 state bank NPLs was about RMB 867 billion (22 51 52 53 March 27, 2001. James Kynge, “Governor Liu Increases Pressure to Clean Out the Stables,” Financial Times, May 16, 2001, p. 30. Bottelier, Pieter, “China’s Domestic Debts: Will They Interfere with Financial Sector Liberalization and WTO Commitments? Issues and Strategies,” Discussion paper for Wilton Park Conference #654 on Economic and Enterprise Reform in China: the Challenges for Government and Business, November 5-8, 2001, pp. 5-6. Nicholas R. Lardy, “When Will China’s Financial System Meet China’s Needs?,” presented at the Conference on Policy Reform in China, Center for Research on Economic Development and Policy Reform, Stanford University, November 18-20, 1999, pp. 7-8. 316 percent of total loans). In addition, state bank capital adequacy fell rapidly from 8.8 percent of assets in 1989 to only 4.0 percent of assets in 1996, far less than the 8 percent Basle standard Chinese central bank adopted in 1994 and subsequently incorporated into the Chinese Commercial Bank Law. Even after a RMB 270 billion capital injection in 1998, the adequacy ratios of the four SOCBs were between 1.4 and 4.6 percent [with the exception of the 8.5 percent of the Bank of China] in September 2000.55 Beijing’s Task and Difficulties In the lesson of the 1980s and 1990s, a large number of countries experienced systemic bank problems when NPLs, net of provision, reach 15 percent of total loans. For example, the share of NPLs in banking lending portfolios was 15 percent in Thailand and 16 percent in Korea just before the onset of the Asian financial crises in 1997. China’s state bank NPLs appear to have reached at least 25 percent between 1997 and 2001. By conventional standards for measuring financial sector robustness, China is past the point at which a systemic banking crisis might be expected.56 Although technically insolvent, China’s SOCBs remain liquid because of their enormous and still rapidly growing private deposit base, reflecting China’s extraordinarily 54 55 56 Jun Ma, The Chinese Economy in the 1990s (New York: St. Martin’s Press, 2000), pp. 64-65. Nicholas R. Lardy, China’s Unfinished Economic Revolution (Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press, 1998), p. 119. Nicholas R. Lardy, “When Will China’s Financial System Meet China’s Needs?,” presented at the Conference on Policy Reform in China, Center for Research on Economic Development and Policy Reform, Stanford University, November 18-20, 1999, pp. 6-7. Haocheng Gong and Guoqing Dai (eds.), 2000 Zhongguo Jinrong Fazhan Baogao [2000 China’s Financial Development Report] (Shanghai: Shanghai Caijin Daxue Chubanshe, 2000), p. 87. Meifang Deng, “PRC Academic on Development, Problems of China’s Banking Industry” (in Chinese), Beijing Zhongguo Xinwen She, October 30, 2001, in FBIS-CHI-2001-1030. Nicholas R. Lardy, “Sources of Macro Economic Instability in China,” in David Shambaugh (ed.), Is China Unstable? Assessing the Factors (Washington D.C.: George Washington University, 1998), p. 55. Helmut Reisen, “Domestic Causes of Currency Crises: Policy Lessons for Crisis Avoidance,” OECD Development Centre, Technical Papers, no. 136, June 1998, p. 23. 317 high savings rate. A financial crisis has been avoided only because households continue to add enormous amounts of funds to their savings accounts in the banks. However, they are essentially participants in a shell game that will last only as long as people believe that they can access their money, that they have no real investment alternatives, and that they are not confronted with galloping inflation. In the long run, this situation is not sustainable. China faces enormous risks delaying the state bank reforms. First, China’s capital account leaks and the leaks will almost inevitably become larger. This places enormous dynamic pressure on China’s financial reforms. 57 Second, any growth slowdown is likely to expose the underlying weakness of the domestic financial system. Slower growth would cut into the operation profits of many SOEs, and thus undermine further the financial position of China’s major banks. Third, the proportion of household deposits in banks’ total liabilities increased sharply from 8 percent in 1978 to almost 50 percent in 1996, and increased to 70 percent by 1999. As the share of household deposits in total liabilities increased, any small change in households’ saving behavior might lead to a major change in banks’ liabilities that could not be easily controlled by the government. A large part of these savings are invested by the banks in SOE loans that are non-recoverable, but the government’s implicit deposit guarantee protects confidence and system stability. Therefore, a banking crisis in China is most likely to be precipitated when domestic savers lose confidence in the government’s implicit guarantee of the value of their deposits in banks.58 57 58 Pieter Bottelier, “China: Dynamics of Economic Reform and Institutional Development,” mimeo, April 1999, pp. 10-11. Nicholas R. Lardy, “When Will China’s Financial System Meet China’s Needs?,” presented at the Conference on Policy Reform in China, Center for Research on Economic Development and Policy Reform, Stanford University, November 18-20, 1999, pp. 2-3. Jun Ma, The Chinese Economy in the 1990s (New York: St. Martin’s Press, 2000), p. 66. 318 This loss of confidence could be triggered by a growth slowdown that weakens the domestic banking system, by the prospect of a major devaluation in response to a large emerging current account deficit and a sharp fall in inward foreign direct investment, or by any other economic, social, and political crisis. For example, China’s leaders have failed to cut interest rates fast enough (real rates were about 10 percent in 1998) to boost domestic demand, perhaps because they fear that domestic savers will panic and seek hard-currency havens, despite an officially closed capital account. If households in large numbers attempted to withdraw their savings, the insolvency problem of China’s largest banks could become a liquidity problem. Even in the absence of significant withdrawals of savings deposits, the abrupt decline in inflows of funds would threaten to curtail the ability of banks to continue to expand their lending to SOEs in a relatively non-inflationary manner.59 Fourth, small city-based commercial banks, and rural and urban credit cooperatives, have found it increasingly difficult to collect and retain deposits. In addition, while liquidity at large Chinese banks could remain strong over the medium term, over time, as China’s capital markets develop, more savings will inevitably be attracted away from banks into stocks, bonds, and other investments. This structural shift, though likely a gradual process, poses a long-term threat to the funding stability of China’s banks.60 With these risks, delay in banking reforms would make problems worse. According to the Japanese banking saga, delay in banking reform will only allow NPLs to grow and erode bank capital. 61 According to the Chinese State Statistical Bureau, Chinese 59 60 61 Nicholas R. Lardy, China’s Unfinished Economic Revolution (Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press, 1998), pp. 106-107, 200-202. “Red Alert,” The Economist, October 24, 1998, p. 23. Moody’s Investors Service Global Credit Research, “China: Banking System Outlook,” August 2000, p. 8. Y.K. Mo, “A Review of Recent Banking Reforms in China,” in Bank of International Settlements (ed.), Strengthening the Banking System in China: Issues and Experience (Basel, Switzerland: Bank of 319 economic and financial risk was barely within the security range and the composite index of financial risk has tended to increase annually. The financial index system includes five aspects ranking from high to low in order: bank internal stability, T-bond risk, macro-economic steadiness, bubble hazard risk, and foreign capital impact risk. The financial risk index in 1999 was 47.6, 11.8 higher than that of 1991, almost approaching the ceiling of the security range (50).62 The World Bank warned in 1997 that China faced a significant risk of major bank insolvency and a banking crisis.63 Pieter Bottelier warns that a financial time bomb is ticking, and it has to be defused as quickly as possible. In particular, Beijing has a very short time to address the banking reforms because the time available for it to meet conditions under its WTO commitments is extremely short.64 A banking crisis in China would be a disaster. Nicholas Lardy warns that a bank-run “would likely lead to a collapse of credit and thus a major recession, something not experienced in China for almost four decades.”65 A banking crisis in China will most likely result in an inflationary spiral and thus massive popular discontent. Pei Minxin warns that the impact of a full-blown banking crisis on political instability is far more lethal than high unemployment because a banking crisis would hurt virtually everyone while unemployment principally affects only one segment of society, namely, manufacturing workers. A broad anti-regime coalition is therefore more likely to emerge 62 63 64 65 International Settlements, 1999), p. 101-103. Yihua Shi, “PRC Statistics Bureau Data Show Financial Risk Surging Year by Year,” Beijing Renmin Ribao (Internet Version), November 15, 2000, in FBIS-CHI-2000-1115. World Bank, China 2020: Development Challenges in the New Century (Washington, D.C.: World Bank, 1997), pp. 30-31. Pieter Bottelier “China’s Economy at the Turn of the Century: The Significance of WTO Membership for Continuing Reform,” CSIS China Economic Outlook, January 2000, http://www.csis.org/asia/chinaecon/ceo0100.html, accessed February 2, 2001, p. 6 of 7. Nicholas R. Lardy, “China’s Economic Growth in an International Context,” Pacific Review, vol. 12, no. 2 (1999), p. 163. 320 following a banking crisis than high unemployment.66 The government was fully aware of this problem. In early 1998, it announced the plan to recapitalize SOCBs through issuing RMB 270 billion ($32.6 billion) in treasury bills, to improve commercial banks’ independence, and to strengthen bank supervision. The recapitalization plan raised the capital of the SOCBs to RMB 478 billion from RMB 208 billion. In addition, the central government has also committed substantially more funds to finance the write-off of enterprise bad debts. This program began in 1996 with an allocation of RMB 20 billion to write off bad debts to banks of enterprises that were being restructured. The funds earmarked for this purpose were RMB 30 billion in 1997 and RMB 40 billion in 1998.67 However, the RMB 270 billion capital injection in 1998 and the RMB 90 billion funds for the SOEs in 1996-1998 were not likely sufficient to recapitalize the banks and solve the NPL problem. Recapitalization of the financial system, according to Nicholas Lardy, would have required an injection equal to about $260 billion, or RMB 2,158 billion (27 percent of China’s GDP), in 1998. The 2000 estimate by the research department of China’s central bank puts the financial cost of restructuring the state banks at RMB 2,260 billion ($273 billion), or close to 30 percent of GDP. Note that in 1998 the expenditures of Chinese central government were only RMB 313 billion. The recapitalization needs pose a staggering threat to China’s fiscal sustainability. Lardy argues that any serious attempt to recapitalize the financial system will immediately push government debt to a level over 50 percent of GDP. Ultimate costs could be higher, particularly because the flow of new bad loans to the SOEs by state banks does not appear 66 67 Minxin Pei, “Is China Unstable,” Foreign Policy Research Institute Wire, July 1999, http://taiwansecurity.org/IS/Pei-990707.htm, accessed November 9, 2000. Nicholas R. Lardy, China’s Unfinished Economic Revolution (Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution 321 to have been halted.68 To prepare the four SOCBs for WTO, China has begun to transfer massive amounts of NPLs from the banks to state-owned AMCs. The AMCs will initially issue bonds to finance their purchase of loans, but these loans are implicitly guaranteed by the Ministry of Finance and will inevitably end up being paid off by the government. 69 This means that the state itself is assuming responsibility for all or part of the NPL portfolio of the state banks. In 1999 and 2000, RMB 1.4 trillion ($169 billion or about 16 percent of GDP) worth of nominal value NPLs was transferred to the AMCs. Renmin Ribao reported that the proportion of non-performing assets dropped by nearly 10 percent. Nonetheless, in March 2001, Governor Dai Xianglong admitted that the NPLs still account for 25 percent of SOCB loans after the AMCs absorbed RMB 1.4 trillion of SOCBs’ NPLs as of the end of 2000.70 Many senior Chinese officials and other analysts admit that the ambitious scheme is fraught with difficulties. The AMCs face shortages of experienced and qualified 68 69 70 Press, 1998), p. 207. Nicholas R. Lardy, “The Challenge of Bank Restructuring in China,” in Bank of International Settlements (ed.), Strengthening the Banking System in China: Issues and Experience (Basel, Switzerland: Bank of International Settlements, 1999), p. 34. Pieter Bottelier, “China’s Economic Reforms and American Interests,” Charles Neuhauser Lecture, Fairbank Center for East Asian Research, November 30, 2000, p. 10. Y.K. Mo, “A Review of Recent Banking Reforms in China,” in Bank of International Settlements (ed.), Strengthening the Banking System in China: Issues and Experience (Basel, Switzerland: Bank of International Settlements, 1999), pp. 93-101. Nicholas R. Lardy, “When Will China’s Financial System Meet China’s Needs?,” presented at the Conference on Policy Reform in China, Center for Research on Economic Development and Policy Reform, Stanford University, November 18-20, 1999, pp. 20-37. Chinese Minstry of Finance has accepted responsibility for ultimate AMC losses, but legally this does not amount to the same thing a formal guarantee for AMC bonds. Zhenjun Han and Honghe Zhang, “Major Progress Scored Five Areas of Reform in State-Owned Enterprises” (in Chinese), Beijing Xinhua Domestic Service, March 6, 2001, in FBIS-CHI-2001-0306. Pieter Bottelier, “The Impact of WTO-Membership on China’s Domestic Economy,” speech at Johns Hopkins University School of Advanced International Studies, China Forum, November 14, 2000, pp. 6-7. Tian Li, “PRC’s Dai Xianlong Discusses Current Financial Issues” (in Chinese), Beijing Renmin Ribao (Overseas Edition), January 23, 2001, in FBIS-CHI-2001-0123. Zhang-rong Kang, “Dai Xianglong: Commercial Banks’ NPLs Account for 25%,” Gongshang Shibao [Commerce Times], March 27, 2001. 322 personnel. There is no adequate operating and legal framework for the AMCs. Unrecoverable loans are enormous while domestic and international investor interest in the NPLs is probably limited even at substantial discounts. Finally, the AMCs are not independent and need to obtain senior government approvals for many transactions.71 Furthermore, the required financial sector reforms are closely interlinked with many other reforms so that a sequential or partial approach will not be effective. In essence, declining tax revenues relative to the size of the economy until 1995 led the government to force excessive social obligations on SOEs. These pressures as well as increasing competition contribute to the declining financial performance of SOEs, which need to borrow heavily from the SOCBs. In the 1990s, the loans of SOCBs to SOEs accounted for about 81 percent of the total loans of SOCBs. This, in turn, is a major contributor to the insolvency of large parts of the banking system. These three problems are closely interrelated. For example, bank reform slowed in 1998-99 as the difficulties of embarking on SOE reform in the midst of the AFC became apparent. In both 1998 and 1999, Beijing advised the SOCBs to increase their financial support of ailing SOEs. As a result, the ratio of the outstanding loans relative to gross domestic output rose from 86 percent at year-end 1995 to 109 percent at year-end 1998. Much of this rapid growth of lending appears to have been used to pay for SOE inputs, workers’ wages, pensions of retirees, and so forth.72 71 72 World Bank, “China,” China Quarterly, March 20, 2000, p. 5. Nicholas R. Lardy, “When Will China’s Financial System Meet China’s Needs?,” presented at the Conference on Policy Reform in China, Center for Research on Economic Development and Policy Reform, Stanford University, November 18-20, 1999, pp. 30-32. 323 IV. Unemployment and Migration Population In 1990, after the sharp slowdown in the economic growth rate in 1989-1990, official unemployment in China was only 3.8 million people, or 2.5 percent of the urban workforce, according to official statistics, which understate the actual situation. The official unemployment rate rose gradually in the 1990s. Between 1995 and 1998, there were about 5.2-5.7 million people registered as unemployed, with the urban unemployment rate running at 2.9-3.1 percent. Nevertheless, the real urban unemployment rates were much higher. According to Chinese official surveys, the urban unemployed population stood at 7.9 million and the unemployment rate was 4.3 percent in 1995; 8.2 million and 4.6 percent in 1996; 9.8 million and 4.9 percent in 1997; and 11.5 million and 6.2 percent in 1998, respectively.73 Even these surveys understate the situation, and do not include the “rural” or “floating” population. Chinese official figures are seriously flawed because they do not take into account laid-off employees and migration from rural areas. Beginning in 1994, SOE workers began to be laid off in massive numbers. The World Bank estimates that, of the 140 million workers remaining in the state-owned sector, as many as 49 million workers (35 percent) could be fired. According to a 1999 United Nations report, at that time there were still an estimated 28 million surplus state sector workers (including disguised unemployed and laid off workers). However, Chinese authorities avoided recording a significant increase in registered unemployment by creating a new category of laid-off 73 Angang Hu, “The Largest Challenges in the Eve of New Century: China Enters a High Unemployment Stage,” in Angang Hu (ed.), Zhongguo Zoxiang [Prospects of China] (Hangzhou, Zhejiang: Zhejiang Renmin Chubanshe, 2000), pp. 53-54. 324 (xiagang) workers, who retained ties to their former work units.74 According to Chinese official estimates and statistics, Chinese laid-off workers were around 3 million in 1993, 5.6 million in 1995, 8.9 million in 1996, 14.4 million in 1997, and 17.3 million in 1998, which was about six times that in 1993. Zhang Zuoji, minister of Labor and Social Security, said that there were 11.7 million SOE laid-off workers in 1999 and as many as 12 million SOE workers could lose their jobs in 2000. Since two-thirds of laid-off workers were from the SOEs and one-third from township, village, and other enterprises, total laid-off workers in 1999 and 2000 could have been as many as 18 million.75 It is very difficult for these laid-off workers to find regular employment. According to Chinese official statistics, the re-employment ratio, the percentage of re-employed laid-off workers within one year to total laid-off workers, was only 37 percent in 1997, 50 percent in 1998, and 42 percent in 1999. For example, Minister Zhang Zuoji said that there were 11.7 million laid-off workers in 1999, of which 4.9 million people were re-employed and 6.5 million were still unemployed.76 Based on the re-employment rate of 40-60 percent, Kao Charng estimates that the 74 75 76 United Nations Development Programme (China), The China Human Development Report (New York: Oxford University Press, 1999), p. 63. John Pomfret, “Miners’ Riot A Symbol of China’s New Discontent,” Washington Post, April 5, 2000, p. A1. Angang Hu, “The Largest Challenges in the Eve of New Century: China Enters a High Unemployment Stage,” In Angang Hu (ed.), Zhongguo Zoxiang [Prospects of China] (Hangzhou, Zhejiang: Zhejiang Renmin Chubanshe, 2000), pp. 56-59. Zhixia Chen and Yi Zhang, “SOE Reforms Attain Important Progress, Laid-Off Workers Receive Effective Protection,” Renmin Ribao [People’s Daily] (Overseas edition), March 8, 2000, p. 3. World Bank, “China,” China Quarterly, September 18, 2000, p.13. Thung-hai Hsu and Le-sheng Xia, “Dalu Zhigong Xiagang Suo Yinfa Wenti Ji Jiejue Duice zhi Pingxi [Analysis on the Issues and Resolution of Mainland Laid-off Employees],” Gongdang Wenti Yanjiu, vol. 27, no. 4 (April 2001), p. 49. Angang Hu, “The Largest Challenges in the Eve of New Century: China Enters a High Unemployment Stage,” In Angang Hu (ed.), Zhongguo Zoxiang [Prospects of China] (Hangzhou, Zhejiang: Zhejiang Renmin Chubanshe, 2000), p. 61. “Bureau Reports on Efforts to Deal with Unemployment,” Beijing Xinhua, March 1, 1999, in FBIS-CHI-1999-0301. Zhixia Chen and Yi Zhang, “SOE Reforms Attain Important Progress, Laid-Off Workers Receive Effective Protection,” Renmin Ribao [People’s Daily] (overseas edition), March 8, 2000, p. 3. “China to Help Most State Enterprises This Year,” Beijing 325 urban unemployment rates were between 3.3 and 3.7 percent in 1993 and between 6.9 and 8.8 percent in 1998. Estimated urban unemployed persons were between 5.4 and 6 million in 1993 and between 12.7 and 16.1 million in 1998. (See Table 9.6.) Table 9.6. Estimate on China’s Urban Unemployment, 1993-98 Unit: Thousand Period Urban registered unemployed persons Laid-off workers Real unemployed persons A 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 4,201 4,764 5,200 5,530 5,700 5,710 3,000 3,600 8,640 8,916 14,352 17,343 B 5,401 6,204 7,456 9,090 11,440 12,650 6,001 6,924 8,584 10,880 14,310 16,120 Real unemployment rate (%) A B 3.3 3.7 3.6 4.1 4.0 4.7 4.9 5.9 6.3 7.8 6.9 8.8 Note: A: Estimation based on 60 percent of the laid-off workers who were re-employed. B: Estimation based on 40 percent of the laid-off workers who were re-employed. Source: Charng Kao, “Unemployment and Underemployment in Urban Areas of Mainland China,” Yuanjing Jikan [Prospect Quarterly] (Taipei), vol. 1, no. 4 (October 2000), p. 73. These estimates were not far from Chinese official figures. According to China’s Labor Statistics Yearbook, while the registered unemployment rate in the urban areas remained at around 3.1 percent, the rate of unemployed plus laid-off workers increased from 5.6 percent in 1996 to 6.5 percent in 1997 and 7.9 percent in 1998. Moreover, in five large cities (Beijing, Chongqing, Guangzhou, Shanghai, and Shenyang) surveyed in 1997, the unemployed and the laid-off together accounted for 13 percent of the labor force. Xinhua, March 7, 2000, in FBIS-CHI-2000-0307. 326 Overall, China’s unemployment rate at least doubled between 1993 and 1998.77 In addition to registered unemployed persons and unemployed laid-off workers, there are a large number of temporary and illegal rural migrants, known as the “floating population” in Chinese cities. Several surveys on population mobility in China in the 1990s found that the total informal migrant population ranged anywhere from 80 to 120 million people. Registration statistics of the Chinese public security department put the size of the floating population at 31 million in 1990 and 84 million in 1995. According to the estimate by the World Bank in 2000, the floating population amounted to nearly 100 million nationwide.78 The situation of surplus labor force in the rural areas was also very serious in the 1990s. According to the United Nations and World Bank, there were an estimated 120-140 million surplus workers in agriculture in the late 1990s – roughly 35 to 40 percent of the agricultural workforce. According to Chinese economist Zhou Tianyong, between 1997 and 2000, the surplus agricultural labor force were between 203 and 242 million persons. According to Renmin Ribao, in 2001 the surplus agricultural labor force exceeded 150 million persons. Given the current basically non-existent social security system in the rural areas, this huge unemployment could lead to serious social instability or even turmoil.79 77 78 79 World Bank, “China,” China Quarterly, March 20, 2000, p. 12. World Bank, “China,” China Quarterly, September 18, 2000, p.12. World Bank, China 2020: Development Challenges in the New Century (Washington, D.C.: World Bank, 1997), p. 47. Pieter Bottelier, “How Stable Is China? An Economic Perspective,” in David Shambaugh (ed.), Is China Stable?: Assessing the Factors (Washington, D.C.: George Washington University, 1998), pp. 65-66. United Nations Development Programme (China), The China Human Development Report (New York: Oxford University Press, 1999), p. 66. World Bank, “China,” China Quarterly, September 18, 2000, p.13. Dorothy J. Solinger, Contesting Citizenship in Urban China: Peasant Migrants, the State, and the Logic of the Market (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1999), pp. 15-23. United Nations Development Programme (China), The China Human Development Report (New York: Oxford University Press, 1999), p. 63. World Bank, China 2020: Development Challenges in the New Century (Washington, D.C.: World Bank, 1997), p. 45. Tianliang Bai, “Urban, Rural Areas Face Considerable Pressure in Employment This Year” (in Chinese), Renmin Ribao (Internet Version), 327 China’s entry to the WTO will significantly exacerbate the problem of unemployment in China, or would at least incur immense economic and social costs of transitional unemployment and re-employment. In early 1999, official China Daily reported that, in 1999,16 million city dwellers (11 percent of the urban work force) would not be able to find work and another 120 million in the countryside would be out of work. According to a 1999 estimate of the Institute of International Economics, liberalized trade in the most protected industrial and agricultural products would add more than 11 million unemployed persons in China. According to Chinese official estimates, demand for labor may decline by 25 percent in traditional industries. According to Renmin Ribao, net unemployed persons would have increased by 1.5 million if China joined the WTO in the end of 1999 while surplus labor force in the agricultural sector would have increased by 9.7 million.80 The reemployment challenge continued to worsen in the early 2000s. According to Renmin Ribao, total labor supply in the urban areas in 2001 would be at least 33.5 million. In addition, the surplus agricultural labor force has already exceeded 150 million. The scale of surplus labor entering the cities from rural areas and moving to other regions will increase because of the difficulty in increasing income and other conditions in rural areas.81 Minister Zhang Zuoji said that China’s total labor supply is estimated at 52 80 81 February 16, 2001, in FBIS-CHI-2001-0216. Tianyong Zhou, “China’s Social Stability and the Sustainability of National Economic Growth” (in Chinese), in Xiaolu Wang and Gang Fan (eds.), Zhongguo Jingji Zengzhang de Kechixuxing [Sustainability of China’s Economic Growth] (Beijing: Economic Science Press, 2000), pp. 415-417. “China – Action Required to Tackle Rising Unemployment,” China Daily, January 18, 1999. Nicholas R. Lardy, “Clinton Spurned a Great WTO Deal With China”, Wall Street Journal, April 20, 1999, p. A22. STRATFOR.COM’s Global Intelligence Update, “Beijing’s Balance Act: Economic, Security Concerns,” February 1, 2001, http://www.atimes.com/china/CB01Ad01.html, accessed February 5, 2001, p. 2 of 4. “Estimates on the Change of Domestic Employment Structure After Joining WTO” (in Chinese), Renmin Ribao [People’s Daily] (overseas edition), November 22, 1999, p. 2 Tianliang Bai, “Urban, Rural Areas Face Considerable Pressure in Employment This Year” (in Chinese), Renmin Ribao (Internet Version), February 16, 2001, in FBIS-CHI-2001-0216. 328 million in the 2001-05 period, but China’s industries can at best offer about 40 million jobs, leaving 12 million unemployed persons or a 5 percent unemployment rate in the cities, which is 2 percentage points higher than the official rates of the 1990s.82 However, it was reported in early 2001 that the Chinese economy requires creating 40 million jobs for new urban jobless and 40 million places for redundant people from the agricultural sector in the 2001-05 period.83 The unemployment problem has imposed staggering concerns with respect to social stability for Beijing. Speaking at a national conference on May 14, 1998, President Jiang Zemin urged the Party and governments at all levels to give top priority to the issue of laid-off workers, which he described as “an extremely arduous task.” He further emphasized, “This is not only a major economic issue, but also a political one. It has both realistic urgency and long-term strategic significance.”84 In 1999, Minister Zhang Zuoji said, “The work of creating jobs is a protracted, formidable mission.”85 In 2000, he warned again, “[T]he nation should be on full alert to the situation and improve its social security system.”86 In particular, a large number of laid-off workers were concentrated in some provinces with huge SOEs, including Liaoning, Heilongjiang, Hunan, Jilin, Jiangxi, Hubei, and Shanxi.87 In a speech to party colleagues in Beijing in January 2000, Mayor 82 83 84 85 86 87 “PRC Zhang Zuoji Says Government to Maintain Unemployment Rate Below 5 Percent,” Beijing Xinhua, March 10, 2001, in FBIS-CHI-2001-0310. Paul Eckert, “China to Ensure Growth, Combat Foes in 2001-2005,” Reuters, March 5, 2001, 3:27 AM ET. “Jiang Zemin: Laid-Off Workers Top Priority,” Beijing Xinhua, May 14, 1998, in FBIS-CHI-98-134. Chi Wang and Leiming Wang, “Minister on Laid-Off Workers’ Job Problems” (in Chinese), Beijing Xinhua, August 28, 1999, in FBIS-CHI-1999-0902. “PRC Official: 12 Million to Loss Jobs at State Firms,” Beijing Xinhua, January 10, 2000, in FBIS-CHI-2000-0110. Thung-hai Hsu and Le-sheng Xia, “Dalu Zhigong Xiagang Suo Yinfa Wenti Ji Jiejue Duice zhi Pingxi [Analysis on the Issues and Resolution of Mainland Laid-off Employees],” Gongdang Wenti Yanjiu, vol. 27, no. 4 (April 2001), pp. 49-50. 329 Mu Suixin of Shenyang issued an extraordinary warning that conditions in his city could be spinning out of control. “Our ability to govern is being seriously affected” by rising joblessness, he acknowledged. “All the work units have collapsed…. It’s a dangerous situation.” That same apprehension grips leaders in dozens of other troubled industrial centers.88 The essence of the unemployment problem in China is that there is no adequate social security net for these unemployed persons and laid-off workers. According to Hu Angang, in 1997, around one-third of the total employed population had no unemployment insurance, about 40 percent of the registered unemployed persons and around 50 percent of laid-off workers in the urban areas did not get basic living expense subsidy from the government.89 In 1999, Minister Zhang Zuoji pointed out that only seven provinces have raised enough funds for ensuring laid-off workers’ basic living needs. 90 Coupled with widespread perceptions of corruption or mismanagement, especially at the local level, the defective security net will greatly enhance the chances that labor unrest due to unemployment and laid-off will become politicized and threaten social stability. Furthermore, the floating population has substantially increased crime rates and the potential for social unrest and instability in the urban areas. Masses of the unemployed floating population are likely to be the catalysts if China descends into chaos. A best-selling book in China during the early 1990s, China Through the Third Eye, argues 88 89 90 Clay Chandler, “WTO Membership Imperils China’s Industrial Dinosaurs,” Washington Post, March 30, 2000, p. A1. Angang Hu, “The Largest Challenges in the Eve of New Century: China Enters a High Unemployment Stage,” In Angang Hu (ed.), Zhongguo Zoxiang [Prospects of China] (Hangzhou, Zhejiang: Zhejiang Renmin Chubanshe, 2000), pp. 49-59. Chi Wang and Leiming Wang, “Minister on Laid-Off Workers’ Job Problems” (in Chinese), Beijing Xinhua, August 28, 1999, in FBIS-CHI-1999-0902. 330 that if the government loses control over the flow of the floating population, it will lose its power to rule because migrants will lead the country to chaos. The author asserts that all Chinese dynasties, without exception, were destroyed by migrants [liumin] – those who lost or abandoned farmland.91 In order to solve unemployment, laid-off, and floating population problems, China needs to keep rapid, efficient, and sustainable growth rates and provide a sound social security net for the unemployed, laid-off workers, and the floating population. The former involves SOE and financial reforms while the later involves social security and fiscal reforms. In particular, the fiscal constraint has been the most serious obstacle for establishing a sound social security net as well as implementing SOE and financial reforms. The magnitude of the reemployment challenge is staggering. According to the Business Week, if growth slips below 7 percent, China’s economy will not generate nearly enough jobs to soak up the 6 million Chinese entering the workforce each year, as well as the 12 million persons laid off by restructured state enterprises. 92 Furthermore, the Economist argues that every percentage-point fall in GDP means 5 million more unemployed.93 According to the first white paper on China’s economy, it is estimated that when economic growth reaches 7 percent it will create more than 7 million jobs.94 Nevertheless, according to China’s official statistics, although the growth rate of GDP in 1998 was 7.8 percent, additional new employment nationwide was only 3.6 million 91 92 93 94 Cited from Cheng Li, “200 Million Mouths Too Many: China’s Surplus Rural Labor,” in Orville Schell and David Shambaugh (eds.), The China Reader: The Reform Era (New York: Vintage Books, 1999), pp. 362-364. Joyce Barnathan, Dexter Roberts, Mark L. Clifford, Bruce Einhorn, and Peter Engardio, “Can China Avert Crisis?,” Business Week, March 16, 1998, p. 47. “Red Alert,” The Economist, October 24, 1998, p. 23. “Economic White Paper Reveals China’s Labor Target” (in Chinese), Beijing Zhongguo Xinwen She, May 20, 1999, in FBIS-CHI-1999-0611. 331 workers. Worse yet, is that the labor supply has been increasing significantly in the late 1990s and 2000s because there have been more laid-off workers and rural migrants due to China’s deepening economic reforms.95 In addition to unemployed or laid-off urban workers, if economic growth slowed, China’s cities might find themselves awash with millions of unemployed, lumpen, and angry workers of the floating population with no welfare safety net to rescue them and no place to go. V. Income Inequality and Poverty While China has experienced rapid economic growth in the last two decades, at the same time there has been a serious increase in income inequalities. From 1981 to 1993, the ratio of per capita income of the top 20 percent to that of the bottom 20 percent in urban areas increased from 2.29:1 to 2.87:1, and the absolute difference between these two groups increased from RMB 432 to RMB 2,526. According to a 2000 Chinese official investigation, the Gini coefficient96 in the urban area is 0.458, which is already higher than the internationally acknowledged warning line of 0.4. On the national level, assuming no difference between the rural and urban cost of living, the national income distribution worsened, with the Gini index rising from 0.35 in 1990 to 0.42 in 1999. Chinese officials recognize that this situation could produce a sense of acute social injustice and eventually social instability and even turmoil.97 95 96 97 Angang Hu, “The Largest Challenges in the Eve of New Century: China Enters a High Unemployment Stage,” In Angang Hu (ed.), Zhongguo Zoxiang [Prospects of China] (Hangzhou, Zhejiang: Zhejiang Renmin Chubanshe, 2000), pp. 49-52. The Gini coefficient is a single measure of relative inequality and the most frequently encountered in studies of income distribution. The Gini coefficient ranges from 0 to 1 – the larger the coefficient, the greater the inequality. Thus 0 represents perfect equality, and 1 represents perfect inequality. Jun Ma, The Chinese Economy in the 1990s (New York: St. Martin’s Press, 2000), p. 11. Yaming Liu, Yan Huang, and Xiaohong Yang, “China Must Make Efforts to Prevent ‘Polarization’ in Income 332 Income inequality coincides with regional disparities in China. In 1991, per capita GDP in Shanghai was RMB 6,114, 4.5 times that of Guizhou’s RMB 1,360. The already large disparities have also tended to worsen, as the coastal provinces have grown at a rate higher than the inland areas. In 1996, per capita GDP in Shanghai was already RMB 22,275, 10.6 times that of Guizhou’s RMB 2,093. In 1999, per capita GDP in Shanghai reached RMB 27,449, 11.2 times that of Guizhou’s RMB 2,458.98 Moreover, although rapid growth has helped lift more than 200 million Chinese out of poverty since 1978, today the task of poverty-lifting in China is still very challenging. Most of the poverty reduction occurred between 1979 and 1984, when agricultural incomes soared following the introduction of the household responsibility system. According to estimates based on China’s poverty line figure, China’s rural poor decreased dramatically in the past twenty years, from 260 million in 1978 to 128 million in 1984. Progress stalled in the mid-1980s, but has picked up since 1992. Chinese poor declined to 42 million in 1998. However, poverty estimates based on a one dollar per day (in purchasing power parity terms) developed by the World Bank indicate substantially greater numbers of absolute poor in China in all years. In 1998, China’s rural poor were 98 Distribution” (in Chinese), Beijing Xinhua Hong Kong Service, March 10, 2001, in FBIS-CHI-2001-0310. Zhenjun Han and Honghe Zhang, “Warning Issued over Two ‘Over 40 percents’” (in Chinese), Beijing Xinhua Service, March 12, 2001, in FBIS-CHI-2001-0312. Shaohua Chen and Yan Wang, “China’s Growth and Poverty Reduction: Recent Trends between 1990 and 1999,” paper presented at a WBI-PIDS Seminar on “Strengthening Poverty Data Collection and Analysis,” held in Manila, Philippines, April 30-May 4, 2001, p. 6-7. Yanfeng Ge, “The Policy Consideration of Mitigate Income Inequality in the Tenth Five-Year Plan” (in Chinese), in Hong Ma and Mengkui Wang (eds.), Zhongguo Fazhan Yanjiu [China Development Studies] (Beijing: Zhongguo Fazhan Chubanshe, 2001), pp. 43-50. Shufeng Song, George S. F. Chu, and Rongqing Cao, “Intercity Regional Disparity in China,” China Economic Review, no. 11 (2000), p. 252. Jun Ma, The Chinese Economy in the 1990s (New York: St. Martin’s Press, 2000), p. 11. The Economist Intelligence Unit, Country Profile 2000: China, November 3, 2000, <hhtp://db.eiu.com/reports.asp?title=Country+Profile+China&Valname=CPACNB&doc_id=677127>, accessed February 5, 2001, p. 2 of 3. 333 still 124 million, or 13.5 percent of rural population.99 In most cases, the poorest people are entire communities living in isolated, upland regions of the interior with few if any natural resources. Moreover, the poor tend to be less educated, less healthy, and have more dependents for each working-age person. As the aggregate number of the poor has dwindled, further reductions have been increasingly difficult to achieve. President Jiang Zemin recognized, “To solve the problem of food and clothing for this portion of the poverty-stricken population is the most difficult poverty-relief task.”100 For example, the Chinese central government spent RMB 24.8 billion (nearly $3 billion) in poverty alleviation in 1999, 30 times more than that in 1980, compared to 18-fold increase of China’s GDP in the same period.101 VI. Social Security Reforms The urgency of social security reforms comes not only from the need to delink social welfare responsibilities from state enterprise management so as to accelerate SOE reform, but a sound social security net is also needed for current unemployed persons, laid-off workers, the floating population, and rural residents in order to avoid large-scale social instability. Furthermore, demographic change in China rapidly worsens the situation. According to the United Nations, the proportion of those 60 years old and above will grow from 7.6 percent of the Chinese population in 1982 to 9.8 percent in 2000, and further to 15.2 percent in 2020. This trend is driving up the cost of health care and Scott Rozelle, Linxiu Zhang, and Jikun Huang, “China’s War on Poverty,” Mimeo, Conference paper, October 1999, pp. 8,18. 100 Zhenying, Jiazheng, and Jie Sun, Liu “Jiang Zemin Addresses Poverty Conference” (in Chinese), Beijing Xinhua Domestic Service, June 9, 1999, in FBIS-CHI-1999-0610. 101 “China State Council Official Declares Elimination of Absolute Poverty,” Beijing Xinhua, November 17, 2000, in FBIS-CHI-2000-1117. 99 334 pensions. In addition, the Chinese labor force growth is slowing. In 1978 there were thirty workers contributing to the pension system for each retiree, but in 1997 there were ten people of working age for every pensioner. By 2020 there will be six, and by 2050 only three. Moreover, an additional 16 years of life for the average worker retiring today and indexing pensions to wages has dramatically increased the pension burden.102 More immediately, China is already facing a pension crisis in its state enterprises. Some enterprises have more pensioners than workers. As the financial performance of enterprises weakened in the 1990s, a growing number of firms discontinued or delayed making contributions to local pension pools. The World Bank estimates that the reserves of the pension system in the mid-1990s were only RMB 30 billion, or only 0.6 percent of GDP and less than a third of the pension payments made to retirees in 1994. By the end of March 1999 total social premium arrears of enterprises, including contributions both for pensions and unemployment insurance funds, were RMB 33 billion. The World Bank characterizes China’s situation as a “pension crisis in the state-owned enterprise sector” and an “urgent and immediate problem.” In addition, in 1998, the 91.6 million persons in the rural labor force, who were wage-employed in town and village enterprises, and 50 to 70 million persons in the urban labor force, who were the floating population, were not provided by a retirement pension and unemployment insurance.103 Despite the urgency of social security reforms, Beijing has insufficient funds to support adequate reforms. The World Bank estimates that implicit pension debt in the 102 United Nations Development Programme (China), The China Human Development Report (New York: Oxford University Press, 1999), p. 65. Nicholas R. Lardy, China’s Unfinished Economic Revolution (Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press, 1998), pp. 44-47. 103 Nicholas R. Lardy, “When Will China’s Financial System Meet China’s Needs?,” presented at the Conference on Policy Reform in China, Center for Research on Economic Development and Policy Reform, Stanford University, November 18-20, 1999, pp. 19-20. Athar Hussain, “Social Welfare in China in the Context of Three Transitions,” unpublished manuscript, p. 21. World Bank, China: Pension System Reform (Washington, D.C.: World Bank, 1996), pp. ix, 2, 15, 26. 335 mid-1990s was equal to about 50 percent of China’s GDP. According to Nicholas Lardy’s estimate, annual social expenditure financed by enterprises that should be shifted to fiscal financing might amount to 3.3 percent of GDP. Beijing in 2000 injected only RMB 87.6 billion, or less than one percent of China’s GDP, into the program of pension and unemployment insurance. Note the 2000 injection was already one-third more than that in 1999, but far from sufficient in order to establish a sound social security system in China.104 VII. Environment Protection and Natural Disaster Deforestation and desertification are two of the most challenging environmental issues for China. From 1981 to 1990, China’s deforestation rate was 0.7 percent of total forest area per year, compared with 0.1 percent in the United States, 0 percent in Australia, and –0.4 percent in Germany. China has witnessed the desertification of some 100,000 square kilometers, or the equivalent of Zhejiang province, since the 1950s. The country’s deserts have been expanding at an annual rate of 2,460 square kilometers between 1985 and 1995, compared with an annual rate of 1,560 square kilometers in 1950s-1960s. The total area of land-turned dessert has surpassed 1.69 million square kilometers, or 17.6 percent of China’s territory. In addition, the total desert area is as much as 2.62 million square kilometers, or 27.3 percent of China’s territory.105 Nicholas R. Lardy, China’s Unfinished Economic Revolution (Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press, 1998), pp. 44-47, 161. “PRC Xiang Huaicheng Says Government to Provide More Funds for Social Security,” Beijing Xinhua, March 10, 2001, in FBIS-CHI-2001-0310. 105 Jun Ma, The Chinese Economy in the 1990s (New York: St. Martin’s Press, 2000), p. 11. “Committee Chairman Qu Geping Says NPC to Enact Anti-Desertation Law,” Beijing Xinhua, February 26, 2001, in FBIS-CHI-2001-0226. “China Faces Challenges of Desertification,” Beijing Xinhua, August 31, 2001, in FBIS-CHI-2001-0831. Ren-jie Wu, “Shachenbao Yiqi yu Dalu Tudi Huangmohua Xiankuang Fenxi [Analysis on The Causes of Sandstorms and the Current Situation of Mainland’s Land Desertification],” 104 336 This dire environmental situation could bring disastrous consequences. For example, China’s northern region was hit by eight sandstorms in the 1960s, thirteen in the 1970s, fourteen in the 1980s, and was up to twenty-three in 1990s. Moreover, China was hit by thirteen sandstorms in the spring of 2000 alone. Many localities suffered from the negative effects of desertification. Chinese statistics show that desertification has been causing an annual direct economic loss of RMB 207 billion ($25 billion) for China by the late-1990s.106 At the present rate, the desert would reach Beijing in 35 years. Chinese Premier Zhu Rongji was so alarmed by what he saw in a village located only 110 kilometers north of Beijing that he told party aides the capital “may eventually have to be moved out of Beijing,” if the desertification process is not halted.107 In addition, air and water pollution is damaging human health and is also very costly to the economy. The World Bank estimates that the annual costs of air and water pollution in China were between RMB 262.1 billion (3.5 percent of GDP) and RMB 576.7 billion (7.7 percent of GDP) by 1997, a number that is expected to almost double by the year 2020. In addition, the World Bank argues that as many as 289,000 deaths a year could be avoided if air pollution alone were reduced to comply with Chinese government standards.108 Despite this serious environmental damage, investment in environmental protection remains very limited because of the fiscal constraint of the Chinese government. China Studies on Chinese Communism, vol. 34, no. 7, p. 51. “Xinhua: China 10th Five-Year Plan Gives Priority to Environmental Protection,” Beijing Xinhua, March 12, 2001, in FBIS-CHI-2001-0312. Ren-jie Wu, “Shachenbao Yiqi yu Dalu Tudi Huangmohua Xiankuang Fenxi [Analysis on The Causes of Sandstorms and the Current Situation of Mainland’s Land Desertification],” Studies on Chinese Communism, vol. 34, no. 7, p. 51. Zhengling Kou, “Desertification, a Grave Threat to China,” Beijing Review, September 21-27, 1998, p. 22. 107 Melinda Liu, “Waiting for Rain,” Newsweek (Atlantic edition), August 21, 2000, p. 44. 108 World Bank, Clear Water, Blue Skies: China’s Environment in the New Century (Washington, D.C.: World Bank, 1997), pp. 23, 37. World Bank, China 2020: Development Challenges in the New Century (Washington, D.C.: World Bank, 1997), p. 71. 106 337 contributed a mere 0.93 percent of its GDP to environmental protection spending for the 1996-2000 period and will raise the expenditure to 1.2 percent for the 2001-05 period. It was estimated by the Chinese government that between 1996 and 2001 China needed to spend an annual RMB 1.5 billion to prevent desertification, while, in reality Beijing only invested an annual RMB 30 million. In addition, about 11.5 percent of Chinese environmental investment was financed by foreign aid in the 1996-2000 period. Foreign countries have contributed around RMB 42 billion to Chinese environmental protection efforts in that period and, in particular, Japanese loans accounted for 30 percent of total foreign aid. In 2001, Japanese loans totaled 197.2 billion yen (RMB 13.1 billion).109 Serious water shortages are another issue of serious concern for Beijing. China is one of 13 nations worldwide which suffers from a water shortage. Based on official figures, the per capita quantity of water is an average of 2,200 cubic meters in China, about one-fourth of the world average, and will further decrease to about 1,760 cubic meters by the year 2030. According to an official Chinese survey, 400 out of 600 major Chinese cities are suffering from acute water shortages. In particular, China’s capital, Beijing, had for just one-eighth of the national average of water and about 3 percent of the world average. Therefore, NPC Chairman Li Peng warned, “[T]he task to ensure water supply will be very arduous.”110 Moreover, water distribution among regions in China is very unbalanced. In the “Xinhua: China 10th Five-Year Plan Gives Priority to Environmental Protection,” Beijing Xinhua, March 12, 2001, in FBIS-CHI-2001-0312. “Sino-Japan Environment Seminar Opens; Says PRC Uses Japanese Loans on Protection,” Beijing Xinhua, March 9, 2001, in FBIS-CHI-2001-0309. “China, Japan Sign Documents for Yen Loans,” Beijing Xinhua, March 30, 2001, in FBIS-CHI-2001-0330. Zhengling Kou, “Desertification, a Grave Threat to China,” Beijing Review, September 21-27, 1998, p. 23. 110 “Xinhua: China Moves to End Water Crisis,” Beijing Xinhua, March 7, 2001, in FBIS-CHI-2001-0307. “Beijing Sets Goal for Conserving Water in 2001,” Beijing Xinhua, March 22, 2001, in FBIS-CHI-2001-0322. Libin Wang and Leiming, “Li Peng Speaks at Forum on Water Conservation,” Beijing Xinhua Domestic Service, March 22, 2001, in FBIS-CHI-2001-0322. 109 338 south, 450 million people – a third of the population – live under threat of flood; in the north 300 counties and 479 cities are short of water. In agriculture alone the shortage of water is estimated to be about 30 billion cubic meters (equal to total use in the Philippines and to about 5.4 percent of China’s total annual available water). 111 The shortage will double if China increases irrigated farmland area as planned, not to mention the pressure put on water supply by mounting urban and industrial requirements.112 According to the U.S. National Intelligence Council, economic losses due to drought in the arid northern plain are estimated at more than RMB 132.5 billion ($16 billion) in 2000. According to Xinhua News Agency, by 2001, water shortages were the cause of economic losses amounting to more than RMB 120 billion annually. Water shortages have led to additional problems for Beijing. For instance, in 2000, Beijing was haunted by crop failures, unusual sandstorms, locust plagues and peasant uprisings – all owing to the drought.113 To solve the water shortage, one ambitious scheme aims to pump water from the Yangtze River, over 1,200 kilometers of mountain and desert to China’s dry northern plains. The project, at an estimated cost of RMB 149 billion (about 48 percent of the central government expenditure in 1998), will not be finished until 2010. Moreover, about 40 percent of China’s rivers and lakes are highly polluted, at least 10 percent of them are so polluted that they are no longer potable. If China would like to divert water from the south to the north, water in the south should first be well treated before being diverted to In spite of these dire water problems, China’s agricultural output has shown a very healthy growth rate over the past 21 years and food supply is now more abundant and diversified than perhaps at any time in China’s history. 112 World Bank, China 2020: Development Challenges in the New Century (Washington, D.C.: World Bank, 1997), p. 65. 113 “Xinhua: China Moves to End Water Crisis,” Beijing Xinhua, March 7, 2001, in FBIS-CHI-2001-0307. Melinda Liu, “Waiting for Rain,” Newsweek (Atlantic edition), August 21, 2000, p. 44. 111 339 the north. Therefore, the fiscal burden is quite challenging for the central government. 114 Finally, natural disasters, exacerbated by Chinese environmental destruction and over-development, has also brought serious damage and sizeable costs to the Chinese. According to Hu Angang, annual direct economic loss due to natural disasters between 1990 and 1994 was on average RMB 119 billion, between 3 to 5 percent of GDP. During the 1990s, on average 380 million people, or one third of China’s population, were affected by natural disasters every year. In particular, in the first ten months of 1998, disasters killed 4,610 people in China, caused direct economic losses estimated at RMB 307.2 billion (about $37.1 billion), and affected some 380 million people. As a result, a total of 22 million people were relocated. According to Cheng Chu-yuan, floods reduced 1998 GDP growth by 0.5 percentage points.115 VIII. Corruption Early in the twentieth century, corrupt Manchu rulers, combined with widespread economic distress, motivated Sun Yat-sen and his followers to overthrow the imperial system. Nearly half a century later, popular indignation about runaway inflation and the blatant graft of the Kuomintang (KMT) bureaucrats helped to topple the KMT regime. The CCP leaders are quite aware of these historical lessons. In the wake of the Tiananmen incident, Deng Xiaoping said, “If we don’t punish corruption, especially when it’s in the Pamela Pun, “NPC Deputy Says 40% of PRC Lakes, Rivers Polluted,” Hong Kong iMail, March 10, 2001, in FBIS-CHI-2001-0310. 115 Angang Hu, “Great Challenges Faced in China’s Reforms,” In Angang Hu (ed.), Zhongguo Zoxiang [Prospects of China] (Hangzhou, Zhejiang: Zhejiang Renmin Chubanshe, 2000), pp. 46-47. “Disasters Kill 4,610, Cost $36.4 Billion in 1998,” Beijing Xinhua, October 16, 1998, in FBIS-CHI-98-289. Chu-yuan Cheng, “China’s Economy: Recent Development and Long-Term Prospects,” Issues & Studies, vol. 36, no. 5 (September/October 2000), p. 130. 114 340 Party, we’re really courting disaster.” Qiao Shi, a member of Politburo Standing Committee at the time, also agreed, “The corruption cases…are clearly responsible for the rising tide of popular dissatisfaction.”116 However, the CCP faces a fatal dilemma, which is best summarized by Chen Yun, a former senior Chinese leader: “Not fighting corruption would destroy the country. Fighting it would destroy the party.” The CCP’s anticorruption record has proved Chen’s insightfulness: The party has found it impossible to stamp out corruption without committing suicide.117 According to the Supreme People’s Procuratorate, annual criminal cases involving corruption and bribery have increased rapidly in the last twenty years: there were on average 20 thousand cases annually between 1978 to 1987; 66 thousand cases annually between 1988 and 1994; and 77 thousand cases annually between 1993 and 1997. In the 1992-97 period, a total of 121,500 members were expelled from the CCP, among whom 37,492 were punished for their criminal acts -- averaging 7,500 annually, though this is a very low rate considering the CCP has 60 million members. Between 1993 and 1999, the number of corruption cases that have been investigated increased by 9 percent nationwide each year and the number of officials given disciplinary punishments grew by 12 percent annually. Between 1993 and 2000, Chinese authorities have recovered at least RMB 37.6 billion in direct economic losses through the anti-corruption campaign. These figures illustrate the achievements of Beijing’s anti-corruption efforts, but also show that corruption phenomena such as embezzlement and bribery have become a widespread and severe problem.118 116 Liang Zhang (comp.), Andrew J. Nathan and Perry Link (eds.), The Tiananmen Papers (New York: Public Affairs, 2001), pp. 138, 151. 117 Minxin Pei, “Will China Become Another Indonesia?,” Foreign Policy, Fall 1999, p. 101. 118 Ziming Chen and Wang Juntao, Jiechu Zhongguo Weiji [Defusing China’s Bomb] (Flushing, N.Y.: Mirror Books, 1996), pp. 370-371. “China: Report: China’s Anti-Corruption Drive Successful,” Beijing Xinhua, September 23, 1997, in FBIS-CHI-97-266. “China State Focuses on Corruption Fight,” China 341 Without attaching undue precision to official Chinese figures, the trends are clear. According to the Chinese Auditing Administration, from 1992 to 1997 China suffered a total loss of RMB 214 billion or about 40 percent of its total funds for purchasing grain, of which over RMB 80 billion were misappropriated and over RMB 120 billion reported lost. The money was used instead to speculate on land deals and stocks. 119 In addition, in October 1998, Premier Zhu Rongji stated on national Chinese television, “A large quantity of petroleum has been smuggled into our domestic market, almost crushing our entire petroleum industry. Smuggling is not something that every boss of a private enterprise can take a share of, and those bastards have [sic] all have links with the army as well as public security and national security setups.”120 According to Xinhua News Agency, China loses RMB 80 billion a year in potential tax revenue because of smuggling, and much of those activities are carried out, and protected, by the PLA. According to the Washington Post, smuggling costs Beijing as much as RMB 248 billion ($30 billion) annually. In particular, the Yuan Hua Group graft scandal with more than 100 officials in Xiamen involved was China's biggest smuggling and corruption case since 1949. RMB 80 billion is usually given as the value of the goods smuggled by the Yuan Hua Group since the mid-1990s. According to the South China Morning Post, a Beijing police source puts the total figure at least RMB 150 billion.121 Daily, March 11, 1998. “Han Zhubin on Intensifying Efforts Against Corruption,” Beijing Xinhua, September 24, 1999, in FBIS-CHI-1999-0924. “Major Corruption Cases,” Beijing Review, vol. 43, no. 21, May 22, 2000, p. 14. “Han Zhubin Says: New Progress Has Been Made in China’s Anticorruption Campaign” (in Chinese), Beijing Xinhua Hong Kong Service, March 10, 2001, in FBIS-CHI-2001-0310. 119 “214 Billion Yuan of Grain Funds Lost and Misappropriated” (in Chinese), Hong Kong Sing Tao Jih Pao, October 14, 1998, B14, in FBIS-CHI-98-308. 120 David M. Lampton, Same Bed, Different Dreams: Managing U.S.-China Relations, 1989-2000 (Berkeley: University of California Press, 2001), pp. 281-282. 121 “PLA Withdrawal From Commerce Viewed,” Hsin Pao (Hong Kong), July 27, 1998, in FBIS-CHI-98-208. John Pomfret, “China holds Security Officials,” Washington Post, January 8, 1999, p. A23. Willy Wo-lap Lam, “Xiamen Graft Total Could Top $140 Billion,” South China Morning Post, January 26, 2000, p.1. 342 Official reports, scholarly studies, and anecdotal evidence all suggest that corruption in China has reached unprecedented levels and resulted in the theft and waste of huge amounts of national wealth. The Chinese National Auditing Administration estimates that RMB 124 billion was embezzled in China in 1999, more than 1 percent of the GDP. Based on data released in the official Chinese media, the annual aggregate costs for corruption was 4.8 percent of the Chinese GDP, or RMB 343 billion, by 1999, according to Pei Minxin. Using a broader definition of corruption,122 Hu Angang estimated the annual costs of corruption to be between RMB 995 billion (13.3 percent of GDP) and RMB 1267 billion (16.9 percent of GDP) in 1995-99. If allowed to continue on this kind of trajectory, Pei warned, corruption will sap China’s economic strength, further delegitimize the ruling party, and increase the risks of a Suharto-style collapse in China.123 The CCP knows that corruption is rampant and that something must be done to reverse this course and preserve the party. According to three official social surveys conducted in 2000, the Chinese public unanimously regards preventing and fighting corruption as a top-priority issue.124 According to a survey conducted by the Central Party School in 2000, more than 70 percent of Party and governmental cadres considered corruption to be the most serious social issue facing China. 125 On March 9, 2001, 122 The losses of corruption, defined by Hu Angang, include the losses of tax revenues, state economic investment and fiscal expenditure, illegal economic “black revenues,” and rents in monopolistic industries. 123 Brian Bennett, “In the End, It’s All About Connections,” Time, October 9, 2000, p.28. Minxin Pei, “Future Shock: The WTO and Political Change in China,” Carnegie Endowment for International Peace Policy Brief, vol. 1, no. 3 (February 2001), p. 5. Minxin Pei, “Will China Become Another Indonesia?,” Foreign Policy, Fall 1999, pp. 94-110. Angang Hu, “Corruption: China’s Biggest Social Pollution,” in Angang Hu, Zhongguo: Tiaozhan Fubai [China: Fighting Against Corruption] (Hangzhou, Zhejiang: Zhejiang Renmin Chubanshe, 2001), pp. 34-66 124 Si Liang, “China Intensifies Efforts to Prevent, Fight Corruption at the Source” (in Chinese), Hong Kong Zhongguo Tongxun She, March 12, 2001, in FBIS-CHI-2001-0312. 125 Lianbin Qing and Zhiqiang Xie, in Xin Ru, Xueyi Lu, Tianlun Shan, 2001 Nian: Zhongguo Shehui Xingshi Fengxi yu Yuce [Year 2001: Analysis and Prediction of China’s Social Situation] (Beijing: Social 343 Chinese NPC Chairman Li Peng frankly told NPC delegates, “We face destruction of our party and destruction of our nation if we fail to fight corruption and promote clean government.”126 Beijing intensified the anti-corruption campaign in the late 1990s. For instance, between January and July 1999, nearly 900 cadres ranking at or above the provincial department and bureau-levels were removed from office, expelled from the party, or handed over to judicial organs to be dealt with according to the law. In September 2000, China executed Cheng Kejie, who was formerly a NPC vice chairman and a protégé of Li Peng, for accepting $4.9 million in bribes. Cheng Kejie became the most senior official to be executed since the People's Republic was established in 1949. Hu Changqing, the former vice governor of Jiangxi province, was also executed for corruption, and Chen Xitong, the former party chief of Beijing, is serving a 16-year prison term for graft. In November 2000, Justice Minister Gao Changli was detained for questioning on corruption charges. In addition, former Vice Minister of Public Security Li Jizhou was sentenced to death on charges of taking bribes and of blocking a probe into the Xiamen graft scandal. These cases show that the CCP is fully aware of rampant corruption within the government and is attempting to root out corruption.127 However, such efforts have failed to win the confidence of the Chinese people and have been criticized by the CCP-controlled national legislature. In the 1996 session, 30 percent of NPC deputies openly opposed the report given by the Supreme Procuratorate Sciences Documentation Publishing House, 2001), pp. 56-57. Christopher Bodeen, “Top Chinese Legislator Warns Colleagues About Corruption,” Washington Post, March 10, 2001, p. A17. 127 Hui-wen Jen, “Major Issues, Including Taiwan Policy, Discussed at Beidaihe Meeting” (in Chinese), Hong Kong Hsin Pao, August 13, 1999, p. 22, in FBIS-CHI-1999-0814. Brian Bennett, “In the End, It’s All About Connections,” Time, October 9, 2000, p.28. Mark L. Clifford and Dexter Roberts, “Can China Tame the Corruption Beast?,” Business Week, December 18, 2000, p. 107. “PRC Sentences Former Deputy Public Security Minister to Death,” Beijing Xinhua, October 22, 2001, in FBIS-CHI-2001-1022. 126 344 on law enforcement and anti-corruption. Twenty percent of the deputies refused to endorse the report given by the chief judge of the Supreme Court. In the 1997 session, the respective numbers were 40 percent and 32 percent. In the 1998 session, they were 40 percent and 31.5 percent, respectively. After the intensified anti-corruption campaign in 1999-2000, at the March 2001 session, about 35 percent of all deputies refused to accept the annual report of the Supreme People’s Procuratorate and 32 percent of all deputies refused to support the annual report of the People’s Supreme Court. At that session, the deputies candidly criticized China’s top judge Xiao Yang and top prosecutor Han Zhubin for failure to stamp out corruption and crack down upon crimes, as well as on the existence of corruption inside courts and procuratorates.128 IX. Inflation Chinese leaders have strong fears of high inflation and its resulting social instability. The older generation in China remembers how high inflation during the final stages of the civil war in the late 1940s helped to undermine support for the KMT regime. More recently, rising inflation, coupled with declining economic growth and rampant corruption within the government, contributed significantly to the fall of Chinese top leaders Hu Yaobang and Zhao Ziyang in the late 1980s. Major mistakes made by Hu and Zhao were to have focused too much on economic growth and not enough on price stability. As a result, in 1985, inflation rose to 8.8 percent, which had not been seen in China since 1961. 128 Minxin Pei, “Political Change in Post-Mao China: Progress and Challenges,” paper presented at the Cato Institute Conference “Whither China? The PRC at 50,” September 29, 1999, Washington, D.C., p. 12. Rena Miller, “China’s Parliament Bares Its Teeth Over New Chief Prosecutor,” Agence France Presse, March 17, 1998, 10:10 GMT. Maryin Fackler, “China’s Congress Cites Corruption,” Associated Press, March 15, 2001, 7:27 AM ET. Siyi Ni, “Will Judicial Work Reports Win High Approval Ratings?” Beijing Xinhua, March 13, 2001, in FBIS-CHI-2001-0313. 345 In 1985-86, students in several universities held demonstrations against a motley collection of personal complaints and social problems, mostly on the issues of poor living conditions, the rising inflation rate, and corruption. Again, inflation leapt dramatically from 7.3 percent in 1987 to 18.5 percent in 1988. Despite the austerity policies that brought GDP growth down to 3.6 percent in 1989, inflation for that year was still 17.8 percent.129 In particular, public support for the demonstrations on Tiananmen Square in 1989 was mostly an expression of protest against high inflation and corruption. For example, prior to the Tiananmen Incident, Li Ruihuan, a Politburo member, pointed out, “We said there would be no inflation, then in fact inflation came – how could people not feel rebellious?”130 A decade later, Lu Baifu, vice minister of Development Research Center of the State Council, warned, “Letting inflation go unchecked is equivalent to suicide [for the CCP].”131 Inflation surged again in China in the mid-1990s. The retail price index surged to 21.7 percent in 1994, which was higher than that in 1988-89 and could have triggered another Tiananmen Incident. In 1995 and 1996, the retail price index increased by 14.8 percent and 6.1 percent, respectively. A 1995 study by the World Bank argues that financial losses incurred by SOEs, the resulting monetization of budgetary and implicit deficits by the central bank, and surges in local-government-led investment demand were main causes for China’s inflation. Therefore, without further enterprise, financial, fiscal, Wing Thye Woo, “The Economics And Politics of Transition to an Open Market Economy: China,” OECD Technical Papers no. 153, October 1999, pp. 12, 39-43. 130 Liang Zhang (comp.), Andrew J. Nathan and Perry Link (eds.), The Tiananmen Papers (New York: Public Affairs, 2001), p. 134. 131 Baifu Lu, “Macro-adjustments in China: Experience and Lessons,” in Bank of International Settlements (ed.), Strengthening the Banking System in China: Issues and Experience (Basel, Switzerland: Bank of International Settlements, 1999), p. 114. 129 346 and administrative reforms, inflation on average is likely to be higher in the future than it was in the mid-1990s because of the increasing public sector deficit. The 1995 World Bank report concludes, “In the interim, the risk of accelerating inflation remains high, and the margin for maneuver is limited.” This poses a staggering challenge for the CCP in the mid-1990s and beyond.132 X. Social Instability Urban Instability Protest rallies, group petitions, street blockages, street demonstrations, sit-ins, slowdowns, industrial strikes (illegal since 1982), acts of sabotage and physical violence against managerial personnel, tax riots, and the like, have become a prominent feature of the social landscape in the Chinese cities in the reform era. Available sources indicate that many types of social conflicts are on the rise at a rapid pace in China in recent years. In addition, conflicts have been worsening in terms of scale of participants, damage, and violence. Grievances that sparked these public protests often reflected the predicaments of debt-ridden state enterprises under reform, including lay-offs, benefit cuts, and management corruption. In the mid-1990s, when massive lay-offs, plant closures, and delays in pension payments occurred, strikes gave way to sit-ins and public demonstrations by unemployed and retired workers as the most common forms of protest. 132 World Bank, Macroeconomic Stability in a Decentralized Economy (Washington, D.C.: World Bank, 1995). Nicholas R. Lardy, China’s Unfinished Economic Revolution, (Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press, 1998), p. 11. 347 Labor protests in the post-Tiananmen decade have witnessed a heightened tendency for workers to go beyond the confines of their workplace. Situations might get out of control since they are often joined by other disgruntled segments of the local economy and peaceful protests could easily evolve into riots and violent conflicts.133 For example, in late 1995, in Nanchong, a Sichuan city, 20,000 workers besieged the town hall for 30 hours in protest at not being paid for six months. In late February 2000, more than 20,000 workers and their families in Yangjiazhangzi, a mining town 250 miles northeast of Beijing, battled with police and soldiers for three days. The miners were incensed over the loss of their jobs and the alleged corruption of officials. They burned car, barricaded streets, smashed windows and set oil drums afire in protests that were finally quelled by a detachment of soldiers from the PLA. In late December 2001, around 2,000 workers occupied the Shuangfeng Textile Factory to protest corrupt officials, missing pension funds, and mass layoffs. They battled repeatedly with police for two weeks.134 Protests by workers happened frequently in China in the 1980s and 1990s. In urban areas, the China Federation of Trade Unions recorded 97 strikes in 1987, and over 100 in 1988. In the late 1980s, China’s leaders were acutely aware of and very worried about the portents of a proletarian counterrevolution emanating from Eastern Europe. They feared similar infections spreading to Chinese workers. Consequently, modest worker efforts to establish independent trade unions during the spring 1989 demonstrations were met with an especially hostile response.135 Ching Kwan Lee, “Pathway of Labor Insurgency,” in Elizabeth J. Perry and Mark Selden (eds.), Chinese Society: Change, Conflict and Resistance (New York: Routledge, 2000), pp. 49-51. 134 Geoffrey Murray, China: The Next Superpower (New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1998), p. 25. John Pomfret, “Miners’ Riot A Symbol of China’s New Discontent,” Washington Post, April 5, 2000, p. A1. Philip P. Pan, “’High Tide’ of Labor Unrest in China,” Washington Post, January 21, 2001, p. A1. 135 Martin King Whyte, “The Changing Role of Workers,” in Merle Goldman and Roderick MacFarquhar 133 348 However, urban social stability has been worsening since then. According to the Hong Kong magazine Cheng Ming, drawn from an allegedly secret State Council report, more than 850 illegal parades and demonstrations, over 1,210 illegal assemblies (including sit-in demonstrations and petitions), over 6,320 illegal strikes (including go-slow actions), over 440 disturbances, and over 210 riots occurred in China just in the year 1993.136 Internal reports compiled by the Department of Public Security recorded a national total of 480 strikes in 1992, 1,870 in 1995, and 1,740 in the first nine months of 1996. In 1995 alone, by official reckoning, protest marches involving more than 20 people rose to a record-high of 1,620, including more than 1.1 million people and occurring in more than thirty cities.137 According to the Ministry of Public Security, there were 60,000 protests in 1998 and 100,000 in 1999.138 According to the calculation by Larry Wortzel, director of Asian Studies at the Heritage Foundation, 100,000 “large-scale protests involving hundreds of people” were reported in China’s media between January 1997 and November 2000.139 One recent Chinese government report acknowledged the country is in the midst of a “high tide” of labor unrest, with the number of workers participating in strikes more than doubling in the first half of the 1990s alone. Another report in an internal party publication said there were 30,000 protests of significant size in 2000, or more than 80 (eds.), The Paradox of China’s Post-Mao Reforms (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1999), p. 174. Jeanne L. Wilson, “The ‘Polish Lesson’: China and Poland, 1980-1990,” Studies in Comparative Communism, vol. 23, no. 2 (1990), pp. 259-280. 136 Hsun-che Chuan, “Secret Report on ‘Disturbances’ on Mainland Last Year” (in Chinese), Hong Kong Cheng Ming, no. 198, April 1, 1994, p. 21, in FBIS-CHI-94-062. 137 Ching Kwan Lee, “Pathway of Labor Insurgency,” in Elizabeth J. Perry and Mark Selden (eds.), Chinese Society: Change, Conflict and Resistance (New York: Routledge, 2000), pp. 49-51. 138 Gordon G. Chang, “The Shahs of Beijing,” Far Eastern Economic Review, http://www.feer.com/2001/0109_13/p031fcol.html, accessed September 21, 2001. 139 Murray Scot Tanner, “Cracks in the Wall: China’s Eroding Coercive State,” Current History, September 349 incidents per day around the country.140 According to the Chinese Ministry of Labor, in 1993 the number of large-scale labor-management disputes, defined as anything from contract disagreements to outright strikes, exceeded 12,000. In some 2,500 cases, workers became violent, besieging plants, setting fire to facilities, engaging in strikes, or detaining their bosses or leaders. Work-related disputes increased 10-fold between 1993 and 1999. Disputes in 1999 totaled more than 120,000, a 29 percent increase from 1998.141 The depth of China’s internal problems was confirmed in a remarkably candid report published in mid-2001 by a group under the Chinese Communist Party’s Central Committee. It details mounting and increasingly confrontational “collective protests and group incidents,” on a greater scale than had otherwise been reported. It cited corruption as “the main fuse exacerbating conflicts between officials and the masses.”142 Crimes and Bombings In addition to collective resistance to express people’s anger to the Chinese government, crimes and bombings are two extreme ways in which individuals express discontent with government policies as well as the social and economic situation. One nationwide police tally found that in 1991 there were about 500 known criminal gangs 2001, p. 245. Philip P. Pan, “’High Tide’ of Labor Unrest in China,” Washington Post, January 21, 2001, p. A1. 141 Yu-shan Lu, “CPC Guards Against Mass Disturbances” (in Chinese), Hong Kong Tangtai, no. 38, May 15, 1994, pp. 20-22, in FBIS-CHI-94-106. Ted Plafker, “Incidence of Unrest Rising in China,” Washington Post, July 18, 2000, p. A20. 142 Robert A. Manning, “Beijing Rules, But It’s Got A Host of Problems,” Washington Post, July 15, 2001, p. B1. 140 350 comprising a few dozen members to more than 100. By 1992, the figure had risen to 1,800, and by 1995 the number had mushroomed to nearly 11,000. By 1995, membership was estimated at close to one million people, with each year thereafter almost doubling in size.143 Gangs are active in both urban and rural areas and engage in smuggling, trafficking of people and drugs, prostitution, armed robbery, racketeering, and even contract murder. As a result, the total number of criminal cases has risen from 1.1 million in 1989 to 2.2 million in 1999. In that ten-year interval, murders soared 40 percent while the number of armed robberies jumped nearly five-fold.144 Although the information on bombings was strictly concealed by the Chinese government, some official reports have confirmed the seriousness of the situation. In March 1997, a small bomb blew up outside a commercial building and another explosive device ripped through a public bus in Beijing, at least killing two people and injuring 30. Two months later, a suicidal migrant worker detonated a bomb in Zhongshan Park in Beijing, just a few hundred yards from the Zhongnanhai compound where China’s top leaders live. Meanwhile, five people were killed and six wounded in an explosion on a bus in Guangdong.145 The Chinese Academy of Social Science revealed that an astonishing 2,500 bomb blasts were recorded in the first nine months of 1998. In January 1999, crude bombs in 12 Patrick Tyler, “Crime (and Punishment) Rages Anew in China,” New York Times, July 11, 1996, p. A1. Elizabeth J. Perry, “Crime, Corruption, and Contention,” in Merle Goldman and Roderick MacFarquhar (eds.), The Paradox of China’s Post-Mao Reforms (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1999), pp. 323-324. 144 Martin Fackler, “China Battling Criminal Gangs,” Associated Press, 12:01 PM ET, February 18, 2001. “ Serious Problem’ Remain in Public Order,” Central People’s Broadcasting Station, February 9, 1990, in BBC Summary of World Broadcasts, February 13, 1990. Trish Saywell, “Crime Unlimited,” Far Eastern Economic Review, November 2, 2000, p. 73. 145 Henry Chu, “Third Explosion in Beijing in 2 Months Reportedly Kills 1,” Los Angeles Times, May 14, 1997, p. A12. 143 351 different incidents were set off or discovered; 33 people died and more than 100 were injured. In September 2000, five crude time bombs exploded in shops and on public buses, injuring about 28 people. In January 2001, three bombs exploded in separate locations in China, killing 19 people and injuring 41. On March 16, 2001, a series of explosions caused by bombs tore through four apartment buildings in the northern industrial city of Shijiazhuang, killing 108 people and injuring 38.146 Rural Instability Peasants are similarly unhappy in much of China today, and frequently with good reasons: informal taxation, fees, fines, appropriations, and other revenue extractions by local officials place enormous burdens on farmers. Added to these issues are the frequent resentment of peasants against the government for its birth control policies, corruption of local officials, and their often gross abuse of power. Peasant unrest is substantial, but mostly localized and sporadic, and occurs more often in the interior provinces than along the coast. Rural discontent has manifested itself in a variety of forms, ranging from protests and petitions to riots, some involving thousands of people. Burdened by arbitrary and often unfair taxes and levies, Chinese farmers have shown a willingness to resort to extreme means to gain attention and redress. For example, according to the Sichuan Information Office, in June 1993, in Renshou 146 Nisid Hajari, “China’s Rage,” Time, February 15, 1999, http://www.time.com/time/asia/asia/magazine/1999/990215/china_bomb1.html, accessed February 7, 2001. Philip P. Pan, “Deadly Blasts Level Apartments in China,” Washington Post, March 17, 2001, p. A16. Trish Saywell, “Labor: On the Edge,” Far Eastern Economic Review, February 25, 2001, http://www.feer.com/9902_25/p46labour.html, accessed February 19, 2001. Philip P. Pan, “Deadly Blasts Level Apartments in China,” Washington Post, March 17, 2001, p. A16. Andrew Browne, “Chinese Blast Suspect Driven by Hatred, Police Say,” Reuters, March 24, 2001, 2:39 PM ET. 352 County, Sichuan, local government demands for excessive highway repair contributions resulted in riots involving more than 10,000 people. The armed police force fired tear gas in order to disperse the crowd and rescue 180 policemen from the siege.147 It was reported that, from July 30 to August 2 in 1997, over 200,000 peasants in twelve counties in Hubei province demonstrated against local officials who had used state grain procurement funds to travel abroad and purchase cars, homes, office buildings, leaving the peasants with IOUs. Eight of these demonstrations became violent. Peasants called these officials “tyrants” and “swindlers” and asserted that “the peasant rebellion is driven by the Communist Party!” The situation was quite similar in Jiangxi, Hunan, and Anhui provinces, involving an estimated half a million participants, leaving at least 184 injured and 14 dead. In most cases, peasants attacked and occupied government buildings. In some cases, leading cadres from the province and the prefecture were surrounded by peasants and had to be rescued by the military. For instance, in August 2000, some 20,000 peasants rioted in Jiangxi province, and the government had to send in the army to stamp out the unrest.148 According to the Hong Kong magazine Cheng Ming, drawn from an allegedly top-level government report, the Chinese countryside witnessed some 1.7 million cases of resistance in 1993, of which 6,230 were disturbances that resulted in severe damage to persons or property. Among the so-called disturbances, 830 involved more than one township and more than 500 participants; 78 involved more than one county and over “Sichuan Spokesman on Riots” (in Chinese), Beijing Zhongguo Xinwen She, June 12, 1993, in FBIS-CHI-93-112. 148 Cheng Mu, “Peasants Riots Erupt in Hubei and Jiangxi,” China Focus, October 1, 1997. Thomas P. Bernstein and Xiaobo Lu, “Taxation without Representation: Peasants, the Central and the Local States in Reform China,” China Quarterly, no. 163 (September 2000), pp. 754-755. Allen T. Cheng, “A Rural Dilemma,” Asiaweek, February 23, 2001, <hhtp://taiwansecurity.org/News/2001/Asiaweek-022301.htm>, accessed February 26, 2001. 147 353 1000 participants; and 21 were long-lasting events that enlisted more than 5,000 participants. This resulted in injury or death for 8,200 township and county government personnel and peasants, of which 2,015 public security personnel were injured, and 385 killed. The following year showed a further escalation. In just the first four months of 1994, rural areas saw 720,000 protests, of which more than 2,300 were serious disturbances that caused injury or death to nearly 5,000 township and county government personnel.149 For 1997, Chinese officials reported that farmers had engaged in more than 10,000 cases of “unruly incidents” ranging from demonstrations and petitions to efforts to surround and damage government offices. It was reported that between January and July 1998 alone, a total of 3,200 incidents of collective protests were sufficiently serious to be recorded at the national level, and more than 420 of these involved conflicts in which rural government buildings were surrounded by angry crowds. During the half-year period, casualties were officially reported as topping 7,400, including more than 1,200 cadres and police wounded. Chinese government admitted there were 5,000 collective protests in 1998.150 In 1999, the number of demonstrations reported to the central government reached 100,000 nationwide – about 270 a day, according to internal information leaked to the Hong Kong-based Information Center for Human Rights and Democracy.151 According Lu Nung, “Situation of Rural Instability Deteriorates” (in Chinese), Hong Kong Cheng Ming, no. 202, August 1, 1994, pp. 28-29, in FBIS-CHI-94-152. 150 Willy Wo-Lap Lam, “Rural Unrest Sets Off Alarm,” South China Morning Post, October 16, 1998, p. 10. Jonathan Unger, “Power, Patronage, and Protest in Rural China,” in Tyrene White (ed.), China Briefing 2000: The Continuing Transformation (Armonk, N.Y.: M.E. Sharpe, 2000), p. 87. Cited from Dongxiang (Trends, Hong Kong), October 1998, pp. 11-12. Minxin Pei, “Is China Unstable,” Foreign Policy Research Institute WIRE, Vol. 7, No. 8, July 1999, p. 5 of 9. 151 Cindy Sui, “Chinese Protesters Hit the Streets Demanding Government Attention,” Agency France Presse, June 12, 2000. 149 354 to a speech attributed to Premier Zhu Rongji, China suffered 117 incidents of armed, violent protest in 2000. Those incidents resulted in more than 4,300 casualties, of which more than half were party cadres and government officials.152 The Root of Social Instability The underlying problem of social instability is not simply corruption or malfeasance. Fiscal stringency has significantly contributed to this instability. In the 1990s, the Chinese government at all levels captured only 10-16 percent of GDP in taxes in its regular budget. The result was that governments at all levels were beset by chronic shortages of funds, while the Center’s capacity to redistribute resources from the rich to the poor provinces drastically declined. In fact, by 1999 more than 60 percent of total government revenues were derived from fees. Poorer, agriculture-dependent regions had to rely on their own funds to develop or provide essential services. Because agriculture was the major resource, rural governments had to rely on extraction of taxes and fees from the peasants in order to meet their expenses and to carry out development programs. An investigation by the central government reported that almost 90 percent of the fees collected by local governments were either unauthorized or illegal.153 In addition, gaining control over burdens was not simply a matter of securing the compliance of local officials. Central agencies themselves were responsible for a part of the burdens, especially fees, fundraising, and assessments. As a report by China’s George Gilboy and Eric Heginbotham, “China’s Coming Transformation,” Foreign Affairs, July/August 2001, p. 34. 153 Minxin Pei, “Will China Become Another Indonesia?,” Foreign Policy, Fall 1999, pp. 100-101. 152 355 Agriculture Ministry revealed, by the end of 1991, 148 documents adding to the farmers’ economic burdens were in fact issued by 48 ministries and commissions of the State Council. By 1999, about 20 percent of such fee revenues are collected by central governments.154 Despite Beijing’s efforts to lighten farmers’ burdens, by the late-1990s, the situation did not improve but, instead, worsened. The CCP Central Committee and the State Council set requirements for reducing the peasants’ burdens almost every year in the 1990s, and issued orders in 1992 and again in 1996 to check fee rates and set the ceiling for the rate at no more than 5 percent of the farmers’ annual net income. However, due to heavy financial burdens and slumping agricultural product sale, income of some 900 million people living in the countryside decreased for four consecutive years – between 1996 to 2000. According to Chinese official figures, farmers in some places saw illegal fees still rise in 2000, with fee charges, fund collections, and illegal fines rising by as much as 21 percent. According to a 2001 official survey, pertinent fees for peasants in Huanyuan, Anhui, was more than three times the agricultural tax.155 The Vigilance of Chinese Leaders and Public Facing such social instability, Chinese leaders have been well alerted in the reform Hao Jia and Wang Mingxia, “Market and State: Changing Central-Local Relations in China,” in Hao Jia and Zhimin Lin (eds.), Changing Central-Local Relations in China: Reform and State Capacity (Boulder: Westview Press, 1994), p. 49. Thomas P. Bernstein, and Xiaobo Lu, “Taxation without Representation: Peasants, the Central and the Local States in Reform China,” China Quarterly, no. 163 (September 2000), pp. 742-752. Minxin Pei, “Will China Become Another Indonesia?,” Foreign Policy, Fall 1999, pp. 100-101. 155 Shuguang Zhang, “China to Begin Comprehensive Reform of Taxes and Fees in Rural Areas” (in Chinese), Beijing Xinhua Hong Kong Service, February 15, 2001, in FBIS-CHI-2001-0215. “China’s Three Major Rural Reforms Introduced” (in Chinese), Beijing Xinhua Hong Kong Service, February 21, 2001, in FBIS-CHI-2001-0221. “PRC: Tax-for-fees Reform to Boost Economy Viewed,” Beijing Xinhua, 154 356 era. The seriousness with which the leadership views the situation can be seen in its harsh response to the attempted formation of a tiny opposition party. The government feared the nascent China Democracy Party would seek to politicize the workers’ complaints. On December 23, 2000, President Jiang Zemin explained Chinese action and warned, “Any factors that could jeopardize stability must be annihilated in the early stages.”156 In a meeting with President George Bush on February 26, 1989, Deng Xiaoping emphasized, “In China the overriding need is for stability. Without a stable environment, we can accomplish nothing and may even lose what we have gained.” 157 Even in 2001, stability was still the foremost goal for Chinese leaders. In a March 6, 2001 meeting with Hong Kong Chief Executive Tung Chee-hua on the Falun Gong spiritual movement in Hong Kong, President Jiang Zemin stressed, “Stability is overriding. Any countries or societies will have no prospects if they have no stability. Only stability will make the economy develop and prosper.”158 Chinese leaders were very worried about the rural unrest. In 1991, Deng Xiaoping reportedly said that China’s stability hinged on whether or not the lives of peasants improved. Sometime in 1992, Deng warned, “Should problems arise in the economy in the 1990s, they would most likely arise in agriculture.”159 The 1993 Renshou riots in protest against assessments for road construction shocked central leaders. In early 1993, Wan Li, chairman of the NPC Standing Committee and one February 22, 2001, in FBIS-CHI-2001-0222. Trish Saywell, “Labor: On the Edge,” Far Eastern Economic Review, February 25, 2001, http://www.feer.com/9902_25/p46labour.html, accessed February 19, 2001. 157 Deng Xiaoping, Selected Works of Deng Xiaoping (1982-1992), vol. 3, translated by the Bureau of the Compilation and Translation of Works of Marx, Engels, Lenin and Stalin (Beijing: Foreign Languages Press, 1994), p. 277. 158 “Chinese President Says Hong Kong to Deal With Falungong on Its Own,” Agence France Presse, March 6, 2001. 159 Thomas P. Bernstein, “Farmer Discontent and Regime Response,” in Merle Goldman and Roderick MacFarquhar (eds.), The Paradox of China’s Post-Mao Reforms (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University 156 357 of the pioneers of rural reform in the late 1970s, heard that when some peasants were asked what they needed, the response was, “We need nothing but Chen Sheng and Wu Guang,” the leaders of first large-scale peasant uprising in China’s history. Wan warned that “the situation in the countryside is desperate…. Should the state neglect to find solutions to these problems, conditions will go from bad to worse, with the peasants turning against the state and letting agriculture slide into chaos.” 160 Vice Premier Tian Jiyun told Tianjin NPC deputies at the 1993 session, “If there are problems in the villages, no one in the present regime can hold on to power,” and the consequences would be “unimaginable.”161 In retrospect, apocalyptic pronouncements of impending doom for the CCP regime were obviously exaggerated. But in the years since, somber warnings have continued to be issued by Chinese official media. In 1996, burdens on farmers were causing “extreme anger.” In 1997, they were “a problem that still arouses the most vehement peasant reaction,” and in 1998, they were “extremely unfavorable to the maintenance of overall social stability.” Moreover, in the late 1990s, as the government’s worries about instability increased, China’s Ministry of Public Security ordered the formation of anti-riot police squads as a means of further beefing up the force for maintaining social stability, including handling mass riots, violence, and terrorist cases.162 Press, 1999), p. 213. Yu-sha Lu, “Outgoing NPC Chairman Warns of Peasant Unrest” (in Chinese), Hong Kong Tangtai, no. 25 (April 1993), pp. 13-14. “Wan Li Cites Deng Warning on Agriculture” (in Chinese), Beijing Zhongguo Xinwen She, July 6, 1993, in FBIS-CHI-93-128. 161 “Tian Jiyun on Easing Farmers’ ‘Flight’,” South China Morning Post, March 22, 1993, p. 8, in FBIS-CHI-93-054. 162 Thomas P. Bernstein and Xiaobo Lu, “Taxation without Representation: Peasants, the Central and the Local States in Reform China,” China Quarterly, no. 163 (September 2000), pp. 753-757. Yibo Fang, “Ministry of Public Security Will Strengthen Building of Anti-Riot Force,” Beijing Xinhua Domestic Service (in Chinese), January 19, 2001, FBIS-CHI-2001-0119. STRATFOR.COM’s Global Intelligence Update, “Beijing’s Balance Act: Economic, Security Concerns,” February 1, 2001, http://www.atimes.com/china/CB01Ad01.html, accessed February 5, 2001, p. 1 of 4. 160 358 In fact, the Chinese public is also aware of the urgent need to maintain stability in China. An international relations scholar in Beijing stressed, “After experiencing the Cultural Revolution, people on the mainland greatly fear a repeat experience. This is why the Mainland stabilized so quickly after the Tiananmen incident. People fear turmoil.”163 Another example is the Chinese suppression of the Falun Gong. An international relations senior scholar in Beijing asserted that although Chinese authorities suppress the Falun Gong with too heavy a hand, people basically support the government’s policy because movements like the Falun Gong jeopardize social stability.164 XI. Conclusion The challenges (or crises) described above were acute for China’s leaders by 2000. This analysis has shown that the top Chinese leaders were constantly concerned about the stability of their country and preservation of their power. Possibly, the challenges were much more serious than this research explores. For instance, Thomas Rawski speculates that cumulative GDP growth between 1997 and 2001 was no more than one-third of official claims, and possibly much smaller. In particular, he considers that the growth rates in 1998 and 1999 were between negative 2.5 percent and positive 2 percent.165 Rawski’s assessment was publicly confirmed by Premier Zhu Rongji, saying that if the Chinese government had not adopted its proactive fiscal and prudent monetary policy between 1998 and 2002, “China’s economy would probably have collapsed.”166 As a 163 An international relations scholar in Beijing, conversation with author, August 13, 2001. An international relations senior scholar in Beijing, interview with author, July 11, 2001. 165 Thomas G. Rawski, “What Is Happening to China’s GDP Statistics?,” China Economic Review, vol. 12, no. 4 (2001), pp. 347-354. 166 “Comparison – Xinhua Reports on Premier Zhu Rongji News Conference” (in Chinese), Beijing Xinhua Domestic Service, March 15, 2002, in FBIS-CHI-2002-0315. 164 359 result, it is not simply a question of how to improve people’s living standards and thus the CCP’s legitimacy, but a question of how to avoid major economic, social, environmental, and political crises in China and thus save the country from possible chaos and environmental calamity. At this point, any domestic or external instability, or a significant slowdown in economic growth could lead China into chaos. A senior economist at the DRC explained, “The Mainland has been emphasizing the maintenance of stability since the mid-1990s due to staggering employment pressure caused by SOE reform and migrants from the rural areas. Social stability can be only maintained through economic development. However, the Mainland currently is facing immense economic difficulties, including financial system reform and non-performing loans, the unemployment problem, income and regional inequality, public finance reform, and industrial development and upgrading. To solve the first four problems, the Mainland needs to sustain rapid economic development. For instance, during the Asian financial crisis, the reason the Mainland implemented active fiscal policy was to solve social contradictions, not because leaders preferred high economic growth rates.”167 A scholar in Beijing added, “In the process of economic transition, there are many factors of uncertainty that face the Mainland. They include inequality between urban and rural areas, inequality between the East and the West, people’s psychological imbalance, lay-offs, SOE reforms, medical insurance, housing, and enormous labor surplus in rural area. As a result, social stability is extremely important. If there is any disturbance, the result could be unimaginable. It could trigger farmers’ uprisings, a total collapse of the state and social regime, and the rise of gangs. Such turmoil would have a very cruel 167 A senior economist at the Development Research Center of the State Council, interview with author, July 31, 2001. 360 impact on China.”168 A senior scholar in Shanghai said, “In the process of economic reforms, the Mainland needs to tackle serious internal problems, including SOEs, agriculture, financial sector. After entering the WTO, these problems will deteriorate. The Mainland has suffered tremendous pressure.”169 A senior scholar in Beijing also stressed, “Without 4-5 percent of economic growth, the society will become unstable and the CCP will hardly be able to sustain its regime.”170 Many see China as a country governed by an effective authoritarian elite, but the Chinese state is actually quite weak in terms of resource control. Beijing does not have sufficient resources to meet the needs of economic and social reforms, in addition to environmental protection. A Shanghai economist pointed out, “The Mainland’s internal problems are very serious. The Central Government is powerless to promote reforms, including the issues of state-owned enterprises, agriculture, and development in the West. To be honest, in internal meetings, the Mainland clearly has bottlenecks.”171 Nevertheless, if Beijing delays these reforms and protections due to fiscal constraints, the problems could easily burst into crises in the very near future. In fact, the conclusions of Chapters 6, 7, and 8 of this study all reflect these staggering concerns in the minds of Beijing’s leaders. These challenges and fears faced by Chinese leaders must be addressed through rapid, efficient, and sustainable economic growth, which needs absolute domestic and external stability, sufficient economic, social, and even political reforms, adequate environmental protection, and an international economic and political environment conducive to these domestic priorities. China needs a 168 169 170 A scholar in Beijing, interview with author, July 12, 2001. A senior scholar in Shanghai, interview with author, July 2, 2001. A senior scholar in Beijing, interview with author, July 17, 2001. 361 peaceful and stable international environment to develop its economy for at least several decades. In addition, China needs to cooperate with the international communities in order to conduct foreign trade and acquire foreign capital and advanced technology. With regard to the Taiwan issue, Chinese leaders have similar concerns and agendas. In Chapter 7, the primary concern for Beijing not to impose sanctions against Taiwan as a signaling tool might be the high costs of economic sanctions. In Chapter 8, it was shown how Beijing’s emphasis on the absolute costs of imposing economic sanctions against Taiwan reflected China’s priority on economic development. A Taiwan studies senior scholar in Shanghai pointed out, “Since 1979, the Mainland has not wished to use extreme measures to tackle Taiwan because the Mainland had to consider the overall situation. The Mainland had to consider not only Taiwanese capital, but also foreign capital and the progress of reforms and opening-up. The core of Mainland policies still centers on economic development.” 172 A senior economist in Shanghai emphasized, “Chinese leaders attach great importance to economic development. They would not sacrifice the economy.”173 Many Chinese scholars unambiguously argued that Beijing attaches great importance to economic development and would never sacrifice China’s economic development in favor of imposing economic sanctions against Taiwan.174 An international relations senior scholar in Beijing further explained, “The Mainland cannot afford the costs of China’s economic sanctions against Taiwan because the society will be unstable and the politics will be in turmoil. For the Mainland, cross-Strait economic interests involve the Mainland’s overall economic and social stability, as well 171 A Shanghai economist, interview with author, June 13, 2001. A Taiwan studies senior scholar in Shanghai, interview with author, June 26, 2001. 173 A senior economist in Shanghai, interview with author, June 22, 2001. 174 An international relations senior scholar in Beijing, interview with author, July 17, 2001. A Taiwan studies senior economist in Xiamen, interview with author, June 8, 2001. A Taiwan studies senior scholar in Beijing, interview with author, July 13, 2001. 172 362 as the stability of the political regime. Whether the current regime can survive is at stake. The Mainland regime dare not take this high of a risk.”175 A Taiwan studies senior scholar in Shanghai and an international relations scholar in Beijing conveyed similar concerns about what China has at stake.176 Actually, Chinese officials are very reluctant to jeopardize any economic development, and usually cherish the achievement of economic reforms for personal welfare. For instance, when asking whether China would impose economic sanctions against Taiwan, a senior official of the Taiwan Affairs Office of the Beijing City government said, “I grew up in Beijing and saw significant change due to rapid economic development in the reform era. No one wants to ruin economic development by disrupting cross-Strait economic exchange.”177 175 An international relations senior scholar in Beijing, interview with author, July 19, 2001. A Taiwan studies senior scholar in Shanghai, interview with author, June 25, 2001. An international relations scholar in Beijing, interview with author, July 13, 2001. 177 A senior official of the Taiwan Affairs Office of the Beijing City government, interview with author, August 1, 2001. 176 363