Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Proposal for the International Conference “Journalism in Transition: Crisis or Opportunity?” March 28-29, 2014, Thessaloniki, Greece European Communication Research and Education Association (ECREA) Journalism Studies Section Title: Acceleration in Journalism: A Theoretical Approach to a Complex Phenomenon Presenter: Dr. Uwe Krüger Institut für Kommunikations- und Medienwissenschaft Abteilung Journalistik Burgstr. 21 04109 Leipzig Germany Phone: ++49-341-9735756 Fax: ++49-341-97-35799 E-mail: [email protected] URL: www.uni-leipzig.de/journalistik Date: September 27, 2013 Acceleration in Journalism: A Theoretical Approach to a Complex Phenomenon The term „acceleration“ is often used to characterize recent trends in society, media and journalism – mostly, unfortunately, not as an analytic term but as an unreflected buzz phrase to express a feeling that everything has become faster (Starkman 2010, Rosenberg/Feldman 2008, Gleick 1999). Hachmeister (2012) points out that “the term has become so banal that it cannot be used anymore at all. But nevertheless, it is probably the meta-word for everything that has been going on recently”. In contrast, I want to show that this term can be highly useful to understand transition processes in journalism. Sociologist Hartmut Rosa (2013: 66) describes acceleration as an increase in quantity per time unit or, logically equivalent, as reduction of time quantum per fixed quantity unit. He distinguishes three forms of “social acceleration”: (1) technological acceleration, (2) the acceleration of social change, and (3) acceleration in the pace of life (ibid.: 71-80). Inspired by his theory, I argue that acceleration processes in journalism may have occurred since the beginning of the Digital Age – and partly before – in the following respects: 1. Reduction of the period between event and coverage: With technological change, 2. 3. 4. 5. journalists ever since have been able to cover events more quickly. This development now culminates in the boom of web-based “real-time journalism” (live blogs, live tickers, live streams) where journalists have almost no time for fact-checking and reflection. Increasing attention to events with a short time horizon: Research on news values has revealed that events that occur suddenly and fit well with the news organization’s schedule are more likely to be reported than those that occur gradually. As the publication frequencies increase with new technologies, I presume that important long-term trends are even less likely to receive much coverage. Faster rotation of personell, e.g., within an editorial staff, between staffs or between journalism and public relations (Mükke 2009: 457). This phenomenon can have advantages but may also lead to loss of expert knowledge, institutional memory and professional identity. Increased density of journalists’ working days (through an increased amount of tasks, both journalistic and non-journalistic) and, thereby, a reduction in time per task: According to two representative surveys among German journalists in 1993 and 2005, the available time for journalistic research has declined from 140 to 117 minutes per day, while the time effort for organization and administration has risen from 69 to 78 minutes, for technical tasks from 50 to 84 minutes and for PR and marketing from 0 to 9 minutes (Weischenberg/Malik/Scholl 2006: 80). This may directly impair the substance of journalistic content. Increased density of journalistic products, e.g., through an increased frequency of cuts and reduced length of sound bites in television news: In the German news broadcast ARD-Tagesschau, from 1975 through 1995 the average length of sound bites has declined from 26 to 12 seconds, while the number of news clips within the 15-minutes TV format has increased (Zubayr/Fahr 1999: 643, see also Hallin 1992). This may impair the understandability and memorability of news for the audience. 6. Reduced length of issue-attention cycles and increased alteration of discussed issues. The higher publication frequencies of new media increase the demand for new information and issues. This may impair the ability of players to generate enough political pressure to cause effective change. As indicated, scattered empirical data exists to some of these aspects. Nevertheless, systematic research on time structures in journalism is required. If data showed acceleration processes that have led to a declining quality of coverage, to an erosion of media’s orientation function and to a dysfunctional public debate, it would be time for a debate about those time structures. References: Gleick, James (1999): Faster: The Acceleration of Just About Everything. New York: Pantheon. Hachmeister, Lutz (2012): Journalismus und digitale Geschwindigkeit. Deutschlandfunk, 20.01., http://diskurs.dradio.de/thema/neuer-journalismus/page/3/ (accessed on 17.09.2013) Hallin, Daniel C. (1992): Sound Bite News: Television Coverage of Elections, 1968-1988. Journal of Communication Vol. 42 (2), pp. 5-24. Mükke, Lutz (2009): ‚Journalisten der Finsternis‘. Akteure, Strukturen und Potenziale deutscher Afrika-Berichterstattung. Köln: Herbert von Halem. Rosa, Hartmut (2013): Social Acceleration: A New Theory of Modernity. New York: Columbia University Press. Rosenberg, Howard/Feldman, Charles S. (2008): No Time to Think. The Menace of Media Speed and the 24-hour News Cycle. New York: Continuum. Starkman, Dean (2010): The Hamster Wheel. Why Running as Fast as we can is getting us Nowhere. Columbia Journalism Review, September/October, pp. 24-28. Weischenberg, Siegfried/Malik, Maja/Scholl, Armin (2006): Die Souffleure Mediengesellschaft. Report über die Journalisten in Deutschland. Konstanz: UVK. der Zubayr, Camille/Fahr, Andreas (1999): Die Tagesschau: Fels in der dualen Brandung? Ein Vergleich von Inhalten und Präsentationsformen 1975 und 1995. In: Wilke, Jürgen (ed.): Massenmedien und Zeitgeschichte. Konstanz: UVK, pp. 638-647.