Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
OECD Regions at a Glance 2013 – Mexico Profile http://rag.oecd.org Regional dynamics GDP per capita, 2010 Mexico in USD GDP growth (year 2000=100) OECD 200 Country max: Luxembourg 69 350 USD 80 000 60 000 Region max: Federal District (MX) 40 000 26 140 USD Country averages 20 000 0 Region min: Mexico Country min: Mexico 8 370 USD 12 010 USD 180 Highest growth in 2010 Tabasco 160 +9.3% per year 140 Mexico 120 OECD 100 Lowest growth in 2010 Morelos 80 2000 +0.5% per year 2005 2010 Mexico had the 2nd largest regional disparities in GDP per capita. In the past decade regional growth was as diverse as +9.3% annually in Tabasco and +0.5% in Morelos. Unemployment rate, 2011 Mexico OECD Country max: Spain 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 25% Region max: Tamaulipas 55 Highest rate in 2011 Tamaulipas 45 42.9% Mexico 25 Country averages 2% 65 35 8.5% Region min: Chiapas Youth unemployment rate, 15-24 years old, 2007-11 OECD 15 Lowest ratein 2011 Chiapas Country min: Norway 3.1% 5 2007 2012 8% In 2011, the unemployment rate was the highest in Tamaulipas (8.5%) and the lowest in Chiapas. The youth unemployment rate is the highest in Tamaulipas (42.9%) and lowest in Chiapas (8%). Source: OECD Regional database. GDP per capita and GDP growth are based on USD constant PPP, constant prices (year 2005). Note: The state of Campeche, economically dependent on oil, is excluded in the computation of the regional GDP per capita. MEXICO PROFILE http://rag.oecd.org Regional dynamics How do the richest and poorest regions fare on social and environmental dimensions? Highest GDP per capita region: Income 10 Innovation 5 Labour Federal District 0 Education Environment Lowest GDP per capita region: Health Chiapas How to read the graph: For each dimension, regions have been assigned values from 0 to 10 based on their rank among all OECD regions and on the latest available data: 10 is the best performance and 0 is the lowest. The OECD median region is equal to 5. The more the radar graph is covered, the better the performance of the region among OECD regions. Both the Federal District (the Mexican state with the highest GDP per capita in the country, after Campeche) and Chiapas (the Mexican state with the lowest GDP per capita in the country) fare better than the OECD median region in labour and in environment. Chiapas is also higher than OECD median region in environment, and the Federal District in education. Federal District Chiapas Mexico OECD average Dimensions Indicators Income Household income per capita, 2010 (USD PPP per capita) 1 614 427 913 18 775 Labour Unemployment rate, 2011 (%) 5.9 2.1 5.3 8.1 Education Share of work force with tertiary education, 2008 (%) 29.2 14.7 19.5 28.4 Health Life expectancy, 2010 (years) 75.5 72.0 74.1 79.8 Environment CO2 per capita, 2008 (tonnes per person) 3.1 4.4 6.6 14.1 Innovation No. of patents per million people, 2010 5.2 .. 1.5 108.8 Source: OECD Regional database. Household disposable income per capita data are based on USD constant PPP, constant prices (year 2005). Note: Regions refer to the first administrative tier of sub-national government; Mexico is composed by 32 regions (Estados). MEXICO PROFILE http://rag.oecd.org Sub-national government finance Sub-national governments have a key role in public investment Sub-national government public investment per capita, 2011 USD per capita Mexico OECD average 1 000 Total public investment 900 800 700 600 Total public investment USD 491 per capita 2.8 % of GDP 500 400 300 200 100 0 Sub-national government investment USD 322 per capita 1.9% of GDP 65.6% of public invest. USD 945 per capita 2.7% of GDP Sub-national government investment USD 691 per capita 1.9% of GDP 72.2% of public invest. In Mexico 66% of the total public investment was carried out by sub-national governments (SNG) compared to 72% in the OECD area. SNG investment has increased in Mexico from USD 298 per capita in 2007 to USD 322 per capita in 2011. Source: OECD National Accounts database. MEXICO PROFILE http://rag.oecd.org Metropolitan areas in the national economy OECD population is increasingly concentrated in cities, 2012 Percentage of population in cities of different sizes and in non-urban areas United MexicoStates OECD average people live in urban areas with population above 500 000 people live in non urban areas 35% people live in urban areas with population below 500 000 112.3 million people - 65% live in cities people live in non urban areas 49% 33% 1 136 million people - 67% live in cities 53% 12% people live in urban areas with population below 500 000 people live in urban areas with population above 500 000 18% Source: OECD Metropolitan areas database. Number of urban areas internationally comparable according to OECD definition: 77 in Mexico and 1 175 in the OECD. In Mexico, 65% of the population lives in cities of different sizes: the share of population in metropolitan areas (urban areas with more than 500 000 people) is 53% compared to 49% in the OECD area. Concentration in metropolitan areas, 2010 Mexico OECD average 80% OECD average 52% 51% 50% 50 40 40% 30 30% 20% 20 10% 10 275 metropolitan areas 60 67% 60% Mexico 70 Mexico City 70% Metropolitan areas’ contribution to national GDP growth, 2000-10 0% % of national GDP % of national employment % of national population 0 % Mexico All metropolitan areas OECD average Largest contributor Source: OECD Metropolitan areas database. Number of metropolitan areas (urban areas with a population of over 500 000): 33 in Mexico compared to 275 in the OECD. Metropolitan areas in Mexico concentrate 67% of national GDP, the third highest value among OECD countries, and 52% of employment. In 2000-10 they accounted for 62% of GDP growth. OECD Regions at a Glance 2013 This edition of OECD Regions at a Glance shows how regions and cities contribute to national growth and the well-being of societies. It updates its regular set of region-by-region indicators, examining a wide range of policies and trends and identifying those regions that are outperforming or lagging behind in their country. New to this edition: • • The role of OECD metropolitan areas in countries’ development Recent trends in public investment, revenues and the debt of subnational governments Consult this publication on line: http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/reg_glance-2013-en