Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species™ ISSN 2307-8235 (online) IUCN 2008: T21251A9260904 Syncerus caffer, African Buffalo Assessment by: IUCN SSC Antelope Specialist Group View on www.iucnredlist.org Citation: IUCN SSC Antelope Specialist Group. 2008. Syncerus caffer. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2008: e.T21251A9260904. http://dx.doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2008.RLTS.T21251A9260904.en Copyright: © 2015 International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources Reproduction of this publication for educational or other non-commercial purposes is authorized without prior written permission from the copyright holder provided the source is fully acknowledged. Reproduction of this publication for resale, reposting or other commercial purposes is prohibited without prior written permission from the copyright holder. For further details see Terms of Use. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species™ is produced and managed by the IUCN Global Species Programme, the IUCN Species Survival Commission (SSC) and The IUCN Red List Partnership. The IUCN Red List Partners are: BirdLife International; Botanic Gardens Conservation International; Conservation International; Microsoft; NatureServe; Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew; Sapienza University of Rome; Texas A&M University; Wildscreen; and Zoological Society of London. If you see any errors or have any questions or suggestions on what is shown in this document, please provide us with feedback so that we can correct or extend the information provided. THE IUCN RED LIST OF THREATENED SPECIES™ Taxonomy Kingdom Phylum Class Order Family Animalia Chordata Mammalia Cetartiodactyla Bovidae Taxon Name: Syncerus caffer (Sparrman, 1779) Common Name(s): • English: African Buffalo Taxonomic Notes: Three or four subspecies are usually distinguished: Forest Buffalo (S. c. nanus); West African Savanna Buffalo (S. c. brachyceros); Central African Savanna Buffalo (S. c. aequinoctialis); and Southern Savanna Buffalo (S. c. caffer) The interrelationships are unclear between the various described subspecies of the African Buffalo, but there is little doubt about the validity of the four subspecies recognized here. The three forms of the savanna buffalo are at least as distinct from one another as from nanus. These subspecies should clearly be distinguished for purposes such as trophy classification and assessment of conservation status. Other subspecies such as the "mountain" buffalo (mathewsi) of eastern Africa may also be valid. lntergrades occur where the distributions of the subspecies meet, including the boundaries between nanus and the savanna subspecies. Assessment Information Red List Category & Criteria: Least Concern ver 3.1 Year Published: 2008 Date Assessed: June 30, 2008 Justification: Listed as Least Concern as the species remains widespread, with a global population estimated at nearly 900000 animals, of which more than three-quarters are in protected areas. While some populations (subspecies) are decreasing, others will remain unchanged in the long term if large, healthy populations continue to persist in a substantial number of national parks, equivalent reserves and hunting zones in southern and eastern Africa. Previously Published Red List Assessments 1996 – Lower Risk/conservation dependent (LR/cd) Geographic Range Range Description: The species is distributed throughout sub-Saharan Africa, but is now generally confined to protected areas, within which it is well represented, and other areas which are sparsely settled. In West Africa, © The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species: Syncerus caffer – published in 2008. http://dx.doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2008.RLTS.T21251A9260904.en 1 they are now extinct in The Gambia, probably occur only as vagrants in Guinea, and the population in Mali’s Bafing Faunal Reserve is probably the country’s last (East 1999; Prins and Sinclair in press). African Buffalo are also extinct in Eritrea (East 1999). In South Africa, they have been reintroduced to areas from which they were formerly extirpated; likewise, they were reintroduced in Swaziland, where the indigenous population was extirpated. African Buffalo were probably extirpated from Bioko Island sometime between 1860 and 1910 (Butynski et al. 1997). Country Occurrence: Native: Angola (Angola); Benin; Botswana; Burkina Faso; Burundi; Cameroon; Central African Republic; Chad; Congo; Congo, The Democratic Republic of the; Côte d'Ivoire; Equatorial Guinea; Ethiopia; Gabon; Ghana; Guinea; Guinea-Bissau; Kenya; Liberia; Malawi; Mali; Mozambique; Namibia; Niger; Nigeria; Rwanda; Senegal; Sierra Leone; Somalia; South Africa; South Sudan; Sudan; Tanzania, United Republic of; Togo; Uganda; Zambia; Zimbabwe Regionally extinct: Eritrea; Gambia Reintroduced: Swaziland © The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species: Syncerus caffer – published in 2008. http://dx.doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2008.RLTS.T21251A9260904.en 2 Distribution Map © The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species: Syncerus caffer – published in 2008. http://dx.doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2008.RLTS.T21251A9260904.en 3 Population East (1999) produced a total population estimate of 830,000 for the three subspecies of savanna buffalo (27,000 West African Savanna Buffalo, 133,000 Central African Savanna Buffalo and 670,000 Southern Savanna Buffalo), probably conservative. East (1999) thought it likely that the total number of buffalo remaining in Africa’s savannas is in the approximate range of 500,000-1,000,000. Savanna buffalo populations are in decline over extensive areas because of meat hunting and continuing toss of habitat, and rinderpest continues to pose a major threat to these subspecies in some regions of Africa. Few population estimates are available for the forest buffalo. It tends to occur locally at relatively high densities in open, grassy areas within the equatorial forest, but at much lower densities in extensive areas of continuous forest. East (1999) produced a total population estimate for the forest buffalo of about 60,000. This estimate is probably very conservative, but forest buffalo populations are in decline over most of the subspecies’ remaining range. Current Population Trend: Decreasing Habitat and Ecology (see Appendix for additional information) African Buffalo inhabit a wide range of habitats, including semi-arid bushland, Acacia woodland, miombo Brachystegia woodland, montane grasslands and forest (to elevations well over 4,000 m asl), coastal savannas, and moist lowland rainforests. They are absent only from deserts and subdeserts, such as the Namib and the Saharan/Sahelian transition zone (Prins and Sinclair in press). Systems: Terrestrial Threats (see Appendix for additional information) In the past, numbers of African Buffalo suffered their most severe collapse during the great rinderpest epidemic of the 1890s, which, coupled with pleuro-pneumonia, caused mortalities as high as 95% among livestock and wild ungulates (Winterbach 1998). Rinderpest and other diseases such as anthrax have continued to result in localized declines and extinctions of populations throughout the 20th century, as rinderpest has spread from cattle to wildlife. The species’ distribution and numbers have also been greatly reduced by habitat loss and poaching. It is a favourite target of meat hunters in many countries, and poaching has been a major contributor to the recent decline of buffalo populations in many protected areas, e.g., national parks such as Comoe (Ivory Coast), Garamba (Congo-Kinshasa) and Serengeti (Tanzania), and probably in many other areas. It is also susceptible to drought, which has caused substantial declines in some populations during the 1990s, alone or in combination with diseases such as anthrax or rinderpest, e.g., in Tsavo, Serengeti/Mara, Gonarezhou and Kruger (East 1999). Conservation Actions (see Appendix for additional information) About 70% of the population of the three savanna buffalo subspecies occurs in and around protected areas, including: Queen Elizabeth and Murchison Falls National Parks (Uganda), Tarangire, MoyowosiKigosi, Katavi-Rukwa and Selous-Kilombero (Tanzania), Kafue and North and South Luangwa National Parks (Zambia), Chobe (Botswana), Sebungwe and the Middle Zambezi Valley (Zimbabwe), Hluhluwe- © The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species: Syncerus caffer – published in 2008. http://dx.doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2008.RLTS.T21251A9260904.en 4 iMfolozi (South Africa) (Southern Savanna Buffalo), Mole (Ghana), Pendjari (Benin) and the national parks and hunting zones of North Province (Cameroon) (West African Savanna Buffalo), and Zakouma (Chad), and Sangba (CAR) (Central African Savanna Buffalo). About 75% of the estimated total population of the forest buffalo occurs in nominally protected areas, including Lobeke (Cameroon) - Dzanga-Sangha (CAR) - Nouabale-Ndoki-Kabo (Congo-Brazzaville), Lope, Wonga-Wongue and Gamba (Gabon), Odzala (Congo-Brazzaville) and Maiko (Congo-Kinshasa). The future status of this species is closely linked to the future of protected areas and well-managed hunting zones, since it is a frequent target of poachers. Credits Assessor(s): IUCN SSC Antelope Specialist Group Reviewer(s): Mallon, D.P. (Antelope Red List Authority) & Hoffmann, M. (Global Mammal Assessment) © The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species: Syncerus caffer – published in 2008. http://dx.doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2008.RLTS.T21251A9260904.en 5 Bibliography Butynski, T. M., Schaaf, C. D. and Hearn, G. W. 1997. African buffalo Syncerus caffer extirpated on Bioko Island, Equatorial. Journal of African Zoology 111: 57-61. East, R. 1999. African Antelope Database 1999. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. Prins, H. H. T. and Sinclair, A. R. E. In press. Syncerus caffer. In: J. S. Kingdon and M. Hoffmann (eds), The Mammals of Africa, Academic Press, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Winterbach, H. E. K. 1998. Research review: the status and distribution of Cape buffalo Syncerus caffer caffer in southern Africa. South African Journal of Wildlife Research 28(3): 82-88. Citation IUCN SSC Antelope Specialist Group. 2008. Syncerus caffer. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2008: e.T21251A9260904. http://dx.doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2008.RLTS.T21251A9260904.en Disclaimer To make use of this information, please check the Terms of Use. External Resources For Images and External Links to Additional Information, please see the Red List website. © The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species: Syncerus caffer – published in 2008. http://dx.doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2008.RLTS.T21251A9260904.en 6 Appendix Habitats (http://www.iucnredlist.org/technical-documents/classification-schemes) Habitat Season Suitability Major Importance? 1. Forest -> 1.5. Forest - Subtropical/Tropical Dry - Suitable - 1. Forest -> 1.6. Forest - Subtropical/Tropical Moist Lowland - Suitable - 2. Savanna -> 2.1. Savanna - Dry - Suitable - 3. Shrubland -> 3.4. Shrubland - Temperate - Suitable - 3. Shrubland -> 3.5. Shrubland - Subtropical/Tropical Dry - Marginal - 3. Shrubland -> 3.6. Shrubland - Subtropical/Tropical Moist - Suitable - 4. Grassland -> 4.5. Grassland - Subtropical/Tropical Dry - Marginal - 4. Grassland -> 4.6. Grassland - Subtropical/Tropical Seasonally Wet/Flooded - Suitable - 4. Grassland -> 4.7. Grassland - Subtropical/Tropical High Altitude - Suitable - 5. Wetlands (inland) -> 5.4. Wetlands (inland) - Bogs, Marshes, Swamps, Fens, Peatlands - Suitable - Use and Trade (http://www.iucnredlist.org/technical-documents/classification-schemes) End Use Local National International Food - human Yes Yes No Sport hunting/specimen collecting No Yes Yes Threats (http://www.iucnredlist.org/technical-documents/classification-schemes) Threat Timing Scope Severity Impact Score 1. Residential & commercial development -> 1.1. Housing & urban areas Ongoing - - - Stresses: 1. Ecosystem stresses -> 1.1. Ecosystem conversion 1. Ecosystem stresses -> 1.2. Ecosystem degradation Ongoing - Stresses: 1. Ecosystem stresses -> 1.1. Ecosystem conversion 1. Ecosystem stresses -> 1.2. Ecosystem degradation 2. Agriculture & aquaculture -> 2.3. Livestock farming & ranching -> 2.3.4. Scale Unknown/Unrecorded © The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species: Syncerus caffer – published in 2008. http://dx.doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2008.RLTS.T21251A9260904.en - - 7 5. Biological resource use -> 5.1. Hunting & trapping terrestrial animals -> 5.1.1. Intentional use (species is the target) 6. Human intrusions & disturbance -> 6.2. War, civil unrest & military exercises 8. Invasive & other problematic species & genes -> 8.2. Problematic native species 11. Climate change & severe weather -> 11.2. Droughts Ongoing - - Stresses: 2. Species Stresses -> 2.1. Species mortality Ongoing - Stresses: 2. Species Stresses -> 2.2. Species disturbance Ongoing - Stresses: 2. Species Stresses -> 2.1. Species mortality Ongoing - Stresses: 1. Ecosystem stresses -> 1.2. Ecosystem degradation - - - - - - - Conservation Actions in Place (http://www.iucnredlist.org/technical-documents/classification-schemes) Conservation Actions in Place In-Place Land/Water Protection and Management Conservation sites identified: Yes, over entire range Conservation Actions Needed (http://www.iucnredlist.org/technical-documents/classification-schemes) Conservation Actions Needed 2. Land/water management -> 2.1. Site/area management Research Needed (http://www.iucnredlist.org/technical-documents/classification-schemes) Research Needed 3. Monitoring -> 3.1. Population trends Additional Data Fields Population Population severely fragmented: No © The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species: Syncerus caffer – published in 2008. http://dx.doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2008.RLTS.T21251A9260904.en 8 The IUCN Red List Partnership The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species™ is produced and managed by the IUCN Global Species Programme, the IUCN Species Survival Commission (SSC) and The IUCN Red List Partnership. The IUCN Red List Partners are: BirdLife International; Botanic Gardens Conservation International; Conservation International; Microsoft; NatureServe; Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew; Sapienza University of Rome; Texas A&M University; Wildscreen; and Zoological Society of London. THE IUCN RED LIST OF THREATENED SPECIES™