Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
1 Globalization and Interdependence: a simple model This is a simple model of globalization and interdependence. It demonstrates the link between increased integration and interdependence between countries in a way that is easy to understand, and that allows for the analysis of variety of shocks. 1.1 Model There are two countries in the global economy, the U S and the EU . Income in the US, Y U S , depends on European income, Y EU , as follows (with a symmetric relationship for the Europe) Y US = US + Y EU Y EU = EU + Y US Each equation has an intercept ( i ) and a constant slope ( ), and there is a simple economic intuition for the intercept, the slope, and the equation. The parameter re‡ects the level of integration (a measure of globalization) between countries, with 2 [0; 1): A higher means a more globalized world (e.g. higher share of trade in GDP, greater capital ‡ows) and therefore a more interdependent world, as we shall see. The basic model is presented in Figure 1. US output EU US Y1US αUS γ 1/γ Y1EU αEU Figure 1: basic model 1 EU output The term may be viewed as multiplied up components of aggregate expenditure, or a measure of domestic …scal and monetary policy settings e.g i = Gi + M i . The value of can be in‡uenced by the level of technology, so that positive technology shock in one country increases (and this is transmitted to the rest of the world via demand e¤ects - see diagram below). Technological spillovers and technology transfer can be viewed as situations where an increase in U S leads directly to an increase in EU which makes the US even better o¤ than without spillovers/transfer. The key point is that as economic integration increases, countries become more interdependent. Your policies / shocks e¤ect me, and through me they also e¤ect you. This is shown in the Figure 2 by an increase in , which steepers the U S line and ‡atters the EU line, with the equilibrum moving from A1 to A2 with higher income in both countries. US output EU1` Y2US EU2 US2 A2` US1 Y1US A1` α2US α1US αEU Y1EU Y2EU EU output Figure 2: Increase in integration 1.2 Shocks i. increase in integration / globalization (increase in ) ii. …nancial crisis, or more generally a negative domestic demand shock (fall in ). Note that this may have the additional e¤ect of reducing world integration (fall in ), e.g. the Great Depression and to a lesser extent the Great Recession, which makes both countries even worse o¤. iii. a change in monetary or …scal policy (change in where = G + M ) iv. impact of innovation (increase in U S ) Figure 3 demonstrates the case of an increase in aU S . 2 Figure 3: Increase in 1.3 US Other applications i. International policy coordination games. There are positive spillovers from from …scal and monetary policy (change in ). For example, an increase in GU S (increase in U S ) increases income in both countries, although to a lesser degree in the EU . This leads to the possibility of free riding (why should I run an expansionary …scal policy when your expansion will be expansionary for me) and a lack of …scal policy response. This is certainly observed in the EU, and has also been observed at a global level during the recent crisis. ii. The European project (increase ) with the objective of stopping France and Germany from going to war. Note that when = 0 there is no consequence for you of attacking your neighbor, but as increases this changes. 1.4 Solution of Model The model solves simply as follows Y US Y EU US = 2 1 EU = 1 3 EU + US + 2 and interdependence (which is multiplier e¤ect) is evident when examining the e¤ects of changes to U S and EU on Y U S since dY U S d US dY U S d EU Further = = 1 1 2 1 2 dY U S dY EU ; >0 d d 4