Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
From www.bloodjournal.org by guest on June 18, 2017. For personal use only. the functional defects allow the individual to phoreplete periphery. purge self-reactive T-cells by permitting new According to this latest emigrants to scan the periphery for tissuestudy, stimulated neonatal RTEs secrete higher levels specific antigens without the danger of eliciting autoimmunity? Neonates must uniquely cope of effector cytokines with lymphopenia and the absence of mature (IL-2, IL-4 and IFN␥) than do adult RTEs.1 Fur- peripheral T cells. Given that T cells undergoing homeostatic proliferation adopt a memory thermore, RTEs from cell phenotype and heightened function,7 the neonates, but not from adults, proliferate in reIL-7– driven proliferation of neonatal RTEs may sponse to the key homeoboth help fill up empty space and provide a T-cell development in the fetus and the neonate begins with immigration of static cytokine IL-7 in the population of memorylike T cells. Clearly, much fetal liver–derived stem cells into the thymus. After intrathymic T-cell absence of T cell–receptor remains to be learned about how the youngest maturation is complete, RTEs exit the thymus and enter the lymphoid periphery. RTEs are marked by green fluorescence in mice carrying a stimulation. CD4⫹ RTEs peripheral T cells cope with their adolescence transgene-encoding green fluorescent protein driven by the RAG2 proand successfully transition into adulthood. in humans also show inmoter. RTEs in the neonate enter a lymphopenic periphery and constitute Acknowledgment: This work was supported creased IL-7– driven prothe majority of peripheral T cells. In the adult, stem cells arise from the bone marrow, and after completing intrathymic maturation, the resulting RTEs by National Institutes of Health grant R01 liferation, although no exit the thymus and enter a lymphoreplete periphery, where they are AI064318. comparative analysis of surrounded by a majority of mature T cells. Conflict-of-interest disclosure: The author neonatal and adult RTEs declares no competing financial interests. ■ was presented in this grafts, and analysis of T cell–receptor restudy.2 The heightened response of murine arrangement excision circles. Each of these neonatal RTEs to IL-7 is accompanied by methods is problematic: they either result in REFERENCES differences in the kinetics of IL-7R␣ downcell death, thereby precluding functional ana1. von Boehmer H. Selection of the T cell repertoire: regulation and downstream transcription facreceptor-controlled checkpoints in T cell development. lyses, or involve surgical manipulation that can tor activation. Analysis of radiation chimeras Adv Immunol. 2004;84:201-238. alter the very parameters being measured. has indicated that the key differences between 2. Haines CJ, Giffon TD, Lu L-S, et al. Human CD4⫹ T Recent advances have highlighted new cell recent thymic emigrants are identified by protein tyneonatal and adult RTEs do not result solely rosine kinase 7 and have reduced immune function. J Exp means of identifying RTEs in both unmanipufrom their distinct stem cell source. Instead, Med. 2009;206:275-285. lated mice and humans, allowing the isolation the availability of IL-7 and the density and 3. Boursalian TE, Golub J, Soper DN, et al. Continued of live RTEs for functional and phenotypic maturation of thymic emigrants in the periphery. Nat Imidentity of the cellular neighbors of RTEs may ⫹ munol. 2004;5:418-425. analyses. In humans, CD4 RTEs are specificontribute to the distinct properties of adult 4. Hale JS, Boursalian TE, Turk GL, et al. Thymic output in cally marked by expression of PTK7, a proand neonatal RTEs. aged mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006;103:8446-8452. tein tyrosine kinase of unknown function in Now that the “hows” are beginning to be 5. Makaroff LE, Hendricks DW, Niec RE, et al. Postthy2 T cells. In the mouse, RTEs can be identified mic maturation influences the CD8 T cell response to antiunderstood, attention is likely to turn to the as fluorescent peripheral T cells in mice exgen. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009;106:4799-4804. “whys” of continued postthymic maturation of 6. Opiela SJ, Koru-Sengul T, Adkins B. Murine neonatal pressing a transgene encoding green fluoresT cells and the functional and phenotypic differ- recent thymic emigrants are phenotypically and functioncent protein under the control of the RAG2 ally distinct from adult recent thymic emigrants. Blood. ences between neonatal and adult RTEs. Does promoter.3 We have learned from these stud2009;113:5635-5643. the 2- to 3-week transition period of postthymic ies that thymic output (as a function of the size 7. Tanchot C, Le Campion A, Leaument S, et al. Naïve CD4⫹ T-cell maturation provide a means for further lymphocytes convert to anergic or memory-like cells in T cell of the generative compartment) is relatively conselecting the T-cell population for “best fit”? Do deprived recipients. Eur J Immunol. 2001;31:2256-2265. ⫹ stant throughout life, that many more CD4 RTEs emigrate than can ultimately be incorpo● ● ● VASCULAR BIOLOGY rated into the peripheral T-cell pool, and that in both mice3-5 and humans,2 RTEs are phenotypiComment on Sörensen et al, page 5680 cally immature and functionally defective, compared with their mature counterparts. Opiela et al have now contributed to this ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------body of work by comparing the function and phenotype of RTEs in the neonatal and adult Manfred Gessler WUERZBURG UNIVERSITY mouse.6 Such a comparison is clearly warThe VEGF-Dll4-Notch1 signaling cascade has taken center stage in angiogenesis, ranted, given the known differences in neonabut it now appears that Dll1 ligands have precedence in arteries and even seem to tal and adult T-cell biology. In the neonate, control VEGF signaling. RTEs differentiate from fetal liver stem cells venous fate onto embryonic precursors prior rteries and veins are structurally and to enter a lymphopenic peripheral environfunctionally different types of vessels, to formation of patent vessels and onset of ment in which they constitute the majority of and they display independent molecular signa- blood circulation. This has been shown most peripheral T cells while in healthy adults, tures. A genetic program imposes arterial or elegantly in zebrafish and seems to hold true RTEs comprise a minority of T cells in a lym- Dll1 and Dll4: similar, but not the same A blood 2 8 M A Y 2 0 0 9 I V O L U M E 1 1 3 , N U M B E R 2 2 5375 From www.bloodjournal.org by guest on June 18, 2017. For personal use only. dence that other components may be equally important. Limbourg et al showed that Dll1, a related Notch ligand, is essential for postnatal angiogenesis with heterozygous Dll1⫹/⫺ mice exhibiting strongly impaired reperfusion after experimental hindlimb ischemia.3 A complete Dll1 knockout is lethal with bleeding around day 11 (E11) of embryonic development, but this seems to be due to defects in surVascular Dll-Notch signaling. In fetal arteries (left), only Dll1 and not Dll4 appear to signal through Notch1 receptors to block the venous program rounding tissues and not and to mediate arterial gene expression in endothelia and in the surroundrelated to intrinsic vascular ing smooth muscle layer in a VEGF-independent manner. This contrasts functions. The availability with sprouting angiogenesis in the capillary bed (right), where Dll4 is the essential ligand that mediates the arterial program in stalk cells. VEGF of hypomorphic and condiinduces this pathway and thereby reduces VEGF sensitivity in stalk cells. tional knockout alleles of Professional illustration by A. Y. Chen. Dll14 now allow Sörensen and colleagues to pinpoint a novel embryonic for mammals as well.1 However, there is enorvascular defect that predicts a revised hierarmous plasticity in this system, allowing comchy of signaling.5 plete cell fate changes in response to external stimuli during early embryogenesis. This While Dll4 mutations (as well as mutaproperty is progressively lost with developtions of Notch receptors or Hey1/2 bHLH mental age.2 effectors) show lethality after day 9.5 of embryonic development,1 Dll1 hypomorphs or Blood vessels in the embryo are first formed by vasculogenesis, the coalescence of mice with endothelial-specific Dll1 deletion precursors to form vascular tubes and meshsurvive until birth. Nevertheless, careful works followed by remodeling and sprouting. analysis of their blood vessels demonstrated The current paradigm of sprouting angiogenthat arterial identity is progressively lost esis holds that vascular endothelial growth from larger vessels starting at day 13.5, the factor (VEGF) signaling through VEGF retime point when endothelial Dll1 expression ceptor 2 (Vegfr2), present on migrating tip should begin. Surprisingly, Dll4 is still excells of newly forming sprouts, induces Dll4 pressed in these vessels, suggesting the exisligands. Dll4 in turn activates Notch signaling tence of a switch making Dll4 incapable to in following stalk cells, making them refracsustain Notch activity and expression of tory to further VEGF-induced sprouting, in arterial markers like Efnb2, Nrp1, or Hey1 part by reducing Vegfr2 and its coreceptor and permitting expression of the vein Nrp1. Dll4 also induces expression of arterial marker Coup-TFII. markers like Hey1/2 bHLH transcription Interestingly, the reduction of Nrp1 exfactors and Efnb2 ligands, and it promotes pression and thus the impaired capacity of maturation and lumen formation. This is parendothelia to respond to VEGF in these mice alleled by repression of vein endothelial markis not due to up-regulation of the venous reguers such as Nrp2, EphB4, and Coup-TFII, lator Coup-TFII, which gets expressed only with the latter being involved in reciprocal later. Sörensen et al instead provide strong antagonism with the Notch pathway compoevidence that in arteries Nrp1 and perhaps nents Hey1 and Hey2 to determine arterial VEGFR2 are directly induced by activated versus venous cell fate. Notch receptors, which are absent from Dll1 Although this model of sprouting angionegative or hypomorphic endothelia. Thus, genesis and arterialization has gained broad VEGF cannot be placed upstream of the Dll/ experimental support, there is increasing eviNotch cascade but rather it appears that Notch 5376 signaling enables VEGF responsiveness of these cells. What is striking is the differential severity of endothelial defects in Dll1 versus Dll4 KO mice. While a lack of Dll4 leads to very early defects in angiogenesis and arterialization, this is much less so with Dll1. Although arterial markers are lacking and venous markers are up-regulated, this is still compatible with embryonic development. The perinatal lethality of the conditional endothelial Dll1 knockouts may be due to vascular problems, but this awaits further study. Nevertheless, it seems that arterialization defects may be tolerated in later development or adults for some time, at least as long as the animals are not subject to additional stress. This is reminiscent of the rather limited arterialization of grafted veins in human coronary arteries.6 The present study clearly shows that there are parallel and noncompensating DllNotch signals in endothelial cells. Dll4 may be more important early on in the capillary bed, while Dll1 preferentially acts in arteries. Yet, the molecular basis for the differential function of these very similar ligands acting on the same Notch1 receptor remains unresolved. The principle of a VEGF-DllNotch signaling cascade in endothelia may have to be revised for arteries with Dll1Notch1 acting not as a target, but as a facilitator of VEGF sensitivity. Conflict-of-interest disclosure: The author declares no competing financial interests. ■ REFERENCES 1. Roca C, Adams RH. Regulation of vascular morphogenesis by Notch signaling. Genes Dev. 2007;21:2511-2524. 2. le Noble F, Moyon D, Pardanaud L, et al. Flow regulates arterial-venous differentiation in the chick embryo yolk sac. Development. 2004;131:361-375. 3. Limbourg A, Ploom M, Elligsen D, et al. Notch ligand Delta-like 1 is essential for postnatal arteriogenesis. Circ Res. 2007;100:363-371. 4. Schuster-Gossler K, Cordes R, Gossler A. Premature myogenic differentiation and depletion of progenitor cells cause severe muscle hypotrophy in Delta1 mutants. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007;104:537-542. 5. Sörensen I, Adams RH, Gossler A. DLL1-mediated Notch activation regulates endothelial identity in mouse fetal arteries. Blood. 2009;13:5680-5688. 6. Kudo FA, Muto A, Maloney SP, et al. Venous identity is lost but arterial identity is not gained during vein graft adaptation. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2007;27: 1562-1571. 28 MAY 2009 I VOLUME 113, NUMBER 22 blood From www.bloodjournal.org by guest on June 18, 2017. For personal use only. 2009 113: 5375-5376 doi:10.1182/blood-2009-02-205468 Dll1 and Dll4: similar, but not the same Manfred Gessler Updated information and services can be found at: http://www.bloodjournal.org/content/113/22/5375.full.html Articles on similar topics can be found in the following Blood collections Information about reproducing this article in parts or in its entirety may be found online at: http://www.bloodjournal.org/site/misc/rights.xhtml#repub_requests Information about ordering reprints may be found online at: http://www.bloodjournal.org/site/misc/rights.xhtml#reprints Information about subscriptions and ASH membership may be found online at: http://www.bloodjournal.org/site/subscriptions/index.xhtml Blood (print ISSN 0006-4971, online ISSN 1528-0020), is published weekly by the American Society of Hematology, 2021 L St, NW, Suite 900, Washington DC 20036. Copyright 2011 by The American Society of Hematology; all rights reserved.