* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Autoimmune Disease Infections and Women
Hospital-acquired infection wikipedia , lookup
Rheumatic fever wikipedia , lookup
Infection control wikipedia , lookup
Sociality and disease transmission wikipedia , lookup
Vaccination wikipedia , lookup
Kawasaki disease wikipedia , lookup
Childhood immunizations in the United States wikipedia , lookup
Behçet's disease wikipedia , lookup
Neglected tropical diseases wikipedia , lookup
Schistosomiasis wikipedia , lookup
Multiple sclerosis research wikipedia , lookup
Psychoneuroimmunology wikipedia , lookup
Transmission (medicine) wikipedia , lookup
Autoimmune encephalitis wikipedia , lookup
Neuromyelitis optica wikipedia , lookup
African trypanosomiasis wikipedia , lookup
Eradication of infectious diseases wikipedia , lookup
Rheumatoid arthritis wikipedia , lookup
Germ theory of disease wikipedia , lookup
Globalization and disease wikipedia , lookup
Molecular mimicry wikipedia , lookup
Sjögren syndrome wikipedia , lookup
Communicable Disease News Editor: Dorothy MacEachern, MS, MPH 1101 W. College Avenue, Room 360 Spokane, WA 99201-2095 509-324-1442 [email protected] Lord, make me an instrument of your peace. Where there is hatred let me sow love; where there is injury, pardon; where there is doubt, faith; where there is despair, hope; where there is darkness, light; and where there is sadness, joy. --St. Francis of Assisi November 200 4 2004 Autoimmune Disease Infections and Women Autoimmune diseases are the third most common category of disease in the United States after cancer and heart disease; they affect approximately 5–8% of the population or 14–22 million persons. Autoimmune diseases can affect virtually every site in the body, including the endocrine system, connective tissue, gastrointestinal tract, heart, skin, and kidneys. At least 15 diseases are known to be the direct result of an autoimmune response. In several instances, such as rheumatoid arthritis, multiple sclerosis, and myocarditis, the autoimmune disease can be induced experimentally by administering self-antigen in the presence of adjuvant (collagen, myelin basic protein, and cardiac myosin, respectively) . Autoimmune diseases tend to cluster in families and in individuals (a person with one autoimmune disease is more likely to get another), which indicates that common mechanisms are involved in disease susceptibility. Genetic background appears to account for about one third of the risk of autoimmune disease. This estimate is based on studies that compared genetically identical, monozygotic twins to nonidentical, dizygotic pairs, for which the concurrence rate can be as low as 2% to 7%. Noninherited factors may account for the remaining (approximately 70%) risk of developing an autoimmune disorder. Soon after autoimmune diseases were first recognized more than a century ago, researchers began to associate them with viral and bacterial infections. A body of circumstantial evidence links diabetes, multiple sclerosis, myocarditis, and many other autoimmune diseases with preceding infections; many different microorganisms have been associated with a single autoimmune disease, which indicates that more than one infectious agent can induce the same disease through similar mechanisms (See table below). Since infections generally occur well before the onset of symptoms of autoimmune disease, clinically linking a specific causative agent to a particular autoimmune disease is difficult. This raises the question of whether autoimmune diseases really can be attributed to infections. To address this question, autoimmunity first needs to be defined. Autoimmune disease occurs when a response against a self-antigen(s) involving T cells, B cells, or autoantibodies induces injury either systemically or against a particular organ. Understanding of autoimmune diseases is hindered by the fact that some level of autoimmunity, in the form of naturally occurring autoantibodies and self-reactive T and B cells, is present in all normal persons. Thus, on a proportional basis, developing autoimmune disease is the relatively uncommon consequence of a common autoimmune response. Although an autoimmune response occurs in most persons, clinically relevant autoimmune disease develops only in some persons. So, how can infections induce autoimmune disease? A mechanism often called on to explain the association of infection with autoimmune disease is “molecular mimicry,” that is, antigens or epitopes of the microorganism closely resemble self-antigens. The induction of an immune response to the microbial antigen thus results in cross-reaction with self-antigens and induction of autoimmunity. Although epitope-specific cross-reactivity between microbes and self-tissues has been shown in some animal models, molecular mimicry has not been clearly demonstrated to occur in human diseases. Another possibility is that microorganisms expose self-antigens to the immune system by directly damaging tissues during an active infection. This mechanism has been referred to as the “bystander effect”. However, whether pathogens mimic self-antigens, release sequestered self-antigens, or both, is difficult to determine. In addition to antigen-specific mechanisms, nonspecific mechanisms could also lead to autoimmunity after infection. To determine whether infection can lead to autoimmune disease, direct evidence (e.g., the ability to transfer autoimmune disease), indirect evidence (e.g., the ability to reproduce autoimmune disease in animal models), and circumstantial evidence (e.g., the association of autoantibodies with disease in appropriate clinical settings) should be considered. The best evidence so far that infections can induce autoimmune diseases comes from animal models. In most animal models of autoimmunity, including myocarditis, disease has been transferred to naïve animals with autoimmune cells (splenocytes or T cells), autoantibodies, or both, which provides compelling evidence that infections induce autoimmune diseases by immune-mediated mechanisms. It has been known for some time that the basic immune response differs between men and women, with women producing a more vigorous immune response and increased antibody production. Women are more susceptible to autoimmune diseases, but autoimmune diseases that develop in men often are more severe. Many animal models of autoimmune disease have shown a similar sex bias. Sex hormones, such as estrogen, testosterone, and progesterone, may mediate most of the sex-biased differences in the immune response. The precise interaction between hormones and the innate immune response after infection is poorly understood. However, in-vitro studies of immune cells cultured in the presence of hormones have shown that estrogen significantly increases proinflammatory cytokine production. Thus, the elevated immune response in women may even further Infe ctions in Humans As s ociate d with Autoimmune Dis e as e s Dis e as e Infe ction Multiple sclerosis Epstein- Barr virus (EBV), measles virus Lyme arthritis Borrelia burgdorf eri Type I diabetes Coxsackie virus B4, rubella virus, cytomegalovirus (CMV), mumps virus Rheumatoid arthritis Escherichia coli, mycobacteria, EBV, hepatitis C virus (HCV) Lupus erythematosis EBV Myocarditis CB3, CMV, chlamydia Rheumatic fever/myocarditis Streptococci Chagas' disease/myocarditis Trypanosoma cruzi Myasthenia gravis Herpes simplex virus, HCV Guillain- Barré syndrome CMV, EBV, Campylobacter spp. amplify the adjuvant effect of infection, thereby increasing the possibility that chronic autoimmune disease will subsequently develop in women. With the increase in the number of autoimmune cases diagnosed in recent years, the possible role of infections in exacerbating disease, particularly in women, is of rising concern. Excerpted from Fairweather D, Rose NR. Women and autoimmune diseases. Emerging Infectious Diseases, 2004 November. Available from http:// www.cdc.gov/ncidod/EID/vol10no11/040367.htm TRAINING AND EDUCATION UPDATES-Satellite Downlinks: Noon-2:00 pm, “Meth Madness: What Every Healthcare Worker Should Know,” SRHD Room 360. Nov 17: Nov 18: 10-Noon, “Rapid Testing: Advances for HIV Prevention,” SRHD Room 360. Dec 7: 11:00 am-1:30 pm, “Crisis & Emergency Risk Communication, Part I” SRHD Room 360. Dec 14: 11:00 am-1:30 pm, “Crisis & Emergency Risk Communication, Part II” SRHD Room 360. Welcome! Jennifer Polello, our new Regional Learning & Support Specialist, joined us on November 1. Jennifer comes to us from SRHD’s Health Promotions Division, where she was the Tobacco Control and Prevention health educator. Visit www.srhd.org/Region9Calendar to find broadcasts that are available on VHS or DVD. For more information call Jennifer Polello at 324-1529, or email [email protected]. AIDS Case Reporting Changes All states and areas have been reporting AIDS cases since 1986 or earlier. For surveillance purposes, AIDS cases have always been counted as belonging to the geographic area where they were diagnosed with AIDS (which may not reflect where they currently reside and receive services). If, for example, someone was first diagnosed with AIDS in Washington and then moved to Oregon, they would still be counted as a Washington case. If the person moved to Oregon and did not tell their health care provider they had been previously diagnosed in Washington, the case would be counted in both states, resulting in duplication and contributing to artificial inflation of case numbers at the national level. To counter the problem, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) initiated the Interstate Deduplication Project (IDEP) in 2002. CDC identified potential duplicates in the national database. Since they do not receive names of those with AIDS, CDC sent the information to the states, who worked together to identify which cases were duplicates. In total, 1,063 Washington State AIDS cases were determined to be the same person as at least one other state’s case. As a result of completion of this exercise, 658 Washington State cases were retained with a local AIDS diagnosis residence and 405 cases were assigned an Out of State diagnosis residence. CASES OF SELECTED DISEASE REPORTED TO SPOKANE REGIONAL HEALTH DISTRICT, OCT 2004 THIS MONTH LAST MONTH THIS YEAR TO DATE LAST YEAR TO DATE DISEASE (Oct. 2004) (Sept. 2004) (Oct. 2004) (Oct. 2003) **0 **1 10 22 AIDS *cumulative--448 since Jan 1984 0 0 2 0 Borreliosis (Relapsing Fever) 0 4 48 65 Campylobacteriosis 86 84 944 825 Chlamydial STD 1 1 2 8 Enterohemorrhagic E. Coli 6 6 41 33 Giardiasis 14 13 133 87 Gonorrhea 0 0 3 6 Hepatitis A-acute 1 0 9 15 Hepatitis B-acute 0 2 18 39 Hepatitis B-chronic 28 22 300 374 Hepatitis C -acute and chronic **0 **0 8 11 HIV *cumulative--136 since Dec 2001 0 0 0 2 Influenza (Sept 1--Aug 31) 0 0 0 0 Measles (Rubeola, Red) 0 0 5 3 Meningococcal Disease 0 0 0 0 Mumps 2 10 34 4 Pertussis (Whooping Cough) 0 0 0 0 Rubella (German Measles) 1 3 24 26 Salmonellosis 1 0 3 9 Shigellosis 1 0 3 3 Syphilis **0 **0 3 4 Tuberculosis** (as of Sept 2004) **Counts may be one month or more delayed *HIV/AIDS cumulative totals adjusted to eliminate interstate duplicates, 10/2004 Clinic 324-1600 Communicable Disease 24-hour Confidential Report Line: 324-1449 HIV/AIDS Program 324-1542 TB Program 324-1614 Epidemiology 324-1442