Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
JOURNAL OF TROPICAL PEDIATRICS, VOL. 56, NO. 2, 2010 Brief Report Management of Scorpion Sting: Prazosin or Dobutamine by B. D. Gupta, M. Parakh, and A. Purohit Department of Pediatrics, Umaid Hospital for Women & Children, Regional Institute of Maternal & Child Health, Dr Sampurnanand Medical College, Jodhpur, India Summary Objective: To compare the efficacy of Dobutamine and Prazosin in the management of cases with scorpion sting. Setting: Pediatric intensive care unit of an affiliated hospital of a medical university. Subjects: Forty-two children with scorpion sting. Intervention: The involved victims were divided alternatively into two groups. Twenty-one patients were treated with intravenous Dobutamine infusion and other 21 received oral Prazosin. Outcome measures: Percent-rise in left-ventricular ejection fraction in first 24 h after institution of the therapy, time taken in recovery from pulmonary edema, requirement of any additional drug and supportive measures, and mortality. Results: The time taken in recovery from pulmonary edema was significantly shorter in cases treated with prazosin (28 18.3 vs. 72 0 h), the p-value being <0.05. Faster improvement of various parameters was observed in prazosin group in comparison to the dobutamine group. Mortality in both the groups was equal. Conclusion: Prazosin and dobutamine, both are useful drugs for management of cardiovascular features of scorpion envenomation, nevertheless, prazosin is slightly better than dobutamine in terms of faster recovery, and also because of its ease of administration and low cost of therapy. Key words: dobutamine, prazosin, scorpion sting. Introduction Scorpion sting is a dreadful medical emergency, more so in pediatric victims because of their smaller body size. It is fairly common in many parts of India like Maharashtra, Andhra Pradesh, Pondicherry, Tamil Nadu, Madhya Pradesh, Orissa and western Rajasthan [1–3]. Scorpion stings cause a wide range of symptoms, from severe local reactions to cardiovascular, respiratory and neurological manifestations. Scorpion envenomation can involve many organs in the body simultaneously producing multiorgan dysfunction. Scorpion envenomation in India (Mesobuthus tamulus) predominantly manifests with cardiorespiratory features like hypertension and pulmonary edema. Most of the deaths due to scorpion sting are also attributed to Correspondence: A. Purohit, Department of Pediatrics, Umaid Hospital for Women & Children, Regional Institute of Maternal & Child Health, Dr Sampurnanand Medical College, Jodhpur, India. E-mail: <[email protected]>. cardiopulmonary complications like myocarditis and acute pulmonary edema [4]. There is still a great controversy regarding specific drug therapy for similar clinical profile and different regimens have been tried so far, such as, steroids, adrenaline, lytic cocktail regimen and many more. Scorpion antivenom is also available, but its utility in the management of these cases is still doubtful. Thus, till date, there is no consensus guideline available for the management of these children [5, 6]. Prazosin has been suggested by some as the first line drug for the management of severe scorpion envenomation [6, 7]. On the contrary, dobutamine infusion alone has also been shown to improve the hemodynamic performance in patients presenting with severe scorpion envenomation [8]. It has been found to be life saving in patients of scorpion envenomation presenting with shock and pulmonary edema, as the shock has been found to be cardiogenic in origin. In search for the best drug in treatment of scorpion envenomed children, we carried out a study at Umaid hospital for women and children, Jodhpur, comparing the efficacy of dobutamine and prazosin in the management of cases with scorpion sting, as these are the two most promising drugs in such cases. ß The Author [2009]. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: [email protected] doi:10.1093/tropej/fmp070 Advance Access Published on 26 August 2009 115 BRIEF REPORT TABLE 1 Characteristics and manifestations in dobutamine and prazosin groups Age of the patients (years) Weight of the patients (kg) Male:female Time elapsed between sting and admission (h) Tachycardia Hypertension Serum CPK-MB (IU/l) Pulmonary edema Prolonged QTc interval ST and T-wave changes LVEF (%) Materials and Methods The present study was conducted in the Department of Pediatrics, Umaid Hospital, Dr Sampurnanand Medical College, Jodhpur. All the patients admitted with the definite history of scorpion sting (scorpion being seen or killed by the relatives or bystander) were included in the study. On admission, particulars of the patient were noted in a specially designed, pre-tested proforma, for the study. This was followed by thorough physical examination and continuous monitoring of vitals including NIBP and pulse oximetry. All the recordings were taken by a multipara monitor (BPL Accura). All the patients were subjected for blood investigations including renal and hepatic profile and serum CPK-MB before starting the treatment in the emergency ward. An electrocardiogram and chest X-ray were done on the day of admission and if found abnormal, were repeated daily, till abnormality got corrected. A 2D-echocardiography (L&T Medicals USG Machine) was done to find out the cardiac status of the patient including the ejection fraction and any regional wall motion abnormality (RWMA) before starting treatment and then daily (if general condition of the patient allowed) till hospital stay. Forty-two patients were enrolled in the study. The patients were divided into two groups on alternate basis for treatment. First group was given intravenous dobutamine infusion and another was given oral prazosin hydrochloride. The patients falling into dobutamine group were given continuous dobutamine infusion at the rate of 10 mg/kg body weight/ min. This was further titrated as per the condition of the patient. This infusion was continued for 48 h of hemodynamic stability and till the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) increased to >60% and then was tapered downwards at the rate of 5 mg/kg body weight every 12 h. A child referred from peripheral hospital that had already been started 116 Dobutamine Prazosin 5.17 3.93 14.14 5.97 2.5:1 7.29 6.76 5/21 (23.8%) 12/21 (57.1%) 122.28 82.82 2/21 7/19 (36.8%) 3 49 13% 4.67 2.58 13.29 4.39 2.5:1 6.69 10.17 9/21 (42.9%) 9/21 (42.9%) 109.32 62.5 3/21 9/21 (52.9%) 6 55 13% dobutamine infusion at a rate >10 mg/kg body weight/min, was continued the same rate of infusion, if stable hemodynamically. The patients falling into prazosin group were given prazosin tablet (orally or by nasogastric tube) at the dose of 30 mg/kg body weight every 6 h for 48 h and till LVEF reached >60%. Statistics The data are expressed as mean standard deviation for descriptive purposes. Chi-square and Student’s t-test were used to compare various variables between the dobutamine and prazosin groups. Yate’s correction was applied, as the sample size was small. In present study, p-value < 0.05 for corresponding value of Chi-square was considered as significant and null hypothesis was rejected, meaning that difference between two proportions was significant. Results Forty-two patients were enrolled in the study, the baseline characteristics of whom are given in Table 1. The two groups were age-, weight- and sex-matched. The patients in the dobutamine group presented 7.29 6.76 h after the sting while those in prazosin group reached 6.69 10.17 h after the accident. At admission, there was no significant difference in the presentation of cases in the two groups. The rise of LVEF during first 24 h was greater with prazosin (4.8%) than with dobutamine (2.55%). Inspite of therapy, left ventricular output decreased in few patients in the next 24 h; number of such patients being six (28.57%) in dobutamine and three (14.28%) in prazosin group. The time taken in recovery from pulmonary edema was significantly shorter in cases treated with prazosin (28 18.3 h), the p-value being <0.05. Therefore, faster improvement of various parameters was observed in prazosin group in comparison with the dobutamine group (Table 2). Journal of Tropical Pediatrics Vol. 56, No. 2 BRIEF REPORT TABLE 2 Dobutamine vs. prazosin Rise in LVEF in first 24 h (%) Number of patients in whom LVEF decreased in first 24 h in spite of treatment Total time taken in normalization of decreased LVEF (days) Time taken in recovery from pulmonary edema (h) Total duration of stay of patients with pulmonary edema (h) Number of patients requiring digoxin Number of patients requiring frusemide Number of patients requiring mechanical ventilation TABLE 3 Comparing outcome in dobutamine and prazosin group Total Number Number Mortality patients of patients of patients rate (%) recovered expired Dobutamine Prazosin 21 21 19 20 2 1 9.5 4.7 Three patients expired during the study with a mortality rate of 7.1%. The mortality rate in dobutamine group was 9.5% in comparison with 4.7% in prazosin group, but the difference was not significant (Table 3). Discussion Alpha-receptors play vital role in the pathogenesis of cardiac failure and pulmonary edema due to scorpion sting. Prazosin is a selective alpha-1 adrenergic receptor blocker. It dilates veins and arterioles, there by reducing pre-load and left ventricular impedance without rise in heart rate and renin secretion. It also inhibits sympathetic outflow in central nervous system. It enhances insulin secretion, which is inhibited by venom action. It has also been found useful even in cases with hypotension. Thus, its pharmacological properties can antagonize the hemodynamic, hormonal and metabolic effects of scorpion venom action [3, 7, 9, 10–14]. However, few doubts have been raised over its mechanism and efficacy in scorpion envenomation [12, 15]. It has been said that alpha-blockers can stimulate the gastric acid secretion, which in turn may, aggravate the existing sub-clinical or clinical acute pancreatitis into a fully blown-up fulminating acute pancreatitis in some scorpion sting victims. In addition, prazosin cannot reverse the tissue damage that has already been caused by catecholamines [16]. Dobutamine infusion alone has been reported to be able to improve the impaired heart function (left as well as right ventricular). It evokes substantial increases in cardiac output and systemic arterial Journal of Tropical Pediatrics Vol. 56, No. 2 Dobutamine Prazosin p-value 2.22 7.77 6 2.1 1.5 72 0 156 118.8 2 2 2 4.8 7.54 3 2.1 0.8 28 18.3 88 13.9 Nil Nil Nil >0.20 <0.05 >0.20 pressure while lowers pulmonary artery occlusion pressure (PAOP). Right ventricular function and tissue oxygenation variables also improve with its use. Many authors have recommended its use in the management of these victims [5, 6, 8, 12]. The present study was aimed at comparing the efficacy of two potent drugs, dobutamine and prazosin in better management of scorpion envenomed cases. There is no other study comparing these two most effective drugs in management of this fearsome emergency. In the present study, time taken in recovery from pulmonary edema in scorpion envenomed cases was 72 0 h in patients treated with dobutamine, while it was only 28 18.3 h in patients treated with prazosin (p < 0.05). Besides, both the cases with pulmonary edema treated with dobutamine required digoxin, frusemide and mechanical ventilation as well. Rise in left ventricular function during first 24 h of therapy was also higher in cases treated with prazosin (4.8 7.54%) in comparison to those treated with dobutamine (2.22 7.77%); however, the difference was not statistically significant. Thus, most of the cardiovascular parameters improved faster with prazosin in comparison to dobutamine. Our study points to the fact that both dobutamine and prazosin are useful in the treatment of cardiovascular features of scorpion envenomation; however, prazosin has an edge over dobutamine in management of these cases. Besides its efficacy, the low cost of therapy and ease of administration with prazosin make it a better option than dobutamine infusion. During our study, all the patients expired because of encephalopathy and no patient died of pulmonary edema or other cardiovascular complications. None of the drugs was found useful in patients of scorpion envenomation associated with encephalopathy. Thus, we further suggest that more multicentric, large-sample studies are required to evaluate the effects of other drugs, besides dobutamine and prazosin, in scorpion-induced encephalopathy. On top of all these factors, this study has also shown that intensive management of these victims is vital for better outcomes. 117 BRIEF REPORT References 1. Balasubramaniam P, Murthy KRK. Liver glycogen depletion in acute myocarditis produced by scorpion venom (Buthus tamulus). Indian Heart J 1984;36:101–6. 2. Bawaskar HS, Bawaskar PH. Management of cardiovascular manifestations of poisoning by the Indian red scorpion (Mesobuthus tamulus). Br Heart J 1992; 68:478–80. 3. Bawaskar HS, Bawaskar PH. Clinical profile of severe scorpion envenomation in children at rural setting. Indian Pediatr 2003;40:1072–7. 4. Biswal N, Charan MV, Betsy M, et al. Management of scorpion envenomation. Pediatr Today 1999;2:420–6. 5. Mahadevan S. Scorpion sting. Indian Pediatr 2000; 37:504–13. 6. Biswal Niranjan, Bashir Rani A, Murmu Uday C, et al. Outcome of scorpion sting envenomation after a protocol guided therapy. Indian J Pediatr 2006; 73:577–82. 7. Bawaskar HS, Bawaskar PH. Severe envenoming by Indian red scorpion M. tamulus – the use of prazosin therapy. Quart J Med 1996;89:701–4. 8. Elatrous S, Nouria S, Besbes-Ouanes L, et al. Dobutamine in severe scorpion envenomation. Chest 1999;116:748–53. 118 9. Bawaskar HS. Scorpion Sting: Current Management. http://www.pediatric oncall.com (5 February 2009, date last accessed). 10. Bawaskar HS. Management of severe scorpion sting at rural settings: what is the role scorpion antivenom. J Venom Anim Toxins Incl Trop Dis 2005;11:3–7. 11. Bawaskar H. Management of Scorpion Sting. http://heart..bmj.com/cgi/content/extract/82/2/253 (20 January 2009, date last accessed). 12. Santhanakrishnan BR. Scorpion sting-letter to editor. Indian Pediatr 2000;37:1154–7. 13. Bawaskar HS, Bawaskar PH. Vasodilators: scorpion envenoming and the heart (an Indian experience). Toxicon 1994;32:1031–40. 14. Bawaskar HS, Bawaskar PH. Prazosin for vasodilator treatment of acute pulmonary oedema due to scorpion sting. Ann Trop Med Parasitol 1987; 81:719–23. 15. Radha Krishna Murthy K. On scorpion envenoming syndrome – problems of medical ethics and accountability in medical research in India. J Venom Anim Toxins 2002;8. 16. Mahadevan S, Choudhury P, Puri RK, Srinivasan S. Scorpion envenomation and the role of lytic cocktail in its management. Indian J Pediatr 1981;48:757–61. Journal of Tropical Pediatrics Vol. 56, No. 2