Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Neglected tropical diseases wikipedia , lookup
Marburg virus disease wikipedia , lookup
Eradication of infectious diseases wikipedia , lookup
History of biological warfare wikipedia , lookup
Biological warfare wikipedia , lookup
Anthrax vaccine adsorbed wikipedia , lookup
Beyond Anthrax: The Weaponization of Infectious Diseases Edited by Larry I. Lutwick and Suzanne M. Lutwick Towata, NJ: Humana Press, 2009. 374 pp $149.00 (hardcover). When did infectious diseases become weaponized, as the title of Beyond Anthrax: The Weaponization of Infectious Diseases suggests? Why is this relevant to the busy clinician dealing with Mother Nature’s infections on a daily basis? The 2001 anthrax attacks not only reminded us that germs can still be used as weapons but demonstrated that random clinicians will be the first to see and recognize cases of infection caused by bioterrorism. Although there have been scores of publications on anthrax since 2001, relatively few have been written on other microbes of concern. Beyond anthrax, a compilation written by multiple academic, government, and organizational experts, seeks to address this gap. After an introductory first chapter on the history of bioterrorism, approximately one-half of the book (Chapters 2–10) reviews specific Category A and B agents, with most chapters introduced by emblematic cases. Often missing in texts on bioterrorism and comprising one-quarter of this book, Chapters 11–15 speak to public health implications in policy, law, surveillance, psychosocial management of events, and communication with the media. Finally, the book concludes with 2 individual chapters on rapid detection and plant pathogens. Each chapter is a stand-alone summary. Chapter 1, written by Pro-MED’s Stuart Handysides, broadly defines bioterrorism as the threat or use of infections as weapons and presents a unique historical summary from ancient times to the present. Chapters 2–6 make up approximately one-third of Beyond anthrax and review the relatively less-covered Category A agents: smallpox, plague, tularemia, botulism, and viral hemorrhagic fever pathogens. Although all chapters touch on epidemiology, microbiology, diagnosis, treatment, prevention, and possible biowarfare use, each varies in depth, ranging from 6 text-filled pages (tularemia) to 30 pages (smallpox, viral hemorrhagic fever). Chapter 2, “Smallpox and Bioterrorism,” is the most comprehensive of the group. It supplements commonly published information on diagnostic criteria and vaccination with sections on monkeypox, use of vaccine in human immunodeficiency virus, similarities to severe acute respiratory syndrome, and genetic and immunologic scenarios. Chapter 6 provides excellent tables of viral hemorrhagic fever viruses associated with bioterrorism that list differences in transmissibility, infectious dose, vaccine availability, and historical use. Chapters 7–10 address selected Category B microbes and intentional food and water contamination. Whereas Chapter 7 focuses on the naturally occurring “Vietnam time bomb” melioidosis, so-called because disease is caused by reactivation years after exposure in an endemic area, Chapter 8 cites the stability and aerosolizability of Rickettsia prowazekii in epidemic typhus fever and its likelihood for substantial spread in a louse-infested population. Chapter 9 groups together commonly-occurring Staphylococcus aureus enterotoxin B with Clostridium perfringens epsilon toxin and relatively rare ricin in its overview of Category B biotoxins. In Chapters 11–15 on public health policy and bioterrorism response, Washington Post Science Writer David Brown’s examination of “The Role of the Media in Bioterrorism” stands out as a compelling and candid advisory to public health officials. Written before the 2009 H1N1 pandemic, it cites specific examples from the anthrax letters of 2001 and offers concrete, constructive suggestions regarding communication of scientific facts in real time. The legal and surveillance chapters that follow discuss quarantine in the context 1462 • CID 2009:49 (1 November) • BOOK REVIEWS of bioterrorism and the logistics of bioterrorism data collection and interpretation, respectively. Chapter 16 focuses on rapid identification methods that use serology, antigen-non-antibody target interactions, and genomics. All in all, Beyond anthrax, which is intended to be a “primer for clinicians and epidemiologists on a variety of agents, organisms, or toxins…of potential use in a biologically attack…,” provides much more in its 17 chapters and 374 pages. With its substantial section on public health applications and inclusion of food, water, and plant bioterrorism and the capacity for standardization and expansion of chapter content, it would make a useful overview text on bioterrorism for medical, public health, and post-doctorate students. Newcomers to bioterrorism may also find it helpful to view the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Institutes of Health Web sites on bioterrorism agent categorization for additional background. For clinicians with more time who are still coming to terms with “countermeasures” parlance and who have many preparedness workshops under their belts, Beyond anthrax offers a thoughtful review of germs not-to-be-forgotten and why they matter. In short, Beyond anthrax moves us beyond anthrax. Mary E. Wright Division of Clinical Research, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland Animalcules: The Activities, Impacts, and Investigators of Microbes By Bernard Dixon Washington, DC: ASM Press, 2009. 358 pp. $39.95 (hardcover). Animalcules is a compilation of essays by Bernard Dixon that have appeared in the American Society for Microbiology journal Microbes. As a result, one can read this book in a number of manners. In a somewhat academic manner, one could theoretically scan the table of contents for a topic and learn something about Botox, frescoes, or Gerhard Domagk. I fear that this would miss the point in an era when PubMed and Google Scholar can readily uncover articles on most any subject with a few keystrokes followed by a click of a search button. Instead, I would recommend a less directed read, such as flipping through essays on evolution by Stephen Jay Gould or reflections on biology by Lewis Thomas. One option is to open the book at random and enjoy a 4–5-page rumination on some microbiological topic that has likely never occurred to you (bedtime reading). Alternatively, one can read the book in its entirety, to get a sense of the common conceptual themes that recur (holiday reading). The book is divided into 5 loose categories, with a more general introductory set of articles followed by essays on ecology, the human context, microbiologists, and, finally, the conduct of microbiological investigation. Although the topics are eclectic, the consistent theme throughout is Dixon, who shapes each chapter with his own personal touch on different levels. On the most scientific level, the author takes you along to a variety of venues, painting a fast-pass portrait of highlights from this particular meeting or that. Beneath this level, one learns of the author’s respect for enquiry and rejection of unproven dogma. This was nicely articulated in a chapter that listed untruths authoritatively taught by his schoolteacher that have been subsequently disproven. On a still more personal level, one encounters a scientist sharing his excitement at having his work cited many years after the fact and a patient who discusses his own symptomatic experience with strep throat. Because of the different levels that play out, I recommend reading the book en bloc over a few days, to best reveal some of the common themes that pop up across sections and stories. Given that the book represents a com- pilation of different ideas written about at different times, one cannot expect each chapter to resonate in the same manner with each reader. My personal bias favors 2 types of chapters: the biographies of unheralded pioneers in microbiology and the rhetorical essays that end with an apparently simple statement followed by a question mark. Chapters on some of the great microbiologists not to be recognized in a full-length biography not only outline the context for some of the seminal contributions in microbiology but also beg the question of whether the work itself or the biographer was the key determinant in a scientist’s ultimate standing. This theme returns in an essay on the citation game. Chapters on specific questions remind me of the first article I read by the author, on whether Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis is to blame for Crohn disease [1]. The typical ingredients in these essays are (1) a defined question, (2) a willingness to comb through old and new articles, (3) a reasoned summation of the current state of the literature, and (4) a concluding question, often presented as a statement, followed by a short question. Many chapters end along the lines of “Given the techniques available, you would think the answer could be quite readily determined. So why are we still asking this question?” The essays span sociological questions (should we be publicizing experiments that generate more potent toxins?) and fundamental questions (what is virulence?). In each case, the message is that many questions are unanswered, partially answered, or poorly answered. As a result, a key message that permeates this book is that many core issues in microbiology and infectious diseases that were defined in the 19th century are still unresolved in the 21st century. This book therefore provides reassurance for those already committed to microbiology and can serve as an inspiration to the next generation of scientists who might be wondering whether there is job security in microbiology. The answer would appear to be yes. In either case, Animalcules presents a conceptual approach through example. Start with good questions, add a dollop of scepticism to what is “known,” read the literature critically, and consider the value of new tools for old questions. I suspect that each niche in microbiology could benefit from a 4page essay by Dixon to remind us of where we are, where we are not, and where we might consider directing our efforts. There is indeed job security for Dixon as he reflects on our efforts. Marcel A. Behr Department of Medicine, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Canada Reference 1. Dixon B. The mystery MAP. Lancet Infect Dis 2002; 2:316. New Books Received Brunette G. CDC Health Information for International Travel 2010. Philadelphia, PA: Mosby Elsevier, 2009. 540 pp. $29.95 (softcover). ISBN: 978-0-7020-3481-7. Cooper AF, Kirton JJ. Innovation in Global Health Governance. Burlington, VT: Ashgate Publishing Company, 2009. 380 pp. $114.95 (hardcover). ISBN: 978-0-75464872-7. Cornely O, Bangard C. A Clinical Atlas of Radiography of Invasive Fungal Disease. München, Germany: Urban & Vogel, 2008. 112 pp. i22.95 (paperback). ISBN: 978-3-89935-254-2. Dworkin MS. Outbreak Investigations around the World. Sudbury, MA: Jones and Bartlett Publishers, 2009. 456 pp. $64.95 (paperback). ISBN: 978-0-76375143-2. Fratamico PM, Smith JL, Brogden KA. Sequelae and Long-Term Consequences of Infectious Diseases. Washington, DC: ASM Press, 2009. 534 pp. $149.95 (hardcover). ISBN: 978-1-55581-430-4. BOOK REVIEWS • CID 2009:49 (1 November) • 1463