* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Vital Genes in the Heterochromatin of
Short interspersed nuclear elements (SINEs) wikipedia , lookup
RNA interference wikipedia , lookup
Skewed X-inactivation wikipedia , lookup
Gene nomenclature wikipedia , lookup
Non-coding DNA wikipedia , lookup
Vectors in gene therapy wikipedia , lookup
Long non-coding RNA wikipedia , lookup
Genetic engineering wikipedia , lookup
Oncogenomics wikipedia , lookup
Human genome wikipedia , lookup
Point mutation wikipedia , lookup
Epigenetics of neurodegenerative diseases wikipedia , lookup
Transposable element wikipedia , lookup
Therapeutic gene modulation wikipedia , lookup
Pathogenomics wikipedia , lookup
Gene desert wikipedia , lookup
Public health genomics wikipedia , lookup
Y chromosome wikipedia , lookup
Essential gene wikipedia , lookup
Quantitative trait locus wikipedia , lookup
Nutriepigenomics wikipedia , lookup
History of genetic engineering wikipedia , lookup
Site-specific recombinase technology wikipedia , lookup
Neocentromere wikipedia , lookup
Gene expression programming wikipedia , lookup
Genomic imprinting wikipedia , lookup
Biology and consumer behaviour wikipedia , lookup
Polycomb Group Proteins and Cancer wikipedia , lookup
Ridge (biology) wikipedia , lookup
Genome evolution wikipedia , lookup
X-inactivation wikipedia , lookup
Minimal genome wikipedia , lookup
Designer baby wikipedia , lookup
Microevolution wikipedia , lookup
Artificial gene synthesis wikipedia , lookup
Gene expression profiling wikipedia , lookup
Genetica 117: 209–215, 2003. © 2003 Kluwer Academic Publishers. Printed in the Netherlands. 209 Vital genes in the heterochromatin of chromosomes 2 and 3 of Drosophila melanogaster Patrizio Dimitri1, Nicoletta Corradini1 , Fabrizio Rossi1 , Fiammetta Vernı̀1 , Giovanni Cenci2 , Giorgio Belloni1 , Igor F. Zhimulev3 & Dmitry E. Koryakov4 1 Dipartimento di Genetica e Biologia Molecolare ‘Charles Darwin’ Università ‘La Sapienza’, Piazzale A. Moro 5, 00185, Roma, Italy (Phone: 39-0649912856; Fax: 39-06-4456866; E-mail: [email protected]); 2 Dipartimento di Scienze Tecnologiche, Biologiche ed Ambientali-ECOTEKNE 73100, Lecce, Italy; 3 Institute of Cytology and Genetics, 630090, Novosibirsk, Russia; 4 Department of Cytology and Genetics, Novosibirsk State University, 630090, Novosibirsk, Russia Key words: Drosophila, heterochromatic genes, heterochromatin Abstract Heterochromatin has been traditionally regarded as a genomic wasteland, but in the last three decades extensive genetic and molecular studies have shown that this ubiquitous component of eukaryotic chromosomes may perform important biological functions. In D. melanogaster, about 30 genes that are essential for viability and/or fertility have been mapped to the heterochromatin of the major autosomes. Thus far, the known essential genes exhibit a peculiar molecular organization. They consist of single-copy exons, while their introns are comprised mainly of degenerate transposons. Moreover, about one hundred predicted genes that escaped previous genetic analyses have been associated with the proximal regions of chromosome arms but it remains to be determined how many of these genes are actually located within the heterochromatin. In this overview, we present available data on the mapping, molecular organization and function of known vital genes embedded in the heterochromatin of chromosomes 2 and 3. Repetitive loci, such as Responder and the ABO elements, which are also located in the heterochromatin of chromosome 2, are not discussed here because they have been reviewed in detail elsewhere. Introduction It is now clear that heterochromatin performs important cellular functions such as gene regulation, centromere and telomere function and meiotic chromosome transmission (Weiler & Wakimoto, 1995; McKee, 1998; Eissemberg & Hilliker, 2000; Henikoff, 2000; Grewal & Elgin, 2002). In particular, the heterochromatin of D. melanogaster contains several essential genetic loci (Gatti & Pimpinelli, 1992; Weiler & Wakimoto, 1995). About 30 genes required for viability and fertility have been mapped to the heterochromatin of major autosomes (Hilliker, 1976; Dimitri, 1991; Schulze et al., 2001; Koryakov, Zhimulev & Dimitri, 2002). The early prediction that these genes correspond to unique sequences (Hilliker, 1976) has been confirmed by molecular analyses. At least light, concertina, rolled and Nipped-B in chromosome 2 and l(3)80Fh, l(3)80Fi and l(3)80Fj in chromosome 3 consist of single copy exons (Devlin, Bingham & Wakimoto, 1990; Parks & Weischaus, 1991; Biggs et al., 1994; Rollins, Morcillo & Dorsett, 1999). Recently, the computational analysis of the sequence of D. melanogaster genome identified about one hundred new predicted genes associated with the proximal regions of the chromosome arms. These genes may have escaped previous genetic analysis and it remains uncertain whether they are indeed located in heterochromatin or correspond to proximal euchromatic genes. Vital genes located in the heterochromatin of chromosome 2 Sixteen vital genes identified by recessive lethal alleles have been thus far mapped to the constitutive 210 Figure 1. Cytological mapping of vital genes in the heterochromatin of chromosomes 2 and 3. (A) Gene distribution within chromosome 2 heterochromatin; note that the l(2)41Aa gene maps to the h41 region proximally to rolled and is separated from it by the breakpoint of Df(2Rh)Rsp1 . (B) Gene distribution within chromosome 3 heterochromatin. Black color and hues of gray color correspond to the intensity of DAPI staining. 2L = left arm of chromosome 2; 2R = right arm of chromosome 2. 3L = left arm of chromosome 3; 3R = right arm of chromosome 3. C = centromeric region. Table 1. The vital genes located in the heterochromatin of chromosome 2 Gene Mitotic map Size (kb) Function Overlaps l(2)40Fa l(2)40Fc light concertina l(2)40Fd l(2)40Fe l(2)40F l(2)40Fg l(2)41Ab l(2)41Aa rolled l(2)41Ad l(2)41Ae l(2)41Af l(2)41Ah Nipped-B h35 h35 h35 h35 h35 h35 h35 h35 h39–40 h41 h41 h43–h44 h46 h46 h46 h46 – – 16 10.5 – – – – – – ∼80 – – – – 39 Unknown Unknown Cellular-protein trafficking Gastrulation Unknown Unknown Unknown Unknown Unknown Chromosome condensation Sevenless signal transduction pathway Legs and wing morphogenesis Unknown Unknown Unknown Chromosomal adherin – – AE002734 AE002743 – – – – – – AE003090 AE002642 – – – AE003040 All the genes have been identified by genetic analysis. Molecular data are available only for light, concertina, rolled and Nipped-B. heterochromatin of chromosome 2 (Hilliker, 1976; Dimitri, 1991; Rollins, Morcillo & Dorsett, 1999). Here we will present available data on their cytological mapping, molecular organization and functions (Figure 1(A) and Table 1). Mapping and molecular organization The vital genes are nonrandomly distributed throughout the mitotic heterochromatin of chromosome 2 (Figure 1(A)): l(2)41Aa, l(2)41Ab, rolled (l(2)41Ac) 211 and l(2)41Ad are clearly located within the proximal heterochromatin of 2R, while eight loci in the left arm (l(2)40Fa, l(2)40Fc, concertina, light, l(2)40Fd, l(2)40Fe, l(2)40Ff and l(2)40Fg) and four in the right arm (l(2)41Ae l(2)41Af, l(2)41Ah and Nipped-B) are clustered within h35 and h46, respectively. These two regions represent the most distal portions of mitotic heterochromatin of chromosome 2 (Dimitri, 1991) and, based on the total DNA content of the heterochromatin (Adams et al., 2000), we estimated that they are roughly 2 and 1.5 Mb of DNA long, respectively. Interestingly, most of the genes thus far detected are located in DAPI-dull fluorescent chromosomal regions. FISH experiments on mitotic chromosomes have shown that those gene-rich regions harbor clusters of transposable element-homologous sequences and are devoid of highly repetitive satellite DNAs (Carmena & Gonzales, 1995; Pimpinelli et al., 1995; Dimitri, 1997). After the release of D. melanogaster genome sequence (Adams et al., 2000), we have a more detailed picture of the molecular structure of some heterochromatic genes of chromosome 2 (Table 1). The light gene (scaffold AE002734) it is about 16 kb long and has 11 introns in agreement with previous work of Devlin, Bingham and Wakimoto (1990); concertina (scaffold AE002743) is about 10.5 kb long and contains four introns. The rolled gene encompasses about 80 kb and has six introns (W. Biggs and K. Zavitz, unpublished). A significant, but incomplete, portion of rolled is present in two different non-overlapping scaffolds (AE003090 and AE002642). Finally, the Nipped-B gene (scaffold AE003040) is 39 kb long and has 23 introns. In general, the introns encompass a major portion of the entire genomic region of those genes. Most of the introns belong to the category of short introns as they range from 50 to 70 bp, while others are longer and their size can reach up 20 kb. Interestingly, the intronic and flanking portions of those genes are enriched in transposable elementhomologous sequences. This peculiar organization was originally shown for light (Devlin, Bingham & Wakimoto, 1990). We have recently performed sequence analysis of the introns from rolled, Nipped-B, light and concertina and found that about 50% of the large introns is composed of degenerate retroelements and DNA transposons (Dimitri, Junakovic & Arcà, submitted). Moreover, comparative analysis of introns from orthologues of the same genes in closely related Drosophila species revealed intron size variation which might result from rearrangements and instability of TE-related sequences. Our findings suggest that the structure of those genes evolve rapidly possibly as a consequence of TE-mediated changes. Functions It appears that single-copy genes on chromosome 2 are involved in several important cellular processes (Table 1). Among 2Lh genes the light gene product is involved in cellular-protein trafficking (Warner et al., 1998), while concertina encodes a maternal α-like subunit of a G protein essential for gastrulation (Parks & Wieschaus, 1991). Among the 2Rh genes, molecular data are available for rolled and Nipped-B. The rolled gene was originally found to be required for imaginal disc development and suggested to be involved in cell proliferation (Hilliker, 1976; Dimitri, 1991). Subsequent studies have shown that the rolled product is a mitogen-activated protein (MAP) kinase which is required in the sevenless signal transduction pathway (Biggs et al., 1994) and may also be implicated in mediating the spindle integrity checkpoint (Inoue & Glover, 1998). The Nipped-B gene encodes a protein which is homologous to a family of chromosomal adherins and may be also involved in sister chromatid cohesion, chromosome condensation, and DNA repair (Rollins, Morcillo & Dorsett, 1999). In the release of D. melanogaster genome sequence, only limited portions of the 60 Mb of heterochromatin have been sequenced (Adams et al., 2000). Thus, the structure and function of most of the heterochromatic genes thus far detected by conventional genetic analysis remains unknown. Among the genes in 2Rh, l(2)41Aa and l(2)41Ad are of particular interest and the analysis of phenotypic defects exhibited by their lethal alleles may help shed some light on their function. Flies mutant for l(2)41Aa survive until third instar larvae (Hilliker, 1976) and have severely defective imaginal discs (Dimitri, 1991). The phenotypes of late lethality and poorly developed imaginal discs are diagnostic of lesions in essential cell-cycle genes (Gatti & Baker, 1989). The cytological analysis of both mitotic and meiotic cell divisions showed that l(2)41Aa mutants affect proper chromosome condensation (Cenci, Belloni & Dimitri, submitted). In particular, in larval brain, a high proportion of cells (∼30–60%) showed irregularly condensed metaphase chromosomes (Figure 2). These results suggest that the l(2)41Aa product may be required for chromosome condensation in both mitosis and meiosis. 212 Figure 2. Mitotic defects associated with l(2)41Aa mutations. (a) Colchicine treated control metaphase stained with DAPI; (b) Phenotype of colchicine treated metaphase of l(2)41Aa mutants stained with DAPI. As previously mentioned, the l(2)41Ad gene maps to the h43–h44 regions of mitotic heterochromatin of 2R. It has been shown that lethal mutations of this gene result in death at the late pupae or pharate adult stage with individuals exhibiting malformed legs and unextended wings (Hilliker, 1976; Dimitri, 1989). This phenotype strongly resembles that of mutations in Drosophila genes involved in morphogenesis suggesting that l(2)41Ad has a similar function. One of those genes is vulcan which encodes a product that is required for proper legs and wings morphogenesis and is a putative component of the septate junction (Spradling et al., 1999; Gates & Thummel, 2000; http://fly.ebi.ac.uk:7081/.bin/fbidq.html?FBgn 0010633). Intriguingly, vulcan has been assigned to 2R in the polytene region 41F. However, complementation tests ruled out the possibility that vulcan and l(2)41Ad are alleles (P. Dimitri & F. Rossi, unpublished). heterochromatin appears to be devoid of known genes or satellite DNAs. Three of the genes from the left arm, l(3)80Fh, l(3)80Fi and l(3)80Fj, have been cloned and found to correspond to single-copy sequences. Interestingly, l(3)80Fh and l(3)80Fj genes appear to be members of the trithorax group (trxG) genes, while the l(3)80Fi gene may have key functions in growth and development (Schulze et al., 2001). In addition, other single-copy genes such as α-Cat, rp21, SCP, DSK, QIII, ziti, Dbp80 and PARP map to regions 80 and 81 (Kelly et al., 1977; Sinclair, Suzuky & Grigliatti, 1981; Kay, Zhang & Jacobs-Lorena, 1988; Nichols, Schneuwly & Dixon, 1988; Oda et al., 1993; Dej & Spradling, 1997; Eisen et al., 1998; Hanai et al., 1998), but it is unclear whether or not they are allelic to the genes described by Marchant and Holm (1988). Predicted genes associated with the proximal regions of the arms Vital genes located in the heterochromatin of chromosome 3 A group of 12 vital genes, identified by EMS, Pelement and γ-rays mutageneses, has been associated with the heterochromatin of chromosome 3 (Schulze et al., 2001). A detailed cytogenetic mapping of those genes on mitotic chromosomes has been recently performed (Koryakov, Zhimulev & Dimitri, 2002; see Figure 1(B)). The results showed that at least seven genes of the left arm (from l(3)80Fd to l(3)80Fj) map to segment h49–h51 and that the most distal genes (from l(3)80Fa to l(3)80Fc) are located within regions h47–h49. The two essential genes on the right arm, l(3)81Fa and l(3)81Fb map to the distal h58 segment. Intriguingly, a large portion of chromosome 3 Several predicted genes located in the proximal regions of the arms of chromosomes 2 ans 3 have been recently identified by the computational analysis of the sequence of D. melanogaster genome (Adams et al., 2000; http://fly.ebi.ac.uk:7081/annot/bands/band41. html; http://fly.ebi.ac.uk:7081/annot/bands/band40. html; http://fly.ebi.ac.uk:7081/annot/bands/band80. html). Moreover, it is still unclear whether all the predicted coding sequences correspond to true functional genes, since only few of the predicted genes have mutant alleles. Thus far, the actual location of most predicted genes remains uncertain since they have been incorporated into gadFly with inferred mapping (http://www.fruitfly.org/sequence/faq.html#seq14). How many predicted genes are located within 213 heterochromatin? Do some of them corresponds to the genetically identified single-copy genes mapped to the mitotic heterochromatin of chromosome 2 and 3? We have preliminary results based on FISH mapping of BACs suggesting that only a small group of the predicted genes mapping to 41C-F is included in h46, the most distal region of 2R mitotic heterochromatin (N. Corradini, F. Rossi, F. Vernì & P. Dimitri, in preparation). Moreover, 3 genes on 2L such as chitinase-3 (CG18140), chitinase-1 (CG17682) (De la Vega et al., 1998) and CG18117 can be mapped on the basis of their linkage with concertina. The concertina gene is found in the scaffold AE002743.1 together with chitinase-3, chitinase-1 and CG1811. Both concertina and chitinase-3 are separated by about 20 kb, while chitinase-1 and CG18117 are even closer to concertina. Since concertina maps to the h35 of 2L mitotic heterochromatin (see the map in Figure 1) it is then conceivable that chitinase-3, chitinase-1 and CG18117 are also located in the same region. Transposon tagging of single-copy genes located in heterochromatin In addition to EMS or γ-rays, the vital heterochromatic genes of chromosomes 2 and 3 can be mutated by insertional mutagenesis with transposable elements, that may greatly facilitate genetic and molecular studies of the disrupted genes. Alleles of the light gene have been induced by P-element transposition and this has allowed the cloning of the gene (Devlin, Bingham & Wakimoto, 1990). More recently, P–M hybrid dysgenesis-induced mutations were also recovered in heterochromatic genes of 3L (Schulze et al., 2001). Transposon tagging using strains carrying single-P element marked with the rosy, white or both white and yellow sequences has been proved to be successful in the recovery of heterochromatic insertions (Zhang & Spradling, 1994; Roseman et al., 1995). A collection of lines carrying single-P inserts in heterochromatin was produced by the Berkeley Drosophila Genome Project (BDGP). Among those insertions, l(2)02047 was shown to be an allele of the NippedB gene which allowed the molecular characterization of the gene (Rollins, Morcillo & Dorsett, 1999). Although P-element mutagenesis represents a powerful tool for the analysis of genes, it is still unclear whether P-elements can mutate all single-copy genes in heterochromatin. Other dysgenic systems may be also used for mutating those genes. I–R hybrid dysgen- esis, where transposition of the I elements is activated (Busseau et al., 1994), was also found to be very efficient in generating mutations at heterochromatic loci of chromosome 2 (Dimitri et al., 1997). About 65% of the heterochromatic lethals recovered in this work affected individual loci and may be due to I factor insertion within the gene, as shown in the case of the rolledIR1 allele. The remaining lethals were associated with chromosome rearrangements which mostly correspond to large deletions spanning megabases of DNA. Interestingly, nine out of 40 (21%) were alleles of the l(2)41Ad gene suggesting that this gene is particularly prone to mutation following I–R dysgenesis. How can the apparent hypermutability of l(2)41Ad be explained? This may result from a highly accessible chromatin state, or to a particularly large size of the gene. Moreover, preexisting I-element sequences in region h44 (Dimitri et al., 1997) may also have a role in this phenomenon perhaps in inducing some kind of ‘homing’. Unfortunately, a limitation to the use of I–R dysgenesis for tagging heterochromatic genes is the lack of a marked I factor construct that can be induced to transpose efficiently. Conclusions Joint efforts are now required to complete the molecular characterization of the heterochromatic genome of D. melanogaster and to extend the work to other Drosophila species. This may allow us to characterize new heterochromatic genes and to learn how they have evolved. An important goal is also to solve the apparent paradox of the ‘functional heterochromatin’. Although it is well know that heterochromatic genes such as light and rolled genes require a heterochromatic environment to function (Wakimoto & Hearn, 1990; Eberl, Duyf & Hilliker, 1993), we still need to understand how heterochromatic domains of gene expression are organized and what accounts for the differences between heterochromatic and euchromatic domains. To this regard it is worth noting that active heterochromatic genes might show a nucleosome array characteristic of euchromatin, while being flanked by TE-sequences that are packaged in a heterochromatic fashion, with long-range order (Sun et al., 2001). Moreover, heterochromatin proteins such as HP1 can be required for heterochromatic gene expression (Lu et al., 1999). Future research on these topics should provide a more complete picture of the 214 functional domains present in the heterochromatin of Drosophila. Acknowledgement We wish to thank Nicolaj Junakovic for helpful comments and discussions. References Adams, M.D., S.E. Celniker, R.A. Holt, C.A. Evans, J.D. Gocayne, P.G. Amanatides, S.E. Scherer, P.W. Li et al., 2000. The genome sequence of Drosophila melanogaster. Science 287: 2185–2195. Berghella, L. & P. Dimitri, 1996. The heterochromatic rolled gene of Drosophila melanogaster is extensively polytenized and transcriptionally active in the salivary gland chromocenter. Genetics 144: 117–125. Biggs, H.W., H.K. Zavitz, B. Dikinson, A. Van Der Straten, D. Brunner, E. Hafen & L.S. Zipursky, 1994. The Drosophila rolled locus encodes a MAP kinase required in the sevenless signal transduction pathway. EMBO J. 13: 1628–1635. Busseau, I., M.C. Chaboissier, A. Pelisson & A. Bucheton, 1994. I factors in Drosophila melanogaster: transposition under control. Genetica 93: 101–116. Carmena, M. & C. Gonzales, 1995. Transposable elements map in a conserved pattern distribution extending from betaheterochromatin to centromeres in Drosophila melanogaster. Chromosoma 103: 676–684. De la Vega, H., C.A. Specht, Y. Liu & P.W. Robbins, 1998. Chitinases are a multi-gene family in Aedes, Anopheles and Drosophila. Insect Mol. Biol. 7: 233–239. Dej, K. & A. Spradling, 1997. A heterochromatic ribosomal protein gene is specifically required during oogenesis to maintain nurse cell chromosome organization. A. Dros. Res. Conf. 38: 8B. Devlin, R.H., B. Bingham & B.T. Wakimoto, 1990. The organization and expression of the light gene, a heterochromatic gene of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 125: 129–140. Dimitri, P., 1991. Cytogenetic analysis of the second chromosome heterochromatin of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 127: 553–564. Dimitri, P., 1997. Constitutive heterochromatin and transposable elements in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetica 100: 85–93. Dimitri, P., B. Arca`, L. Berghella & E. Mei, 1997. High genetic instability of heterochromatin after transposition of the LINElike I factor in Drosophila melanogaster. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94: 8052–8057. Eberl, D., B.J. Duyf & A.H. Hilliker, 1993. The role of heterochromatin in the expression of a heterochromatic gene, the rolled gene of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 134: 277–292. Eisen, A., M. Sattah, T. Gazitt, K. Neal, P. Szauter et al., 1998. A novel DEAD-box RNA helicase exhibits high sequence conservation from yeast to humans. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1397: 131–136. Eissemberg, J.C. & A.J. Hilliker, 2000. Versatility of conviction: heterochromatin as both repressor and an activator of transcription. Genetica 109: 19–24. Elgin, S.C.R., 1996. Heterochromatin and gene regulation in Drosophila. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 6: 193–202. Gates, J. & C.S. Thummel, 2000. An enhancer trap screen for ecdysone-inducible genes required for Drosophila adult leg morphogenesis. Genetics 156: 1765–1776. Gatti, M. & B.S. Baker, 1989. Genes controlling essential cell-cycle functions in Drosophila melanogaster. Gene. Dev. 3: 438–453. Gatti, M. & S. Pimpinelli, 1992. Functional elements in Drosophila melanogaster heterochromatin. Ann. Rev. Genet. 26: 239–275. Grewal, S.I. & S.C. Elgin, 2002. Heterochromatin: new possibilities for the inheritance of structure. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 12: 178–187. Hanai, S., M. Uchida, S. Kobayashi, M. Miwa & K. Uchida, 1998. Genomic organization of Drosophila Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase and distribution of its mRNA during development. J. Biol. Chem. 273: 11881–11886. Hilliker, A.J., 1976. Genetic analysis of the centromeric heterochromatin of chromosome 2 of Drosophila melanogaster. Deficiency mapping of EMS-induced lethal complementation groups. Genetics 83: 765–782. Inoue, Y.H. & D.M. Glover, 1998. Involvement of the rolled/MAP kinase gene in Drosophila mitosis: interaction between genes for the MAP kinase cascade and abnormal spindle. Mol. Gen. Genet. 258: 334–341. Kay, M.A., J.-Y. Zhang & M. Jacobs-Lorena, 1988. Identification and germline transformation of the ribosomal protein rp21 gene of Drosophila melanogaster: complementation analysis with the Minute QIII locus reveals nonidentity. Mol. Gen. Genet. 213: 354–358. Kelly, Z.E., A.M. Phillips, M. Delbridge & R. Stewart, 1977. Identification of a gene family from Drosophila melanogaster encoding proteins with homology to invertebrate sarcoplasmic calcium-binding proteins (SCPS). Insect Biochem. Molec. 27: 783–792. Koryakov, D.E., I.F. Zhimulev & P. Dimitri, 2002. Cytogenetic analysis of the third chromosome heterochromatin of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 160: 509–517. Lu, B.Y., P.C. Emtage, B.J. Duyf, A.J. Hilliker & J.C. Eissenberg, 2000. Heterochromatin protein 1 is required for the normal expression of two heterochromatin genes in Drosophila. Genetics 155: 699–708. McKee, B.D., 1998. Pairing sites and the role of chromosome pairing in meiosis and spermatogenesis in male Drosophila. Curr. Top. Dev. Biol. 37: 77–115. Nichols, R., S.A. Schneuwly & J.E. Dixon, 1988. Identification and characterization of a Drosophila homologue to the vertebrate neuropeptide cholecystokinin. J. Biol. Chem. 263: 12167–12179. Oda, H., T. Uemura, K. Shiomi, A. Nagafuchi, S. Tsukita & M. Tekeichi, 1993. Identification of a Drosophila homologue of α-Catenin and its association with the ARMADILLO protein. J. Cell. Biol. 121: 1133–1140. Parks, S. & E. Wieschaus, 1991. The Drosophila gastrulation gene concertina encodes a G alpha-like protein. Cell. 64(2): 447–458. Pimpinelli S. & P. Dimitri, 1989. Cytogenetic organization of the Rsp (Responder) locus in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 121: 765–772. Pimpinelli S., M. Berloco, L. Fanti, P. Dimitri, S. Bonaccorsi, E. Marchetti, R. Caizzi, C. Caggese & M. Gatti, 1995. Transposable elements are stable components of Drosophila melanogaster heterochromatin. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 92: 3804–3808. Rollins, A.R., P. Morcillo & D. Dorsett, 1999. Nipped-B, a Drosophila homologue of chromosomal adherins, participates in activation by remote enhancers in the cut and Ultrabithorax genes. Genetics 152: 577–593. Roseman, R.R., E.A. Johnson, C.K. Rodesch, M. Bjerke, R.N. Nagoshi & P.K. Geyer, 1995. A P element containing suppressor 215 of Hairy-wing binding regions has novel properties for mutagenesis in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 141: 1061–1074. Schulze, S., D.A. Sinclair, E. Silva, K.A. Fitzpatrick, M. Singh, V.K. Lloyd, K.A. Morin, J. Kim, D.G. Holm, J.A. Kennison & B.M. Honda, 2001. Essential genes in proximal 3L heterochromatin of Drosophila melanogaster. Mol. Gen. Genet. 264: 782–789. Sinclair, D.A.R., D.T. Suzuky & T.A. Grigliatti, 1981. Genetic and developmental analysis of a temperature-sensitive Minute mutation of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 97: 581–606. Spradling, A.C., D. Stern, A. Beaton, E.J. Rhem, T. Laverty, N. Mozden, S. Misra, G.M. Rubin et al., 1999. The Berkeley Drosophila genome project gene disruption project. Single P element insertions mutating 25% of vital Drosophila genes. Genetics 153: 135–177. Sun, F.L., M.H. Cuaycong & S.C. Elgin, 2001. Long-range nucleosome ordering is associated with gene silencing in Drosophila melanogaster pericentric heterochromatin. Mol. Cell. Biol. 21: 2867–2879. Wakimoto, B.T. & M.G. Hearn, 1990. The effects of chromosome rearrangements on the expression of heterochromatic genes in chromosome 2L of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 125: 141–154. Warner, T.S., D.A. Sinclair, K.A. Fitzpatrick, M. Singh, R.H. Devlin & B.M. Honda, 1998. The light gene of Drosophila melanogaster encodes a homologue of VPS41, a yeast gene involved in cellular-protein trafficking. Genome 41: 236–243. Weiler, K.S. & B.T. Wakimoto, 1995. Heterochromatin and gene expression in Drosophila. Ann. Rev. Genet. 29: 577–605. Zhang, P. & A.C. Spradling, 1994. Insertional mutagenesis of Drosophila heterochromatin with single P elements. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 91: 3539–3543.