Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Conservation of Endangered Fiveneedled Pines in Alberta Parks Joyce Gould PhD Parks Division, Alberta Tourism, Parks and Recreation BC Protected Areas Research Forum December 7, 2011 Outline • Introduction • Conservation initiatives • Research Whitebark and Limber Pine •General separation of range (with some overlap in some areas) •Whitebark—high elevations •Limber—lower elevation Limber pine (Pinus flexilis) • Endangered in Alberta • Primary threats: – – – – white pine blister rust mountain pine beetle fire climate change Provincial Distribution Limber Pine Whitebark pine (Pinus albicaulis) • Endangered in Alberta and assessed for Canada • Primary threats: – – – – white pine blister rust mountain pine beetle fire suppression/exclusion climate change Whitebark Pine Provincial Distribution Whitebark Pine Whitebark as Keystone Species • Modifies microclimate to facilitate establishment of other trees (subalpine fir) • Often found in headwaters – influences hydrology and drainage—often increased snow accumulation, reduced erosion • Food source for birds and mammals – Clark’s nutcracker – Grizzly bear (listed) – American red squirrel • Seeds are high in carbohydrate (21%), protein (21%) and fat (52%) • ‘charismatic mega-flora’ Cyndi Smith Distribution of whitebark and limber pine in AB protected areas • Prior to 2005 – Incidental observations – Limited information on extent of occurrence and population size – No information on health Assessed distribution within AB protected areas • Aerial and ground surveys (a few sites per year) • Started in 2005 Recovery Planning •One team, two plans •Fosters team approach to conservation •Builds on recovery work being done prior to initiation of process •AB Parks member of team •Provide clear direction for recovery •Plans nearing completion Recovery Goal • to ensure viable, selfsustaining populations Objectives: • Reduce mortality • Conserve genetic diversity • Develop and introduce rust-resistant strains • Increase and enhance natural regeneration • Assess impacts from climate change • Support research Reduce Mortality Prescribed fire – Exclude high value stands from burn unit – Stand modification to reduce risk – Protect mature trees (cone production) – Reassess post-burn Reduce Mortality Protection from MPB • Removal of infected lodgepole in stands • Application of verbenone pouches in vulnerable stands (ASRD) – tells beetle that tree is ‘occupied’ – Very expensive – Must be reapplied every year – Not a long-term solution— buys time Habitat Modification (fire) • Application of fire into stands being advocated • Majority of stands are climax(?) • Competition not as strong • Preliminary work by Wong (UBC) supports this • Competing values pose challenges to Park management Photo: Bob Gray Kakwa Wildland Willmore Wilderness Area Jasper National Park Kakwa Wildland Willmore Wilderness Area Jasper National Park Kakwa Wildland Willmore Wilderness Area Jasper National Park Kakwa Wildland Willmore Wilderness Area Jasper National Park Kakwa Wildland Willmore Wilderness Area Jasper National Park Kakwa Wildland Willmore Wilderness Area Jasper National Park Gene Conservation • Whitebark and limber are priority species – Banking of seed – Identification and planting of rust resistant trees – Identification and development of genetic resistance for rust • Recognition of importance of seed zones in restoration efforts Seed Collection • Seed bank, blister rust screening, planting (Alberta Tree Improvement and Seed Centre) • Cage cones to protect from predators: nutcrackers and squirrels • Identify “plus trees” – those that are potentially blisterrust resistant Photo: Cyndi Smith, Parks Canada Monitoring Whitebark Pine Ecosystem Foundation Whitebark Limber Either Assessing health • Alberta Parks: – 38 health transects established in whitebark – 8 in limber pine stands across latitudinal gradient • Parks Canada: – 115 whitebark pine transects between international border and McBride, BC – 85 limber pine, including 2 in BC, with Canadian Forest Service (CFS) • Alberta SRD (Forestry): – 7 whitebark and 1 limber pine transect near Crowsnest Pass overall percent infection 43% overall mortality 35% Health Transects Whitebark Pine and Limber Pine Cyndi Smith, Parks Canada mean infection level -- 41.3% mean mortality level is 22.1% (Achuff and Wilson 2009). Health Transects Whitebark Pine and Limber Pine Cyndi Smith, Parks Canada Health • some of healthiest stands in North America occur in Alberta • healthiest stands in north (generally) • health declining • variability within sites 60 50 40 Stem 30 Branch 20 10 0 06WBP01 06WBP02 06WBP03 06WBP05 06WBP07 06WBP08 06WBP09 Increase (%) of active and inactive cankers by site, Willmore, 2006-2011 AB SRD, Hinton Climate Change •Climate not controlling distribution •Challenges •Identification of future habitat •Identification of future regeneration sites •Identification of pests and diseases Support Research Research Projects • Predictive modeling (Dr. G. McDermid, U of C) • Characterization of regeneration sites (Dr. J. Gould and E. Macdonald, U of A) • Grizzly bear utilization (FRI) • Seed predation (Dr. V. Peters, Kings University College) • Climate change (A. Clason, UNBC) • Treeline (Drs. D. Tomback, U Colorado and L. Resler, Virg Tech) Communication Items Interpretive Programming • Public amphitheatre talks • Guided hikes • Health of whitebark and limber pine continues to decline in spite of being in protected areas • Recovery of populations will require intensive management and research Contact information • Alberta Parks – Joyce Gould ([email protected]) • Recovery Team Leads – Robin Gutsell ([email protected]) – Brad Jones ([email protected])