Download Categories Pretreatment Diagnosis and Treatment Plan Treatment

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts
no text concepts found
Transcript
Categories
Excellent
Pretreatment
Diagnosis and
Treatment Plan
Thorough medical and
dental history was
obtained
Complete and thorough
clinical findings were
recorded
Clinical procedures
were performed at the
highest level of skill
There was an
appropriate review of
systems
Appropriate diagnostic
tests were performed
and the results recorded
All essential procedures
were performed and in
the appropriate
sequence
Appropriate medical
consultations were
obtained and
documented
Appropriate
radiographs/images and
interpretation
Vital signs were
recorded
Medications were
documented (including
rationale for prescribing,
dosages, and frequency
of dosing
The pulpal and
periapical (periradicular)
diagnosis was correct
The treatment plan was
appropriate
Alternative treatment
plans was appropriate
Possible complications
were considered
Acceptable
Lacking details
Minor information
omitted that does not
significantly affect the
treatment and prognosis
Informed consent was
obtained
The pulpal and
periapical (periradicular)
diagnosis was correct
despite the fact limited
diagnostic tests were
performed
The radiographic
examination was
inadequate
There is missing
diagnostic information
that does not affect the
diagnosis, treatment
plan, or prognosis
The alternative
treatment plans were
incomplete
Treatment
Pharmacological
management was
appropriate and justified
Treatment was modified
in accordance with the
medical and dental
history
Post-treatment
Appropriate recall
intervals were prescribed
The clinical examination
was complete and
appropriate tests
performed
Results were consistent
with the treatment
Radiographs/images
were appropriate and
diagnostic
The tooth was
adequately restored
Minor procedural
deficiencies were
evident that do not
compromise the
outcome
Procedures were not
sufficiently documented
or demonstrated
The narrative was
complete, thorough, and
readable with correct
spelling and proper
grammar
Required highest level of
knowledge and technical skill
The terminology used was
consistent with the
Glossary of Endodontic
Terms and abbreviations
were adequately explained
Treatment consultations
were required
Required the highest level of
patient management
The treatment sequence was
a critical component
The radiographic
documentation was
complete and of the
highest quality
Clinical photographs were
of high quality and
appropriate
Application of biologic
principles was
demonstrated
The treatment sequence
was not appropriate but
this did not affect the
treatment outcome
Complexity
Procedures were justified
and explained
Radiographs/images
were adequate and
demonstrate quality
treatment
Procedures were
performed at a
satisfactory level
Documentation
The dates and treatment
sequencing were accurate
The clinical examination
and data provided was
adequate but not
complete
Results reported were
consistent with the data
provided
The tooth was
inadequately restored but
noted in the narrative
Minor errors not affecting
the interpretation or
understanding of the case
High technical skill required
Adequate patient
management
Treatment sequence
important but not critical
Categories
Deficient
Pretreatment
Diagnosis and
Treatment Plan
Incomplete medical and
dental history
The clinical examination
was incomplete
Insufficient information
that influences the
prognosis
Appropriate diagnostic
tests were not
performed
Insufficient information
that influences and/or
affects the diagnosis,
treatment, or prognosis
Interpretation of the
data/radiographs
(images) was incorrect
Alternative treatment
plans were not
appropriate or missing
Unacceptable
The medical and dental
history was not provided
Incorrect information
was provided
Appropriate
consultations were not
obtained
Vital signs were not
recorded
Treatment
Procedural errors were
evident that may have
affected the outcome
Treatment performed
was not consistent with
the diagnosis and
treatment plan as
outlined
Radiographs/images
lack detail and proper
interpretation
Post-treatment
Misinterpretation of
radiographs/images
Poor quality of
radiographs/images
Documentation
Frequent narrative errors
Poor grammar and
spelling errors
Complexity
Routine diagnostic and
technical difficulty
requiring average skills
Poor radiographs/images
Incomplete clinical
examination
Processing errors
Failure to recognize the
lack of a permanent
restoration
Lack of medical
consultation reports when
indicated
The lack of biopsy reports
when indicated
The prognosis was
inaccurate
No data to justify the
pulpal and
(periradicular) diagnosis
Major procedural errors
The pulpal and/or
(periradicular)
diagnosis was incorrect
Inappropriate
pharmacological
management
Inappropriate treatment
Radiographs/images
were improper or of
poor quality
Sequence of treatment
adversely affects the
prognosis
The treatment plan was
incorrect
Radiographs/images
are of poor quality or do
not demonstrate
adequate treatment
Inappropriate
application of biologic
principles
An appropriate clinical
examination was not
performed
The radiographs/images
were inadequate
The radiographic
interpretation was not
correct
Appropriate
treatment/recall
recommendations were
not provided
There was no recall at
least one year following
completion of treatment
Incomplete information
Information was presented
that could not be
interpreted
The narrative and/or
radiographic
documentation was not
representative of the case
The knowledge and
technical skills required
were within the scope of
the general dentist
Related documents