Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
1 APPENDIX Supplementary Methods Original CPAP Initiation After an initial diagnostic study, all subjects participated in another overnight polysomnography on continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) after becoming familiar with the device. CPAP was initiated at 4 cm H2O, and the pressure was progressively and gradually increased up to 10 cm H2O or until the highest pressure tolerated was reached. CPAP with a fixed pressure level was determined for each subject. Then, they have started CPAP treatment and continued it for at least 3 months. Principles of Operation of ASV The principle of operation of this adaptive-servo ventilation (ASV) device (HEARTPAP, Respironics, Murrysville, Pennsylvania) has been described previously (1,2). Briefly, this ASV provides a manually set level of expiratory positive airway pressure (EPAP) to maintain upperairway patency and automatically modulates the inspiratory positive airway pressure (IPAP) within a preset range to maintain a target peak inspiratory airflow, thereby eliminating central sleep apnea (CSA) events. Besides, the device provides an automatic backup rate, should sustained apnea be detected. Principles of Titration for CPAP or ASV 2 During the titration study in the CPAP-mode group, pressure levels were manually modulated from the currently used levels to 12 cm H2O if necessary. Finally, an appropriate fixed pressure was identified. The principle of titration for ASV which has been previously described was used (2). First, the EPAP was manually titrated from 4 cm H2O to the effective pressure, with a maximum of 10 cm H2O, using a similar titration method to that used for CPAP. The minimal IPAP was set at the determined EPAP level or to EPAP + 2 cm H2O in patients with obstructive flow limitation. The maximal IPAP was set to 10 cm H2O greater than IPAP min. In addition, all subjects were initially set to an automatic back-up rate. When the central apneas were not corrected, the automatic backup rate was changed to the fixed back-up rate of 10 breaths/min or more. Subsequently, if continued periodic breathing was observed, maximal IPAP was raised by 2 cm H2O. Initially, all subjects in both groups were given CPAP of 2 cm H2O below the currently used level or 4 cm H2O until sleep onset, and the CPAP of currently used levels for the CPAP-mode group or the ASV for the ASV-mode group was provided. All subjects were blinded to their assignment throughout the study period. After titration, all subjects were instructed to use the ASV device at home with the assigned mode; a 15- to 25min ramp time to start optimal CPAP levels or an appropriate ASV-mode was also provided to minimize the perception of differences between the 2 modes. Intervention Protocol 3 After baseline assessment, all enrolled subjects were provided the ASV device to use in place of their CPAP device. Patients were then randomly assigned to one of two therapeutic modes: CPAP-mode or ASV-mode. Patients underwent titration of the assigned mode during an overnight polysomnography. During the titration study in the CPAP-mode group, pressure levels were manually modulated from the currently used levels to 12 cm H2O if necessary. Finally, an appropriate fixed pressure was identified. In the ASV-mode group, previously described principles of titration for ASV were used (2). Briefly, EPAP was manually titrated with a maximum of 10 cm H2O. Minimal IPAP was set at the determined EPAP level or to EPAP + 2 cm H2O in patients with obstructive flow limitation. Maximal IPAP was set to 10 cm H2O above minimal IPAP. Back-up rate was set as an automatic or fixed rate of >10 breaths/min when the central apneas were not corrected. If continued periodic breathing was observed, maximal IPAP was raised by 2 cm H2O. After titration, all subjects were instructed to use the ASV device at home with the assigned mode. All subjects were blinded to their assignment throughout the study period. Measurements Overnight and in-laboratory, attended polysomnography was performed using a digital polygraph (SomnoStar α Sleep System, SensorMedics Corp, Yorba Linda, California). Generally accepted definitions and scoring methods for sleep stage and arousals were used (3,4). Respiratory events were scored as previously described (5). Apnea was defined as cessation of inspiratory airflow ≥10 s. All such events were counted regardless of desaturation degree or 4 arousal. The absence of airflow in the upper airway with and without ribcage and/or abdominal movement was defined as obstructive and central apnea, respectively. Hypopnea was defined as a discernible reduction of airflow or thoracoabdominal movement lasting for 10 s, resulting in arousal or at least a 3% drop in arterial oxyhemoglobin saturation. We classified hypopnea as obstructive apnea if paradoxical thoracoabdominal movements occurred or if airflow decreased disproportionately to the reduction in the thoracoabdominal movements. The effectiveness of CSA treatment was evaluated at baseline and 3 months after randomization. Nightly usage was measured by the machine’s built-in counter. Applied pressure was also recorded in the device, and the mean value during the follow-up period was automatically calculated. The CPAP level before study enrollment and nightly CPAP usage for 3 months before enrollment were also determined. At baseline and follow-up polysomnography, body mass index, sleepiness, arterial blood gas, cardiovascular variables such as blood pressure, heart rate, plasma B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) by the chemiluminescent enzyme immunoassay (Architect·BNP-JP, Abbott Japan Co. Ltd., Chiba, Japan), 24-h urinary norepinephrine excretion (UNE) by the HPLC method (HLC-725CAII, Tosoh Co. Ltd., Tokyo, Japan), distance walked in 6 min (6MWD), LVEF, left ventricular end-diastolic and end-systolic diameters (LVEDD and LVESD, respectively), mitral regurgitation (MR) area, and quality of life (QOL) were assessed. Sleepiness was subjectively evaluated using the Epworth sleepiness scale (6). An arterial blood sample was collected while patients were awake after 30-min rest periods while in the supine position. Blood samples for BNP measurement were obtained in the early morning. Urine was collected for a 24-h period from arrival at hospital to the next day just after polysomnography. Data were presented as 24-h UNE adjusted by creatinine excretion. The protocol for the 6-min walk test has been described 5 (7). The total 6MWD was measured and assessed. Two-dimensional echocardiographic images were obtained from the parasternal long- and short-axes, apical long-axis, and apical fourchamber views. LVEDD and LVESD were determined, and LVEF was calculated according to the modified Simpson’s method. Averaged values of five consecutive beats were used. As a MR area, ratio of the area of color-flow Doppler regurgitant jet per the area of the left atrium in systole as percentages were calculated. The sonographers were blinded to treatment mode assignments and were not involved in the present study. QOL was assessed using the short-form 36 questionnaire (8). Statistical Analysis All values are shown as the mean ± SD for normally distributed data and as the median (interquartile range) for non-normally distributed data. Categorical variables are expressed as numbers and percentages. Patient characteristics at baseline were compared using the Student t test for normally distributed data, the Mann-Whitney U test for non-normally distributed data for continuous variables, and the chi-square test or Fisher exact test for categorical variables. Twoway repeated measures analysis of variance, followed by the Tukey test, was used to compare within- and between-group differences in variables measured at baseline and 3 months later. For non-normally distributed data, natural log-transformed values were used for analyses. A p value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. All statistical analyses were performed using SAS version 9.1 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, North Carolina). 6 Supplementary References 1. Kasai T, Narui K, Dohi T, et al. First experience of using new adaptive servo-ventilation device for Cheyne-Stokes respiration with central sleep apnea among Japanese patients with congestive heart failure: report of 4 clinical cases. Circ J 2006;70:1148–54. 2. Kasai T, Usui Y, Yoshioka T, et al. Effect of flow-triggered adaptive servo-ventilation compared with continuous positive airway pressure in patients with chronic heart failure with coexisting obstructive sleep apnea and Cheyne-Stokes respiration. Circ Heart Fail 2010;3:140–8. 3. Rechtschaffen A, Kales A. A manual of standardized terminology, techniques and scoring for sleep stages of human subjects. Los Angele, Calif: UCLA Brain Information Service/Brain Research Institute, 1968. 4. EEG arousals: scoring rules and examples: a preliminary report from the Sleep Disorders Atlas Task Force of the American Sleep Disorders Association. Sleep 1992;15:173–84. 5. Dohi T, Kasai T, Narui K, et al. Bi-level positive airway pressure ventilation for treating heart failure with central sleep apnea that is unresponsive to continuous positive airway pressure. Circ J 2008;72:1100–5. 6. Johns MW. A new method for measuring daytime sleepiness: the Epworth sleepiness scale. Sleep 1991;14:540–5. 7. Guyatt GH, Sullivan MJ, Thompson PJ et al. The 6-minute walk: a new measure of exercise capacity in patients with chronic heart failure. Can Med Assoc J 1985;132:919– 23. 7 8. Jenkinson C, Stradling J, Petersen S. Comparison of three measures of quality of life outcome in the evaluation of continuous positive airways pressure therapy for sleep apnoea. J Sleep Res 1997;6:199–204. 8 Online Figure 1 Effects of ASV and CPAP Modes on QOL Of the 8 subscales of the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36), changes in PF, BP, GH, VT, and MH were significantly different, whereas changes in RP, SF, and RE were not significantly different between the two groups. Changes in GH and VT were significantly different within groups. *p < 0.05 between groups; †p < 0.01 between groups; ‡p < 0.05 vs. baseline; §p < 0.01 vs. baseline. BP = bodily pain; GH = general health perception; MH = mental health; PF = physical functioning; RE = role limitations due to emotional problems; RP = role limitations due to physical problems; SF = social functioning; VT = vitality.