Download PDF Version of this Article

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Nuclear medicine wikipedia , lookup

Backscatter X-ray wikipedia , lookup

Positron emission tomography wikipedia , lookup

Image-guided radiation therapy wikipedia , lookup

Medical imaging wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
Radiology Rounds
A Newsletter for Referring Physicians
Massachusetts General Hospital
Department of Radiology
High Field (1.0 T) Extremity MRI
The dedicated extremity MR scanner at Mass General Imaging West, Waltham, is designed for
scanning the hand, wrist, elbow, foot, ankle, and knee
The diagnostic quality is comparable to 1.5 T conventional whole-body MR scanners
The maximum field of view of the extremity MR is 16 cm, which limits visualization of longitudinal
structures such as the quadriceps muscle and Achilles tendon
The bore size (18 cm) is too small for some applications (e.g. large knees) and is not suitable for
patients with leg or ankle casts or patients with limited flexibility
T
he 1.0 T MR dedicated extremity scanner (Figure 1),
installed at Mass General West Imaging, Waltham, is
designed to image the bones, joints, and soft tissues of
the hand, wrist (Figure 2), elbow, foot, ankle, and
knee. Because the joint of interest is centered in the
extremity scanner, it is always at the “sweet spot” of
the magnet, optimizing image quality, which is not
possible for elbow, wrist, or hand images in a
conventional whole-body MR scanner.
Images obtained with a 1.0 T MR extremity scanner are
generally regarded as comparable to those obtained in
a standard 1.5 T whole-body scanner, although there
are limited objective studies at this time. A
comparative study of patients with rheumatoid arthritis
showed excellent agreement between 1.5 T whole-body
MR and 1.0 T extremity MR in the scores for erosion,
synovitis, and bone marrow edema. Another study
compared accuracy and test-retest precision of
quantitative cartilage morphology in these two MR
systems and found no systematic bias between the
measurements of the cartilaginous surface of the
medial tibial plateau, the lateral tibial plateau, or the
central medial femoral condoyle. However, the study
revealed a statistically significant (P < 0.05) variation
of about 10% in cartilage volume (VC) and cartilage
thickness (ThCtAB) in the central lateral femoral
condyle.
Limitations
Although the large majority of patients can be scanned
with extremity MR, it is not suitable for all patients. The
bore size is 18 cm at its narrowest (Table 1), which
means that the scanner cannot be used for knee
imaging if the knee or distal thigh circumference is
greater than 22 1/4 inches (56.5 cm). Although casts
on wrists or arms are usually small enough to fit into
the magnet, a cast on the leg or ankle will not fit. In
addition, the patient must be able to flex his or her
ankle in order to pass the foot through the center of
Figure 1. The 1.0 T extremity MR scanner.
the bore. Therefore it is not possible to obtain images
of the knee if the patient has a cast on the ankle of the
same leg, and patients with limited ankle mobility may
find it difficult or impossible to insert their leg. Finally,
limited hip mobility can make it uncomfortable for a
patient to separate the legs sufficiently to place one leg
in the magnet while the other rests on the floor.
The field of view of extremity MR can be no larger than
16 cm, which is smaller than a conventional scanner.
This means that the system truncates the visualization
of structures such as the quadriceps or Achilles tendon.
It is also not possible to view the entire hand or foot in
a single set of images. If the site of pain is localized to,
for example, the calcaneus region or the ball of the
foot, this is not a problem. However, the scanner is not
Figure 2. Images of the wrist obtained with the 1.0 T extremity scanner. (A) Axial image shows tendons and median nerve in
the carpal tunnel, (B) and (C) Coronal images showing scaphoid lesion (arrow). (D) Gadolinium contrast-enhanced image
excludes osteonecrosis.
suitable for diagnosis of patients with extensive tumor
involvement because it is necessary to visualize the
whole foot in these patients.
Table 1. High Field Extremity MRI Specifications
Field Strength
1.0 Tesla
Procedure
Bore size
18 cm, flared to 20 cm at entrance
Patients sit or recline on an ergonomically designed
chair, positioned so that the appropriate limb is
comfortably resting inside the bore of the extremity MR
scanner. Patients find the extremity MR scanner less
intimidating than a conventional MR scan because the
experience is not claustrophobic and the scanner is
relatively quiet. This sense of comfort helps patients
remain still and reduces problems due to motion
artifact. Therefore, it could be excellent for pediatric
patients. Scan duration is 30-35 minutes.
Bore circumference
56.5 cm (22
Field of view
4-16 mm
Slice thickness
2D: 210 mm
3D: 0.510 mm
Patient chair weight
limit
350 lb
Scan Time
30-35 minutes
2
inches)
Scheduling
Further Information
Extremity MR images can be ordered through ROE or
by calling 617-724-XRAY (9729). In both cases, it is
possible to specify the dedicated extremity MR scanner,
located at Mass General Imaging West, Waltham, or a
conventional scanner. Note that the weight limit of the
extremity scanner system is 350 lb.
For further questions on extremity MRI, please contact
William E. Palmer, M.D., Director of Musculoskeletal
Imaging and Intervention at the Massachusetts General
Hospital, 617-726-7717.
We would like to thank William E. Palmer, M.D., Tyler
Martin, Operations Manager at Mass General West
Imaging, Waltham, and Debra Miller, MR technologist,
for their advice and assistance in preparation of this
article.
If a patient has been scheduled for the dedicated
extremity MR scanner but the technologist finds that he
or she cannot be accommodated, the examination will
have to be rescheduled on a conventional scanner.
Every effort will be made to make an appointment the
same day, although that appointment may be at
another imaging site, such as Mass General Imaging,
Chelsea, or the main campus.
References
Inglis, D, Pui, M, Ioannidis, G, et al. (2007) Accuracy and test-retest precision of quantitative cartilage morphology
on a 1.0 T peripheral magnetic resonance imaging system. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 15: 110-5
Naraghi, AM, White, LM, Patel, C and Keystone, E (2008). Comparison of 1.0 T extremity MRI (eMRI) and 1.5 T
whole body conventional MRI (cMRI) systems in assessment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) of the hand and wrist.
Annual Meeting and Scientific Assembly of the Radiology Society of North America. Chicago, Abstract # SSA14-03.
©2009 MGH Department of Radiology
Janet Cochrane Miller, D. Phil., Author
Raul N. Uppot, M.D., Editor
3