Download Poster - University of Bath

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Crystallization wikipedia , lookup

Cocrystal wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
Interactions of model drugs in HFAs and crystals dissolution:
an AFM in situ investigation using functionalised probes
Daniela Traini1*, P.G.A. Rogueda 2, Robert Price 1
SiN4
a
5
COOH
6
6
4
2
0
2
1
0
-8
b
The aim of this work was to apply an in-situ AFM technique to investigate
interactions between two different drug crystals in a model propellant system (2H,
3H-decafluoropentane (mHFA), Apollo Scientific, Derbyshire, UK) using two
functionalised AFM probes.
Actuator
20
30
40
1
0
c
-12
50
60
10
20
Z piezo displacement (nm)
30
40
-1
50
0
60
10
20
30
40
d
50
60
Z piezo displacement (nm)
Z piezo displacement (nm)
Face 100
Fig. 5 a, b, c and d: Force Plots for model drug A
1.5
a
SiN4
2.5
COOH
2.0
CH3
1
2.5
2.5
COOH
2.0
CH3
1.0
SiN4
2.0
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.0
0.5
1.0
0.5
0.0
0.5
0.5
0.0
-0.5
b
0.0
c
-0.5
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
Z Piezo displacement (nm)
Z piezo displacement (nm)
d
-1.0
-1.0
-0.5
0
Figure 1. Schematic diagram of the AFM optical head
-1.5
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
Z piezo displacement (nm)
Face {002}
All AFM experiments were conducted using a commercially availabl e AFM (Multimode AFM with Nanoscope IIIa controller, DI, Cambridge, UK) equipped with an in situ
Multimode AFM liquid cell (Fig. 3, Fig. 4). A model hydrofluoroa lkane propellant (2), which has similar properties to propellan ts used in a pMDI, was used for the study.
Fig. 6 a, b, c and d: Force Plots for model drug B Note: Experiment performed also on other 3 well defined faces of model drug B (Face {101}, {011}
and {10(-1)} ) and results presented similar trend
SiN4
{002}
1.1± 0.3
COOH
0.6 ± 0.1
Laser
OUT
Cantilever
IN
Out
Photo detector
10
Force (nN)
Metering valve
2
-6
-10
-3
Force (nN)
High vapour pressure propellant that supplies
the energy for dispersion (flash evaporation)
-4
-2
0
Force (Nm)
Pressurised container that holds the
micronised drug suspension or solution
-2
-1
0
The atomic force microscope (1) (AFM) (Fig.2) has recently been applied to a
number of pharmaceutical related problems. This is mainly due to its ability in
characterizing the surface morphology of materials at very high resolution, and its
capability in measuring fundamental interactive forces between c ontiguous surfaces.
Furthermore, with the use of functionalised AFM probes, the in situ AFM technique
can provide an invaluable tool into the behaviour of individual particulate
interactions.
SiN4
3
2
3
8
4
COOH
4
CH3
4
CH3
10
Force (nN)
12
Pharmaceutical Technology
Research Group
Force (nN)
AFM Measurements
14
Force(nN)
To investigate interactions of model drugs in HFAs (Hydrofluoroalkane), relevant to pressurised metered dose inhalers (pMDI), using a custom built pressurised AFM
cell for the atomic force microscope. It is not unreasonable to suggest that a fundamental knowledge of the interactions between probe-drug-propellant will expedite the
rational formulation of suspension type pMDIs (Fig. 1). While the development of a pressurised AFM cell is still in the conceptual/development stage and giving the
early stages of the project, preliminary studies have been initiated using two model drugs and a model propellant (2H, 3H-decafluoropentane).
Force(nN)
Introduction
Technology Research Group, Department of Pharmacy and Pharmacology, University of Bath, Bath, BA2 7AY, UK
2 AstraZeneca R&D Charnwood, Bakewell Road, Loughborough, Leics, UK
Force (Nm)
1Pharmaceutical
Substrate
Substrate
Sample
CH3
{011}
0.9 ± 0.4
0.7 ± 0.4
Drug B
Drug A
Force of Adhesion (nN)
{101}
{10(-1)}
1.4 ± 0.3
1.1 ± 0.6
{100}
0.7 ± 1.3
0.1 ± 0.0
0.7 ± 0.1
Analysis of the adhesion force values
(n = 100) indicates a rank adhesion of
SiN 4 > COOH > CH3 for drug B
and COOH>>CH 3>>SiN 4 for drug A
3.4 ± 1.5
Non measurable force detected
1.0 ± 2.6
Table I. Force of Adhesion summary
Piezo Transducer
Scanner
x
z
y
Figure 2. Schematic diagram of the
AFM optical head
Figure 4. Schematic diagram of the Multimode
AFM in situ cell
Figure 3. Multimode AFM in situ cell
Visualisation of the un -saturated and saturated model drug-hydrofluoroalkane solutions suggested progressive crystal dissolution in the unsaturated
system. Within minutes the previously atomically flat surface of drug B (exposed to unsaturated solution) indicated crystal diss olution (etching) to occur
via a layer-by-layer process (Fig. 8). As expected, no etchings of the model drug A crystals were observed when exposed to both saturated and
unsaturated hydrofluoroalkane solutions (Fig. 7)
Drug A
Multiple force measurements were conducted on 4 well-defined crystalline faces of single crystals of two model drugs (Model drug A, monoclinic crystal and model
drug B, orthorhombic crystal) using polar (COOH) a-polar (CH3) (BioForce Nanoscience, USA) and SiN4 (Digital Instruments, UK) functionalised AFM probes. Force
measurements were conducted in a saturated solution of a model hydrofluoroalkane solution to eliminate potential crystal etching. In addition, AFM Imaging of the
previously investigated crystals was performed in situ using saturated and un -saturated - hydrofluoroalkane solutions. This allowed observation of real -time changes
in the surface topography individual crystal faces at the mesosc opic scale.
30
minutes
later
1µm
Results and Discussion
Drug B
30
minutes
later
1µm
Figure 7. Visualization of drug S in saturated solution of hydrofluoroalkane
Significant differences in the adhesion profile between functionalised probes were observed. In addition, analysis of the adhesion values with respect to crystal
face indicated the dominance of specific polar groups. Variation in such polarity could clearly influence particulate interactions in a pMDI and may also
dominate specific face etching prior to saturation. Representative AFM force plots of the two model drug substrates are shown in Figures 5a, b, c, d and
Figure 6a, b, c and d respectively. Summary of force of adhesion results is presented in Table I.
1µm
Conclusions
The use of the AFM to determine variations in particle substrate interactions, under model propellant, clearly opens up the possibility for rapid material
screening. Such techniques could prove invaluable during the early phases of formulation product development. Future innovations , including the
development of a pressurised AFM cell, may allow a better insigh t into the interactions of such a complex system.
References
*Correspondence:
Daniela Traini.
1. Binnig, G., Quate, C. F., and Gerber, C., Phys. Rev. Lett. 56, 930 (1986)
-:
[email protected]
(:
+44 1225 384831
1µm
Figure 8. Visualization of drug B in saturated solution of hydrofluoroalkane
2. Rogueda, P.G.A, Drug Development in Industrial Pharmacy, Issue Volume 29, Issue 1,pages 29-39 (2003)