* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Reply to Ferreira and Culleton To the Editor—We thank Ferreira and
Survey
Document related concepts
Transcript
Reply to Ferreira and Culleton To the Editor—We thank Ferreira and Culleton [1] for their insightful comments. These authors are interested in helping to explain our unexpected finding that therapy for Plasmodium falciparum malaria with artemether-lumefantrine selected in subsequent infections for key polymorphisms in pfmdr1 up to approximately 2 months after prior therapy, well beyond the period of selection predicted by the pharmacokinetics of artemether and lumefantrine. We suggested that clinical impacts might be seen well after the period of selection because new illnesses in semi-immune children may follow extended periods of asymptomatic infection. Ferreira and Culleton additionally offer a model to help explain our results, demonstrating increased selection over the course of a clinical trial, based on the impact of the trial itself on parasites in the study community. The authors suggest that researchers should consider the impact of study drugs on the selection of resistance-mediating polymorphisms over the course of a clinical trial. In our study, we compared genotypes between each initial and recurrent CORRESPONDENCE d JID 2012:205 (1 May) d 1475 malaria infection, in contrast to comparison with prevalence at a set time; thus, secular trends leading to changes in population-wide prevalence of polymorphisms over time were expected to have a minor impact on our results. In addition, our cohort study enrolled only a small proportion of children living in the study area, and thus it is unlikely that the use of artemether-lumefantrine in the study children had a marked impact on the population of P. falciparum in the area. On the other hand, artemetherlumefantrine is now the first-line therapy for uncomplicated falciparum malaria in Uganda, and increased population-wide use of the drug might explain some of the selection of the pfmdr1 86N and 1246D genotypes in our study. However, as noted above, because our assessments of selection were over the course of a single recurrence, overall trends in population prevalence would be expected to play a minor role. In any event, we agree with Ferreira and Culleton that our results highlight the importance of long-term follow-up to assess selection of drug resistance mediators after treatment for malaria. Indeed, because selection was seen over a period of 2 months after a regimen containing lumefantrine, it would be expected to last even longer after a regimen containing amodiaquine, mefloquine, or piperaquine, all of which are artemisinin partner drugs with half-lives considerably longer than that of lumefantrine. Frederick N. Baliraine and Philip J. Rosenthal Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco Reference 1. Ferreira, Culleton. Dynamics of Plasmodium falciparum selection after artemetherlumefantrine treatment in Africa. J Infect Dis 2012; 205:1473–5. Received and accepted 28 November 2011; electronically published 27 March 2012. Correspondence: Philip J. Rosenthal, Box 0811, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94143 (prosenthal@medsfgh. ucsf.edu). The Journal of Infectious Diseases 2012;205:1475–6 Ó The Author 2012. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Infectious Diseases Society of America. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@ oup.com DOI: 10.1093/infdis/jis222 Notes Financial support. This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health (grant numbers AI52142, AI075045, and TW01506 to P. J. R.) and the Doris Duke Charitable Foundation, with which P. J. R. is a Distinguished Clinical Scientist. F. N. B. was supported by a National Institutes of Health T-32/Ruth L. Kirschstein National Research Service Award (5T32AI060537). Potential conflicts of interest. All authors: No reported conflicts. All authors have submitted the ICMJE Form for Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest. Conflicts that the editors consider relevant to the content of the manuscript have been disclosed. 1476 d JID 2012:205 (1 May) d CORRESPONDENCE