Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Pleural fluid collections in critically ill patients Elankumaran Paramasivam MRCP Andrew Bodenham FRCA Key points Pleural fluid collections are common in the critically ill; they are predominantly transudates that do not require drainage unless compromising respiration. Relying on protein content for diagnosis of pleural effusion may be misleading; estimation of pH should be performed if infection is suspected. Bedside ultrasound provides more reliable confirmation of effusions and their approximate volume than chest X-ray. Seldinger small bore drains are safe and less painful than traditional large bore drains. Prior verification of a collection by imaging will avoid needle damage to the lung. Blood in the pleural space (haemothorax) is normally related to trauma or surgical interventions and requires early drainage and possibly surgical exploration. Elankumaran Paramasivam MRCP Specialist Registrar in Intensive Care Medicine and Respiratory Medicine Anaesthetic Department Leeds General Infirmary Leeds LS1 3EX UK Andrew Bodenham FRCA Consultant Anaesthetist and Director of Intensive Care Unit Anaesthetic Department Leeds General Infirmary Leeds LS1 3EX UK Tel: 0113 3922321 Fax: 0113 3928431 E-mail: [email protected] (for correspondence) 10 Pleural effusion is defined as the excessive accumulation of fluid in the pleural space, indicating an imbalance between pleural fluid formation and removal. The presence of a pleural effusion may be a primary manifestation or a secondary complication of many disorders. A subsequent review will cover air leaks and pneumothorax. Pathophysiology The inner surface of the chest wall and the surface of the lungs are covered by the parietal and visceral pleura, respectively, with a 10– 24 mm separation normally between the two surfaces. This space is usually filled with a very small amount of fluid. However, large amounts (4–5 litres in an adult) of fluid can accumulate in the pleural space under pathological conditions. The parietal pleura has sensory innervation. Both pleural surfaces are mainly supplied by systemic arterial vessels. Lymphatic vessels from the parietal pleura drain to lymph nodes along the anterior and posterior chest wall; lymphatics from the visceral surface drain to the mediastinal lymph nodes. The pleural space typically contains a small amount of a colourless alkaline fluid (0.1–0.2 ml kg21, pH 7.62), which has a low amount of protein (,1.5 g dl21). Approximately 90% of accumulated fluid in the pleural space is drained by the venous circulation; the other 10% is absorbed by the lymphatics. A delicate balance between the oncotic and hydrostatic pressures of the pleural space regulates filtration and drainage of pleural fluid. Net absorption of pleural fluid is slightly greater than net filtration forces. In addition, lymphatic drainage from the parietal pleura can surpass the rate of fluid filtration in the pleural space. Chest wall and diaphragmatic movements also enhance absorption of pleural fluid by the vascular and lymphatic vessels. Excessive filtration of fluid can overwhelm these efficient absorptive mechanisms and lead to the formation of pleural effusion. Types of fluid collections Pleural effusions are traditionally classified as either transudates or exudates. Diseases that affect the filtration of pleural fluid result in transudate formation and often occur bilaterally. Inflammation or injury increases pleural capillary membrane permeability to proteins and various types of cells and lead to the formation of an exudative effusion.1 Blood in the pleural space (haemothorax) is normally related to trauma or surgical interventions and requires early drainage, plus consideration for surgical exploration for control of bleeding. In chest trauma, an initial drainage of 1500 ml or . 200 ml h21 is an indication for surgical exploration.2 Early drainage is essential before clotting occurs as thereafter only serum will drain leaving residual clot. If extensive, this will cause mechanical problems and may become infected. Importantly, blood clot will not drain effectively through a fine bore drain; surgical decortication via thoracotomy may be required. Collection of lymphatic fluid (chyle) in the chest from disruption of the major lymphatic trunks is a rare but recognized problem after surgical procedures such as oesophagogastrectomy and trauma. The drained fluid is characteristically milky if the patient is on enteral feeding. Management is initial drainage and institution of total parenteral nutrition to reduce the volume of losses and provide nutrition. Persistent large volume losses for .10 days are an indication for surgical correction of the leak.3 Chyliform or pseudochylous pleural effusions grossly resemble chylothorax. However, these effusions contain no chylomicrons and pathogenesis does not involve the thoracic duct. There is a high lipid content (cholesterol crystals or lecithin– globulin complexes) causing a milky white appearance. Pseudochylous pleural effusions occur commonly with longstanding pleural effusions and are associated with rheumatoid pleuritis. Causes of pleural effusions Each case of pleural effusion must be evaluated on an individual basis. Knowledge about its prevalence in underlying illnesses can be of help in developing the differential diagnosis (Table 1). A flow chart for the diagnosis of pleural effusion is shown in Fig. 1. Continuing Education in Anaesthesia, Critical Care & Pain | Volume 7 Number 1 2007 & The Board of Management and Trustees of the British Journal of Anaesthesia [2007]. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: [email protected] doi:10.1093/bjaceaccp/mkl060 Pleural fluid collections and non-productive cough. Physical findings are reduced tactile fremitus, dullness on percussion, and diminished or absent breath sounds. A pleural rub may also be heard during inspiration during the early phase of inflammation. Even large pleural effusions can often remain asymptomatic and present as incidental findings. Pulmonary function tests show a restrictive ventilatory defect and reduced functional residual capacity. In the intensive care unit (ICU) setting they are difficult to detect on clinical examination alone due to patient positioning and chest wall oedema. Table 1. Types of pleural effusion with associated conditions Transudates Common Congestive heart failure Nephrotic syndrome Cirrhosis with ascites Peritoneal dialysis Less common Urinothorax Pulmonary embolism Myxoedema Exudates Parapneumonic effusion Malignancy Pulmonary embolism Collagen vascular disease Subphrenic abscess Pancreatitis Tuberculosis Postcardiac injury syndrome Chylothorax Uraemia Oesophageal perforation Asbestos-related disease Drug-induced reactions Viral infection Yellow nail syndrome Sarcoidosis Imaging Chest radiography Symptoms and signs Symptoms depend upon the amount of fluid and the underlying cause. These include pleuritic chest pain, dyspnoea, Standard posteroanterior and lateral chest radiography remains the most important technique for the initial diagnosis of pleural effusion. The classical signs of pleural effusion on erect chest X-ray are blunting of the costo-phrenic angle, homogeneous opacification with no air bronchograms and a meniscus with the apex towards the axilla (Fig. 2A). On supine chest radiography (commonly used in ICU), moderate-to-large pleural effusions may escape detection because the pleural fluid settles posteriorly and no change in the diaphragm or lateral pleural edges may be noted. In these cases, a Fig. 1. Flow chart for diagnosis of pleural effusion. Continuing Education in Anaesthesia, Critical Care & Pain j Volume 7 Number 1 2007 11 Pleural fluid collections Fig. 3. Ultrasound image of a sagittal view of a right-sided pleural effusion with the probe in the infraaxillary region. The markings indicate the thickness of the fluid layer between the inferior margin of the collapsed lung and the chest wall. Computerized tomography scanning Computerized tomography (CT) scans for pleural effusions should be performed with contrast enhancement. In simple uncomplicated pleural effusions, the CT scan shows crescent-shaped opacities in the posterior and basal portions of the hemi-thorax (Fig. 4A). In cases of difficult drainage, CT scanning should be used to delineate the size and position of loculated effusions (Fig. 4B). CT scanning may also be used to differentiate between benign and malignant pleural thickening. Laboratory tests Fig. 2. (A) Erect chest X-ray showing right pleural effusion with the classic signs of costo-phrenic angle obliteration, and meniscus with the apex towards the axilla. (B) Supine chest X-ray showing a moderate right-sided pleural effusion in a ICU patient with homogenous opacification of the lower zone and preserved vascular markings. After obtaining a sample of pleural fluid, the clinician should determine whether the effusion is a transudate or exudate. If the fluid is a transudate, the possible causes are relatively few and further diagnostic procedures are not necessary. In contrast, if the fluid is an exudate, further diagnostic tests are required. Light’s criteria pleural effusion must be suspected when there is increased opacity of the hemithorax without obscuring of the vascular markings (Fig. 2B). In large pleural effusions there is a complete white out of the hemithorax. Mediastinal shift to the opposite side along with a visible lung margin will differentiate it from collapse of the lung due to endobronchial obstruction. If an effusion is suspected but not clear on plain chest X-ray, ultrasonography should be performed. Ultrasonography The classical appearance of a pleural effusion is an echo-free layer between the visceral and parietal portions of the pleura (Fig. 3). The nature of the fluid and presence of loculations can be seen. The volume of an effusion can be estimated from measurements of dimensions of an effusion in various planes or by measuring the width between the lower lung margin and diaphagm.4 12 Transudative and exudative pleural effusions are differentiated by comparing protein and lactate dehydrogenase concentrations in the pleural fluid to those in the blood. Exudative pleural effusions meet at least one of the following criteria, whereas transudative pleural effusions meet none: (i) the ratio of pleural fluid protein to serum protein is . 0.5; (ii) the ratio of pleural fluid lactic dehydrogenase (LDH) and serum LDH is . 0.6; (iii) pleural fluid LDH is more than two-thirds normal upper limit for serum. The sensitivity for exudate is 98% and specificity 83% with the above criteria. Twenty-five per cent of patients with transudative pleural effusions are mistakenly identified as having exudative pleural effusions by the above criteria.5 Additional testing is therefore needed if a patient identified as having an exudative pleural effusion appears clinically to have a condition likely to produce a transudative effusion. Continuing Education in Anaesthesia, Critical Care & Pain j Volume 7 Number 1 2007 Pleural fluid collections Amylase concentration A high pleural amylase concentration (.200 U dl21) occurs both in acute and chronic pancreatitis, malignancy, or oesophageal rupture. The clinical setting usually separates these entities and assay of isoenzymes can be helpful (salivary vs pancreatic source) (Table 2).7 Management of pleural effusions Diagnosis vs treatment The management of pleural effusions in ICU patients with respiratory failure remains controversial. All pleural effusions associated with pneumonic illness should be aspirated for diagnostic investigation.8 Quantitative assessment of the volume of pleural effusions is crucial to select critically ill patients for thoracentesis. Tap vs drain Fig. 4. (A) Supine CT of the thorax showing bilateral pleural effusions appearing as crescent-shaped opacities in the posterior hemithorax. (B) Computerized tomogram of the thorax showing a large multi-loculated left pleural effusion with pleural enhancement. The left lung is markedly collapsed. Pleural fluid characteristics remain the most reliable diagnostic test to guide management. The presence of frankly purulent or turbid/ cloudy fluid on pleural aspiration indicates the need for prompt chest-tube drainage, as is the presence of organisms identified by positive Gram staining. Thereafter, pleural fluid pH is the most useful index predicting the need for chest-tube drainage and the pleural LDH and glucose concentration do not further improve diagnostic clarity in parapneumonic effusions. Routine preprocedure checks of platelet count, prothrombin time, or both are only required in those patients with known risk factors. Fluid collections greater than a litre associated with respiratory compromise should be considered for drainage, irrespective of their nature. Which drain? Glucose concentration The glucose concentration in transudates and most exudates is similar to that of serum. The conditions that cause low pleural fluid glucose concentrations are rheumatoid arthritis, tuberculosis, empyema, and malignancies with extensive pleural involvement. Studies have shown that the small catheters (10– 14 Fr) are often as effective as larger bore tubes and are more comfortable and better tolerated by the patient.9 There are no large randomized control trials directly comparing small and large bore tubes. In the event of failure to drain a pneumothorax due to excessive air leakage, it is recommended that a larger bore tube is inserted. On the basis of clinical experience, large bore tubes are more effective for draining thick pus and blood. pH The pH of normal pleural fluid is approximately 7.62 owing to active transport of HCO2 3 into the pleural space. A low pH is seen in inflammatory and infiltrative processes such as infected parapneumonic effusions, empyema, malignancies, collagen vascular disease, and oesophageal rupture. Urinothorax is the only transudative effusion that can present with a low pleural fluid pH. A parapneumonic pleural fluid with pH , 7.2 indicates a poor patient outcome and requires drainage.6 Table 2. Laboratory tests on pleural fluid for differential diagnosis. The choice of the test depends on the clinical condition All effusions Exudates Other tests Protein LDH pH Cell count Cholesterol Gram stain/culture Fungal stain/culture Acid-fast stain and culture Cytological analysis Glucose Amylase Antinuclear antibody titre Triglycerides Albumin Continuing Education in Anaesthesia, Critical Care & Pain j Volume 7 Number 1 2007 13 Pleural fluid collections Which bottle? The chest tube is attached to a drainage system that allows one direction of flow only. This is the closed underwater seal bottle in which a tube is placed under water at a depth of approximately 3 cm with a side vent which allows escape of air, or it may be connected to a suction pump. The respiratory swing in the fluid in the chest tube is useful for assessing tube patency and confirms the position of the tube in the pleural cavity. The use of integral Heimlich flutter valves are advocated in patients with pneumothorax as they permit ambulatory or even outpatient management and have been associated with a 85 –95% success rate. A drainage bag with an incorporated flutter valve and vented outlet has been successfully used postoperatively. Suction High-volume, low-pressure suction pumps are used in persistent pneumothorax and following chemical pleurodesis. However, there is no evidence to support their routine use in the initial treatment of spontaneous pneumothorax. If suction is required, this should be performed via the underwater seal at a level of 10–20 cm of water. Wall suction is effective but chest drains must not be connected directly to the high negative pressure available from wall suction. Removing the drain The timing of drain removal is dependent on the original reason for insertion and clinical progress. In cases of haemothorax, the drain should not be removed until it completely ceases to drain; however, for transudates, it should be left until it reduces to insignificant quantities (approx. 50 –100 ml in 24 h). Clamping of the drain before removal is unnecessary. The chest tube should be removed either while the patient performs a Valsalva’s manoeuvre or during expiration. A brisk firm movement is required with an assistant tying the previously placed closure suture. Further management issues Blocked chest tubes should be flushed with 20 –50 ml normal saline to ensure patency. Contrast-enhanced CT scanning is the most useful imaging modality in patients for whom chest-tube drainage has proved unsuccessful; it provides anatomical details such as loculations and ensures accurate tube placement. All patients with pleural infections should have an assessment of the effectiveness of the pleural fluid drainage along with resolution of sepsis 5– 8 days after chest-tube insertion and commencement of antibiotics. For an empyema, there are no objective criteria to define the point at which a patient should be referred for surgery. Patients with purulent fluid and loculations are more likely to require surgical drainage. Failure of sepsis to resolve within 7 days 14 has been suggested as an appropriate period after which a surgical opinion should be sought. A number of surgical approaches are available including video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery, open thoracic drainage, or thoracotomy and decortication. The type of procedure performed will depend on many factors including patient age, co-morbidity and surgical preference. Re-expansion pulmonary oedema Re-expansion pulmonary oedema occurs following rapid evacuation of large pleural effusions and during decompression of spontaneous pneumothorax.10 The two main factors involved are alteration of capillary permeability and increase of hydrostatic pressure.11 Mild symptoms suggestive of re-expansion oedema are common after large volume thoracentesis in pleural effusion with patients experiencing discomfort and cough. It is recommended that no more than approximately 1.5 litres should be drained at any one time or drainage should be slowed to ,500 ml h21. References 1. Light RW. Diagnostic principles in pleural Diseases. Eur Res J 1997; 10: 476– 81 2. Weil PH, Margolis IB. Systematic approach to traumatic hemothorax. Am J Surg 1981; 142: 692–4 3. Mallick A, Bodeham AR. Disorders of the lymph circulation: their relevance to anaesthesia and intensive care. Br J Anesth 2003; 91: 265– 72 4. Eibenberger KL, Dock WI, Ammann ME, Dorffner R, Hormann MF, Grabenwoger F. Quantification of pleural effusions: sonography versus radiography. Radiology 1994; 191: 681 –4 5. Light RW, MacGregor MI, Luschsinger PC, Ball WC. Pleural effusions: the diagnostic separation of transudates and exudates. Ann Intern Med 1972: 62: 57– 63 6. Davies CW, Kearney SE, Gleeson FV, Davies RJ. Predictors of outcome and long-term survival in patients with pleural effusion. Am J Resp Crit Care Med 1999; 160: 1682– 7 7. Sherr HP, Light RW, Merson MH, Wolf RO, Taylor LL, Hendrix TR. Origin of pleural fluid amylase in oesophageal rupture. Ann Inter Med 1972; 76: 985–6 8. Davies CWH, Gleeson FV, Davies RJO. British Thoracic Society guidelines for the management of pleural infection in adults. Thorax 2003; 58(Suppl. 2): 18– 28 9. Clementsen P, Evald T, Grode G, Hansen M, Krag Jacobsen G, Faurschou P. Treatment of malignant pleural effusion: pleurodesis using a small bore catheter. A prospective randomized study. Respir Med 1998; 92: 593–6 10. Henderson AF, Banham SW, Moran F. Re-expansion pulmonary oedema; a potentially serious complication of delay in diagnosis of pnemothorax. BMJ 1985; 29: 593 –4 11. Mahajan VK, Simon M, Huber GL. Reexpansion pulmonary oedema. Chest 1979; 75: 192– 4 Please see multiple choice questions 8 –11 Continuing Education in Anaesthesia, Critical Care & Pain j Volume 7 Number 1 2007