Download Sketch of Lecture 36

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts
no text concepts found
Transcript
Sketch of Lecture 36
Wed, 4/19/2017
Example 184. Here is a brief follow-up on the notion of countability: is the set of rational
numbers in [0; 1] countable? Does the diagonal argument apply?
0 1 1 1 2
Solution. Yes, the set of rational numbers is countable: we can make a complete list as follows 1 ; 1 ; 2 ; 3 ; 3 ;
1 3 1 2 3 4
; ; ; ; ; ; :::
4 4 5 5 5 5
So, why does the diagonal argument not apply? Well, the argument runs ne until we construct the new
number x = 0:x1x2x3::: such that the decimal digit xi diers from the ith digit of number #i on our list.
We can certainly construct this number. However, in general, this will not be a rational number (because the
digits of a rational number must eventually repeat).
11.1 An inner product on function spaces
On the space of, say, (piecewise) continuous functions f : [a; b] ! R, it is natural to consider
the dot product
Z b
hf ; gi =
f (t)g(t)dt:
a
Why? A (sensible) dot product provides a (sensible) notion of distance
between functions. The dot product
P
n
above is the continuous analog of the usual dot product hx; y i = n
t=1 xtyt for vectors in R . Do you see it?!
As a consequence, once we have the dot product, we can orthogonally project functions onto spaces of simple
functions. In other words, we can compute best approximations of functions by simple functions (for instance,
best quadratic approximations).
Why continuous? We need that any product f (x)g(x) is integrable. That means we cannot work with all
functions. Continuity is certainly sucient. In fact, the right condition is that f (x)2 should be integrable on
[a; b] (i.e. f (x) is square-integrable). Such a function is said to be in L2[a; b].
Example 185. What is the orthogonal projection of f : [a; b] ! R onto the space of constant
functions (that is, spanf1g)?
Solution. The orthogonal projection of f : [a; b] ! R onto spanf1g is
Rb
Z b
f (t)1dt
hf ; 1i
1
1 = aR b
=
f (t)dt:
h1; 1i
b¡a a
12dt
a
This is the average of f (x) on [a; b].
Comment. Makes perfect sense, doesn't it? Intuitively, the best approximation of a function by a constant
should indeed be the one where the constant is the average.
p
Example 186. (homework) Find the best approximation of f (x) = x on the interval [0; 1]
using a function of the form y = ax.
Solution. The orthogonal projection of f : [0; 1] ! R onto
spanfxg is
R1
Z 1
f (t)tdt
hf ; xi
x = 0R 1
x = 3x
tf (t)dt:
hx; xi
t2dt
0
0
In our case, the best approximation is
3x
Z
1
p
t t dt = 3x
0
Z
1
0
Armin Straub
[email protected]
1 5/2 1 6
3/2
t dt = 3x
t
= x:
5/2
5
0
1.2
1.0
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
76
p
Example 187. Find the best approximation of f (x) = x on the interval [0; 1] using a function
of the form y = a + bx.
Important observation. The orthogonal projection of f : [0; 1] ! R onto spanf1; xg is not simply the
projection onto 1 plus the projection onto x. That's because 1 and x are not orthogonal:
Z 1
1
h1; xi =
tdt = =
/ 0:
2
0
Solution. To nd an orthogonal basis for spanf1; xg, following GramSchmidt, we compute
x¡
hx; 1i
1
projection of
=x¡
1=x¡ :
x onto 1
h1; 1i
2
1
Hence, 1; x ¡ 2 is an orthogonal basis for spanf1; xg.
n
o
1
The orthogonal projection of f : [0; 1] ! R onto spanf1; xg = span 1; x ¡ 2 therefore is
D
R1
1
Z 1
f
(t)
t
¡
dt
hf ; 1i
1
1
0
E x¡
22
1+ D
=
f (t)dt + R x¡
1
1
1
1
h1; 1i
2
2
0
x ¡ 2; x ¡ 2
t ¡ 2 dt
0
Z 1
Z 1
1
=
f (t)dt + (12x ¡ 6)
f (t) t ¡
dt:
2
0
0
1
f;x ¡ 2
E
In our case, this best approximation is
Z 1
Z 1 p
p
1
1 3/2 1
1 5/2 1 1 3/2 1
t dt + (12x ¡ 6)
t t¡
dt =
t
+ (12x ¡ 6)
t
¡
t
2
3/2
5/2
2 3/2
0
0
0 0
2
2 1
=
+ (12x ¡ 6)
¡
3
5 3
4
1
=
x+
:
5
3
The plot below conrms how good this linear approximation is (compare with the previous example):
1.0
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0.2
0.4
Armin Straub
[email protected]
0.6
0.8
1.0
77