Download Solutions for Problem Set 4 A: Consider the polynomial ring R = Z[x

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts
no text concepts found
Transcript
Solutions for Problem Set 4
A: Consider the polynomial ring R = Z[x]. Let I = (x), the principal ideal of R generated
by x. Show that I is a prime ideal of R, but not a maximal ideal of R.
Solution. Suppose that f (x) and g(x) are in Z[x]. Suppose that their constant terms are
a0 and b0 , respectively. The ring operations in Z[x] were defined in class one day (in a much
more general setting). We need just the following facts. The constant term of f (x) + g(x) is
a0 + b0 . The constant term of f (x)g(x) is a0 b0 . Define a map ϕ : Z[x] → Z by
ϕ f (x) = the constant term of f (x)
for all elements f (x) in the ring Z[x]. The above facts mean that ϕ is a ring homomorphism.
In fact, the map ϕ is just the “evaluation homomorphism” ϕ0 which was defined in class.
The map ϕP: Z[x] → Z is a surjective ring homomorphism. Suppose that f (x) is in Z[x].
Write f (x) = ni=0 ai xi , where a0 , ..., an are in Z. Then
f (x) ∈ Ker(ϕ) ⇐⇒ a0 = 0 ⇐⇒ f (x) = xg(x) f or some g(x) ∈ Z[x] ⇐⇒ f (x) ∈ I .
Thus, we have Ker(ϕ) = I. By the first isomorphism theorem, it follows that
Z[x]/I ∼
= Z .
Since Z is an integral domain, it follows that I is a prime ideal in Z[x]. Since Z is not a
field, it follows that I is not a maximal ideal in Z[x]. We are using theorems 7 and 8 on the
handout listing important theorems about ring homomorphisms and ideals.
B: Consider the polynomial ring R = Q[x]. Let I = (x), the principal ideal of R generated
by x. Show that I is a maximal ideal of R.
Solution The solution is similar to that for problem A. We define ϕ in the same way, except
that now ϕ is a surjective ring homomorphism from Q[x] to Q. The kernel of ϕ is the ideal
I = (x). Hence we have
Q[x]/I ∼
=Q .
Since Q is a field, it follows that I is a maximal ideal of the ring Q[x].
C: This problem is a continuation of problem B from problem set 3. The results from
parts (a), (b), and (c) of that problem will be useful in this problem. Suppose that R is a
commutative ring with identity, that e is an idempotent in R, and that f = 1R − e.
(a) Let S = Re and T = Rf . Thus, S and T are ideals in the ring R. Show that R = S +T .
Solution. Suppose that r ∈ R. Since 1R = e + f , we have
r = r · 1R = r(e + f ) = re + rf
and so, for any r ∈ R, we can write r = s + t, where s = re and t = rf . Note that we have
s ∈ Re = S and t ∈ Rf = T . Thus, r ∈ S + T . This is true for all r ∈ R and so we indeed
have R = S + T .
(b) Suppose that r ∈ R. According to part (a), there exist elements s ∈ S and t ∈ T such
that r = s + t. Prove that s and t are uniquely determined by r.
Solution. In part (a), we have written r = s + t, where s = re and t = rf . Suppose that
we also have r = u + v, where u ∈ S and v ∈ T . We will prove that u = s and v = t. First
note that
re = (u + v)e = ue + ve
and
rf = (u + v)f = uf + vf
.
Furthermore, since u ∈ S and e is the identity element in S, we have u = ue. Since v ∈ T
and f is the identity element in T , we have v = vf . Thus, we obtain the equations
re = ue+ve = ue+(vf )e = ue+v(f e)
and
rf = uf +vf = (ue)f +vf = u(ef )+vf.
Since f e = 0R and ef = 0R , we then obtain the following equations:
s = re = ue + v · 0R = ue = u
and
t = rf = u · 0R + vf = vf = v .
That is, we have u = s and v = t. This proves that s and t are indeed uniquely determined
by r.
(c) Suppose that r ∈ R. Using part (a), one can write r = s + t, where s ∈ S and t ∈ T .
Define a map ϕ : R → S × T by ϕ(r) = (s, t). By part (b), this map ϕ is well-defined.
Prove that ϕ is an isomorphism of the ring R to the ring S × T .
Solution. The map ϕ is surjective because if s is any element of S and t is any element of
T , then r = s + t is an element of R and has the property that ϕ(r) = (s, t).
To see that the map ϕ is a ring homomorphism, suppose that r1 and r2 are in R. We
can write r1 = s1 + t1 and r2 = s2 + t2 , where s1 , s2 ∈ S and t1 , t2 ∈ T . Then we have
r1 + r2 = (s1 + t1 ) + (s2 + t2 ) = (s1 + s2 ) + (t1 + t2 )
and we have s1 + s2 ∈ S, t1 + t2 ∈ T . Therefore, by definition,
ϕ(r1 + r2 ) = (s1 + s2 , t1 + t2 ) = (s1 , t1 ) + (s2 , t2 ) = ϕ(r1 ) + ϕ(r2 ) .
Now we consider multiplication. Let r = r1 r2 . As pointed out in the solution to part
(b), we have r = s + t, where s = re and t = rf . Similarly, we also have the equations
s1 = r1 e, t1 = r1 f, s2 = r2 e, and t2 = r2 f . We obtain
s = re = (r1 r2 )(ee) = (r1 e)(r2 e) = s1 s2
and
t = rf = (r1 r2 )(f f ) = (r1 f )(r2 f ) = t1 t2 .
We have used the associative law and also the assumption that R is a commutative ring in
the above calculation. It follows that
ϕ(r1 r2 ) = ϕ(r) = (s, t) = (s1 s2 , t1 t2 ) = (s1 , t2 )(s2 , t2 ) = ϕ(r1 )ϕ(r2 ) .
We have proved that ϕ(r1 + r2 ) = ϕ(r1 ) + ϕ(r2 ) and that ϕ(r1 r2 ) = ϕ(r1 )ϕ(r2 ) for all
r1 , r2 ∈ R and hence that ϕ is a ring homomorphism from R to S × T .
Finally, we will show that ϕ is injective. It suffices to show that Ker(ϕ) = {0R }. Suppose
that r ∈ Ker(ϕ). Thus, we have ϕ(r) = (0S , 0T ), the additive identity in the ring S × T .
By the definition of ϕ, it follows that r = 0S + 0T . Since S and T are subrings of R, we
know that 0S = 0R and 0T = 0R . Therefore, r = 0R + 0R and so r = 0R . Hence, we have
Ker(ϕ) = {0R }.
We have proved that ϕ is a bijection and that ϕ is a ring homomorphism. Hence ϕ is a
ring isomorphism from R to S × T .
D: This question concerns the following subring of M2 (R).
a b a, b ∈ R
.
R =
b a You may assume that R is a subring of M2 (R). This is a result from problem 4 on the
Suggested Problems handout. Using problem C above, show that the rings R and R × R are
isomorphic. Give an explicit map ϕ : R → R × R which is a ring isomorphism.
Solution. We will use the following two idempotents in the ring R:
1 1
1
− 21
2
2
2
e = 1 1
and
f =
.
− 12 21
2
2
1 0
and that we do actually have f = 1R − e.
Note that 1R is the identity matrix
0 1
a b
in R. Here, a and b are in R. We have
Consider an element r =
b a
a b 12
re =
b a 21
1
2
1
2
=
a+b
2
a+b
2
a+b
2
a+b
2
= (a + b)
1
2
1
2
1
2
1
2
= (a + b)e
and
1
a−b
1
1
a−b
1
−
−
−
a b
2
2
2
2
= (a − b) 2 1 1 2 = (a − b)f .
=
rf =
a−b
−2 2
b a − 12 12
− a−b
2
2
Note that when we write (a + b)e, we mean the product of the real number a + b and the
matrix e, as defined in matrix theory. The meaning of (a − b)f is similar.
The above calculation tells us that S = Re = { ce | c ∈ R } and T = Rf = { cf | c ∈ R }.
We will define a ring isomorphism σ from S to R and a ring isomorphism τ from T to R.
Here is the definition of σ. Suppose that s ∈ S. Thus, we have s = ce, where c ∈ R. We
define σ(s) = c. It is clear that σ is a bijection from S to R. Suppose that s1 and s2 are
elements of S. We have s1 = c1 e and s2 = c2 e, where c1 and c2 are in R. Then
s1 + s2 = c1 e + c2 e = (c1 + c2 )e
and
s1 s2 = (c1 e)(c2 e) = c1 c2 ee = c1 c2 e .
We have used some facts from matrix algebra and the fact that ee = e. It follows that
σ(s1 + s2 ) = c1 + c2 = σ(s1 ) + σ(s2 )
and
σ(s1 s2 ) = c1 c2 = σ(s1 )σ(s2 )
We have proved that σ : S → R is a ring isomorphism.
The definition of τ is similar. Suppose that t ∈ T . Thus, we have t = cf , where c ∈ R.
We define τ (s) = c. Then τ : T → R is a ring isomorphism. The proof is almost identical to
the one given above for τ .
is
We can use σ and τ to define a ring isomorphism χ from S × T to R × R. The definition
χ (s, t) = σ(s), τ (t)
for all elements (s, t) in the ring S × T .
Finally, we have an isomorphism ϕ : R → S × T from problem C which is defined by
ϕ(r) = (re, rf ) for all r ∈ R. Let ψ = χ ◦ ϕ. Then ψ is an isomorphism from R to R × R
which is defined by
a b
a b
a b
= χ ϕ
= (χ ◦ ϕ)
ψ
b a
b a
b a
= χ
= (a + b, a − b)
(a + b)e, (a − b)f
for all a, b ∈ R.
E: Let R = Q[x] (x2 − 4x + 4). Prove that R has infinitely many nilpotent elements.
Solution. Let I = (x2 − 4x + 4). Since x2 − 4x + 4 has degree 2, we know that the elements
in the quotient ring Q[x]/I can be uniquely represented in the form
r(x) + I
where r(x) = a + bx and a, b ∈ Q. The uniqueness will be important in this solution. Now
notice that x2 − 4x + 4 = (x − 2)(x − 2) = (x − 2)2 . Suppose that q ∈ Q. Consider
rq (x) = a + bx, where a = −2q and b = q. Then
rq (x) = − 2q + qx = q(x − 2)
and
rq (x)2 = q 2 (x − 2)2 ∈ I .
It follows that the element rq (x) + I in the quotient ring Q[x]/I has the following property:
2
rq (x) + I
= rq (x)2 + I = I ,
which is the additive identity element in the ring Q[x]/I. Thus, rq (x) + I is a nilpotent
element in the ring Q[x]/I. This is true for each q ∈ Q.
If q1 , q2 ∈ Q and q1 6= q2 , then rq1 (x) 6= rq2 (x). Hence, the cosets rq1 (x) + I and rq2 (x) + I
will be different elements in the ring Q[x]/I. Thus, we have obtained an infinite number of
nilpotent elements in Q[x]/I.
F: Let R = Q[x] (x2 + 1). Show that R is a field.
Solution As explained in class, it suffices to show that (x2 + 1) is a maximal ideal in the
ring Q[x]. For that purpose, it suffices to prove that x2 + 1 is an irreducible element in the
ring Q[x]. Suppose to the contrary that we have a factorization
x2 + 1 = g(x)h(x)
where g(x) and h(x) are in Q[x] and that the degree of g(x) and h(x) are both < 2. This
means that g(x) and h(x) have degree 1. Thus g(x) = a + bx and h(x) = c + dx, where
a, b, c, d ∈ Q, b 6= 0 and d 6= 0. Let J = (a + bx), the principal ideal in Q[x] generated by
a + bx. Then x2 + 1 is in J.
Consider the ring homomorphism ϕθ : Q[x] → Q which
was defined in class. We will
a
take θ = − b , which is an element of Q. Thus, ϕ f (x) = f (θ) for all f (x) ∈ Q[x]. Notice
that
ϕθ (a + bx) = a + bθ = 0
and hence a + bx ∈ Ker(ϕθ ). Therefore, J ⊆ Ker(ϕθ ). (In fact, we have Ker(ϕθ ) = J, but
this fact won’t be needed.)
However, notice that ϕθ (x2 + 1) = θ2 + 1 ≥ 1 since θ is a real number and therefore
θ2 ≥ 0. Hence, ϕθ (x2 + 1) 6= 0. Therefore, x2 + 1 6∈ Ker(ϕθ ). Since J ⊆ Ker(ϕθ ), it follows
that x2 + 1 cannot be in J. This is a contradiction.
follows that x2 + 1 is indeed an
It
irreducible element in the ring Q[x]. Therefore, Q[x] (x2 + 1) is indeed a field.
G: Let R = R[x] (x2 − 2). Show that R is not a field.
Solution We have the following factorization in the ring R[x]:
√
√
x2 − 2 = (x − 2)(x + 2)
which shows that x2 − 2 is a reducible element in the ring R[x]. Therefore, the principal
ideal (x2 − 2) is not a maximal ideal in that ring. Therefore, the quotient ring R[x] (x2 − 2)
is not a field.
H: Let R = Q[x]/I, where I = (x3 + 5x2 + 6x + 7). Let β = x + I. Thus, β is an element
of R. Show that
β 3 + 5β 2 + 6β + 7 · 1R = 0R .
Solution. We will repeatedly use the definition of addition and multiplication in the ring
R. If a(x) and b(x) are in Q[x], then
(a(x)+I) + (b(x)+I) = a(x)+b(x) +I
and
(a(x)+I)(b(x)+I) = a(x)b(x) +I .
Also, recall that 1R = 1 + I. Using this definition, we obtain
β 3 + 5β 2 + 6β + 7 · 1R = (x + I)3 + 5(x + I)2 + 6(x + I) + 7 · (1 + I)
= (x3 + 5x2 + 6x + 7) + I = I .
The last equality holds because the polynomial x3 + 5x2 + 6x + 7 is in the ideal I. Since
I = 0R , we have proved the stated equality.
Related documents