Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Global Ocean Sprawl: A Driver of Jellyfish Blooms Lily Munsill Life 2.0 Research Paper Bio401/ Senior Seminar Wheaton College, Norton, Massachusetts, USA December 1, 2014 Introduction The world is on a slimy slope to global jellyfish ecosystem domination. There is no single cause to increasing jellyfish, or Cnidarian, populations, but rather many contributing anthropogenic factors including eutrophication, climate change, ocean acidification, and overfishing. An often-overlooked factor however is global ocean sprawl, or the proliferation of artificial structures in the ocean. Global ocean sprawl is hypothesized to be a driver of jellyfish blooms in coastal systems as it provides valuable habitat for jellyfish polyps, the benthic stage of the jellyfish lifecycle (Duarte et al 2012). The observed increase in jellyfish populations in coastal systems has harmful implications for fisheries and environmental health, causing potentially irreversible ecological phase shifts and trophic cascades (Lyman et al 2006). Technology: Global Ocean Sprawl Global ocean sprawl applies to any man-made structure that is in the ocean. Examples of artificial structures in the ocean include docks, pipes, ship bottoms, sunken ships, docks, buoys, offshore wind turbines, harbor infrastructure, seawalls and breakwaters, piers, aquaculture infrastructure, artificial reefs, and oil rigs. Figure 1: Activities, structures, and industry growth contributing to global ocean sprawl. MT=metric tons, µ=annual growth rate. Other numbers show global occurrence. Areas without numbers show unquantifiable structures (cemented shoreline, breakwaters, recreational boating, buoys and moorings) that account for a large portion of artificial structures in the ocean. Additionally, intentional artificial reefs are listed as being present in at least 34 countries. This figure depicts the largest existing contributors to global ocean sprawl and shows industry growth of marine transport, aquaculture, and offshore wind http://icuc.wheatoncollege.edu/rmorrisspace/bio401/2015/munsill_lily/index.htm[6/16/2015 3:18:24 PM] energy which will all continue the further input of artificial structures into the ocean in the future (figure from Duarte et al. 2012). Increasing coastal populations allow for the expansion of coastal industries like shipping and aquaculture, which contributes to the global ocean sprawl of artificial structures. Figure 1 depicts some of the larger contributors to global ocean sprawl. There are more than 14,000 commercial harbors globally and 4100 kilometers of channels and inlets, providing infrastructure for polyp growth, the benthic stage of the jellyfish lifecycle (Duarte et al 2012). Growing industries like aquaculture, offshore wind energy, and marine transport are also large contributors to polyp growth, growing at rates of 7.5%, 28.3%, and 3.7% per year, respectively (Duarte et al 2012). Artificial structures have been introduced into the ocean for as long as human civilization, however, global ocean sprawl has not been seen as a problem until recently where the magnitude of artificial structures in the ocean has been observed to impact ecosystems (Duarte et al 2012). Biology: Influences on Cnidarian Populations Cnidarians are some of the world’s oldest and most resilient organisms. Cnidarian populations are influenced by a number of natural and anthropogenic factors including rising sea temperatures, increased ocean acidity, high salinity, eutrophication, overfishing, and natural global oscillations (Condon et al 2012, Quinones et al 2013, Purcell 2012, Haroldsson et al 2012, Uye 2011, Lyman et al 2010, Richardson et al 2009). Without any anthropogenic influence, Cnidarian populations fluctuate cyclically; observed minima and maxima of jellyfish populations supports global jellyfish oscillation cycles with 20 year periods (Condon et al 2012). Jellyfish abundance also correlates with major physical phenomena, like El Nino and El Nina periods of the El Nino Southern Oscillation cycle; Cnidarian populations increase during the El Nino and El Viejo periods when climate is warmer, but decreases are observed with the cooler La Niña period (Quinones et al 2013). Cnidarian populations have been fluctuating as a consequence of anthropogenic influences before the introduction of artificial structures in the ocean became problematic (Brotz et al 2012). In addition to natural phenomena eutrophication, climate change, and overfishing have been leading contributors to increasing populations (Purcell 2007, Purcell 2012, Haroldsson et al 2012). Phase shifts in pelagic ecosystems have been related to overfishing and the filling of an absent niche by jellyfish; an alarming figure, 100-120 million tonnes of fish is annually removed from global oceans (Richardson et al. 2009). The low water clarity, high nutrients, and anoxia in eutrophic regions are all favorable conditions for jellyfish (Purcell 2012). As nonvisual predators, jellyfish can outcompete lower trophic level fish as water clarity decreases with eutrophication (Haroldsson et al 2012). Jellyfish can survive in very low oxygen environments, up to <1 mg 02 per liter, well below the toxic level for fish, around 2 or 3 mg per liter (Purcell 2012). Climate change also creates ideal conditions for jellyfish blooms (Purcell 2007). Warming sea temperature has been associated with higher rates of asexual reproduction in some jellyfish like moon jellies, Aurelia labiata, (Purcell 2007) and a scyphozoan species Cotylorhiza tuberculata (Purcell et al. 2012). Some fish species cannot survive the harsher conditions associated with climate change, especially ocean acidification, further enabling jellyfish domination (Purcell et al 2012). Stronger winds associated with climate change will be beneficial to dispersal of jellyfish populations, aiding in the spread of blooms (Lyman et al 2010). Most of these anthropogenic factors influence the pelagic phase of the Cnidarian lifecycle, however, the benthic is often overlooked. Some classes in the phylum Cnidaria, like Scyphozoa, Hydrozoa, and Cubozoa have a benthic stage in their lifecycle where a sessile benthic polyp attaches to a substrate, which produce ephyrae, or juvenile jellyfish medusa (Duarte et al 2012). Polyps can produce asexually and during each asexual reproductive event, a single polyp can create up to 40 juvenile medusa (Duarte et al 2012). Benthic polyps can remain attached to a substrate for many years, releasing medusa seasonally or when environmental conditions are optimal for the jellyfish (Duarte et al 2012). A single polyp can produce hundreds or thousands of medusae, and those medusa can go on to produce thousands or millions of polyps (Duarte et al 2012). As Cnidarians have characteristics of a fast growing r-selected population, the ability of these polyps to produce many medusa allows for exponential growth of jellyfish populations. The Hybrid System: Cnidarian Benthic Polyp Growth on Artificial Structures http://icuc.wheatoncollege.edu/rmorrisspace/bio401/2015/munsill_lily/index.htm[6/16/2015 3:18:24 PM] Artificial structures in the ocean are hypothesized to magnify the intensity of jellyfish blooms (Duarte et al 2012). The proliferation of artificial structures in the ocean has had unintended consequences for jellyfish populations by providing valuable substrate for the benthic Cnidarian polyp to attach and release juvenile medusa, especially in areas with soft benthic sediments that lack natural rock substrates (Duarte et al 2012). The introduction of artificial structures provides a perfect substrate in regions with less then ideal substrates for attachment. The magnitude of space that artificial structures provide polyps is of concern since polyps are only a few millimeters in length for most Cnidarian species, but polyps can be found on artificial structures in densities from 10,000-100,000 individuals per square meter (Duarte et al. 2012). Thus seemingly insignificant artificial substrates, even plastic garbage pollutants like plastic bottles can contribute greatly to blooms since polyps have high-density populations. Blooming Cnidarian populations have found to be correlated with areas with high occurrences of artificial substrates, and when artificial structures are removed, densities of medusa has declined (Duarte et al. 2012). Artificial structures, especially in harbors, provide shaded surfaces which are preferable to polyp growth, and provide shelter to polyps in areas where high wave energy would otherwise destroy them. The high level of artificial structures in ports in combination with high fishing pressures, eutrophication, increased pollution, and hypoxia creates perfect environments for polyp growth in conjunction with the removal of competing species (Duarte et al. 2012). In this way, artificial structures provide a nursery habitat for blooming Cnidarian populations. Consequences and Future Predictions Cnidarian blooms as an unintended consequence of global ocean sprawl have negative impacts on ecosystems, causing ecological phase shifts and shifting towards Cnidarian dominance in the lower trophic level (Lyman et al 2006). Additionally, blooms have economic consequences as they impact tourism, fishing industries, and nuclear power plants (Richardson et al 2009). However, artificial structures also have unintended positive consequences as they provide benthic substrate for many organisms including corals and oysters, providing a productive marine habitat in areas of otherwise poor nutrients and low biodiversity (Duarte et al 2012). As a consequence of increasing sea temperature and ocean acidification, in combination with the increasing presence of artificial structures in the ocean, scientists expect to see future increases in occurrence and intensity of Cnidarian blooms (Duarte et al 2012, Brotz et al 2012, Richardson et al 2009). Both climate change and the existence of artificial structures in the ocean are likely irreversible, so jellyfish populations may continue to increase globally. While the expansion of coastal industries can’t be slowed, artificial substrates can be modified with different surfaces that polyps cannot attach to, which would effectively reduce coastal jellyfish blooms (Duarte et al 2012). In addition, eutrophication induced blooms can be mitigated with better coastal management and run off systems. Furthermore, research can be conducted to reverse existing jellyfish blooms (Gibbons, Richardson 2013). Global ocean sprawl has unintentionally provided habitat for benthic jellyfish polyps. This new hybrid technology, combined with other favorable factors for jellyfish growth including eutrophication, increasing temperatures, and ocean acidification is causing coastal populations of jellyfish to increase, which consequently causes irreversible ecological phase shifts and trophic cascades. References Brotz L, Cheung WL, Kleisner K, Pakhomov E, Pauly, D (2012) Increasing jellyfish populations: trends in Large Marine Ecosystems. Hydrobiologia 690: 3-20 Condon RH, Duarte CM, Pitt KA, Robinson KL, Lucas CH, Sutherland KR (2013) Recurrent jellyfish blooms are a consequence of global operations. PNAS 110(3): 1000-1005. Duarte CM, Pitt KA, Lucas CH, Purcell JE, Uye S, Robinson KL, Brotz L (2012) Is global ocean sprawl a cause of jellyfish blooms? Frontiers in Ecology and the Environ 19: 91-97. Haraldsson M, Tonnesson K, Tiselius P, Thingstad TF, Aksnes DL (2012) Relationship between fish and jellyfish as a function of eutrophication and water clarity. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 471: 73-85 http://icuc.wheatoncollege.edu/rmorrisspace/bio401/2015/munsill_lily/index.htm[6/16/2015 3:18:24 PM] Gibbons MJ, Richardson AJ (2013) Beyond the jellyfish joyride and global oscillation advancing jellyfish research. J. Plankton Research 35: 929-938 Lee PLM, Dawson MN, Neill SP, Robins PE, Houghton JD, Doyle TK, Hays GC (2013) Identification of genetically and oceanographically distinct blooms of jellyfish. J. R. Soc. Interface 10:80 Lyman CP, Lilley MKS, Bastian T, Doyle TK, Beggs SE, Hays GC (2010) Have jellyfish in the Irish Sea benefited from climate change and overfishing? Global Change Biology 17:767-782 Lyman CP, Gibbons MJ, Axelsen CA, Sparks J, Coetzee J, Heywood BG, Brierly AS. (2006) Jellyfish overtake fish in a heavily fished ecosystem. Current Biology 16(13): 492-493 Purcell JE (2007) Environmental effects on asexual reproduction rates of the scyphozoan Aurelia labiata. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 348: 183-196 Purcell JE (2012) Jellyfish and ctenophore blooms coincide with human proliferations and environmental perturbations. Annual Review of Marine Science 4: 209-235 Purcell JE, Atienza D, Fuentes V, Olariaga A, Tilves U, Colahan C, Gili JM (2012) Temperature effects on asexual reproduction rates of scyphozoan species from the northwest Mediterranean Sea. Hydrobiologia 690: 169-180 Quinones J, Monroy A, Marcelo Acha E, Mianzan H (2013) Jellyfish bycatch diminishes profit in an anchovy fishery off Peru. Fisheries Research 139: 47-50 Richardson AJ, Bakun A, Hays GC, Gibbons MJ (2009) The jellyfish joyride: causes, consequences, and management responses to a more gelatinous future. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 24:312-322 Uye, S-I (2011) Human forcing of the copepod-fish-jellyfish triangular trophic relationship. Hydrobiologia 1: 71-83 http://icuc.wheatoncollege.edu/rmorrisspace/bio401/2015/munsill_lily/index.htm[6/16/2015 3:18:24 PM]