Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Cancer Alliances Workshop (South Region) Thursday 9 June 2016 11:00 – 15:00 www.england.nhs.uk Welcome Nigel Acheson, Regional Medical Director (South), NHS England www.england.nhs.uk 2 Context and background Cally Palmer, National Cancer Director, NHS England www.england.nhs.uk 3 Why a focus on cancer? “The disparity between incidence and awareness of bowel cancer in the UK is greater than that of any other cancer. This results in poor awareness of symptoms, late detection, high mortality and greater treatment expense than would be the case if awareness were higher.” “The first mention of the word 'cancer' was used by a doctor in the middle of a sentence. It seems that he may have believed that I had already been informed.” “….. Some doctors are rather keen to give information as quickly as possible without recognising where the patient is coming from. Medical information needs to match patient need.” “We over diagnose, over treat, and treat for marginal benefit.” www.england.nhs.uk 4 Implementation Plan www.england.nhs.uk 5 National Cancer Programme Five Year Forward View Board National Cancer Advisory Group National Cancer Transformation Board National Cancer Senior Management Team Prevention workstream Early Diagnosis workstream www.england.nhs.uk Patient experience workstream Living With and Beyond Cancer workstream High Quality Modern Services workstream Commissioning, Provision and Accountability workstream 6 Key priorities for 2016/17 £15m to test the faster diagnosis standard in 5 areas and Launch a National Diagnostic Capacity Fund and Roll out the ACE wave 2 pilots: • London Cancer • Greater Manchester • Leeds Multi-disciplinary diagnostic centres in • Bristol the community • Oxfordshire • Airedale, Wharfedale & Craven Cancer Alliances www.england.nhs.uk 7 What are Cancer Alliances? Bring together providers and commissioners A shared focus on cancer across the pathway National priorities delivered locally For the first time an integrated dashboard Work across and with STPs to provide the detail on cancer Knowing where the gaps are and working together to address www.england.nhs.uk 8 Phase 1 Cancer Dashboard www.england.nhs.uk 9 Alliances to Accountable Networks? Est. Cancer vanguard Est. alliances Shared learning and testing www.england.nhs.uk Accountable Cancer networks 10 Alliance footprints – how many? www.england.nhs.uk 11 Timeframes May – June 2016 Local design workshops Start July 2016 Draft Alliance footprints and local structures proposed End July 2016 Oversight Group agrees Alliance footprints and local structures From September NHS England business plan commitment on starting to roll out Cancer Alliances End October 2016 Draft Cancer Alliance action plans proposed Mid November 2016 Oversight Group agrees action plans www.england.nhs.uk 12 Questions Who are the key stakeholders that would make up Alliances? How do we encourage a collaborative approach from the start? www.england.nhs.uk How do we give the Alliances levers? What is the relationship with the Cancer Vanguard? How should Alliances engage with the prevention agenda? 13 Purpose of the workshop Jo Cottam, National Cancer Policy Lead, NHS England www.england.nhs.uk 14 Recap… • Cancer Alliances are the local stakeholders. • They are not employing organisations. • On the basis of shared data and metrics, Alliances will agree action plans which set out at a system-wide level the activity required to deliver the Taskforce strategy locally. This means: • Delivering improvements against 2020 ambitions • Delivering particular initiatives. • In practice this will involve adding the next layer of detail on cancer to STPs. • Alliances will take decisions required to lead the cross-organisation, whole system approach to improving outcomes. www.england.nhs.uk 15 Therefore… • This is not completely separate to the STP process – we are looking to ensure that STP leads are driving the establishment of Alliances. • Alliances will need support – this will be determined locally, but we expect this will be provided in part by Clinical Networks. • The establishment of Alliances does not change the statutory responsibilities of individual members. • The progress made by Cancer Alliances in leading improvements in cancer outcomes will be highlighted by performance against: • the integrated cancer dashboard • metrics associated with Alliance action plans. www.england.nhs.uk 16 Purpose of the workshop • To develop proposals, informed by engagement with key regional stakeholders, on: o The geographic footprints of Cancer Alliances o The structure of each Cancer Alliance/how each Cancer Alliance will function locally to ensure that each can lead the improvement of cancer outcomes for its population o The ‘gateway’ points for the development of Cancer Alliances over the coming years. www.england.nhs.uk 17 Discussion: proposed geographies Pat Haye, Deputy Director Clinical Networks and Clinical Senates (South), NHS England www.england.nhs.uk 18 Principles for determining Cancer Alliance geographies • Ideally, Cancer Alliance geographies will both: 1. Be aligned with patient flows 2. Be aligned with STP footprints. Where it is not possible to meet both of these criteria, the first criterion will take precedence. • Cancer Alliances will bring together stakeholders from across the whole cancer pathway, therefore Alliance geographies must include one or more tertiary centres. • We expect that Cancer Alliances will cover populations of between 2-3 million. www.england.nhs.uk 19 Specialised Commissioning Strategic approach Vaughan Lewis Clinical Director Specialised Commissioning (South) www.england.nhs.uk STP spend by top service areas - 14/15 www.england.nhs.uk 21 5 year strategic view • Population focus • 2 to 3 Million population base for most specialised services • Consolidation into fewer centres • Clustering of inter-related and co-dependent services • Horizon scanning re emerging technologies • Emphasis on quality • Networked provision of lower acuity elements of care • Transformation through STP alliance www.england.nhs.uk National Recommendations CRG ref CRG B01 Radiotherapy B01 Radiotherapy B01 Radiotherapy B01 Radiotherapy RECOMMENDATION Sub Region (Hub) Sub Region (Hub) National National B02 Health Economy B10 B11 B12 B12 B13 B13 B13 B14 B14 B14 B14 B15 B15 B16 B17 Service Line Radiotherapy (All Ages) Brachytherapy and Molecular Radiotherapy (All Ages) Breast Radiotherapy Injury Rehabilitation Proton Beam Therapy Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography Scanning PET-CT (All Ages) Thoracic Surgery Cancer: Malignant Mesothelioma (Adult) Upper GI Surgery Cancer: Oesophageal and Gastric (Adult) Sarcoma Cancer: Soft Tissue Sarcoma (Adult) Primary Malignant Bone Tumours Service (Adults and Sarcoma Adolescents) CNS Tumours Cancer: Brain and Central Nervous System (Adult) CNS Tumours Complex Neurofibromatosis Type 1 Service (All Ages) CNS Tumours Neurofibromatosis Type 2 Service (All Ages) Urology Cancer: Specialised Kidney, Bladder and Prostate (Adult) Urology Cancer: Penile (Adult) Urology Cancer: Testicular (Adult) Urology Ex-vivo Partial Nephrectomy Chemotherapy Cancer: Chemotherapy (Adult) Chemotherapy Cancer: Chemotherapy (Children, Teenagers and Young Adults) Head and Neck Cancers Cancer: Head and Neck (Adult) Teenage & young Cancer: Teenagers and Young People peoples Cancers www.england.nhs.uk Health Economy Health Economy Sub Region (Hub) National Health Economy National National Health Economy Sub Region (Hub) Sub Region (Hub) National Health Economy Sub Region (Hub) Health Economy Health Economy 23 NHS South STP population sizes 0.61M 1.66M 0.52M 0.92M 0.89M 0.54M 1.16M 0.84M 1.98M 1.78M 1.82M 0.76M 0.55M www.england.nhs.uk 24 Combined populations of STP ‘clusters’ 0.61M 2.5 1.66M 0.52M 0.92M 0.89M 0.54M 1.16M 0.84M 1.98M 4.4 1.78M 1.82M 0.76M 0.55M www.england.nhs.uk 25 Discussion: local structures Chris Harrison, National Clinical Director for Cancer, NHS England www.england.nhs.uk 26 Cancer Alliance Model - STRAW MAN FOR DISCUSSION CANCER ALLIANCE PARTNERSHIP • • • • • • • • Chair: Alliance lead* STP lead(s)/rep(s) Senior rep from each provider trust GP/GP federation lead(s) Director of Public Health Specialised commissioner lead CCG lead Voluntary sector provider(s) Meets every two months • To examine shared outcomes data to identify areas across whole pathways where improvement is required • To agree an action plan which: • Adds the next layer of detail on cancer to STPs • Addresses areas where improvement is required • Delivers the Taskforce strategy locally (by both seeking to meet the Taskforce’s 2020 ambitions and focusing on some specific recommendations/initiatives) CANCER ALLIANCE ADVISORY GROUP • Charities • Patients • Other local stakeholders Meets quarterly • To lead the delivery of the action plan by: • Driving the activity required within their own organisations • Working together to lead the joint activity *A senior clinician or manager who has credibility to provide cross-organisational leadership within the NHS and with stakeholders SUPPORT • • • Clinical Network staff (TBC: boosted by national funding) NHS England and NHS I regional staff (TBC: boosted by national funding) TBC: central support (e.g. on analytics) • To provide challenge and advice on the development and delivery of Alliance action plans Discussion questions • Does the straw man include the right members of the Cancer Alliance Partnership and the Cancer Alliance Advisory Group? Is anyone missing? • What support will Alliance members need? How can we make use of existing local capacity in supporting Alliances? • Ultimately the Commissioning, Provision and Accountability Oversight Group will oversee Cancer Alliances, although Regional Executive Teams will also play a key role. What other local governance arrangements - particularly in relation to STPs - need to be taken into account? • Does the straw man represent a meaningful approach to clinical leadership and patient engagement? If not, how can this be improved? • How often and in what way should the Cancer Alliance Partnership and the Cancer Alliance Advisory Group meet? www.england.nhs.uk 28 Discussion: 'gateway points' for Alliance development Jo Cottam, National Cancer Policy Lead, NHS England www.england.nhs.uk 29 Discussion: scenario Scenario: the members of the Cancer Alliance Partnership in a particular area have been given formal accountability for the outcomes for their cancer population. The members of the Partnership will all be held to account for delivering improvements against these outcomes, and will share both the risks and benefits of meeting these outcomes. Discussion question: What steps will the Cancer Alliance need to have taken before being given this formal accountability? www.england.nhs.uk 30 Wrap up and close Nigel Acheson, Regional Medical Director (South), NHS England www.england.nhs.uk 31