Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Lower left ventricular stroke volume predicts cardiovascular events in asymptomatic aortic stenosis (the SEAS study) Mai Tone Lønnebakken 1,2, Dana Cramariuc 2, Kurt Boman 3, Anne B. Rossebø 4, Kenneth Egstrup 5, Simon Ray 6, Christa Gohlke-Baerwolf 7, Eva Gerdts 1,2 Institute of Medicine, University of Bergen , Norway 1, Department of Heart Disease, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway 2, Skelleftea Hospital, Department of Medicine, Skelleftea, Sweden 3, , University of Oslo, Aker University Hospital, Department of Cardiology, Oslo, Norway 4 , Svendborg Hospital, Department of Cardiology, Svendborg, Denmark 5 , Manchester Academic Sciences Centre, Manchester, United Kingdom 6 , Heart Centre Bad Krozingen, Bad Krozingen, Germany 7 Background: Results: •Mean aortic gradient is used to assess aortic stenosis (AS) severity and cardiovascular (CV) risk •During follow-up, a total of 631 CV events occurred (Table 1) •In Kaplan Meier plot, low SVI was associated with higher rate of CV events (Figure 1) •Lower SVI at baseline was associated with older age, lower mean aortic gradient and lower LV mass (p<0.01) •In time-varying Cox regression analysis lower SVI at baseline and during follow-up both predicted higher rate of CV events independent of mean aortic gradient (Table 2) •Theoretically, reduced lower left ventricular (LV) stroke volume may cause a reduction in mean aortic gradient and consequently an underestimation of CV risk •The aim of the study was to assess the added prognostic information by including LV stroke volume in follow-up of AS Methods: •1752 patients with mild-moderate AS included in the Simvastatin and Ezetimibe in Aortic Stenosis (SEAS) study •Stoke volume derived from Doppler echocardiography and index for height2.04 (SVI) from baseline and annual follow-up visits with a mean follow-up of 4.3 years Table 1 Clinical characteristics Variables N= 1752 Age (years) 67±10 CV events 631 (36%) •The primary study end-point was major CV events including CV death, aortic valve events and ischemic CV events Log Rank 14.6 (p<0.01) SVI<22ml/m2.04 SVI baseline (ml/m2.04) LV mass (g) N=222 28.6±8.2 SVI ≥22ml/m2.04 195±68 N=1530 LV Ejection fraction (%) 66±7 Mean aortic gradient (mmHg) 23±9 Table 2 Time-dependent Cox Regression Analysis HR (95% CI) •Low SVI was defined as <22 ml/m 2.04 •The prognostic impact of SVI was tested by Kaplan Meier plot and Cox regression analysis reporting Hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) Figure 1 Low SVI predicted higher CV event rate SVI* (ml/m2.04) 1.016(1.006-1.026)** Mean aortic gradient* (mmHg) 1.021(1.017-1.026)** LV mass* (g) 1.002(1.001-1.003)** Study treatment 1.051(0.898-1.230) Baseline SVI (ml/m2.04) 1.014(1.002-1.026)* * p<0.05, ** p<0.01 Conclusion: During follow-up of patients with asymptomatic AS, lower baseline LV SVI or reduction in LV SVI both predicts higher rates of CV events independent of AS severity Disclosures: KB, ABR, KE, SR, CGB and EG were members of the Scientific Steering Committee in the SEAS study and received honoraria from Merck Schering Plough, the sponsor of the study