Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
August 30, 2012 EQ: How do I operate with exponents and special cases? Bellwork Quiz: Simplify each expression and leave in exponential form. 1. 58 x 512 2. 99 94 3. (56)3 8 x 42 4 4. (42)3 Simplify each expression and leave in standard form. 5. 1270 6. (-4) 4 August 30, 2012 EQ: How do I operate with exponents and special cases? Bellwork Quiz: Identify each relationship below as a relation, a function, or both 1. (1, 2), (2, 3), (3, 4), (4, 5), (5, 6) 2. x y 6 5 7 5 8 10 5 5 3. (5, 6), (5, 7), (5, 8), (5, 9), (5, 10) 4. 1 2 3 4 5 6 4 5 6 7 8 9 5. August 30, 2012 So, we've learned the rules for operating with exponents, but sometimes there are special cases that we have to consider. these aren't so much unique cases as they are cases in which multiple rules must be applied in the correct order. Before we look at those cases, though, let's make sure we remember the basic rules: Rule # 1: ax x ay = a(x+y) x Rule # 2: a = a(x-y) ay Rule # 3: (ax)y = a(x*y) Rule #4: a0 = 1 Rule #5: a-x = 1 ax August 30, 2012 Special Case #1: What if our exponential expressions don't have the same base? Consider the following expression: 93 x 34 Based on our rules, there is nothing we can do here, right? Well, before we give up, we need to make sure that we can't re-write our expression in a way that allows us to follow the rules. Is there a way to write 9 as a power of 3? 2 9=3 In mathematics we are allowed to substitute one expression for another as long as those expressions are equivalent. In this case, 9 is equivalent to 32, so we can use them interchangeably. When we substitute into our original expression, we get: 23 4 (3 ) x 3 This is still a little complicated, but at least it follows the rules: 36 x 34 310 So, 93 x 34 = 310 By rule 3 By rule 1 Try checking out answer with a calculator! August 30, 2012 Special Case #2: What if we have multiple exponential expression and multiple rules to follow? Ever since 5th grade, or maybe earlier, you've been hearing about PEMDAS. Well, PEMDAS is one of the great things in mathematics that works almost every time. If you have multiple operations to perform, all you have to do is follow the prder of operations. Consider the expression below: 6 (5 ) 3 ( ( (53) In this case, we have multiple expressions and multiple operations. So let's follow the order of operations: P - Parentheses: We have three sets of parentheses. the smaller two are really unnecessary. We could expand those expressions into standard form, but that wouldn't be very helpful. The large set of parentheses tells us to take everything inside those parentheses to the 3rd power. that gives us: 518 59 This is a little easier to deal with. using our division rule, we get: 59 as our answer! August 30, 2012 Special Case #3: What if I don't have any numbers? The higher you get in mathematics, the fewer actual numbers you are going to deal with. More often, you will deal with variables instead. Consider the expression below: x5 * x4 x3 * x2 Variables follow the exact same rules as numbers do, so we can treat this just like we did the last problem. All we do is follow our 5 basic rules while keeping the order of operations in mind. x5 * x 4 = 3 2 x *x 4 x9 = x x5 August 30, 2012 Special Case #4: What if I have both exponential and nonexponential terms in my expression? In algebra, we do something called collecting like terms. While not exactly the same thing, we can do something similar when looking at exponential expressions. We can work with only the pieces of the expression that seem to fit together. Consider the expression below: 3b9 5 18b At first glance, it's a little intimidating. What about if I wrote it like this? 3b9 5 18b We know how to simplify a fraction, and that's all we have to do here: 1b9 6b5 Now we deal with the exponents and get: 4 Which we could also write as: 1 b 6 1b4 6 August 30, 2012 Special Case #5: What's the deal with negative exponents? We have a pretty simple rule for dealing with negative exponents. the problem is, it gets hard to figure out what to do with the negative sign when you are already working with a fraction. The first thing you need to know is that a truly simplified exponential expression has only positive exponents. So, before an expression is complete, we have to convert all of the negative exponents to fractions. Look at this expression: g6 1 = g-4 = g10 g4 What about a harder one? 4k13 16k20 = 1k13 20 4k = 1k 4 -7 = 1 4k7 August 30, 2012 Special Case #6: More negative exponents... So what if we have a negative exponent in the denominator? Consider the following expression: If we simplify the fraction, we get: 5 25x-5 1 -5 5x Now, we learned last year that we can think of a negative exponent as an opposite sign. The same is true here. A negative exponent simply means to move the exponent expression from the denominator to the numerator, or to put it on the opposite side of the fraction. So our expression becomes: 1x5 5 which equals x5 5 which equals... 1 x5 5 August 30, 2012 Practice Problems: The Easy Sheet 4. (36)(32)2 = (36)(34) = 310 5. ((52)3)2 = (56)2 = 512 6. (35)(9) = (35)(32) = 37 (52)(58) 510 7. = = 57 3 53 5 8 28 28 8. 2 = = 22 = 4 = 23 (2 ) 43 26 9. ( (1516) (15 11 ) 4 ( 3 7 2 10 2 12 1. (2 )(2 )(2 ) = 2 (2 ) = 2 8 2. 12 = 124 124 3. 62 × 69 = 611 = (155)4 = 15 20 August 30, 2012 Practice Sheet 2: A little Harder 1. a4× a3 = a7 2. n5× n4 = n9 3. x2 × x9 = x11 4. y × y6 × y2 = y9 5. y3 y2 7 a 6. a3 7. =y = a4 1 a6 = a-2 = a8 a2 a7 a3 August 30, 2012 Practice: Simplify each of the following exponential expressions. Your final expression should have no negative exponents. 1. (3n4)2 n2 2. 15(x3)4 3(x5)3 3. (2a3b4c5)2 4(a2b2c2)4 4. (4p4r2s6)3 (2p2rs3)6