Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
V-9 Prognostic value of left ventricular deformation parameters in patients with aortic stenosis Lars Gunnar Klæboe, Trine F. Håland, Ida S. Leren, Rachel M.A. ter Bekke, Helge Røsjø, Torbjørn Omland, Lars Gullestad, Svend Aakhus, Kristina H. Haugaa, Thor Edvardsen Dept of Cardiology and Center for Cardiological Innovation, Oslo University Hospital, Rikshospitalet Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo Dept of Cardiology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, The Netherlands Center for Heart Failure Research, University of Oslo Dept of Cardiology, Division of Medicine, Akershus University Hospital E-mail: [email protected] Disclosures: None V-9 Introduction • In aortic stenosis (AS) subtle alterations in myocardial mechanics can be detected by speckle tracking echocardiography prior to reduction of left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (EF) Purpose • We aimed to investigate if parameters from strain echocardiography are markers of prognosis in AS-patients V-9 • • • • • METHODS 162 patients referred for evaluation of severe AS We recorded all-cause mortality and number AVR performed during follow up Baseline standard 2D echocardiography including speckle tracking strain Global longitudinal strain (GLS): average of peak longitudinal shortening from a 16 LV segments model Mechanical dispersion: standard deviation of contraction duration defined as time from onset of Q/R on ECG to peak longitudinal strain in 16 segments (Figure 1) Survivor with low mechanical dispersion (39 ms) Contraction duration Onset of QRS on ECG Non-survivor with pronounced mechanical dispersion (76 ms) V-9 Overall results • Follow-up 37 ± 13 months 16 • Surgical AVR (n = 120, 74%) 26 • Conservatively treated patients (n = 42) due to comorbidity (n=19) or sparse symptoms (n=23) were similarly distributed between survivors and non-survivors (p=0.20) • 37 (23%) patients died • Overall survival closely related to AVR-status (Kaplan, log rank < 0.01) • Prognostic value of parameters from strain echocardiography examined only in the subgroup of conservatively treated patients No. at risk AVR Conservatively treated patients 120 114 104 5 42 25 16 1 V-9 Results - Conservatively treated AS-patients (n = 42) Age, years Men/women, n NYHA class AVA, cm2 GLS, % IVSd, cm LV ejection fraction, % Mean AV gradient, mmHg Mech. dispersion, ms Survivors (n=16) Non-survivors (n = 26) 80±7 5/11 2.1 ± 0.9 0.85±0.26 - 17.2±3.7 1.1 ± 0.2 60 ± 11 34 ± 17 60 ± 15 79±6 17/9 2.7 ± 1.0 0.70 ± 0.29 - 13.9±4.9 1.3 ± 0.2 53 ± 15 50 ± 21 80 ± 24 log rank 0.02 P-value 0.61 0.06 0.09 0.11 0.04 < 0.01 0.10 0.02 < 0.01 log rank 0.02 Mechanical dispersion predicted mortality independently of LVEF and age [HR =1.25 (1.05, 1.49), p=0.01, per 10 ms increase]. Mech. dispersion > 65 ms Mech. dispersion < 65 ms GLS < -15.4 % GLS > -15.4 % Days (n) V-9 CONCLUSIONS • Increased mechanical dispersion and reduced GLS in aortic stenosis • is associated with increased mortality in conservatively treated patients • may be additional risk factors • can strengthen the indication for interventional treatment in patients with preserved LVEF not eligible for AVR when using traditional criteria