Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Rapport om PhD-programmet
Document related concepts
no text concepts found
Transcript
Rapport om PhD-programmet Tim Brennen Til fakultetsstyret, 8. desember 2016 1 PhD program, 7 tracks Technology, innovation and culture Sociology Human geography Psychology Economics Social anthropology Political science Stipendiater (May 2016) Disputaser (2015) TIK 28 3 Sociology 53 7 Human Geography 20 3 Psychology 128 26 Economics 46 12 Social anthropology 27 7 Political science 59 10 • Mandate – “The primary task of the external evaluation committee is to evaluate the scientific quality of the program specializations in light of international standards. This includes an evaluation of the program structure, courses offered, supervision, research environment, administrative support, internationalization, the structure and scientific merit of doctoral dissertations, the attractiveness of the program for new applicants, and the attractiveness of candidates for academic and non-academic positions.” The panel • • • • • • Jens Jungblut, Kassel, Germany, Political Science Ingrid Lunt, Oxford, Education, Psychology Jon Mitchell, Sussex, Anthropology Jakob Munch, Copenhagen, Economics Geraldine Pratt, British Columbia, Geography Nina Køpke Vøllestad, UiO, Medicine • Vøllestad has agreed to lead the panel Preparatory information • Internal evaluation, Thune (2015) • A self-evaluation from each track • A few theses • All evaluation reports from PhD committees • Article-based & monographs • Journals where PhD work is published Site visit • September Report received • November Ros • “In general, we find that all tracks are well functioning, of good quality and show high levels of self-reflection and awareness of existing challenges.” – keep the structure with 7 tracks • “As far as could be judged from the thesis abstracts, and the evaluation reports the quality of PhD research is comparable to other research intensive universities internationally.” • “the assessment and examination process is robust throughout”. Utfordringer • • • • • • «What is the PhD for?» Generiske ferdigheter for stipendiater PhD plan Opplæring og utvikling hos veiledere Informasjonsflyt Opplæringsdel Prosess videre • • • • • • Leder i SV-nytt Stipendiater PhD administrativt nettverk PhD programråd Instituttledere Dekanat • Diskusjon i fakultetsstyret i neste møte, vedtakssak i juni?
