Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Economics of fascism wikipedia , lookup
Global financial system wikipedia , lookup
Ragnar Nurkse's balanced growth theory wikipedia , lookup
Production for use wikipedia , lookup
Fiscal multiplier wikipedia , lookup
Non-monetary economy wikipedia , lookup
Protectionism wikipedia , lookup
Economic democracy wikipedia , lookup
AppendixC. EconomicFreedomIndex:SubcomponentsandDefinitions. Sub‐Dimensions RuleofLaw PropertyRights Freedomfrom Corruption Limited Government FiscalFreedom Government Spending Definitions The ability to accumulate private property and wealth is understood to be a central motivating force for workers and investors in a market economy. The recognition of private propertyrights,withsufficientrule oflawtoprotectthem,isa vital featureofa fullyfunctioning marketeconomy. Securepropertyrightsgive citizensthe confidence to undertakeentrepreneurialactivity,savetheirincome,andmakelong‐termplansbecause they know that their income, savings, and property (both real and intellectual) are safe fromunfairexpropriationortheft.Theprotectionofprivatepropertyrequiresaneffective andhonestjudicialsystemthatisavailabletoall,equallyandwithoutdiscrimination.The independence, transparency, and effectiveness of the judicial system have proved to be keydeterminantsofacountry’sprospectsforlong‐termeconomicgrowth.Suchasystem isalsovitaltothemaintenanceofpeaceandsecurityandtheprotectionofhumanrights.A key aspect of property rights protection is the enforcement of contracts. The voluntary undertaking of contractual obligations is the foundation of the market system and the basis for economic specialization, gains from commercial exchange, and trade among nations. Even‐handed government enforcement of private contracts is essential to ensuringequityandintegrityinthemarketplace. Corruption is defined as dishonesty or decay. In the context of governance, it can be definedasthefailureofintegrityinthesystem,adistortionbywhichindividualsareable togainpersonallyattheexpenseofthewhole.Politicalcorruptionmanifestsitselfinmany formssuchasbribery,extortion,nepotism,cronyism,patronage,embezzlement,and(most commonly) graft, whereby public officials steal or profit illegitimately from public funds. Corruption can infect all parts of an economy; there is a direct relationship between the extent of government regulation or other government intervention in economic activity and the amount of corruption. Almost any government regulation can provide an opportunityforbriberyorgraft.Inaddition,agovernmentregulationorrestrictioninone areamaycreateaninformalmarketinanother.Forexample,acountrywithhighbarriers totrademayhavelawsthatprotectitsdomesticmarketandpreventtheimportofforeign goods, but these barriers create incentives for smuggling and a black market for the restricted products. Transparency is the best weapon against corruption. Openness in regulatory procedures and processes can promote equitable treatment and greater regulatoryefficiencyandspeed. Fiscal freedom is a direct measure of the extent to which individuals and businesses are permitted by government to keep and control their income and wealth for their own benefit and use. A government can impose fiscal burdens on economic activity through taxation,butitalsodoessowhenitincursdebtthatultimatelymustbepaidoffthrough taxation.Themarginaltaxrateconfrontinganindividualis,ineffect,thegovernment’scut of the profit from his or her next unit of work or engagement in a new entrepreneurial venture;whateverremainsafterthetaxissubtractedistheindividual’sactualrewardfor the effort. The higher the government’s cut, the lower the individual’s reward—and the lowertheincentivetoundertaketheworkatall.Highertaxratesinterferewiththeability ofindividualsandfirmstopursuetheirgoalsinthemarketplaceandreduce,onaverage, their willingness to work or invest. While individual and corporate income tax rates are importanttoeconomicfreedom,theyarenotacomprehensivemeasureofthetaxburden. Governmentsimposemanyotherindirecttaxes,includingpayroll,sales,andexcisetaxes; tariffs; and the value‐added tax (VAT). In the IndexofEconomicFreedom, the burden of thesetaxesiscapturedbymeasuringtheoveralltaxburdenfromallformsoftaxationasa percentageoftotalGDP. Thecostofexcessivegovernmentisacentralissueineconomicfreedom,bothintermsof generating revenue (see fiscal freedom) and in terms of spending. Some government spending, suchas providing infrastructure orfunding research or even improvements in humancapital,maybethoughtofasinvestments.Therearepublicgoods,thebenefitsof which accrue broadly to society in ways that markets cannot appropriately price. All government spending that must eventually be financed by higher taxation, however, entails an opportunity cost equal to the value of the private consumption or investment that would have occurred had the resources involved been left in the private sector. In other words, excessive government spending runs a great risk of crowding out private economic activity. Even if an economy achieves fast growth through heavy government expenditure,sucheconomicexpansiontendstobeonlyshort‐lived,distortingallocationof resourcesandprivateinvestmentincentives.Evenworse,agovernment’sinsulationfrom market discipline often leads to bureaucracy, lower productivity, inefficiency, and mountingdebtthatimposesanevengreaterburdenonfuturegenerations.Asmanyhave experienced in recent years, high levels of public debt accumulated by irresponsible governmentspendingundermineeconomicfreedomandstiflegrowth Regulatory Efficiency BusinessFreedom Businessfreedomisaboutanindividual’srighttoestablishandrunanenterprisewithout interferencefromthestate.Burdensomeandredundantregulationsarethemostcommon barriers to the free conduct of entrepreneurial activity. By increasing the costs of production, regulations can make it difficult for entrepreneurs to succeed in the marketplace. Although many regulations hinder business productivity and profitability, the mostinhibitingtoentrepreneurshiparethosethat areassociatedwithlicensingnew businesses.Insomecountries,aswellasmanystatesintheUnitedStates,theprocedure forobtainingabusinesslicensecanbeassimpleasmailinginaregistrationformwitha minimalfee.InHongKong,forexample,obtainingabusinesslicenserequiresfillingouta singleform,andtheprocesscanbecompletedinafewhours.Inothereconomies,suchas India and parts of South America, the process of obtaining a business license can take muchlonger,involvingendlesstripstogovernmentofficesandrepeatedencounterswith officious and sometimes corrupt bureaucrats. Once a business is open, government regulation may interfere with the normal decision‐making or price‐setting process. Interestingly, two countries with the same set of regulations can impose different regulatory burdens. If one country, for instance, applies its regulations evenly and transparently,itlowerstheregulatoryburdenbyfacilitatinglong‐termbusinessplanning. Iftheotherappliesregulationsinconsistently,itraisestheregulatoryburdenbycreating an unpredictable business environment. Rigid and onerous bankruptcy procedures are also distortionary, providing a disincentive for entrepreneurs to start businesses in the firstplace. LaborFreedom Theabilityofindividualstoworkasmuchastheywantandwherevertheywantisakey componentofeconomicfreedom.Bythesametoken,theabilityofbusinessestocontract freelyforlaboranddismissredundantworkerswhentheyarenolongerneededisavital mechanismforenhancingproductivityandsustainingoveralleconomicgrowth.Thecore principleofanymarketisfree,voluntaryexchange.Thatisastrueinthelabormarketasit is in the market for goods. State intervention generates the same problems in the labor market that it produces in any other market. Government regulations take a variety of forms, including wage controls, hiring and firing restrictions, and other restrictions. In manycountries,unionsplayanimportantroleinregulatinglaborfreedomand,depending onthenatureoftheiractivity,maybeeitheraforceforgreaterfreedomoranimpediment to the efficient functioning of labor markets. In general, the greater the degree of labor freedom,thelowertherateofunemploymentinaneconomy. MonetaryFreedom Monetary freedom, reflected in a stable currency and market‐determined prices, is to an economy what free speech is to democracy. Free people need a steady and reliable currencyasamediumofexchange,unitofaccount,andstoreofvalue.Withoutmonetary freedom,itisdifficulttocreatelong‐termvalueoramasscapital.Thevalueofacountry’s currencyiscontrolledlargelybythemonetarypolicyofitsgovernment.Withamonetary policythatendeavorstofightinflation,maintainpricestability,andpreservethenation’s wealth,peoplecanrelyonmarketpricesfortheforeseeablefuture.Investments,savings, and other longer‐term plans can be made more confidently. An inflationary policy, by contrast, confiscates wealth like an invisible tax and also distorts prices, misallocates resources,andraisesthecostofdoingbusiness.Thereisnosingleacceptedtheoryofthe rightmonetarypolicyforafreesociety.Atonetime,thegoldstandardenjoyedwidespread support. What characterizes almost all monetary theories today, however, is support for lowinflationandanindependentcentralbank.Thereisalsowidespreadrecognitionthat pricecontrolscorruptmarketefficiencyandleadtoshortagesorsurpluses. OpenMarkets TradeFreedom Investment Freedom FinancialFreedom Tradefreedomreflectsaneconomy’sopennesstotheimportofgoodsandservicesfrom around the world and the citizen’s ability to interact freely as buyer or seller in the international marketplace. Trade restrictions can manifest themselves in the form of tariffs,exporttaxes,tradequotas,oroutrighttradebans.However,traderestrictionsalso appearinmoresubtleways,particularlyintheformofregulatorybarriers.Thedegreeto whichgovernmenthindersthefreeflowofforeigncommercehasadirectbearingonthe abilityofindividualstopursuetheireconomicgoalsandmaximizetheirproductivityand well‐being. Tariffs, for example, directly increase the prices that local consumers pay for foreign imports, but they also distort production incentives for local producers, causing them to produce either a good in which they lack a comparative advantage or more of a protected good than is economically efficient. This impedes overall economic efficiency and growth.Inmanycases,trade limitationsalso putadvanced‐technologyproductsand services beyond the reach of local entrepreneurs, limiting their own productive development. A free and open investment environment provides maximum entrepreneurial opportunitiesandincentivesforexpandedeconomicactivity,greaterproductivity,andjob creation. The benefits of suchan environment flow not only to the individual companies thattaketheentrepreneurialriskinexpectationofgreaterreturn,butalsotosocietyasa whole. An effective investment framework will be characterized by transparency and equity, supporting all types of firms rather than just large or strategically important companies, and will encourage rather than discourage innovation and competition. Restrictionsonthemovementofcapital,bothdomesticandinternational,underminethe efficient allocation of resources and reduce productivity, distorting economic decision‐ making. Restrictions on cross‐border investment can limit both inflows and outflows of capital, shrinking markets and reducing opportunities for growth. In an environment in whichindividualsandcompaniesarefreetochoosewhereandhowtoinvest,capitalwill flowtoitsbestuse:tothesectorsandactivitieswhereitismostneededandthereturns aregreatest.Stateactiontoredirecttheflowofcapitalandlimitchoiceisanimpositionon the freedomofboththeinvestorand the personseekingcapital.Themorerestrictionsa countryimposesoninvestment,theloweritslevelofentrepreneurialactivity. A transparent and open financial system ensures fairness in access to financing and promotes entrepreneurship. An open banking environment encourages competition to provide the most efficient financial intermediation between households and firms and between investors and entrepreneurs. Through a process driven by supply and demand, marketsprovidereal‐timeinformationonpricesandimmediatedisciplineforthosewho have made bad decisions. This process depends on transparency in the market and the integrityoftheinformationbeingmadeavailable.Aneffectiveregulatorysystem,through disclosurerequirementsandindependentauditing,ensuresboth.Increasingly,thecentral role played by banks is being complemented by other financial services that offer alternativemeansforraisingcapitalordiversifyingrisk.Aswiththebankingsystem,the useful role forgovernment in regulating these institutions lies in ensuring transparency; promoting disclosure of assets, liabilities, and risks; and ensuring integrity. Banking and financial regulation by the state that goes beyond the assurance of transparency and honesty in financial markets can impede efficiency, increase the costs of financing entrepreneurialactivity,andlimitcompetition.Ifthegovernmentintervenesinthestock market, for instance, it contravenes the choices of millions of individuals by interfering withthepricingofcapital—themostcriticalfunctionofamarketeconomy.Equitymarkets measure,onacontinualbasis,theexpectedprofitsandlossesinpubliclyheldcompanies. Thismeasurementisessentialinallocatingcapitalresourcestotheirhighest‐valueduses andtherebysatisfyingconsumers’mosturgentrequirements. Source:HeritageFoundation/WallStreetJournal,2012.Website:www.heritage.org/index