Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
10/16/2011 ASSESSMENT OF LV DIASTOLIC FUNCTION BY DOPPLER ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY S Bakhoum, Bakhoum, MD Assistant Professor of Cardiology Cairo University PHYSIOLOGY OF DIASTOLE Normal diastolic function is defined as the ability of the LV to accommodate an adequate filling volume to maintain CO while operating at low pressure. 1 10/16/2011 AVC IVRT Rapid Early Filling LV Diastasis Atrial Systole MVO S2 MVC LA D S1 A wave E wave AR PV Flow MV Flow Doppler Indices of Diastolic Function Isovolumic relaxation time. Transmitral Pulmonary flow. vein flow. 2 10/16/2011 Isovolumic Relaxation Time LV LVOT MV LA Isovolumic Relaxation Time IVRT 3 10/16/2011 Isovolumic Relaxation Time Clinical Applications Normal value: value: 65 + 20 msec msec.. Prolonged in various ario s diseases (> (>90 90 msec) that result in impairment of myocardial relaxation.. relaxation Non invasive predictor of: of: – Doxorubicin Doxorubicin--induced cardiomyopathy cardiomyopathy.. – Early cardiac transplant rejection Shortened in stages 2(< (<90 90 msec), 3 & 4 (<70 (< 70 msec) diastolic dysfunction. dysfunction. Isovolumic Relaxation Time Limitations It measures the time taken by isovolumic relaxation l i andd not the h rate off relaxation. l i It is age dependent. It is sensitive to changes in HR and systolic function. It does not give information on LV filling. 4 10/16/2011 Doppler Indices of Diastolic Function Isovolumic relaxation time. Transmitral Pulmonary flow. vein flow. Transmitral Flow Transmitral blood flow velocities representative t ti off volumetric l t i flow. fl are The measured peak velocity is indicative of the relative instantaneous change in pressure between the LA and LV after the opening of the MV. 5 10/16/2011 Technical Considerations for optimal recording of TM flow Sample size should be relatively small, at the leaflet tips to yield higher flow velocities. Use color flow Doppler echocardiography to line up the sample volume parallel to flow in the 44-CH view . PW Doppler has superior temporal and range resolution than CW Doppler. Use the lowest filter settings possible. Ask patient to hold normal expiration, avoiding straining and average at least three beats. Normal Transmitral Flow 6 10/16/2011 Doppler Transmitral Flow Peak E wave velocity: 70 – 100 cm/sec. Peak A wave velocity: 45 – 70 cm/sec. E/A ratio: 1.0 – 2.0 E deceleration time (DT): 160 – 240 msec. Abnormal Transmitral Flow Stage I: Impaired Relaxation Stage II: Pseudo Pseudo--normalization Stage III: Restrictive Filling (Reversible) Stage IV: Restrictive Filling(Irreversible) 7 10/16/2011 Impaired LV Relaxation A E E/A <1 DT >240msec IVRT >90msec Impaired LV Relaxation Clinical Applications This pattern has been described in: in: – Patients i with i h LVH due d to HTN, AS, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy & obesity heart syndrome. syndrome. – Patients with syndromes.. syndromes myocardial y ischemic 8 10/16/2011 Pseudonormalization E/A :1 -1.5 DT: 160-240msec IVRT<90msec Pseudonormal Pattern The diagnosis can often be suspected by LA enlargement enlargement. l . Confirmation of the diagnosis can be made on the basis of abnormal PV flow, abnormal TD annular motion or an abnormal response to the Valsalva maneuver. maneuver. 9 10/16/2011 Pseudonormalization Restrictive Pattern E A E/A >2 DT <160 msec IVRT<70msec 10 10/16/2011 Restrictive Pattern Clinical Applications This ppattern has been described in patients p with advanced heart failure & in patients with restrictive cardiomyopathy. cardiomyopathy. Heart failure patients with this pattern have: – poor treadmill performance. – higher mortality. Transmitral Flow Limitations A large number of factors can affect the transmitral i l flow fl i l di age, heart including h rate, heart rhythm, loading conditions, LV systolic function, atrial function, and mitral valve disease disease.. TM flow cannot be used in isolation to assess diastolic function. function. 11 10/16/2011 Doppler Indices of Diastolic Function Isovolumic relaxation time. Transmitral Pulmonary flow. vein flow. Normal Pulmonary Venous Flow S2 S1 D Pulm. V. Flow e l Ar Transmitral Flow Tra IVRT 12 10/16/2011 Normal Pulmonary Venous Flow S D Ar Normal Pulmonary Venous Flow Peak S wave velocity: 60 + 15 cm/sec. Peak D wave velocity: 40 + 15 cm/sec. Peak S / Peak D ratio: 1.3 – 1.5 ( + 0.3). Systolic fraction= STVI/DTVI x 100= 60 - 68 +10% Peak Ar wave velocity: -32 + 10 cm/sec. Ar duration: 137 + 31 msec. 13 10/16/2011 Impaired LV Relaxation Higher S1 and S2 peak velocity. p y Lower D peak velocity. Higher systolic fraction. S D A Variable Ar. Pseudormalisation Pattern Lower S1 and S2 peak velocity. Higher D peak velocity. S Lower Systolic fraction. D A Higher Ar 14 10/16/2011 Pulmonary Venous Flow Estimation of LA Pressure LAP = 35 – 0.39 0 39 x ( systolic t li fraction) f ti ) Systolic Fraction < 55% was 91% sensitive & 87% specific for predicting a mean LA pressure >15 mmHg Kuecherer et al., Circulation 1990; 82: 1127 Pulmonary Venous Flow Estimation of LVEDP An A Ar velocity A l i >35 3 cm/sec / & a difference in duration ( Ar – A ) >30 msec, is higly predictive of a LVEDP > 15 mm Hg. p g Rossvol et al. JACC 1993; 21: 1687 15 10/16/2011 Other Markers of Diastolic Function Non Invasive Assessment of Tau. Color MM-mode Propagation Velocity. Tissue Doppler Mitral Annular Velocity. LA Volume Other Markers of Diastolic Function Non Invasive Assessment of Tau. Color MM-mode Propagation Velocity. Tissue Doppler Mitral Annular Velocity. LA Volume 16 10/16/2011 Non Invasive Measurement of Tau τ Measurement of “Tau τ (TL)” Normal values: values: 25 – 40 msec msec.. Higher i h values l represent reduced d d early l diastolic distensibility due to slow relaxation.. relaxation It does not however describe events during phases of ventricular filling filling.. It is only applicable in patients with a complete MR envelope. envelope. 17 10/16/2011 Other Markers of Diastolic Function Non Invasive Assessment of Tau. Color MM-mode Propagation Velocity. Tissue Doppler Mitral Annular Velocity. LA Volume Color MM-mode Flow Propagation Velocity E Vp A 18 10/16/2011 Color MM-mode Flow Propagation Velocity The slope of the early filling wave front “Vp V ” is Vp” i a useful f l non invasive i i index i d off LV relaxation.. relaxation “Vp Vp”” < 55 cm/sec in the young or < 45 cm/sec in older individuals identifies impaired LV relaxation. relaxation. It is less affected by preload than TM or PV flow.. flow Color MM-mode Flow Propagation Velocity E/Vp E/ Vp ratio can be used to estimate PCWP PCWP.. PCWP = [5.27 x E/ E/Vp Vp]] + 4.6 (in mmHg) Garcia et al. JACC 1997;29: 448 Positive and negative predictive values for E/Vp E/ Vp > 1.5 to predict PCWP >12 mm Hg were 93% 93% and 70% 70% respectively. respectively. Garcia et al. JACC 2000; 35: 201 19 10/16/2011 Other Markers of Diastolic Function Non Invasive Assessment of Tau. Color MM-mode Propagation Velocity. Tissue Doppler Mitral Annular Velocity. LA Volume Tissue Doppler Mitral Annular Velocity S a’ e’ 20 10/16/2011 TD Mitral Annular Velocity Impaired LV Relaxation 21 10/16/2011 TD Mitral Annular e’ Velocity Is related to LV relaxation. relaxation. Reduced and delayed in impaired LV relaxation, relates inversely with the time constant of LV relaxation. relaxation. It is relatively load independent. independent. Patients with pseudonormal LV filling are separated from normal by an e’ < 8.5 cm/sec and an e’ /a’ ratio < 1. E/e’ Ratio E/e’ > 15 identifies patients with LVEDP >12 mm Hg . E/e’ < 8 identifies patients with normal LVEDP. PCWP (mm Hg) = 1.24 (E/e’) + 1.9 Nagueh et al., JACC 1997; 30: 1527 22 10/16/2011 E/e’ Ratio E/e’ should not be used to estimate LV filling in : – – – – – – – Normal subjects. Significant annular calcification. Surgical rings. Mitral stenosis. stenosis. Prosthetic mitral valves. Moderate to severe mitral regurge. regurge. Constrictive pericarditis. pericarditis. Recommendations for the Evaluation of LV Diastolic Function by Echocardiography. European Journal of Echocardiography 2009: 10; 165–193 TE-e´ Interval The time interval between the QRS complex and the onset of mitral E velocity is subtracted from the time interval between the QRS complex and e´ onset to derive (TEe´). It is advantageous to use: – subjects with normal cardiac function – those with mitral valve disease – when the E/e´ E/e´ ratio is 8 to 15 23 10/16/2011 TE-e´ Interval An IVRT/TE-e´ ratio < 2 has reasonable accuracy in identifying patients with increased LV filling pressures. pressures. Tau τ (msec) = 32 + 0.7 x (TE-e’) Rivas-Gotz et al. J Am Coll Cardiol 2003; 42:1463–70. Other Markers of Diastolic Function Non Invasive Assessment of Tau. Color MM-mode Propagation Velocity. Tissue Doppler Mitral Annular Velocity. LA Volume 24 10/16/2011 LA Volume An increase in LA size is a morphologic expression i off chronic h i diastolic di li dysfunction d f dysfunction. i . Although non specific, it reflects both the duration and severity of the disease. disease. LA volume indexed to BSA has both diagnostic and prognostic value value.. Novel markers of diastolic function Global diastolic strain 25 10/16/2011 Novel markers of diastolic function Global diastolic myocardial strain rate: – SRIVR has a strong correlation with time constant of LV pressure decay. – SRE is significantly related to LVEDP. – E/ SRIVR is most useful in patients with E/e’ ratio: 8 to 15 and is more accurate than E/e’ in patients with normal EF and regional dysfunction Wang, et al. Circulation. 2007;115:1376-1383 Novel markers of diastolic function Regional diastolic myocardial strain rate: – to evaluate diastolic stiffness during stunning & infarction.. infarction – correlates with the degree of interstitial fibrosis.. fibrosis LV twist: twist: – Both rate and extent of untwisting can be quantified.. quantified 26 10/16/2011 Recommendations for the Evaluation of LV Diastolic Function by Echocardiography. European Journal of Echocardiography (2009) 10, 165–193 CONCLUSION LV filling is the result of a variety of complex forces forces.. No single parameter can be derived that will adequately describe diastolic function.. function Diastolic filling patterns do not remain static in either health or disease disease.. 27 10/16/2011 28