Download Chemical Enhancement of Footwear Impressions in Blood on Fabric

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Blood transfusion wikipedia , lookup

Schmerber v. California wikipedia , lookup

Autotransfusion wikipedia , lookup

Plateletpheresis wikipedia , lookup

Blood donation wikipedia , lookup

Jehovah's Witnesses and blood transfusions wikipedia , lookup

Hemorheology wikipedia , lookup

Blood type wikipedia , lookup

Men who have sex with men blood donor controversy wikipedia , lookup

Blood bank wikipedia , lookup

Rh blood group system wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
Chemical Enhancement of Footwear Impressions in Blood on Fabric –
Part 3: Amino Acid Staining
Kevin J. Farrugia a,b, Helen Bandey c, Kathleen Savage a, Niamh NicDaéid a,*
a
Centre for Forensic Science, WestCHEM, Department of Pure and Applied Chemistry,
University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, G1 1XW, UK
b
c
School of Contemporary Sciences, Division of Environment and Forensic Sciences,
University of Abertay, Bell Street, Dundee, DD1 1HG, UK
Centre for Applied Science and Technology [formerly HOSDB], Home Office Science,
Woodcock Hill, Sandridge, St. Albans, AL4 9HQ, UK
* CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
Niamh NicDaéid
Centre for Forensic Science
WestCHEM, Department of Pure and Applied Chemistry
University of Strathclyde
Glasgow, G1 1XW
UK
[email protected]
Chemical Enhancement of Footwear Impressions in Blood on Fabric –
Part 3: Amino Acid Staining
ABSTRACT
Enhancement of footwear impressions, using ninhydrin or ninhydrin analogues is not
considered common practice and such techniques are generally used to target amino acids
present in fingermarks where the reaction gives rise to colour and possibly fluorescence.
Ninhydrin and two of its analogues were used for the enhancement of footwear impressions
in blood on various types, colour and porosities of fabric. Test footwear impressions on fabric
were prepared using a specifically built rig to minimise the variability between each
impression. Ninhydrin enhancement of footwear impressions in blood on light coloured
fabric yielded good enhancement results, however the contrast was weak or non-existent on
dark coloured fabrics. Other ninhydrin analogues which have the advantage of fluorescence
failed to enhance the impressions in blood on all fabrics. The sequential treatment of
impressions in blood on fabric with other blood enhancing reagents (e.g. protein stains and
heme reagents) was also investigated.
Keywords: footwear impressions, enhancement, blood, fabric, amino acid, ninhydrin, DFO,
1,2-indanedione
1
INTRODUCTION
Ninhydrin is a non-specific amino acid reagent useful for the development of latent
fingerprints [1-3]. As amino acids are also present in blood, chemicals that enhance latent
fingerprints may also enhance impressions in blood. Bodziak [4] has indicated that ninhydrin
is occasionally used to enhance footwear impressions in blood. Furthermore, ninhydrin has
been reported as successful in enhancing footwear impressions in blood on paper that had
been exposed to rain for over three weeks [5]. The reaction of ninhydrin results in an
intermediate colour change, varying from orange to purple (Ruhemann’s purple complex)
depending on the fingerprint’s origin and development conditions [6]. Recent research [7, 8]
showed that liquid hydrofluorocarbons such as HFC4310, HFE7100 and HFE71DE are
efficient and safe substitute solvents to CFC113 for formulations of ninhydrin and its
analogues.
1,8-Diazafluorenone-9-one (DFO) is a ninhydrin analogue developed by Grigg et al. [9]. The
reaction of DFO with amino acids gives a magenta colour which is less intense than the one
obtained with ninhydrin. The main advantage of DFO is that it exhibits enhancement with
both colour and fluorescence [10]. Ninhydrin analogues developed in the 1980s exhibited
similar results to ninhydrin itself [11, 12]. 1,2-indanedione (1,2-IND), 5-methylthioninhydrin
(5-MTN) and 5-methoxyninhydrin, developed by Heffner and Joullie [13], are reagents
utilised for processing latent impression evidence in a similar mechanism to ninhydrin. It has
been reported that treated latent impressions produced a bright purple colour that was
stronger than ninhydrin [13] and fluoresced stronger than those developed with DFO [14, 15].
Such compounds are known as dual fingerprint reagents as they produce enhanced latent
impressions that are both coloured and fluorescent [16].
There are numerous techniques for the enhancement of impressions in blood with new
techniques being discussed routinely. However, Kent [17] stresses the importance that “we
are not seduced into giving up well-tried and documented methods by superficial attraction of
a ‘new technique’ until we have reliable data”. As ninhydrin and some of its analogues are
well used and established techniques, this study evaluates these chemical reagents for the
enhancement of impressions in blood on fabric with comparison to other reagents previously
reported [18-20].
2
2.1
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Preparation of test footwear impressions
Footwear impressions in blood (bovine) on fabric were prepared using a specifically built
footwear rig to minimise variables such as pressure and the amount of blood deposited on the
substrate [21]. 50mL of blood was poured over two Kimberley® blue double ply tissues
before the sole was brought in contact with the footwear sole. A stepping motion was then
repeated twice on clean tissues to remove excess blood before using the footwear rig to
provide a stamping action on the fabric required.
The objective of this work was the comparison of the ability of various amino acid staining
techniques to enhance footwear impressions in blood, rather than directly mimic operational
conditions normally encountered. The use of the footwear rig to prepare test footwear
impressions provided repeatability of the quality of the footwear impression produced which
allowed for a direct comparison of the various stains to be robust.
Six repeat impressions for each fabric-enhancement technique were prepared and each
impression was aged for 7 days before enhancement. Photography at various stages of the
enhancement process of the impression was performed using a Canon EOS 300D [sensor size
22.7 x 15.1 mm (3.42 cm²)]. Appropriate controls of the chemical reagents and calibration of
camera and computer monitor were also carried out to ensure the robustness of the study.
2.2
Chemical Formulations
The chemical reagents and fabrics utilised in the study are listed in table 1. Ninhydrin, DFO,
1,2-IND, acid black 1 (AB1) and acid yellow 7 (AY7) were prepared as recommended by the
Centre for Applied Science and Technology [6, 22]. Fluorescence examination was
performed using a Mason Vactron Qauser 40 where the wavelength ranges represent the 1%
cut-on and cut-off points.
Table 1 - List of Chemicals and Fabrics
Chemical Name
Alternative Chemical
Name
Chemical
Supplier
Fabric
Fabric
Supplier
Ninhydrin
2,2-Dihydroxy-1,3-
Sigma
White Cotton
WBL Whaleys
indanedione
Aldrich
(WC)
Bradford Ltd.
1,8-Diazafluorenone-9-
BVDA
Black Cotton
WBL Whaleys
(BC)
Bradford Ltd.
Patterned
WBL Whaleys
Cotton (PC)
Bradford Ltd.
White
WBL Whaleys
Polyester
Bradford Ltd.
DFO
one
1,2-IND
Acid Black 1
1,2-indanedione
Amido Black 10B
BVDA
BVDA
(AB1)
(WPE)
Acid Yellow 7
Brilliant
BVDA
Sulfoflavine
Black
WBL Whaleys
Polyester
Bradford Ltd.
(BPE)
Luminol
5-Amino-2,3-dihydro-
Bluestar
White Nylon/
WBL Whaleys
1,4-phthalazinedione
Forensic
Lycra (WNL)
Bradford Ltd.
Black Nylon/
WBL Whaleys
Lycra(BNL)
Bradford Ltd.
Denim
Mandors,
Glasgow, UK
Bovine
The Clyde
Leather
Leather Co.,
Glasgow, UK
2.2.1 Amino acid Stains
Ninhydrin Concentrated Solution: 25g of ninhydrin (Sigma) was dissolved in 225mL of
absolute ethanol (Sigma). 10mL of ethyl acetate (Sigma) followed by 25mL of acetic acid
(Sigma) was added to the slurry and stirred until a clear yellow solution was produced. The
solution will keep for at least 12 months at normal room temperature.
Ninhydrin Working Solution: 52mL of ninhydrin concentrated solution was measured out
followed by the addition of 1L of HFE 7100 (3M Novec) whilst stirring with a magnetic
stirrer. The solution will keep for at least 12 months at normal room temperature.
Treatment of articles with Ninhydrin: The fabric was immersed in the working solution for a
maximum of five seconds. The excess solution was allowed to drain back in the tray. The
fabric was allowed to dry completely before being heated in a humidity oven at 80oC for four
minutes and at a nominal 65% relative humidity. Enhancement can occur immediately or
within the next few hours/days.
DFO Working Solution: 0.25g of DFO was dissolved in 30mL of methanol (Sigma) using a
magnetic stirrer to produce a slurry. 20mL of acetic acid (Sigma) was added and stirred until
a clear, yellow solution was produced followed by the addition of 275mL of HFE71DE (3M
Novec) and 725mL of HFE7100 (3M Novec) with continued stirring. The solution will keep
for at least one month at normal room temperature.
Treatment of articles with DFO: The fabric was immersed in the working solution for a
maximum of five seconds. The excess solution was allowed to drain back in the tray. The
fabric was allowed to dry completely before being heated in an oven at 100oC for 20 minutes
without humidifying. Fluorescence examination was carried out using a green excitation filter
wavelength of 473-548nm with a viewing Schott filter of 549nm.
1,2-Indanedione Working Solution: 0.25g of 1,2-indanedione (BVDA) was weighed and
dissolved using a magnetic stirrer in 90mL of ethyl acetate (Sigma), 10mL of acetic acid
(Sigma) and 0.5mL of ZnCl2 stock solution. Finally 1L of HFE-7100 (3M Novec) was added
to the mixture and stirred.
ZnCl2 Stock Solution: 0.2g of anhydrous zinc chloride (BDH) was dissolved in 5mL absolute
ethanol (Sigma).
Treatment of articles with 1,2-Indanedione: The fabric was immersed in the working solution
for a maximum of five seconds. The excess solution was allowed to drain back in the tray.
The fabric was allowed to dry completely before being heated in an oven at 100oC for 10
minutes without humidifying. Fluorescence examination was carried out using a green
excitation filter wavelength of 473-548nm with a viewing Schott filter of 549nm.
2.2.2 Protein Stains
Acid Black 1 and Acid Yellow 7
Fixing solution: 23g of 5-sulfosalicyclic acid dihydrate (Acros) was dissolved and stirred in
1L of distilled water. This was used to fix the impressions in blood by immersion for a
minimum period of 5 minutes.
Staining solution: 1g of acid black 1 or 1g of acid yellow 7 (BVDA) was stirred for at least
30 minutes in 50mL acetic acid (Sigma), 250mL ethanol (Sigma) and 700mL distilled water.
This was used to stain the impressions by immersion for a minimum period of 3 minutes.
De-staining solution: 50mL acetic acid, 250mL ethanol and 700mL ethanol. This was used to
wash the excess dye from the background. All items were let to air dry overnight before
photography.
2.2.3 Luminol
Luminol
The luminol formulation in this study was Bluestar® Forensic Magnum purchased from
Bluestar® Forensic. It was prepared by dissolving the three tablets in the liquid supplied
(125mL) and then applied using an Ecospray® unit supplied by Bluestar® Forensic.
Luminol photography: The best photographic quality of the resultant chemiluminescent
reactions was obtained using the following conditions: ISO400, f 5.6, exposure of 15 seconds
and white balance set on tungsten,
2.3
Sequential Chemical Enhancement
Sequential chemical enhancement was investigated using black cotton and white polyester as
exemplars of dark and light, natural and synthetic fabric. Examples of a peroxidase reagent
[luminol (LUM)] a protein stain [acid black 1 (AB1)], an amino acid stain [ninhydrin (NIN)]
and an alginate (ALG) were used to enhance the impressions on white polyester. For black
cotton, AB1 and ninhydrin were replaced with acid yellow 7 (AY7) and DFO respectively as
they may provide fluorescence and hence visualisation against the dark background. Six
different sequential enhancements were considered as shown in table 2.
Table 2 - Sequential enhancement for impressions in blood on black cotton
Sequence
Technique Sequence
1
AY7, LUM, DFO
2
LUM, AY7, DFO
3
DFO, AY7, LUM
4
NIN, DFO, AY7
5
LUM, DFO, AY7
6
AY7, DFO, LUM
AY7 and DFO were replaced with AB1 and ninhydrin for enhancement on white polyester
3
3.1
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Ninhydrin
Footwear impressions in blood on dark coloured fabrics and enhanced with ninhydrin did not
demonstrate good contrast with the background and no enhancement was observed. The
enhancement achieved on light coloured fabrics, however provided good contrast as
illustrated in figures 1 and 2. The background staining on white nylon/lycra, illustrated in
figure 3, covered the whole fabric, obliterating the original impression in the process. This
background staining is due to a reaction between the amide bonds in the nylon structure and
ninhydrin. Background staining on other light-coloured fabrics such as cotton and polyester
was not as prominent as that observed on nylon/lycra. In some instances, the bright purple
colour from ninhydrin enhancement appeared to be brighter after a few hours. reaching a
maximum brightness after about 24 hours. The enhancement of footwear impressions in
blood on denim using ninhydrin was very weak due to the low contrast between the blue
colour of denim and ninhydrin’s Ruhemann complex with the amino acids in blood.
Figure 1 - Enhancement of a footwear impression in blood on white cotton using ninhydrin:
(a) before; (b) after
Figure 2 - Enhancement of a footwear impression in blood on patterned cotton using
ninhydrin: (a) before; (b) after
Figure 3 - Enhancement of a footwear impression in blood on white nylon/lycra using
ninhydrin: (a) before; (b) after
The treatment of articles with ninhydrin is quick and straightforward. Furthermore, ninhydrin
is able to develop latent impressions as well as those in blood and urine [23] making the
technique an attractive option. Drying times are very short since HFE-7100 is very volatile.
However, HFE-7100 is an expensive solvent and the procedure requires treatment of articles
in an oven that can control humidity and temperature.
3.2
DFO and 1,2-IND
Very weak or no enhancement of impressions in blood on fabric was achieved using DFO as
illustrated in figure 4. The application of DFO was similar to ninhydrin with the use of a dry
oven. DFO required the use of two expensive solvents: HFE-7100 and HFE-71DE, however,
it has the potential advantage of fluorescence. The literature suggests that DFO only reacts
with minute traces of blood [24, 25]. To test this hypothesis, a diminishing series of footwear
impressions in blood was prepared on white and patterned cotton. Again, no enhancement
(visual or fluorescent) was achieved. Similar to DFO, no enhancement of impressions in
blood on fabric was obtained with 1,2-indanedione. The lack of fluorescence may be
explained by the interaction of the fabric dyes with the enhancement chemicals leading to
fluorescence quenching [23].
Figure 4 - Enhancement of a footwear impression in blood on white cotton using DFO: (a)
before; (b) after
3.3
Sequential Chemical Enhancement
The sequential chemical enhancement of footwear impressions in blood on fabric was
attempted using techniques that target different components in blood such as proteins (acid
black 1 and acid yellow 7), iron/haemoglobin (luminol) and amino acids (ninhydrin, DFO).
Acid black 1 and ninhydrin were used for enhancement of impressions in blood on white
polyester whereas acid yellow 7 and DFO were used for enhancement on black cotton to
provide the added advantage of fluorescence when possible. These two fabrics were selected
as exemplars of light and dark as well as synthetic and natural fibres. Table 2 illustrates the
different sequences attempted.
The main observations during these sequences were that luminol gave no or very weak
chemiluminescence when applied after ninhydrin or DFO. Luminol enhancement was also
poor after the use of protein stains, however, the effect was not as pronounced as that
obtained when luminol was used after ninhydrin and DFO. It also appeared that one
technique would give suitable results without the requirement of sequential techniques: for
example AY7 fluorescence gave superior results when utilised on its own rather than in
sequential treatment with luminol. The use of protein stains and ninhydrin after luminol did
not demonstrate any deterioration of the impression. Figure 5 illustrates the sequential
chemical enhancement of a footwear impression in blood on polyester using luminol
followed by ninhydrin and AB1 whereas figure 6 demonstrates the sequential chemical
enhancement of a footwear impression in blood on black cotton using luminol followed by
DFO and AY7. The flow chart for the processing of fingerprints in blood, as described in the
Manual of Fingerprint Development Techniques, also suggests that ninhydrin and DFO
should precede the use of protein stains. In addition, as observed previously, the lack of
fluorescence after DFO enhancement may be explained by the interaction of the fabric dyes
with the enhancement chemicals leading to fluorescence quenching.
Diffusion and obliteration of the original footwear impression, especially on porous surfaces,
is a possibility when using one technique therefore extra caution is necessary when using
sequential treatment. The use of one technique might provide suitable enhancement, however,
if sequential treatment is attempted, the use of luminol as a first technique is recommended.
Figure 5 – Sequential chemical enhancement of a footwear impression in blood on white
polyester: (a) luminol; (b) ninhydrin and (c) acid black 1 (AB1)
Figure 6 – Sequential chemical enhancement of a footwear impression in blood on black
cotton: (a) luminol; (b) DFO and (c) acid yellow 7 (AY7)
4
CONCLUSION
Ninhydrin successfully enhanced footwear impressions in blood on light coloured fabrics
with background staining issues on nylon/lycra. The use of DFO and 1,2-IND did not yield
any enhancement on impressions in blood on all fabrics possibly due to fluorescence
quenching. Design features of the footwear outsole were recoverable and examples include
the fine detail of the lettering on the outsole, however individual characteristics (such as cuts)
were not visualised most likely because of the weave of the fabric rather than the capability
of the enhancement technique. Future work will investigate the effect of fabric dyes on the
enhancement mechanism as well as pseudo-operational trials of the enhancement techniques
on impressions in blood on fabric.
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank CAST, EPSRC and the University of Strathclyde for the
financial support. This work was also partially funded by the Malta Government Scholarship
Scheme.
REFERENCES
1.
C. Champod, C.J. Lennard, P. Margot, M. Stoilovic, Fingerprints and Other Ridge Skin
Impressions, CRC Boca Raton: Florida, 2004
2.
H.C. Lee, R.E. Gaensslen, Advances in Fingerprint Technology, 2nd ed, CRC Press LLC:
Florida, 2001
3.
R.S. Ramotowski ed. 2001. Composition of Latent Print Residue. 2nd ed. Florida: CRC Press
Boca Raton.
4.
W.J. Bodziak, Footwear Impression Evidence: Detection, Recovery and Examination, 2nd ed,
CRC Boca Raton: London, 2000
5.
R.K. Morgan-Smith, D.A. Elliot, H. Adam, Enhancement of Aged Shoeprints in Blood,
Journal of Forensic Identification, 59 (1) (2009) 45-50.
6.
V. Bowman. 2005. Manual of Fingerprint Development Techniques. 2nd ed. Sandridge, UK:
Home Office Scientific Development Branch.
7.
D.F. Hewlett, V.G. Sears, An Operational Trial of Two Non-ozone Depleting Ninhydrin
Formulations for Latent Fingerprint Detection, Journal of Forensic Identification, 49 (4)
(1999) 388-396.
8.
D.F. Hewlett, V.G. Sears, S. Suzuki, Replacements for CFC113 in the Ninhydrin Process:
Part 2, Journal of Forensic Identification, 47 (3) (1997) 300-331.
9.
R. Grigg, T. Mongkolaussavaratana, C.A. Pounds, S. Sivagnanam, 1,8-Diazafluorenone and
Related Compounds. A New Reagent for the Detection of Alpha Amino Acids and Latent
Fingerprints, Tetrahedron Letters, 31 (49) (1990) 7215-7218.
10.
S. Hardwick, V.J. Sears, T. Kent, P. Winefield, Improvements to the Formulation of DFO and
the Effects of Heat on the Reaction with Latent Fingerprints, Fingerprint Whorld, 19 (65)
(1993).
11.
J. Almog, A. Hirshfeld, J.T. Klug, Reagents for the chemical development cf latent
fingerprints: Synthesis and properties of some ninhydrin analogues, Journal of Forensic
Science, 27 (1982) 912-917.
12.
C.J. Lennard, P.A. Margot, M. Stoilovic, R.N. Warrener, Synthesis of Ninhydrin Analogues
and Their Application to Fingerprint Development: Preliminary Results, Journal of the
Forensic Science Society, 26 (5) (1986) 323-328.
13.
R.J. Heffner, M.M. Joullie, Synthetic Routes to Ninhydrins: Preparation of Ninhydrin, 5Methoxyninhydrin and 5-(Methylthio)ninhydrin, Synthetic Communications, 21 (21) (1991)
2231-2256.
14.
J. Almog, A. Hirshfeld, A. Frank, H. Grant, Z. Harel, Y. Ittah, 5-Methylthio Ninhydrin and
Related Compounds: A Novel Class of Fluorogenic Reagents, Journal of Forensic Science, 37
(3) (1992) 688-694.
15.
A.A. Cantu, D.A. Leben, M.M. Joullie, R.J. Heffner, R.R. Hark, A Comparative Examination
of Several Amino Acid Reagents for Visualising Amino Acid (Glycine) on Paper, Journal of
Forensic Identification, 43 (1) (1993) 44-66.
16.
N. Lemberger, J. Almog, Structure Elucidation of Dyes That Are Formed in the Colorimetric
Detection of the Improvised Explosive Urea Nitrate, Journal of Forensic Sciences, 52 (5)
(2007) 1107-1110.
17.
T. Kent, Standardizing Protocols for Fingerprint Reagent Testing, Journal of Forensic
Identification, 60 (3) (2010) 371-379.
18.
K.J. Farrugia, N. Nicdaéid, K.A. Savage, H.L. Bandey, Chemical enhancement of footwear
impressions in blood deposited on fabric - Evaluating the use of alginate casting materials
followed by chemical enhancement, Science & Justice, 50 (4) (2010) 200-204.
19.
K.J. Farrugia, K.A. Savage, H.L. Bandey, T. Ciuksza, N. Nic Daéid, Chemical Enhancement
of Footwear Impressions in Blood on Fabric – Part 2: Peroxidase reagents, Science & Justice,
51 (3) (2011) 110-121.
20.
K.J. Farrugia, K.A. Savage, H.L. Bandey, N. Nic Daeid, Chemical Enhancement of Footwear
Impressions in Blood on Fabric – Part 1: Protein Stains, Science and Justice, 51 (3) (2011)
99-109.
21.
K.J. Farrugia, P. Riches, H.L. Bandey, K.A. Savage, N. Nic Daéid, Controlling the Variable
of Pressure in the Production of Test Footwear Impressions, Science & Justice, 52 (3) (2012)
168-176
22.
V.G. Sears, R. Batham, S. Bleay, The Effectiveness of 1,2-Indanedione-Zinc Formulations
and Comparison with HFE-Based 1,8-diazafluoren-9-one for Fingerprint Development,
Journal of Forensic Identification, 59 (6) (2009) 654-678.
23.
K.J. Farrugia, H.L. Bandey, S. Bleay, N. Nic Daéid, Chemical Enhancement of Footwear
Impressions in Urine on Fabric, Forensic Science International, 214 (1-3) (2012) 67-81.
24.
M. Stoilovic, Detection of semen and blood stains using polilight as a light source, Forensic
Science International, 51 (2) (1991) 289-296.
25.
M. Stoilovic, Improved method for DFO development of latent fingerprints, Forensic Science
International, 60 (3) (1993) 141-153.