Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Neuroimaging in Brain Death: CT Perfusion in comparison with other ancillary imaging tests Dr. Derek MacDonald, Dr. Jai Shankar Poster #: eP-39 Control #: 2304 Disclosures • None Purpose of Brain Death Confirmation • The goal is timely resolution • Unnecessary/ harmful treatment for patient; closure for families • Expedite organ transplantation (prerequisite) • Reduce costs • Brain death etiology • Adults – TBI, SAH • Children – Abuse, MVC’s, Asphyxia • Definition has progressed from 1959 coma dépassé • “irreversible coma” – lost consciousness, brainstem reflexes, respiration, flat EEG’s Brain Death (BD) in Canada • In Canada, 2 physicians must determine • Deep unresponsive coma with established etiology, absence of reversible conditions • Absent brainstem reflexes (gag/ cough, bilateral absence of corneal response, pupillary response to light, vestibulo-ocular response) • Absent respiratory effort based on apnea test • Absent confounding factors • Ancillary testing often required due to… • Unresuscitated shock, hypothermia (<34⁰ in Canada), severe metabolic abnormalities/ disorders, peripheral nerve or muscle dysfunction, complex spinal reflexes • Drugs (EtOH, barbiturates, sedatives, neuromuscular blockade agents) • High cervical spine injury, craniofacial trauma • Failed apnea test Ancillary Testing • Various modalities (cerebral blood flow or bioelectrical activity): • • • • • • • EEG Cerebral angiography* Nuclear Med* Transcranial Doppler CTA MRA CTP – particular utility in brainstem evaluation • Clinical judgement is deciding factor L Vert Cerebral Angiography in BD • Gold standard, 1st used CBF modality • 4 vessel angiogram; anterior & posterior circulation evaluation • No intracerebral filling detected at level of entry into the skull of carotid or vertebral artery • External carotid filling • Invasive, availability, costly, contrast, requires expertise 32 F, woke with large L MCA territory stroke L CCA Nuclear Medicine in BD • Gold standard, radionuclide angiography (Tc99m HMPAO) • Isotope injection 30 min after reconstitution • Immediate, 30-60 min, 2 hr delay images • “hollow skull/ empty light bulb” sign = no uptake • Associated time delay, availability • May not be detecting brainstem activity 59 F, TBI. Pedestrian hit by sideview mirror of truck Electroencephalogram Transcranial Doppler Ultrasonography • EEG in BD demonstrates loss of bioelectrical activity • Bilateral insonation of intracerebral (including vertebral/ basilar) arteries • Used for BD confirmation since 1959 • Absent flow, reversed diastolic flow, small systolic spikes • Non-invasive, portable • Non-invasive, portable • No longer recommended • Electrical interference • Unable to detect deep cerebral or brainstem function • Operator-dependent/ technical expertise MR Angiography in BD • Intracranial arterial flow voids • No contrast required 23 M, punched in head, fell & hit head • Availability, cost, associated time delay, life-sustaining equipment in MR zone Non-enhanced CT in BD • Loss of grey-white differentiation, edema • Cannot assess intracranial flow • Contrast-enhanced acquisition too delayed compared to CT angiography • 5 minutes with CECT versus 12-16 seconds with CTA • Slow diffusion causing late opacification not representative of viable brain 47 F, Anoxic injury after found unresponsive 19 M, TBI. Gunshot, no exit wound CT Angiography in BD • Quickly replacing all modalities • Fast, non-invasive, available • Protocol variation • Large vessel perfusion • Demonstrate absence of intracranial flow, but presence of extracranial flow • Non-opacification is a late phenomenon 5 days & a frontal craniectomy later CT Perfusion in BD • Brainstem evaluation – ‘absence of brainstem reflexes/ function’ • Small vessel perfusion • Absence of intracranial flow, but presence of extracranial flow • Availability, timely, but currently post-processing data variation • CTP advantage • other ancillary tests demonstrate only global absence of CBF • research has demonstrated the utility of CTP in BD • brainstem activity can be measured by CTP (functional data) • Can detect severe hypoperfusion (2%, 1.2 ml/100g/min) from absence (0%) • Normal CBF 50-60 • < 35 cessation of neuronal protein synthesis, < 20 synaptic transmission modified • < 10 = irreversible damage and neuronal death CTP • Small vessel perfusion (arterioles, capillaries, venules) • TTP (MTT) = time it takes for blood to perfuse through tissue (seconds) • CBF = blood flow rate (ml/ 100 g/ min) • CBV = blood flow volume (ml/ 100 g) • Technique • 9.6 cm coverage (“shuttle mode”), 80 kV, 100mAs, 128 x 0.6 mm collimation • Total scan time 110 seconds, start delay 5 seconds (DLP 2220 mGy-cm) • Total contrast 40 ml Isovue-370, rate 5 ml/s, saline flush 40 ml • Perfusion analysis performed if intracranial arteries seen on source images • Color-coded perfusion maps for TTP (MTT), CBF, and CBV 23 F Diffuse hypoxic injury post cardiac arrest CBF CBV 25 M, TBI. Fell out of vehicle at 25km/hr 2013 Study (Shankar & Vandorpe) • 11 patients clinically suspected of brain death • CTP • CTA derived from CTP data for anatomic information • All 11 showed no or matched decrease in CBF and CBV • 100% sensitivity • 9 showed none • 2 showed brainstem death, but residual flow to rest of brain • Later declared BD • Early declaration of brain death possible with CTP (timely resolution) Purpose of Current Study • Was CTP useful locally for confirming brain death? • If brain death was confirmed: • When did withdrawal of life-sustaining care occur? • Was it because of brain death confirmation? Materials and Methods • Data from brain-death confirmation studies past 10 years • 49 patients • Imaging studies • CTP, CTA, CT Head, Nuc Med, cerebral angiogram, MR • “brain death, neurological determination of death, NDD” • CTP • # cases • Brain death Y/N • Withdrawal of life-sustaining care Results • Pt demographics • Age range: 16 – 74, mean - 43 • Gender: 19 F, 30 M • Diagnosis • • • • • • Anoxic injury – 18 TBI - 15 SAH – 9 ICH – 7 (three also SAH) Stroke – 2 Meningitis - 1 Modalities Modality # Brain Dead on Imaging Not Brain Dead on Imaging CTP (2011) 22 12 10 CTA 20 14 6 Nuc Med 15 13 2 Angiogram 2 2 - MR 1 1 - CT Head 2 - - CTP Results Modality # Brain Dead on Imaging Clinically BD Not Brain Dead on Imaging Not Clinically BD CTP 22 12 12 10 10 CTA 20 14 16 6 4 Nuc Med 15 13 13 2 2 • Nuc Med: 100% sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV • CTA: 87.5% sens, 100% spec, 100% PPV, 67% NPV • CTP: 100% sens, spec, PPV, NPV • CTP demonstrated BD for 2 patients for which CTA did not • CTP demonstrated not BD for 1 patient, clinical decision was reevaluated and reversed • Further analysis of withdrawal of life-sustaining care (22 patients) Limitations & Future Applications • Small number of cases • Difficult to further study when families/ clinicians not keen to have patient undergo multiple imaging modalities • No children included • CTP results may require collaborative expert opinion in BD determination • Multimodal evaluation of brain death • Collaborative efforts amongst centers • CTP in Trauma? • Added time, cost, & contrast BUT potential timely resolution & cost reduction Conclusions 1) Multiple imaging modalities used to assess for brain death when clinical picture unclear • Cerebral angiogram, nuclear medicine studies are gold standard • CTA, CTP evolving to become preferred tests 2) CTP useful ancillary tool in brain(stem) death confirmation • Extracranial flow must be seen 3) Clinical judgement is deciding factor if faced with discrepant results References Berenguer, C., Davis, F., & Howington, J. (2010). Brain death confirmation: Comparison of computed tomographic angiography with nuclear medicine perfusion scan. The Journal of Trauma, 68(3), 5539. Bohatyrewicz, R., Sawicki, M., Walecka, A., Walecki, J., Rowinski, O., Bohatyrewicz, A., et al. (2010). Computed tomographic angiography and perfusion in the diagnosis of brain death. Transplantation Proceedings, 42(10), 3941-3946. Citerio, G., Crippa, I., Bronco, A., Vargiolu, A., & Smith, M. (2014). Variability in brain death determination in europe: Looking for a solution. Neurocritical Care, 21(3), 376-82. Escudero, D., Otero, J., Marqués, L., Parra, D., Gonzalo, J., Albaiceta, G., et al. (2009). Diagnosing brain death by CT perfusion and multislice CT angiography. Neurocritical Care, 11(2), 261-71. Heran, M. K. S., Heran, N., & Shemie, S. (2008). A review of ancillary tests in evaluating brain death. Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences, 35(4), 409-19. Huang, A., Tsai, J., Kuo, L., Lee, C., Lai, H., Tsai, L., et al. (2014). Clinical application of perfusion computed tomography in neurosurgery. Journal of Neurosurgery, 120(2), 473-88. Kramer, A., & Roberts, D. (2014). Computed tomography angiography in the diagnosis of brain death: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Neurocritical Care, 21(3), 539-50. Machado, C. (2010). Diagnosis of brain death. Neurology International, 2(1), e2. Sahin, H., & Pekçevik, Y. (2015). CT angiography as a confirmatory test in diagnosis of brain death: Comparison between three scoring systems. Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, 21(2), 177-83. Shankar, J. J., & Banfield, J. C. (2015). Comments on shemie et al.: International guideline development for the determination of death. Intensive Care Medicine, 41(3), 571-015-3679-3. Epub 2015 Feb 24. Shankar, J. J. S., & Vandorpe, R. (2013). CT perfusion for confirmation of brain death. American Journal of Neuroradiology, 34(6), 1175-1179. Shemie, S., Doig, C., Dickens, B., Byrne, P., Wheelock, B., Rocker, G., et al. (2006). Severe brain injury to neurological determination of death: Canadian forum recommendations. Canadian Medical Association.Journal; CMAJ,174(6), S1-13. Shemie, S. D., Hornby, L., Baker, A., Teitelbaum, J., Torrance, S., Young, K., et al. (2014). International guideline development for the determination of death. Intensive Care Medicine, 40(6), 788-797. Shemie, S. D., Lee, D., Sharpe, M., Tampieri, D., Young, B., & Canadian Critical Care Society. (2008). Brain blood flow in the neurological determination of death: Canadian expert report. The Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences.Le Journal Canadien Des Sciences Neurologiques, 35(2), 140-145. Taylor, T., Dineen, R., Gardiner, D., Buss, C., Howatson, A., & Pace, N. (2014). Computed tomography (CT) angiography for confirmation of the clinical diagnosis of brain death. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 3, CD009694. Uwano, I., Kudo, K., Sasaki, M., Christensen, S., Østergaard, L., Ogasawara, K., et al. (2012). CT and MR perfusion can discriminate severe cerebral hypoperfusion from perfusion absence: Evaluation of different commercial software packages by using digital phantoms. Neuroradiology, 54(5), 467-74. Welschehold, S., Boor, S., Reuland, K., Thömke, F., Kerz, T., Reuland, A., et al. (2012). Technical aids in the diagnosis of brain death: A comparison of SEP, AEP, EEG, TCD and CT angiography. Deutsches Ärzteblatt International, 109(39), 624-30. Wijdicks, E. F. M., Varelas, P., Gronseth, G., & Greer, D. (2010). Evidence-based guideline update: Determining brain death in adults: Report of the quality standards subcommittee of the american academy of neurology.Neurology, 74(23), 1911-8. Wijdicks, E. F. (2001). The diagnosis of brain death. The New England Journal of Medicine, 344(16), 1215-21. Wijdicks, E. F. (2002). Brain death worldwide: Accepted fact but no global consensus in diagnostic criteria. Neurology, 58(1), 20-25.