Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Can be syndromic or non-syndromic Environmental and Genetic Factors Pre and perinatal factors, infections, family histories, parental age, pesticides, drugs and chemicals Observed in all ethnic groups More than 600 genes described in literature Majority of cases are non-syndromic with no other features to assist in diagnosis Most have not be replicated Many individuals with autism are still unresolved – more genes/loci? Genetic testing is recommended for all children with ASD ~25-30% have an identified genetic syndrome or variant This means that ~70% have no mechanism identified as yet Comorbidity with ID, epilepsy, motor impairment, certain dysmorphic features supports a likely underlying genetic etiology Future Goal: genetic characterization of etiology will facilitate targeted treatments based on the underlying mechanism of the disease Concordance in monozygotic twins approaches 70% Recurrence rates in siblings of children with ASD range from 5% to 20% Recurrence rate increases to 33% if a family has 2 children with ASD Pediatr Clin N Am 2015;62:607-18 Nature 2012;485:242-5 Nature 2012;485:246-50 The Double Helix – April 1953 James Watson Francis Crick Chromosomes: 46, XX or 46, XY. Rosalind Rosalind Franklin Franklin Mitochondrial DNA 23 chromosomes from mother, 23 from father. Genes arranged on chromosomes which code for proteins (enzymes, transporters, etc). Maurice Wilkins X-ray diffraction photographs of DNA - 1951 2007 50 J. Craig Venter Decoded a full diploid genome – his and James Watson’s years later It took 3 months and $300,000 each It took 13 years and 3 billion dollars Currently it takes ~3 months and $5,000 to $7,000 Goal is under $1000 for genome sequencing Chromosome Technology Progress Technology Resolution Sample Diagnosis Karyotype (1970’s) Whole Chromosome Down syndrome Fluorescent In Situ Hybridization - FISH Large Deletions or duplications (> 4 Mb) Looks for small specific sections of DNA (30-50 genes) that would be missed by routine chromosome analysis Fluorescence in situ ~ 100 kb 22q11.2 syndrome Hybridization (FISH) VCFS (1990’s) Tests a single locus at a time Need Prior knowledge of region Array CGH (2000’s) Flexible, only limited by probe spacing (> 1 kb) Submicroscopic deletions/duplications anywhere in the genome Detects microdeletion syndromes like: 22q11.2 deletion 7q11 del Williams Can test whole-genome simultaneously Slide courtesy of Jennifer Mulle PhD 22q11.2 Region and FISH Fish for Williams syndrome 7q11.23 deletion Incidence 1:10 to 15,000 Normal Deleted Array-based Comparative Genomic Hybridization What is array CGH Comparative Genomic Hybridization? Patient DNA Genomic Clones (aka - Chromosomal Microarray) NORMAL Only detects unbalanced rearrangements What can it tell me? Control DNA Pinkel et al., Nat Genet (1998), 20(2):207-11 Slide courtesy of Christa Martin, PhD Array-based CGH Patient DNA Turner synd. (45,X) Normal (46,XX) 47,XXX Genomic Clones Loss: ratio < 0.8 Normal: ratio 0.8 - 1.2 Gain: ratio > 1.2 Control DNA Diagnostic Yield for ID, ASD, DD and MCA: Conventional Karyotype - 5% oligo probe coverage on EmArray FISH probe (~100 kb) used for testing only covers this gene 3 Mb DGS region Microarray – 20% positive for CNVs Yield for ASD alone – 10% positive for CNVs Recommendation: order a microarrays a first tier test for 1. Intellectual Disability 2. Multiple Congenital Anomalies 3. Developmental Delays 4. Autism Spectrum Disorders American Journal of Human Genetics 86, 749-764, May 13, 2010 Genetics in Medicine 15 (7) July 2013 DNA Primer DNA Testing Transcription mRNA (messenger) tRNA (transfer) rRNA (ribosomal) Translation Protein Production mRNA (U instead of T Single Stranded) Gene – String of A’s, T’s C’s and G’s ATG GGG TTT TCT CCA CAC TAC CCC AAA AGA GGT GTG AUG GGG UUU UCU CCA CAC Enzyme Transporter etc. Met Gly Met Gly Phe Ser Pro His Ser Phe Pro His Codons Room for Normal Variation Single base variants Silent mutation: codes for same amino acid (AA) Conservative missense: codes for similar AA – protein works Altered Biological Function = Disease Known Genes with Autism as a feature: Autosomal Dominant – TSC1 and TSC2 Tuberous Sclerosis Autosomal Recessive – BCKDK - Branched Chain Ketoacid Dehydrogenase Kinase X-Linked – Fragile X syndrome Nonconservative missense: codes for different AA – protein may lose function Nonsense: STOP codon reduced or no protein made Frame Shift: insertion or deletion shifts reading frame First Generation (Sanger Sequencing): • Single base variants Other Mechanisms: • • • • • • Small Deletions Whole Gene Deletions Splice Mutations Chromosomal deletions Rearrangements Epigenetic changes Benefits: - All nucleotides interrogated in a specific gene - Analyst reviews quality at every basepair - Gold standard Limitations: - Large deletions or duplications cannot be detected - Relatively high cost, labor intensive - Low through put - Limited automation in data review - Potentially complicated interpretation and reporting Next Generation Sequencing Second Generation (NextGeneration Sequencing): New sequencing Techniques Sometime we know what gene to sequence Benefits: - Sophisticated bioinformatics - Highly automated - Large amount of sequence Limitations: - High cost for infrastructure - Sophisticated bioinformatics - Reagent cost - Complicated interpretation and reporting Autism and Macrocephaly – sequence the PTEN tumor suppressor gene on chromosome 10q Gene Panels Utility of Panels: autism; cardiomyopathy; seizures etc Cost wise: panels are frequently close to the same cost as sequencing one single gene Cardiomyopathy Panel • 63-gene cardiomyopathy NGS panel Emory Autism Panel • 62 genes: • ADSL, AFF2, AP1S2, ARX, ATRX, BCKDK, BRAF, CACNA1C, CASK, CDKL5, CHD7, CHD8, CNTNAP2, CREBBP, CYP27A1, DHCR7, DMD, EHMT1, FGD1, FMR1, FOLR1, FOXG1, FOXP1, FOXP2, HPRT1, KDM5C, L1CAM, MAGEL2, MBD5, MECP2, MED12, MEF2C, MID1, NHS, NIPBL, NLGN3, NLGN4X, NR1I3, NRXN1, NSD1, OPHN1, PAFAH1B1, PCDH19, PHF6, PNKP, PQBP1, PTCHD1, PTEN, PTPN11, RAB39B, RAI1, RELN, SCN1A, SLC2A1, SLC9A6, SMARCB1, SMC1A, TCF4, UBE2A, UBE3A, VPS13B, ZEB2 • all except 3 of these genes are associated with known genetic syndromes or intellectual disability Venn diagram of the overlap of genes affected by hot zone de novo mutations across four neuropsychiatric disorders Slide courtesy of: David B. Goldstein, Institute for Genomic Medicine, Columbia University Baker, Elizabeth and Jeste, Shafali: Pediatr Clin N Am 62 (2015) 607-618 Exome sequencing The Next Test? WES – Whole Exome Sequencing WGS – Whole Genome Sequencing Panels vs Exome Next Generation Sequencing Genome vs. Exome exon Cost Turn-around time Analytical sensitivity Clinical sensitivity Gene coverage Parental testing Potential Results Panel Exome $2,500-$3,200 8-12 weeks $6,700 trios 16 weeks 99%; All coding exons of all genes on panel are analyzed; Del/Dup included All genes are associated with specific phenotype of panel Only genes included on panel are analyzed Not required; parental follow up may be useful Mutations and VOUS identified in genes associated with specific phenotype 92%; all exons of all genes are not covered; no del/dup No specific phenotype needed; not all exons/genes covered Captures exomes indiscriminately Recommended; can help with interpretation and classification Mutations, VUS, and carrier status can be identified in any gene, including adult onset, cancer and non-medically actionable genes intron