Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
The sum and number of primes between any two positive integers Zhen Liu Abstract Using the method for equation reconstruction of prime sequence, this paper gives the proof that there is at least one prime between positive integers n 2 and n 1 .The sum 2 and number formulae of primes between any two positive integers are also given out. 1 Introduction Because it can not be divisible except 1 and itself, primes are difficult to be described by appropriate expressions. This property makes prime sequence be difficult to be described such as arithmetic progression, geometric progression with the determined term formula. However, this property can make prime number establish some diophantine equations. And prime numbers can be decided by whether there is positive whole number solutions of these diophantine equations. Therefore, the expressions for solutions of these diophantine equations and its transform are used to describe the divisible property of prime number, and forming an equivalent sequence for the property. Thus, this will be easy to find the key node and the law implied to solve the problem. To this end, the theorem for equation reconstruction of prime sequence is presented and proved. Using the method, this paper gives the proof that there is at least one prime between positive integers n 2 and n 1 .The sum and number formulae of 2 primes between two positive integers are also given out. It could be hope to provide an idea and methods to solve similar problems. Zhen Liu Doctor, Associate Professor of School of Marine Sciences, Sun Yat-sen University, China Adds: Sun Yat-sen University, No.135, Xingang Xi Rd, Haizhu District, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510275, China E-mail: [email protected] 1 In this paper, all parameters are positive whole number except where stated. 2 Proof of the theorem for equation reconstruction of prime sequence Lemma: The prime sequence could be equivalent to the sequence with the determined general term formula through equation reconstruction of prime number for the divisible property. Proof. Any prime number c could be expressed as 3a 1 ( a is an positive even), 4a 1 or 6a 1 . Proof is carried out the following in the case of 3a 1 first. If 3a 1 is a prime number, it certainly can not be written 3a 1 (3 x1 1)(3 x2 1) , otherwise, and vice versa. Case 1: 3a 1 3a 1 (3 x1 1)(3 x2 1) 9 x1 x2 3( x1 x 2 ) 1 or 3a 1 (3 x1 1)(3 x2 1) 9 x1 x 2 3( x1 x2 ) 1 Where, let x1 x1 , x2 x 2 . Then there is a 3 x1 x2 ( x1 x2 ) . It is easy to see that whether 3a 1 is a prime number depends entirely on the a . Namely 3a 1 is a prime number that is equivalent x1 and x2 are both positive whole number in a 3 x1 x 2 ( x1 x2 ) . Let x1 x 2 q , x1 x 2 p According to Vieta's formulas, equation (1) is established. x 2 qx p 0 Then there is x1, 2 (1) q q2 4 p 2 Therefore, if x1 and x2 of equation (1) roots are not both positive whole number, 3a 1 2 must be a prime number. Otherwise, it will be a composite number. There is a 3p q Obviously, if 3a 1 is a prime number, q and q 2 4 p are not both even numbers. Therefore, in the divisible property of prime number, ci in prime sequence cn is equivalent to ai 3 pi qi in sequence a n , namely prime sequence cn is equivalent to sequence a n . Here qi and qi2 4 pi are not both even numbers. In order to facilitate the expression, let q 2s , p 2r . Here s and r are real numbers. ∴ x1, 2 s s 2 2r Let s 2 2r t There is a 12st 12t 2 2s Therefore, ai 3 pi qi in sequence a n ( qi and qi2 4 pi are not both even numbers) is equivalent to ai 12si t i 12t i2 2 si in sequence an ( si and t i are not both positive whole number solutions) . Namely, in the divisible property of prime number, prime sequence cn is equivalent to sequence an . It is obvious that s s2 t Let s 2 2s a 3 2 2s a e2 3 Then there is 3 a 3s 2 2s 3e 2 Therefore, ai 12si t i 12t i2 2 si in sequence an ( si and t i are not both positive whole number solutions) is equivalent to ai 3si2 2si 3ei2 in sequence an ( si and ei are not both positive whole number solutions) . Namely, in the divisible property of prime number, prime sequence cn is equivalent to sequence an . It is obvious that s Let 9e 2 3a 1 3h 1 1 9e 2 3a 1 3 2 Then there is 3a 1 3h 1 3e 2 2 a 3h 2 2h 3e 2 Therefore, ai 3si2 2si 3ei2 in sequence an ( si and ei are not both positive whole number solutions) is equivalent to 3a n 1 3hi 1 3ei in sequence an ( ei and hi 2 2 are not both positive whole number solutions) . Namely, in the divisible property of prime number, prime sequence cn is equivalent to sequence an . Case 2: 3a 1 3a 1 (3 x1 1)(3 x2 1) 9 x1 x2 3( x2 x1 ) 1 Where, let x1 x1 , x2 x 2 . Then there is a 3 x1 x2 ( x1 x2 ) . Namely 3a 1 is a prime number that is equivalent x1 and x2 are both positive whole number in a 3 x1 x 2 ( x1 x2 ) . 4 Let x1 x 2 q , x1 x 2 p . Here p is negative whole number. According to Vieta's formulas, equation (2) is established. x 2 qx p 0 Then there is x1, 2 (2) q q2 4 p . 2 Therefore, if x1 and x2 of equation (2) roots are not both positive whole number, 3a 1 must be a prime number. Otherwise, it will be a composite number. There is a 3 p q Obviously, if 3a 1 is a prime number, q and q 2 4 p are not both even numbers. Therefore, in the divisible property of prime number, ci in prime sequence cn is equivalent to ai 3 pi qi in sequence a n , namely prime sequence cn is equivalent to sequence a n . Using the same argument as in the case 1, we can easily get a 12t 2 12st 2s Therefore, ai 3 pi qi in sequence a n ( qi and qi2 4 pi are not both even numbers) is equivalent to ai 12t i2 12 si t i 2 si in sequence an ( si and t i are not both positive whole number solutions) . Namely, in the divisible property of prime number, prime sequence cn is equivalent to sequence an . It is obvious that s s2 t Let s 2 2s a 3 2 2s a e2 3 Then there is 5 a 3e 2 3s 2 2s Therefore, ai 12t i2 12 si t i 2 si in sequence an ( si and t i are not both positive whole number solutions) is equivalent to ai 3ei2 3si2 2s in sequence an ( si and ei are not both positive whole number solutions) . Namely, in the divisible property of prime number, prime sequence cn is equivalent to sequence an . It is obvious that s Let 9e 2 3a 1 3h 1 1 9e 2 3a 1 3 2 Then there is 3a 1 3e 3h 1 2 2 a 3e 2 3h 2 2h Therefore, ai 3ei2 3si2 2s in sequence an ( si and ei are not both positive whole number solutions) is equivalent to 3a n 1 3ei 3hi 1 in sequence an ( ei and hi 2 2 are not both positive whole number solutions) . Namely, in the divisible property of prime number, prime sequence cn is equivalent to sequence an . The prime sequence that prime number c could be expressed as 4a 1 or 6a 1 , have equivalent methods that are similar to the case of 3a 1 . It can be proved in the same way as shown in the case of 3a 1 before. Of course, some new equivalent sequences are reconstructed through establishing other forms equations. This completes the proof. According to above proof, in the divisible property of prime number, the prime sequence cn without term formula is analyzed by using the sequence a n 、 an 、 an 、 an with 6 term formula. This will be easy to find the key node and the law implied to solve the problem. 3 Proof of existing at least one prime between positive integers n 2 and n 1 2 Theorem1: There is at least one prime between positive integers n 2 and n 1 , where n 2 is any positive integer. Proof. It proves the Theorem with the reduction to absurdity follows. If the Theorem is not true, it becomes: there is a positive integer n0 that makes all integers between n02 and n0 1 be composite numbers. 2 According to the Lemma for equation reconstruction of prime sequence, there are 3a 1 3 x1 13 x2 1 (3) 3a 1 3 x1 13 x2 1 or 3a 1 3 x1 13 x2 1 (4) Where, a 2l , l is positive whole number. Therefore, when a is large enough, at least one of equation (9) and equation (10) has integer solutions. Using the same argument as in the proof of equation reconstruction of prime sequence, we can easily get this statement fellows. For equation (3), there are a 6t12 6s1t1 s1 2 t1 Let s12 s1 s12 2s1 a 3 2 2s1 a e12 3 Then, there is s1 1 9e12 6l 1 3 Let 9e12 6l 1 3h1 1 ,Namely it makes s1 be a positive whole number. 2 7 Then, there is 6l 1 9e12 3h1 1 2 a 2l 3e12 3h12 2h1 3a 1 9e12 3h1 1 2 (5) For equation (4), there are a 6s 2 t 2 6t 22 s 2 2 t2 Let s 22 s 2 s 22 2s2 a 3 2 2s2 a e22 3 Then, there is s2 1 9e22 6l 1 3 Let 9e22 6l 1 3h2 1 ,Namely it makes s 2 be a positive whole number. 2 Then, there is 6l 1 3h2 1 9e22 2 a 2l 3h22 2h2 3e22 3a 1 3h2 1 9e22 2 (6) According to the equation (5) and equation (6), there is 3a 1 3h 1 9e 2 2 Let 3a 1 n02 m , 0 m 2n0 1 . Then, if the Theorem is not true, it becomes: there is a positive integer n0 that makes n02 m be composite numbers. Namely there is a positive integer n0 that makes n02 m 3h 1 3e 2 . 2 For n0 , there are 3 cases: n0 3k 0 1 , n0 3k 0 and n0 3k 0 1 . 8 Let when k 0 is a even, k 0 2d 0 . Let when k is odd, k 0 2d 0 1 . Then, Case n0 3k 0 1 : when k 0 2d 0 , n02 36d 02 12d 0 1 , when k 0 2d 0 1 , n02 36d 02 48d 0 16 . Csae n0 3k 0 : when k 0 2d 0 , n02 36d 02 , when k 0 2d 0 1 , n02 36d 02 36d 0 9 . Case n0 3k 0 1 : when k 0 2d 0 , n02 36d 02 12d 0 1 , when k 0 2d 0 1 , n02 36d 02 24d 0 4 . ∵Any prime could be expressed as 6b 1 . ∴Just consider only a situation that n02 m could be expressed as 6b 1 , while the rest are composite numbers. Because of n02 m corresponding to be expressed as 6b 1 and 6b 1 , there are 6 cases as follows: when n02 36d 02 12d 0 1 , m 6c or m 6c 4 , when n02 36d 02 48d 0 16 , m 6c 1 or m 6c 1 , when n02 36d 02 , m 6c 1 or m 6c 1 , when n02 36d 02 36d 0 9 , m 6c 4 or m 6c 2 , when n02 36d 02 12d 0 1 , m 6c 4 or m 6c , when n02 36d 02 24d 0 4 , m 6c 1 or m 6c 3 . When n02 m 3h 1 3e , let 2 2 9 n02 m0 3a 0 1 3h0 1 3e0 A 2 2 Where, m0 is the minimum of m . Then the equation n02 m0 m 3h0 h 1 3e0 e 2 2 has integer solutions for any m . There is h 1 3h0 1 3 3h0 12 92e 18e0 e m ∴ 3h0 1 92e 18e0 e m is a square number. 2 Then let 3h0 12 92e 18e0 e m f 2 3h0 12 B There is e 1 3e0 9e02 m B f 3 2 ∴ 9e02 m B f 2 is also a square number. Then, there is 9e02 m B f 2 c20 c for arbitrary continuous m . And there is c2 c c2 m 6c 0 0 It is easy to see that 6c are not all the difference between square numbers. This is also in contradiction with the difference between square numbers m20 m m20 . When n02 m 3e 3h 1 , let 2 2 n02 m0 3a 0 1 3e0 3h0 1 A 2 2 Where, m0 is the minimum of m . Then the equation n02 m0 m 3e0 e 3h0 h 1 2 2 has integer solutions for any m . There is 10 h 3h0 12 92e 18e0 e m 1 3h0 1 3 ∴ 3h0 1 92e 18e0 e m is a square number. 2 Then let 3h0 12 92e 18e0 e m f 2 3h0 12 B There is e ∴ 9e02 m B f 2 1 3e0 9e02 m B f 3 2 is also a square number. Then, there is 9e02 m B f 2 c20 c for arbitrary continuous m . And there is c2 c c2 m 6c 0 0 It is easy to see that 6c are not all the difference between square numbers. This is also in contradiction with the difference between square numbers m20 m m20 . It is now obvious that the theorem holds. There is at least one prime between positive integers n 2 and n 1 . 2 This completes the proof. 4. Proof of the sum and number formulae of primes between two positive integers Theorem2: The sum formula , and number formula , of primes between positive integers and , where . Proof. According to the Lemma for equation reconstruction of prime sequence, any prime could be expressed as 3a 1 , where p . And 3a 1 3h 1 3e 2 2 Then 11 1 3 ∴The equation 3a 1 3h 1 3e 2 3a 1 between 2 a 1 3 does not have integer solutions for all primes and , while the equation 3a 1 3h 1 3e 2 2 has integer solutions for composite numbers. ∴ The sum formula , of primes between positive integers and is an hn en a1 h1 e1 , 3ai 1 3hi 12 3ei 2 1 1 2 2 Where, a1 1 , an , 3a1 1 3h1 1 3e1 , 3 3 3a n 1 3hn 1 3en . 2 2 3hi 12 3ei 2 And 3h j 1 3e j . if 2 2 3hi 12 3ei 2 3h j 1 3e j , it 2 2 could only take one of ( hi , ei ) and ( h j , e j ) in the calculations. And there are 3a 1 3h2 1 9e22 , 3a 1 9e12 3h1 1 . 2 2 ∴ The number formula , of primes between positive integers and is , 3ai 1 9h 6hi 9e hn an en 2 i h1 a1 2 i e1 an 3a a1 i hn en h1 e1 1 9ei2 9hi2 6hi It could also be written as an hn en a1 h1 e1 , 3ai 1 9hi2 6hi 9ei2 2n 5. Proof of the upper and lower limit formula of number of primes between two positive integers Theorem3: The upper and lower limit formula of number , for primes between positive integers and , where . Proof. Using the same method as in the proof of Theorem1, for , there are 3 cases: 3 1 , 12 3 and 3 1 . Let when is a even, 2 . Let when is odd, 2 1 . Then, Case 3 1 : when 2 , 6 1 , when 2 1 , 6 4 . Case 3 : when 2 , 6 , when 2 1 , 6 3 . Case 3 1 : when 2 , 6 1 , when 2 1 , 6 2 . ∵Any prime could be expressed as 6b 1 . ∴Just consider only a situation that could be expressed as 6b 1 , while the rest are composite numbers. Where . Because of corresponding to be expressed as 6b 1 and 6b 1 , there are 6 cases as follows: when 6 1 , 6 2 or 6 , when 6 4 , 6 5 or 6 3 , when 6 , 6 1 or 6 5 , when 6 3 , 6 4 or 6 2 , when 6 1 , 6 or 6 4 , when 6 2 , 6 3 or 6 1 . 13 Let 6 , then it could be marked when 6 1 , 1, 2 2, 0 , when 6 4 , 1, 2 5, 3 , when 6 , 1, 2 1, 5 , when 6 3 , 1, 2 4, 2 , when 6 1 , 1, 2 0, 4 , when 6 2 , 1, 2 3, 1 . Using the same method as in the proof of Theorem1, there are When 3h 1 3e , let 2 2 0 3a 0 1 3h0 12 3e0 2 A Where, 0 is the minimum of . If is a composite number, the equation 0 3h0 h 1 3e0 e 2 2 has integer solutions. There is h 1 3h0 1 3 3h0 12 92e 18e0 e ∴ 3h0 1 92e 18e0 e is a square number. 2 Then let 3h0 12 92e 18e0 e f 2 3h0 12 B There is e ∴ 9e02 B f 2 1 3e0 9e02 B f 3 2 is also a square number. And max 14 1 1 ∴ The number of that make be expressed as 6b 1 is . 6 The number of that make 9e02 B f 2 be square number and be divided evenly by 1 1 6 is . 6 1 1 1 The number of that make e be positive integers is . 6 3 But this could not make h be positive integers. ∴ The number of primes be expressed as 6b 1 between and is 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 , 6 6 6 3 When 3e 3h 1 , let 2 2 0 3a 0 1 3e0 2 3h0 12 A Where, 0 is the minimum of . If is a composite number, the equation 0 3e0 e 3h0 h 1 2 2 has integer solutions. There is h 1 3h0 1 3 3h0 12 92e 18e0 e ∴ 3h0 1 92e 18e0 e is a square number. 2 Then let 3h0 12 92e 18e0 e f 2 3h0 12 B There is e ∴ 9e02 B f 2 1 3e0 9e02 B f 3 2 is also a square number. 15 And max 2 1 ∴ The number of that make be expressed as 6b 1 is . 6 The number of that make 9e02 B f 2 be square number and be divided evenly by 2 1 6 is . 6 1 2 1 The number of that make e be positive integers is . 6 3 But this could not make h be positive integers. ∴ The number of primes be expressed as 6b 1 between and is 2 1 1 2 1 2 1 1 , 3 6 6 6 ∴The upper and lower limit of number , for primes between positive integers and is 1 1 2 1 6 6 , 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 2 3 6 6 6 6 3 , This completes the proof. References 1. Vinogradov Ivan Matveevich: Elements of Number Theory. State izdatelstvo technical and theoretical literature (1952). (Qiu Guangming Translate, Harbin Institute of Technology Press (2011)) 2. Pan Chengdong, Pan Chengbiao: Elementary proof of the prime number theorem. Shanghai Science and Technology Press (1988). 3. Wang Yuan. Dictionary of Mathematics. Science Press of China (2010). 16