Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
[CANCER RESEARCH 34, 105-108, January 1974] A Comparison of Three in Vivo Assays for Cell Tumorigenicityl John C. Petricciani, Roslyn E. Wallace, and Donald W. McCoy Division of Pathology, Bureau of Biologies, Food and Drug Administration, Rockville, Maryland 20852 fJ. C. P./, and Lederle Laboratories, Pearl River, New York 10965 [R. E. W., D. W. M./ cortisone-treated adult hamster with those in the ATS-treated newborn hamster and the ATG-treated nonhuman primate. SUMMARY The cortisonized adult hamster, the antithymocyte-treated newborn hamster, and the antithymocyte globulin-treated monkey were compared as in vivo test systems for the tumorigenic potential of cells. The newborn hamster and monkey systems were more consistent in allowing the expression of tumors than was the cortisonized hamster when each of three human tumor cell lines was assayed. Cells derived from normal tissues failed to show evidence of tumorigenicity in any of the three animal systems. INTRODUCTION Animal systems remain the most reliable approach to assess the tumorigenic potential of cells because any in vitro test such as growth in solid agar still requires validation by a sensitive in vivo assay system. In 1956 it was demonstrated (2) that cell lines derived from neoplastic tissues produced frankly invasive tumors in the cheek pouches of hamsters treated with cortisone. This in vivo system became the most widely used test for potential malignancy of cells in culture, and it has remained the traditional system against which all others are compared. An alternative assay system using weanling mice treated with ALS2 was described in 1968 (10), and the usefulness of the ALS-treated mouse was quickly confirmed (12). Newborn hamsters treated with ATS were also described (16) as a simple, rapid, and more sensitive assay system than was the standard cortisone-treated adult hamster for the purposes of testing heterotransplantability of cells in culture. More recently, nonhuman primates treated with ATG have been shown to be sensitive hosts for progressive growth of human neoplastic cells and virus-transformed cells (8, 9), and the athymic or "nude" mouse has been found useful for tumorigenicity studies (11). The question of whether a given cell line has tumorigenic potential for man cannot be answered unequivocally using any of the above systems; however, the nonhuman primate assay offers the closest reasonable ap proach to human experimentation. This study was directed at comparing the results of tumorigenicity assays in the MATERIALS AND METHODS ALS, ATS, and ATG. Hamster ATS was prepared as described previously (16) by giving rabbits 3 injections of adult hamster thymocytes in adjuvant and collecting the sera 1 week after the last injection. A 1:4 dilution of this serum allowed 2.5 X 10s KB cells to grow to an average size of 14.2 cu cm in newborn hamsters at 4 weeks. Commercial hamster ALS was obtained from Microbiological Associates, Inc., Bethesda, Md., and Grand Island Biological Co., Grand Island, N. Y. A 1:2 dilution of these preparations resulted in average KB tumors of 1.3 cu cm in 1 case, and the other was inactive in the newborn hamster. Monkey ATG was also prepared in rabbits as described previously (9) in a manner similar to that used for the hamster ATS. This material prolonged skin allograft survival by 9 to 12 days in rhesus monkeys. Rhesus monkey ALS prepared from lymph node tissue was purchased from Microbiological Associates. Cells. Table 1 describes the origin, passage level, and pertinent characteristics of each of the cell cultures used. The KB cell line (1) was initially obtained from Dr. George Foley (Children's Cancer Research Foundation, Boston, Mass.). Cell line WI-38 (3), RMK, VMK, BSC-1 (4), and HEp-2 (13) cells were all supplied by the Division of Virology, Bureau of Biologies, Food and Drug Administration. Cell lines DBS-FRhL-2 (7, 18), Led-130 (14), DBS-FCL-1 (7, 17), Led-T, (15), FRhL4 (17), and Led-WIDR (R. Wallace, R. W. March, and D. W. McCoy. Production of Carcinoembryonic Antigen by a Cell Line Established from Human Colon Carcinoma, unpublished.) were established by Dr. R. E. Wallace. LLC-MK-2 (5) was originally obtained from Flow Laboratories, Rockville, Md. Cells were propagated in Eagle's minimal essential medium or Waymouth's MAB 87/3 medium supplemented with fetal bovine serum at 10% concentration. Suspensions of each cell type for inoculation were made in medium without serum and adjusted to provide 1 X IO6 to 7 X IO7 cells/test in monkeys and 2.5 X 10s to 5 X IO6 cells/test in hamsters. Animals and Methods of Inoculation. Syrian hamsters 1This work was supported in part by Contracts NIH-69-100 and (Mesocricetus auratus) approximately 24 hr old were inocu NIH-69-2264 from Bureau of Biologies, Food and Drug Administration. 2The abbreviations used are: ALS, antilymphocyte serum; ATS, lated s.c. with 0.1-ml cell suspensions. The needle was inserted antithymocyte serum; ATG, antithymocyte globulin; i.d., intrader- just above the base of the tail and directed under the skin towards the neck to prevent leakage of the inoculum. mally. Received February 15, 1973¡accepted October 1, 1973. Immediately after inoculation, 0.05 ml of ATS was injected JANUARY 1974 Downloaded from cancerres.aacrjournals.org on June 15, 2017. © 1974 American Association for Cancer Research. 105 John C. PetrÃ-cciani,Roslyn E. Wallace, and Donald W. McCoy Table 1 Description of cells used in tumorigenicity tests The cells described below were grown in Eagle's minimal essential medium or Waymouth's MAB 87/3 medium supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum. Cells were harvested at confluency and suspended in medium without serum before inoculation into the various test animals. CellsNeoplastic and passage35-50°10-20°17-25102-110KaryologyAneuploidAneuploidAneuploidAneuploidOrigin commentsHuman originKBHEp-2Led-WIDRVirus epidermoidcarcinomaHuman laryngealcarcinomaHuman colonadenocarcinomaHuman transformedLed-T,Culture lung fibroblasts transformed with SV40 virus Abnormal karyology BSC-1 86-100 Aneuploid I RhL-4 60-65 Aneuploid LLC-MK-2 12-20° Aneuploid Normal primate cell lines Wl-38 18-24 Diploid Led-130 DBS-FRhL-2 28-30 13-47 Diploid Diploid DBS-FCL-1 13-42 Diploid Primary RMK 1-3 Diploid VMK 1-3 Diploid African green monkey kidney Rhesus monkey fetal lung Rhesus monkey kidney pool Human fetal lung; substrate used in virus vaccine production Human fetal lung Rhesus monkey fetal lung; candidate for use in virus vaccine production African green monkey fetal lung Rhesus monkey kidney African green monkey kidney; substrate used in virus vaccine production " Represents number of passages at Bureau of Biologies or Lederle Laboratories, Pearl River, N. Y., not total culture passages. i.p. In most tests a 2nd injection of ATS was given 7 days later. Cell suspensions in 0.1 ml were also inoculated i.d. into the cheek pouches of adult, 60- to 70-g Syrian hamsters by the technique of Foley et al. (2). Adult hamsters were given s.c. injections of 2.5 mg of cortisone in 0.05 ml once on the day the cells were inoculated and thereafter twice a week. All hamsters were observed once each week for at least 4 weeks. Three diameters of the tumors were measured with a graduated caliper and the tumor volume was expressed as 0.52 of the product of the diameters in cu mm. Selected animals in each experiment were killed and their tissues were preserved for histological examination. Newborn, infant, and juvenile rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) were obtained from either the Primate Quarantine Unit, Veterinary Resources Branch, NIH, Bethesda, Md.. or Litton Bionetics, Inc., Kensington, Md.; African Green monkeys (Cercopithecus aethiops) of the same age ranges were 106 from the NIH colony or from the colony maintained at Litton Bionetics by the Bureau of Biologies, Food and Drug Administration. ATG was injected s.c. on the abdomen of test monkeys the day before inoculation of the cells and on Days 1 and 3 after cell inoculation. Newborn or infant monkeys received ATG, 50 mg/kg, at each injection, whereas the juveniles received ATG, 7 to 13 mg/kg, at each injection. Cell suspensions (1.0 ml) were inoculated i.m. into the midbiceps or anterior thigh on Day 0. KB cells served as the positive control for each test animal and were inoculated into the right biceps, since it had been shown previously that these cells grew progressively in this system. Each cell type was inoculated into a minimum of 3 monkeys, and all monkeys were observed for evidence of tumor formation; but an open biopsy of the inoculation site was performed between Days 9 and 16 even without gross evidence of tumor formation. Biopsy material was fixed in CANCER RESEARCH VOL. 34 Downloaded from cancerres.aacrjournals.org on June 15, 2017. © 1974 American Association for Cancer Research. Comparison of Cell Tumorigenicity Assays mercuric sublimate-formal (B-5) (6), dehydrated, cleared, and embedded in paraffin. Histological sections were stained with hematoxylin and eosin. RESULTS Table 2 summarizes the results of cell inoculations into the 3 animal systems studied in this report. Those cells that were tumorigenic in the hamster cheek pouch (KB, HEp-2, Led-Ti, and Led-WIDR) were also tumorigenic in the ATS-treated newborn hamster and the ATG-treated monkey. However, the tumorigenicity of these cell lines was more consistent in the ATS-treated newborn hamster than in the adult hamster test (p = 0.05). The ATG-treated monkey was a more consistent host for KB and Led-Ti cells than was the adult hamster (p = 0.05). One commercial preparation of anti-hamster ALS was of comparable potency to our ATS preparation as judged by the high percentage of KB tumors, but the average tumor size was less than 50% of that seen in ATS-treated animals. The other commercial source of anti-hamster ALS showed no immunosuppressive activity in this system. The one commer cial preparation of anti-rhesus ALS that was tested showed no activity in terms of allowing the development of typical KB tumors. DISCUSSION The results of this study confirm and extend our previous observations (16) that the newborn hamster treated with ATS is more sensitive than the cortisone-treated adult for the purpose of testing heterotransplantability of cultured cells. The tumors produced by the same inoculum of KB cells were significantly larger in hamsters treated with ATS; and the latter system supported the growth of HEp-2, Led-WIDR, and Led-T! cells more consistently than did the cortisone-treated adult hamster. The ATG-treated monkey is equally as sensitive an assay system for cell tumorigenicity as is the ATS-treated hamster; and, even though relatively fewer monkeys could be used for testing, they were more sensitive than the adult hamster in the case of KB cells and Led-Ti cells. Although the "nude" mouse appears to be a useful animal model for tumorigenicity studies, the ALS- or ATS-treated rodent offers several advantages. Pathogen-free environments are not required, large numbers of animals are readily available for testing, and the general condition of the animals does not deteriorate even with repeated doses of ALS or ATS. The variability in potency of ALS preparations was clearly pointed out in tests using 3 commercial sources. Of particular importance in this regard may be the source of lymphocytes used in the preparation of a given lot of ALS. Our potent anti-monkey ATG was made against thymocytes from young monkeys, while the commercial ALS which failed to show activity in monkeys was prepared against lymphocytes derived from peripheral lymph nodes. We have also found that multiple injections of thymocytes can raise the cytotoxic antibody titer, but this results in the production of inferior ATS with lowered immunosuppressive activity. On the basis of the results reported here, the most Table 2 Tumorigenicity of various cells in 3 in vivo assays The cell types listed below were inoculated into: (a) cheek pouches of adult Syrian hamsters treated with 2.5 mg cortisone on the day of inoculation and twice a week thereafter; (b) 1-day-old Syrian hamsters treated with ATS on the day of inoculation and again 1 week later; and (c) arms and legs of monkeys treated with ATG the day before inoculation and I and 3 days following inoculation. From 1 X 10' to 7 x 10' cells/test were inoculated into the monkeys, and 2.5 X 10s to 5 X 10* cells/test were used for the hamster studies. The larger cell inocula were used for those cells that showed no evidence of tumorigenicity in the initial trials with lower numbers of cells. No. with tumor/no, inoculated inoculatedNeoplastic Cells cheek pouch27/328/1012/189/180/90/30/120/30/30/120/30/240/6ATS-treated hamster100/106 newborn monkey38/38 originKBHEp-2Led-WIDRVirus 22/24")42/4327/2850/540/250/70/410/60/80/520/100/810/22ATG-treated (0/5°; (0/3°)6/66/66/60/40/30/40/50/40/50/90/40/4 transformedLed-T,Abnormal karyologyBSC-1FRhL-4LLC-MK-2Normal primatecell linesWI-38Led-130DBS-FRhL-2DBS-I;CL-1PrimaryRMKVMKHamster a Commercial ALS. JANUARY 1974 Downloaded from cancerres.aacrjournals.org on June 15, 2017. © 1974 American Association for Cancer Research. 107 John C. Petricciani, Roslyn E. Wallace, and Donald W. McCoy reasonable approach to determining the tumorigenic potential of any given cells would seem to be to test them first in the rapid, inexpensive, and easily available ATS-treated mouse or newborn hamster system. If such tests are negative and if further evaluation of the cells is indicated, additional assays in the ATG-treated monkey should be considered. Any cells to be used in the production of material for human use should ultimately be tested in the ATG-treated nonhuman primate. As we and others have stated previously (8, 9), none of the currently available tests can give complete assurance that a cell line is not tumorigenic. This study suggests that the 3 in vivo tests examined are not equivalent in their sensitivity and that the greatest level of confidence can be placed in the results of tests in the ATS-treated newborn hamster and in nonhuman primates treated with ATG. Further refinement of these tests is in progress and may lead to an even greater degree of sensitivity and reliability. REFERENCES 1. Eagle, H. Propagation in a Fluid Medium of a Human Epidermoid Carcinoma, Strain KB. Proc. Soc. Exptl. Biol. Med.,S9: 362-364, 1955. 2. Foley, G. E., Handler, A. H., Adams, R. A., and Craig, J. M. Assessment of Potential Malignancy of Cultured Cells: Further Observations on the Differentiation of "Normal" and "Neoplastic" Cells Maintained in Vitro by Heterotransplantation in Syrian Hamsters. Nati. Cancer Inst. Monograph, 7: 173-204, 1962. 3. Hayflick, L., and Moorhead, P. S. The Serial Cultivation of Human Diploid Cell Strains. Exptl. Cell Res., 25: 585-621, 1961. 4. Hopps, H. E., Bernheim, B. C., Nisalak, A., Tjio, J. H., and Smadel, J. E. Biologic Characteristics of a Continuous Kidney Cell Line Derived from the African Green Monkey. J. Virol., 91: 416-424, 1963. 5. Hull, R. N., Cherry, W. R., and Johnson, I. S. The Adaptation and Maintenance of Mammalian Cells to Continuous Growth in Tissue Culture. Anat. Record, 124: 490, 1956. 108 6. Lillie, R. D. Histopathologic Technic and Practical Histochemistry, p. 48. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Co., 1965. 7. Petricciani, J. C., Hopps, H. E., and Lorenz, D. E. Subhuman Primate Diploid Cells: Possible Substrates in Vaccine Production. Science, 274: 1025-1027,1971. 8. Petricciani, J. C., Kiischstein, R. L., Hiñes,J. E., Wallace, R. E., and Martin, D. P. Tumorigenicity Studies in Nonhuman Primates Treated with Antithymocyte Globulin. J. Nati. Cancer Inst., 57: 191-196,1973. 9. Petricciani, J. C., Kirschstein, R. L., Wallace, R. E., and Martin, D. P. Assay for Cell Tumorigenicity in Subhuman Primates Treated with Antilymphocyte Globulin. J. Nati. Cancer Inst., 48: 705-713, 1972. 10. Philips, B., and Gazet, J. C. Effect of Antilymphocyte Serum on the Growth of HEp-2 and HeLa Cells in Mice. Nature, 220: 1140-1141,1968. 11. Rygaard, J., and Poulsen, C. O. Heterotransplantation of a Human Malignant Tumor to "Nude" Mice. Acta Pathol. Microbio!. Scand., 79: 159-169,1971. 12. Stanbridge, E. J., and Perkins, F. T. Tumor Nodule Formation as an in Vivo Measure of the Suppression of Cellular Immune Response by Antilymphocyte Serum. Nature, 227: 80-81, 1969. 13. Toolan, H. W. Transplantable Human Neoplasm Maintained in Cortisone-treated Laboratory Animal: H.S. #1, H.Ep #1, H.Ep #2, H.Ep #3, H.Emb.Rh. #1. Cancer Res., 14: 660-666, 1954. 14. Wallace, R. Studies on Preservation by Freezing of Human Diploid Cell Strains. Proc. Soc. Exptl. Biol. Med., 116: 990-998, 1964. 15. Wallace, R., and Moyer, A. W. Effect of Wheat Germ Lipase on Human Cells Transformed in Vitro by Simian Virus 40. Proc. Soc. Exptl. Biol. Med., /19: 481-487, 1965. 16. Wallace, R., Vasington, P. J., and Petricciani, J. C. Heterotrans plantation of Cultured Cell Lines in Newborn Hamsters Treated with Antilymphocyte Serum. Nature, 230: 454-455, 1971. 17. Wallace, R. E., Vasington, P. J., Petricciani, J. C., Hopps, H. E., and Lorenz, D. E. Development and Characterization of Cell Lines from Subhuman Primates. In Vitro, 8: 333-341, 1973. 18. Wallace, R. E., Vasington, P. J., Petricciani, J. C., Hopps, H. E., Lorenz, D. E., and Kadanka, Z. Development of a Diploid Cell Line from Fetal Rhesus Monkey Lung for Virus Vaccine Production. In Vitro,«: 323-331, 1973. CANCER RESEARCH VOL. 34 Downloaded from cancerres.aacrjournals.org on June 15, 2017. © 1974 American Association for Cancer Research. A Comparison of Three in Vivo Assays for Cell Tumorigenicity John C. Petricciani, Roslyn E. Wallace and Donald W. McCoy Cancer Res 1974;34:105-108. Updated version E-mail alerts Reprints and Subscriptions Permissions Access the most recent version of this article at: http://cancerres.aacrjournals.org/content/34/1/105 Sign up to receive free email-alerts related to this article or journal. To order reprints of this article or to subscribe to the journal, contact the AACR Publications Department at [email protected]. To request permission to re-use all or part of this article, contact the AACR Publications Department at [email protected]. Downloaded from cancerres.aacrjournals.org on June 15, 2017. © 1974 American Association for Cancer Research.