Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
• 1 Polycythemia Vera Running head: POLYCYTHEMIA VERA: DIAGNOSTIC WORK-UP AND TREATMENT OPTIONS POLYCYfHEMIA VERA: DIAGNOSTIC WORK-UP AND TREATMENT OPTIONS By JOANNE TUTHILL EDDINGTON • A manuscript submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER IN NURSING WASIllNGTON STATE UNIVERSITY Department of Nursing May 2000 3 Polycythemia Vera ACKNOWLEDGEMENT I wish to thank: my husband, Gordon, for his unwavering support and understanding over the last 3 years. Without his assistance this manuscipt would have never been completed. I also wish to thank Amy Roth and Peggy Baldwin, library staff at Providence Portland Medical Center, for their assistance in obtaining resources used in the development of this manuscript. 4 Polycythemia Vera POLYCYTHEMIA VERA: DIAGNOSTIC WORK-UP AND TREATMENT OPTIONS Abstract by Joanne Tuthill Eddington, R.N., B.S.N. Washington State University May 2000 Polycythemia Vera (PV) is a chronic myeloproliferative disorder characterized by excessive proliferation of erythrocytes, leukocytes and thrombocytes (Means, 1998; Broudy, 1996). Undiagnosed patients may present to their primary care providers with an elevated hematocrit. A thorough diagnostic work-up is essential in differentiating PV from secondary and relative polycythrnia. Treatment options for PV includes phlebotomy and myelosuppressive therapy. A good understanding of the diagnostic tests required to diagnose PV are necessary to appropriately refer patients to a hemotologist for treatment. With a thorough understanding of treatment options, primary care providers can counsel and supported their patients. This manuscript reviews the diagnostic tests required to accurately diagnose PV and reviews over 20 years of research evaluating treatment for PV. . 5 Polycythemia Vera TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Page 3 ABSTRACT 4 LIST OF TABLES 6 LIST OF FIGURES 7 MANUSCRIPT 8 REFERENCES 23 APPENDIX SUMMARY OF SELECTED PUBLISHED RESEARCH ON POLYCYTHEMIA VERA . 32 6 Polycythemia Vera LIST OF TABLES 1. Diagnostic Criteria for Polycythemia Vera 29 2. Clinical and Laboratory Criteria for Diagnosis of Polycythemia Vera 30 3. Treatment Recommendations by Age 31 7 Polycythemia Vera LIST OF FIGURES 1. Peripheral Blood Smear 27 2. Algorithm for Evaluation of Elevated Hematocrit .28 • 8 Polycythemia Vera Introduction Polycythemia Vera (PV), also known as Polycythemia Rubra Vera, is a chronic myeloproliferative disorder characterized by excessive proliferation of erythrocytes, leukocytes and thrombocytes (Means, 1998~ Broudy, 1996). This abnormal cell production appears to occur at the level of the pluripotent stem cell in the bone marrow, therefore PV is classified as a • hematologic disorder (Means, 1998~ Messinezy & Pearson, 1997). There are three classifications of polycythemia: (1) primary polycythemia or PV, (2) secondary polycythemia which is due to increased erythropoietin production and (3) relative polycythemia which is due to decreased plasma concentration (Berlin, 1975). Proper treatment ofPV requires distinguishing this hematologic disorder from non-hematologic polycythemias. Epidemiology The incidence ofPV is very low. There is little recent epidemiologic data on the incidence ofPV because it is an uncommon disease that occurs in low frequency. The most recent epidemiologic study ofPV was done in Olmstedt County, Minnesota. This community's medical care is primarily self contained within the community and lends itself to population-based epidemiological research. Over a 55 year period from 1935-1989, the age and sex-adjusted incidence rate ofPV was 1.9 per 100,000 person-years (Ania, Suman & Sobell, 1994). The Gruppo Italiano Studio Policitimia (1995) is recognized as a leading reference based on a retrospective cohort study of 1213 patients with PV in Italy. These patients were followed for 20 years. Prior to this study, there was little research evaluating the natural history ofPV. This study demonstrated that PV is slightly more common in men than women, with a male • 9 Polycythemia Vera /female ratio of 1.2: 1.. PV is more commonly diagnosed in those individuals who are between the ages of 50 and 75. For patients who are treated, the cumulative median survival is greater than 15 years and the overall mortality rate is 2.94 deaths per 100 persons per year (Gruppo Italiano Studio Policitimia, 1995). Pathophysiology PV or primary polycythemia results from an overproduction of erythrocytes, leukocytes and platelets which is independent and unregulated by the body (Broudy, 1996). Erythropoietin (EPO) is a hormone secreted by the kidney for primary regulation of erythropoiesis (Biligrami & Greenberg, 1995). Granulocyte macrophage stimulating factor (GM-CSF), Interleukin-3 (IL-3) and stem cell factor (SCF) are hematopoietic growth factors. In PV, erythrocytosis occurs despite low or normal erythropoietin levels and it is theorized that leukocytosis and thrombocytosis occur from hypersensitivity to GM-CSF, IL-3 and SCF (Weinberg, 1997). Staging of Polycythemia Vera PV usually evolves through specific stages which include the proliferative stage, the stable phase, and the spent phase (Dickenstein & Vardiman, 1995). The diagnosis ofPV is usually made at the proliferative stage of the disease process. This stage is characterized by a significant increase in red blood cell (RBC) volume. Figure 1 shows a typical peripheral blood smear seen in patients with PV. It shows erythrocyte overlap demonstrating an increase in red cell volume, as well as an increase in the number of platelets. This increased volume leads to hyperviscocity and thrombosis, as well as other circulatory problems including tissue infarction and hemorrhage (Means, 1998; Dickenstein & Vardiman, 1995; Broudy, 1996). Patients who develop PV may 10 Polycythemia Vera initially be asymptomatic and some may have a thrombotic event prior to the diagnosis (Gruppo Italiano Studio Policitemia, 1995). If patients with PV survive the proliferative stage, they may stabilize and enter what is known as the stable phase. During this phase, red blood cell counts normalize and the patient may not require regular treatment. Some patients may progress into the spent phase. This final stage is characterized by anemia, leukopenia, thrombocytopenia, marrow fibrosis and progressive hepatosplenomegaly. The spent phase is often called Post Polycythemic Myeloid Metaplasia (PPMM) (Broudy, 1996; Dickenstein & Vardiman, 1995). According to the Gruppo Italiano Studio Policitimia's retrospective study of 1213 patients with PV, the most frequent fatal complication was thrombosis. Death from cancer was the second most frequent fatal complication ofPV and 15% of these deaths were from acute myeloid leukemia (Gruppo Italiano Studio Policitimia, 1995). Clinical Manifestations During the proliferative stage the patient usually becomes symptomatic. The patient often presents with a variety of nonspecific complaints that may include headache, dizziness, visual disturbances, weakness and pruritus (Berlin, 1975). Some patients may be completely asymptomatic and PV is initially suspected by elevated hematocrit alone (Knoop, 1996; Means, 1998). A detailed history, physical exam and laboratory evaluation is important in differentiating PV from secondary and relative polycythemia. Since treatment for PV is very different from other types of polycythemia, it is important to ensure that the patient is carefully evaluated for causes of erythrocytosis. A history of cardiac disease, pulmonary disease, high altitude, smoking, and renal disease could be a cause of • 11 Polycythemia Vera secondary polycythemia (Linker, 1997). A careful history must be taken in order to identify any secondary causes. Some patients may have both secondary polycythemia and PV. On physical exam the patient with PV may have skin plethora (ruddy cyanosis), conjunctival plethora, engorged vessels of the fundus, systolic and/or diastolic hypertension, hepatomegaly and splenomegaly (Berlin, 1975). A patient with secondary polycythemia may have bluish cyanosis that is noted on physical exam (Berlin & Wassennan, 1997). A palpable spleen is one of the most significant findings on physical exam. A palpable spleen is usually seen only in PV patients and not in other polycythemias. However, patients with PV may not have a palpable spleen (Berlin, 1975). Diagnostic Studies Laboratory studies are essential to the accurate diagnosis ofPV. A thorough diagnostic evaluation must be perfonned since a misdiagnosis could have dire consequences. Care must be taken to avoid indescriminent testing, because evaluation could be extremely costly (Hoffinan & Boswell, 1995). A complete blood count (CBC) with a differential count usually identifies Polycythemia by an elevated hemoglobin (> 18g1dL in males and > 16g1dL in females), an elevated hematocrit (> 54% in males and > 49% in females) and an increase in the red cell count (> 6,000,000/ mm3) indicating erythrocytosis. These elevations require further evaluation. Figure 2 contains the pathway to evaluate an elevated hematocrit. A red blood cell (RBC) mass should be drawn. If the RBC mass is nonnal then the patient is thought to have relative polycythemia and should be evaluated for a possible cause. If the RBC mass is increased (~36 ml/kg for males and ~ 32 ml/kg for females) then further testing is indicated to differentiate PV and secondary • 12 Polycythemia Vera polycythemia. The next step in the diagnostic evaluation of an elevated hematocrit is to measure the arterial blood oxygen saturation. A low arterial oxygen saturation tends to support a diagnosis of secondary polycythemia with erythrocytosis likely being compensatory. If the arterial oxygen saturation is normal and the patient has a history of smoking then a measurement of • carboxyhemoglobin (carboxy-Hb) concentration is indicated. An increase in carboxy-Hb indicates smoker's polycythemia where there is a compensatory increase in native hemoglobin in order to maximize oxygen transport (Berlin & Wasserman, 1997). If the carboxy-Hb concentration is normal and the patient is not a smoker, then an evaluation of serum erythropoietin production (EPO assay) should be considered. If the EPO assay is elevated then radiographic studies are needed to establish possible sites of ectopic erythropoietin production. If the EPO assay is normal, a measurement of the partial pressure of oxygen at which hemoglobin is 50% saturated (hemoglobin P so O 2) maybe helpful. This test is used to identify individuals with high-oxygen affinity hemoglobinopathy. If the saturation is normal, the patient likely has long standing myocardial failure. If the saturation is shifted to the left, then the patient has a hemoglobinopathy with high oxygen affinity (Berlin & Wasserman, 1997). If the EPO assay is reduced or nonexistent or all ofthe tests described exclude other diagnoses, then the diagnosis ofPV can be made (Berlin & Wasserman, 1997; Frenkel, 1997). The presence ofleukocytosis (WBC ~ 12,000/ nun3) and thrombocytosis (platelets ~ 400,000/ nun3) also supports the diagnosis ofPV (pearson & Messinezy, 1995). If there is any question in the diagnosis ofPV, additional evaluation of bone marrow can be helpful. • • 13 Polycythemia Vera The Polycythemia Vera Study Group (PVSG) was created in 1966 with support from the National Cancer Institute (Berlin & Wasserman, 1997). This group was responsible for performing a, prospective, randomized, controlled clinical trial to evaluate the best treatment for PY. The PVSG developed a set of criteria for the diagnosis ofPV in order to assure that participants in the trial actually had PV (Berlin, 1975). Table 1 outlines the PVSG criteria. This criteria contains two categories. Category A, requires that the patient have AI: an increased red cell mass of2: 36 rnl/kg for males and 2: 32 rnl/kg for females, A2: an arterial oxygen saturation of 2: 92% and A3: splenomegaly. Category B is used if the patient did not have splenomegaly. This category includes a platelet count of 2: 400,000/ nun3 , WBC count 2: 12,000/ nun3, a leukocyte alkaline phosphatase level> 100 and a serum vitamin B 12 level 2: 900 pglml, or a serum vitamin B 12 binding protein> 2,200 pglml. The diagnosis ofPV is made if the patient has Al+A2+A3 or Al +A2+ any two criteria from category B. These criteria are strict. Although the specificity is very high (false positive rate is less than 0.5%), some patients with PV may not fulfill the criteria (Berk et al., 1989). The criteria were established prior to the technological ability to determine serum erythropoietin levels and perform endogenous erythroid colony assays, therefore, they were not included in the PVSG criteria. With new technology available, more recent criteria have been developed that include evaluation of serum erythropoietin levels, and bone marrow for endogenous erythroid colony (EEC) assay (Hoffinan & Boswell, 1995). Criteria suggested by Hoffinan and Boswell is outlined in table 2. For patients who do not meet the PVSG criteria these proposed additional criteria may provide supporting evidence for the diagnosis ofPV (Broudy, 1996). Revisions to • 14 Polycythemia Vera the diagnostic criteria for PV continue to evolve as more is learned about bone marrow histopathology (Michaels & Juvonen, 1997). The patient being evaluated for an elevated hematocrit should be informed that the diagnostic work-up requires a large battery of tests. They will usually experience repeated blood and laboratory tests to establish and confirm the diagnosis ofPV. A bone marrow biopsy is • considered the most invasive test in the diagnostic work-up. Prior to this test, they will be required to sign a separate consent form giving permission for this procedure to be performed. The patient should be informed ofthe probability of pain or discomfort during this procedure. They should be reassured that they will be given pain medication and sedation. Treatment The patient diagnosed with PV must be educated in the chronicity of the disorder and informed that treatment will be required for life. It is important for the patient to understand that ifPV is left untreated, life expectancy may be as short as eighteen months from diagnosis (Gruppo Italiano Studio Policitemia, 1995). The treatments selected for PV may, however, put them at increased risk for other problems such as thrombosis and cancers including acute myelogenous leukemia (Hoffinan & Boswell, 1995; Means, 1999). According to Means (1999), the goal in treating patients with PV is to reduce the RBe mass with the least amount of complications possible, in order to provide increased survival , maximum quality of life, low cost of treatment and convenience for the patient. Treatment can extend the median survival for PV patients to greater than 10 years. Treatment-related complications have caused debate regarding the best way to treat PV. • 15 Polycythemia Vera As previously mentioned, one of the goals of the Polycythemia Vera Study Group (PVSG) was to determine the best way to treat PV. There were seven protocols studied by the PVSG that looked at a variety of treatment issues related specifically to PV (Berk, Wasserman, Fruchtman & Goldberg, 1995). Three of these studies, PVSG 01, PVSG OS, PVSG 08, and an update on data from PVSG 08 which provide the clinical data that support therapeutic recommendations made by the PVSG, will be reviewed in more detail. The first study by the PVSG, PVSG 01, was a prospective randomized phase III clinical trial that compared treatment with phlebotomy alone to either treatment with radioactive phosphorus ep) or treatment with the chemotherapeutic agent chlorambucil. 2 32p and chlorambucil were selected as they were standard treatment for PV during the 1960's when this study was conducted (Berk, Wasserman, Fruchtman & Goldberg, 1995). In order to ensure that the patients were in the active, proliferative stage of the disease, they were phlebotomized and then observed for rapid elevation of hematocrit. If the patient demonstrated active proliferative disease, they were randomized to one of the three treatment arms. Patients were enrolled into this study from 1967 to 1974. During this time period, a total of 431 patients were randomized to one of the three treatment arms. One of the strengths of this study was the length offollow-up. Surviving patients that were enrolled in this study have been followed for more than 19 years. However, during this time, modification of treatment occurred. Patients who had been randomized to the chlorambucil arm were found to have an increase in the development of leukemias and were switched to other treatments (Najean & Rain, 1997). The results of this trial demonstrated that each of the . 16 Polycythemia Vera treatment arms of PVSG 01 were related to a significant increase in complications. Those that were treated with phlebotomy alone were at a significantly increased risk for life threatening thrombotic events during the first 3 years of treatment. The incidence of these events were highest in those who had a history of previous thrombosis, those that needed frequent phlebotomy or the elderly. The patients who received chlorambucil or 32p had an increase risk of leukemia, • lymphocytic lymphoma or carcinoma of the skin or gastrointestinal tract. However, patients developed this risk after at least 5 years of treatment (Berk, Wasserman, Fruchtman & Goldberg, 1995). The overall survival was found to be shorter for those who were treated with chlorambucil and longer for those who received 32p or phlebotomy. Because of the risk of thrombotic complications with phlebotomy alone, the PVSG examined the possibility that the use of aspirin and persantine would decrease the incidence of thrombotic complications in patients receiving phlebotomy. PVSG 05 was a randomized controlled phase III clinical trial evaluating the use of aspirin and persantine in patients with PY. It was initiated in 1977. There were 178 patients who were randomized to one of two treatment arms. One group received phlebotomy with 300 mg of aspirin and 75 mg ofpersantine three times a day. The other group received 32p. 32p served as the control arm due to the risk of thrombotic events in patients receiving phlebotomy alone (Berk, Wasserman, Fruchtman & Goldberg, 1995). PVSG 05 was stopped in April of 1981 due to the significant increase in gastrointestinal hemorrhage in the group receiving phlebotomy, aspirin and persantine. Despite early termination of this study, results failed to demonstrate a decrease in the incidence of thrombotic complications in the patients who received phlebotomy with aspirin and persantine. In fact, an increase in 17 Polycythemia Vera thrombotic complications was seen compared to the control arm receiving 32p. There was no difference in thrombotic complications compared to those in PVSG 01 who received phlebotomy alone (Berk, Wassennan, Fruchtman & Goldberg, 1995). The third therapeutic trial that the PVSG sponsored was PVSG 08. This trial originally was designed to evaluate the efficacy of hydroxyurea in patients with PV. Hydroxyurea was known to be a potent nonalkylating myelossupressive agent. In addition, it was not known to cause leukemia. It had been successfully used before in other hematologic malignancies (Donovan et al., 1984). This efficacy trial by the PVSG and reported by Donovan et al. (l984),was designed so that patients received hydroxyurea and supplemental phlebotomy. The goal was to show that hydroxyurea could be used successfully to achieve and maintain a hematocrit of < 50% and a platelet count of< 1,000,000 mm3 with minimal use of phlebotomy. The number of phlebotomies . were restricted to six or less per year. Patients were evaluated for their clinical response and long tenn disease control. There were 118 subjects enrolled in this PVSG efficacy trial. Of this group, 59 patients had received no prior treatment. The other 59 patients had received previous myelosuppressive therapy. Of the patients with a pre-treatment platelet count of >1,000,000 mm3 , 88% responded with platelet counts < 600,000 mm3 by twelve weeks. In patients with elevated pre-treatment hematocrits, 800/0 achieved nonnal values by twelve weeks. The cumulative I-year failure-free survival in patients who had not previously been treated was 73%. This was reduced to 590/0 in those who had received prior myelosuppressive therapy. Only two patients developed acute leukemia by the time of the initial analysis of this study. Two patients who had never received . 18 Polycythemia Vera prior treatment experienced thrombotic events (Donovan et al., 1984). This study by PVSG, reported by Donovan, et al. (1984), demonstrated that for hydroxyurea to be effective it must be given continuously at doses of 500 mg to 1000 mg per day. If the drug was discontinued, patients could not maintain normal blood counts for long. In addition, a severe rebound thrombocytosis was seen in patients with pre-treatment high platelet counts. This rebound effect often occurred within 7-10 days of the discontinuation of hydroxyurea. Soon after the PVSG 08 met its initial goals of establishing the efficacy of hydroxyurea, the PVSG lost significant funding for additional randomized trials (Berk, Wasserman, Fruchtman & Goldberg, 1995). The PVSG made the decision to continue following the patients who were already enrolled in PVSG 08 and evaluate the long-term effects and complications of chronic prolonged use of hydroxyurea. Kaplan, et al. (1986), published a report that updates previous observations reported by Donovan et al. (1984) on the efficacy of hydroxyurea and the incidence of complications. His report focused on the patients enrolled in PVSG 08 who had not previously been treated prior to therapy with hydroxyurea. These previously untreated patients in PVSG 08 were compared to a historical control group from PVSG 01. This historical control group was made up of patients with PV who had been treated with phlebotomy alone. There were 51 patients who had not previously been treated with myelosuppressive therapy who continued to received hydroxyurea and supplemental phlebotomy as of December, 1984. Of these, 31 patients continued to experience long-term disease free control. They were • 19 Polycythemia Vera compared to the 134 patients enrolled in the control arm of PVSG 01 who had received only pWebotomy as treatment for pv. These two patient groups were very similar and were believed to have the same initial prognosis. The patients were diagnosed using identical diagnostic criteria and recruitment was structured to avoid selection bias. There were some slight differences in age and sex distributions in the two groups and some differences in the initial mean hemoglobin and • hematocrit values between both groups. There were some protocol changes over the years that reflected a change in desired hematocrit level on therapy and some differences in treatment escape clauses allowing treatment of patients with dangerously high platelet counts. While this study has been criticized for the use of a historical control arm, Kaplan et al (1984) believes that despite these exceptions the comparison is valid. According to Kaplan et al. (1984) comparison of the two groups demonstrate that fewer thromboembolic complications occurred in patients treated with hydroxyurea and supplemental pWebotomy than pWebotomy alone. In addition, there was not a statistically significant difference in the incidence of acute leukemia between the two groups. Tatarsky & Sharon (1997) have published data looking at a subgroup of patients enrolled in the PVSG 08 trial who were treated by the department of hematology at Rambam Medical Center. This center was an active member of the PVSG from the start. Their findings support the results reported by Kaplan et al. (1998). Because of the significant side effects and risks associated with pWebotomy and chemotherapy, the search continues for a treatment for PV which is both safe and effective in controlling myeloproliferation. Recently, there has been a great deal of interest in the use of Interferon alpha (INF-a) for the treatment ofPV. Interferons are cytokines which are involved in • 20 Polycythemia Vera a variety of biologic mechanisms which include antitumor, antiviral, immunomodulary activity and alteration of cell surface protein expression (Fruchtman et aI., 1997). INF-a therapy has been evaluated and has been found to be effective in inhibiting excessive myeloproliferation controlling the thrombocytosis, leukocytosis and erythrocytosis seen in PV (Silver, 1997; Stasi et al., 1998; Elliot & Tefferi, 1997). Studies by Stasi, et al (1998) and Silver (1997) have shown that human leukocyte interferon-a (hlIFN-a) or recombinant interferon-a (rIFN-a) given subcutaneously can effectively control myeloproliferation, reducing the need for phlebotomy. IFN-a can also reduce accompanying thrombocytosis, leukocytosis and splenomegaly. The side effects are mainly flulike symptoms which were tolerated by most of the patients studied (Stasi, et al, 1998; Silver, 1997). Stasi, et al (1998) prospectively evaluated 18 patients with PV who were given hlIFN-a. Seventeen out of these 18 patients showed at least a partial response and 11 showed a complete response after 3 months of therapy. However, since the mean follow-up of these patients was only 19.5 months the end points of this study did not include evaluation of long term treatment with hlIFN-a. Silver (1997), studied the long term effects ofrIFN-a. This prospective nonrandomized clinical trial followed 28 patients for more than 5 years. It demonstrated that in over six years of follow-up, no patient developed any malignancy or thrombohemorrhagic complication from using rINF-a. Current recommendations for INF-a therapy include: rIFN-a starting at 1 million units, subcutaneously three times per week with gradual dose escalation to a maximum of 5 million • 21 Polycythemia Vera units, subcutaneously three times per week. In addition, phlebotomy should be used to maintain a hematocrit between 40% and 45%. Phlebotomy requirements should decrease over time (Silver, 1997). Based on PVSG 01, PVSG 05 and PVSG 08, Bilgrami & Greenberg (1995), propose recommendations for treatment ofPV based on age. Table 3 outlines these recommendations. Treatment should, however, be tailored to each individual by taking into account the patient's age and their risk for complications. This information should be weighed against the known risks of each treatment strategy (Broudy, 1996). Antiplatelet agents have recently been re-examined as an effective way to control myeloproliferative thrombocythemia and prevent thrombosis. Because of their antiplatelet activities, low dose Aspirin and Anagrelide are being evaluated for their control of thrombocythemia and thrombotic complications seen in PV (Landolfi & Marchioli, 1997; Petitt, Silverstein & Petrone, 1997). Petitt, Silverstein & Petrone (1997) prospectively evaluated 942 patients with myeloproliferative thrombocythemia. Out of these patients, 113 had PV. In this study, the use of Anagrelide demonstrated a reduction in the platelet count in patients with myeloproliferative thrombocythemia. It also appeared to slow megakaryocyte maturation. Further evaluation of Anagrelide is required before it is considered as a first-line agent to control thrombocythemia in patients with PV. The European Collaboration on Low-dose Aspirin in Polycythemia Vera (ECLAP) has recently published their protocol which is a randomized trial evaluating the risks and benefits of • 22 Polycythemia Vera low-dose aspirin in PV (Landolfi & Marchioli, 1997). The plan is to enroll approximately 3500 patients and follow them for three to four years. Using a double blind study method, patients will be randomized to receive 100 mg of aspirin daily or a placebo (Landolfi & Marchioli, 1997). In summary, no therapy for PV is without risk. There have been published recommendations for treatment of PV (Berk et al., 1986; Hoffman & Boswell, 1995; Bilgrami & Greenberg, 1995; Fruchtman et al, 1997). These recommendations will continue to change and evolve as prospective randomized trials are developed to evaluate the long-term effects of standard treatments compared to new innovative therapies (See Appendix for summaries of selected published research). Conclusion PV is myeloproliferative disorder that requires accurate diagnosis. It is important to rule out other causes of an elevated hematocrit and erythrocytosis prior to the initiation of treatment. IfPV is treated promptly the mean life expectancy of an individual is more than 10 years. Treatment for PV should be individualized for each person based on age at diagnosis, presenting symptoms and comorbid conditions since there are risks associated with each specific type of therapy. Life long treatment is necessary to control the symptoms of erythrocytosis and prevent complications. IfPV progresses, therapy will need to be adjusted and palliation and supportive care may become the treatment goal . • • 23 Polycythemia Vera References Ania, B. 1., Suman, V. 1., Sobell, 1. L., Codd, M. B., Silverstein, M. N., Melton III, L. 1. (1994). Trends in the incidence of polycythemia vera among olmsted county, minnesota residents, 1935-1989. American Journal ofHematoloiY. 47.89-93. Berk, P. D., Wassennan, L. R., Fruchtman, S. M., & Goldman, 1. D. (1995) Treatment of • polycythemia vera: a Summary of clinical trials conducted by the polycythemia vera study group. In L. R. Wassennan, P. D. Berk, N. I. Berk, (Eds.). Polycythemia Vera and the Myeloproliferatiye Disorders. (166-94). Philadelphia: WB Saunders Berlin, N. I. (1975). Diagnosis and classification of the polycythemias. Seminars in Hematoloi)'. 12 (4), 339-351. Berlin, N. I., Wassennan, L. R. (1997). Polycythemia vera: A retrospective and reprise. Journal ofLaboratOl)' and Clinical Medicine. 130.365-373. Bilgrami, S., & Greenberg, B. R. (1995). Polycythemia rubra vera. Seminars in Oncoloi)'. 2.2 (4),307-326. Broudy, V. C. (1996). The polycythemias. In D. C. Dale, & D. D. Fedennan (Eds.), Scientific American Medicine 1978-1999. New York: Scientific American Medicine. Dickstein, 1. I., & Vardiman, 1. W. (1995). Hemotopathologic findings in the myeloproliferative disorders. Seminars in Oncoloi)'. 22 (4),355-373. Donovan, P. B., Kaplan, M. E., Goldberg, 1. D., Tatarsky, I., Najean, Y., Silberstein, E. B., Knospe, W. H., Laszio, 1., Mack, K., Berk, & P. D., Wassennan, L. R. (1984). Treatment of polycythemia vera with hydroxyurea. American Journal ofHematoloiY, 17.329-334. • 24 Polycythemia Vera Elliot, M. A., & Tefferi, A. (1997). Interferon-a therapy in polycythemia vera and essential thrombocythemia. Seminars in Thrombosis and Hemostasis, 23 (5),463-472. Frenkel, E. P. (1997). Approach to the patient with an elevated hemoglobin level. In W. N. Kelley, MD. (Ed.), Textbook ofInternal Medicine (3rd ed., 1315-1318). Philadelphia: Lippincott - Raven. • Fruchtman, S. M., Mack, K., Kaplan, M. E., Peterson, P., Berk, P. D., & Wasserman, L. R. (1997). From efficacy to safety: A polycythemia vera study group report on hydroxyurea in patients with polycythemia vera. Seminars in HematoloiY, 34 (1), 17-23. Gruppo Italiano Studio Policitemia. (1995). Polycythemia vera: The natural history of 1213 patients followed for 20 years. Annals of Internal Medicine, 123,656-664. Hoffinan, R., & Boswell, H. S. (1995). Polycythemia vera. In R. Hoffinan, M.D., E. 1. Benz, Jr., M.D., S. 1. Shattil, M.D., B. Furie, M.D., H. 1. Cohen, M.D., Ph.D., L. E. Silberstein, M.D. (Eds.), HematoloiY Basic Principals and Practice (2nd ed., pp. 1121-1141). New York: Churchill Livingstone. Kaplan, M. E., Mack, K., Golberg, 1. D., Donovan, P. B., Berk, P. D., & Wasserman, L. R. (1986). Long-term management of polycythemia vera with hydroxyurea: A progress report. Semjnars in hematoloiY, 23 (3), 167-171. Knoop, T. (1996) Polycythemia vera. Semjnars in OncoloiY Nursina. 12 (1), 70-77. Landolfi, R., M.D., & Marchioli, R., M.D. (1997). European collaboration on low-dose aspirin in polycythemia vera (ECLAP): A randomized trial. Seminars in Thrombosis and Hemostasis, 23 (5),473-478. • 25 Polycythemia Vera Linker, e. A., (1999). Blood. In Tierney, L. M., Jr., M.D., McPhee, S. 1., M.D., Papadakis, M. A., M.D., (Eds.), Current Medical Diaanosis and Treatment 1999 (38th ed., pp. 484-585). Stamford, CT: Appleton & Lange. Means, R. T., Jr. (1999). Polycythemia vera. In G. R. Lee, M.D., 1. Foerster, M.D., B.Se. (Med), F.R.C.P.(C)., 1. Lukens, M.D., F. Paraskevas, M.D., 1. P. Greer, M.D., & G. M. Rogers, • M.D., Ph.D. (Eds.), Wintrobe's Clinical HematoloiY (10th ed., pp. 2374-2389). Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins. Messinezy, M., Westwood, N. B., Woodcock, S. P., Strong, R. M., & Pearson, T. e. (1995). Low serum erythropoietin - a strong diagnostic criterion of primary polycythemia even at nonnal hemoglobin levels. Clinical & Laboratory HaematoloiY. 17.217-220. Messinezy, M., & Pearson, T. C. (1997). ABC of clinical haematology: Polycythemia, primary (essential) thrombocythemia and myelofibrosis. BMJ. 314 (7080),587-590. Michiels, 1. 1., & Juvonen, E. (1997). Proposal for revised diagnostic criteria of essential thrombocythemia and polycythemia vera by the thrombocythemia vera study group. Semjnars in Thrombosis and Hemostasis, 23 (4),339-347. • Najean, Y., & Rain, 1. D. (1997). The very long-tenn evolution of polycythemia vera: an analysis of 318 patients initially treated by phlebotomy or 32p between 1969 and 1981. Seminars in HematoloiY, 34 (1),6-16. Pearson, T. e., & Messinezy, M. (1996). Investigation of patients with polycythemia. PostiTaduate Medical Journal, 72 519-524. Petitt, R. M., Silverstein, M. N., & Petrone, M. E. (1997). Anagrelide for control of 26 Polycythemia Vera thrombocythemia in polycythemia and other myeloproliferative disorders. Seminars in HematoloiY. 34 (1), 52-54. Silver, R T. (1997). Interferon alpha: Effects of long-term treatment for polycythemia vera. Seminars in HematoloiY. 34 (1), 40-50. Stasi, R, Venditti, A., Del Poeta, G., Conforti, M. Brunetti, M. Bussa, S., Amadori, S. & • Pagano, A. (1998). Role of human leukocyte interferon-a in the treatment of patients with polycythemia vera. The American Journal of Medical Sciences. 315 (4), 237-241. Tatarsky, I., & Sharon, R (1997). Management of polycythemia vera with hydroxyurea. Seminars in HematoloiY. 34 (1), 24-28. 27 Polycythemia Vera FiiWre 1. Peripheral blood smear shows erythrocyte overlap demonstrating an increase in red cell volume and an increase in the normal number of platelets (> 10 per high power field). 28 Polycythemia Vera Red Blood Cell Mass . Normal Increased 1 Relative polycythemia /1 Arterial Blood Gases and Carboxy-Hb ~ Increased (CoHg) Smoker's polycythemia Decreased (pO/02 Sat) Secondary polycythemia Normal Epo assay Elevated CT scan of the abdomen 1 Low/Absent Normal High affinity Hb Chronic Inappropriate Epo secretion Polycythemia Vera mYOidiai failure I Pso O2 " Shifted I \t Normal High affinity Hg Pump failure Fii"re 2. Algorithm for Evaluation of Elevated Hematocrit * ~. From Internal Medicine (p. 1317), by Frankel, E. P., 1997, Philadelphia: LippencottRaven. Copyright 1997 by Lippencott-Raven Publishers. Reprinted with permission. • 29 Polycythemia Vera Table I The DiaiJlostic Criteria for PolYGythemia vera developed by the PolYGythemja Study Group (PVSG) Catagory A Al TRed cell mass Malt2 36 mIlkg Catagory B B 1 Thrombocytosis Platelet count> 400,000/ mm3 Femalt2 32 mIlkg A2 Arterial oxygen saturation 2: 92% B2 Leukocytosis> 12,000/ mm3 (no fever or infection) A3 Splenomegaly B3 Leukocyte alkaline phosphatase score >100 B4 Serum vitamin B 12 > 900pg/ml or Serum unbound vitamin B 12 binding capacity> 2,200 pg/ml ~ Diagnosis ofPV is confirmed if either combination is present: Al + A2 + A3 or Al + A2 + any two from category B. From "Diagnosis and Classification of the Polycythemias," by N. 1. Berlin, 1975, Seminars in HematoloiY. 12 (4), p. 342. Copyright 1975 Grune & Stratton, Inc. Reprinted with pennission. • 30 Polycythemia Vera Table 2. Clinical and Laboratory Criteria for DiaiUJosis of Polycythemia vera Criteria Elevated red blood cell mass of2: 36m11kg for males and 2: 32 m1Ikg for females. Normal arterial oxygen saturation, 2: 92% in the presence of erythrocytosis as defined in criterion 1. Splenomegaly Thrombocytosis (platelet count of2: 400,0001 mm3 ) and leukocytosis (white blood cell count of2: 12,0001 mm3 ). Bone marrow hypercellularity associated with megakaryocytic hyperplasia and absent iron stores. Low serum EPO levels «30mU/mI) in the presence of an increased red blood cell mass as defined in criterion 1. Abnormal marrow proliferative capacity as manifested by formation of erythroid colonies in the absence of exogenous EPO. ~ The presence of four of these criteria indicates that the patient's hematologic disorder is polycythemia vera. From "Polycythemia Vera", by R. Hoffinan and H. S. Boswell, 1995, In HematolQiY Basic Principles and Practice, (2nd ed. p 1133), edited by R. Hoffinan, M.D., E. 1. Benz, Jr., M.D., S. 1. Shattil, M.D., B. Furie, M.D., H. 1. Cohen, M.D., Ph.D., L. E. Silberstein, M.D. New York: Churchill Livingstone. Copyright 1995 by Churchill Livingstone. Reprinted with permission. • 31 Polycythemia Vera Table 3. '" Treatment Recommendations by Aie* Age (yr) Treatment > 70 32p + supplemental phlebotomy ** Busulfan, IFN 50-70 Busulfan, IFN <50 ~* Phlebotomy. Add hydroxyurea if high phlebotomy requirement or history ofthrombosis** Alternative Phlebotomy. Add hydroxyurea if high phlebotomy requirement or history ofthrombosis** Modified from recommendations ofPVSG. **Goal is to maintain hematocrit at < 45%. Platelet anti-aggregating agents only for patients with transient ischemic attacks or peripheral ischemic attacks or peripheral digital ischemia. From "Polycythemia Rubra Vera" by S. Bilgrami and B. R. Greenberg, 1995, Seminars in Oncoloi)'. 22 (4), p. 319. Copyright 1995 W. B. Saunders Company. Reprinted with permission. • 32 Polycythemia Vera Appendix Summary of Selected Published Research on Polycythemia Vera • • • • • 33 Polycythemia Vera Author & Year Sample & Size Design Measurement of Variables Key Findings Comments and Analysis Ania, Suman & Sobel (1994) Olmsted County residents. Those with PV who were part of the final data set had to have lived in the county for at least 1 yr prior to diagnosis, meet the diagnostic criteria for PV as set by the PVSG, and be diagnosed between 1935 and 1989. Population basedepidemiologic research. For incidence rates the entire county population was considered to be at risk. Sex and agespecific personyears of residence between 1935-1089 were used as the denominators. This was determined using linear interpolation from decennial census data. Survival was calculated according to the Kaplan-Meier product-limit estimator. *50 residents met diagnostic criteria for PV between 1935-1989. *Overall age and sex-adjusted incidence rate was found to be 1.9 per 100,000 personyears. *The incidence rate showed an increase between 1970-1989 compared to 19351969 however this was not statistically significant. *Of the 50 cases 62% were males and 38% were female. *The age- adjusted incidence for men was more than *Small number of cases makes" it difficult to evaluate the full range of adverse outcomes because the small incidence of leukemias and other myeloproliferative disorders. *Epidemiologic data is difficult to come by for PV due to its low incidence rates. *These studies must be performed in a large isolated community where there are few places to receive medical care so that all information can be obtained and • ~ • • 34 Polycythemia Vera Author & Year Berk, et al. (1995) PVSG protocol 01 Sample & Size Patients diagnosed with PV within the past 4 years between 1967 and 1974. They had to Design Prospective randomized, non placebo controlled, after only phase III clinical evaluation Measurement of Variables First occurrence of major thrombotic event, the development of acute leukemia or Key Findings Comment/ Analysis twice that for women (2.8 vs 1.3). *The median duration for survival was 7.2 years. There was no significant difference in survival between men and women. *The most common cause of death was myocardial infarction or ischemic heart disease. it is not lost to other health care systems. *As ofJanuary 1, 198750.8% of the initial randomized cohort had died while on the study. Length of followup and the prospective design of this study adds strength to the data • ~ ~ ~ 35 Polycythemia Vera Author & Year . Sample & Size Design Measurement of Variables Key Findings Comment/ Analysis meet the PVSG diagnostic criteria for PV in order to be eligible. A total of 431 patients were fully eligible. of three treatment modalities. Patients were randomized to receive phlebotomy alone, 32p (2.3mCilm2) with initial phlebotomy to achieve normal hemoglobin:S 45%, or Chlorambucil with initial phlebotomy to achieve normal hemoglobin:S 45%. lymphoma, the development of a nonhematologic malignancy, or death. *Median survival for those receiving chlorambucil was 9. 1 years, for those receiving 32p it was 10.9 years, and for those receiving phlebotomy it was 12.6 years. *The most common cause of death reported was thrombosis. *Thrombosis occurred more frequently in the phlebotomized patients during the first three years of treatment. * Leukemia and non hematologic malignancies provided in this study. However, long term follow-up was affected in this study by the necessity of stopping the chlorambucil treatment arm. The advantage of long term follow-up is that long term effects can be evaluated and may change previous early recommendations. If the study had only followed patients for 3 years, the adverse effects of chlorambucil may not have been seen. • • • • 36 Polycythemia Vera Author & Year Sample & Size Design Measurement of Variables Key Findings occurred more frequently in patients who had received 32p and chlorambucil after 5 years of treatment. *The incidence of developing acute leukemia in patients , recelvmg chlorambucil was found to be statistically significant and in 1981 this treatment arm was discontinued. Patients who had been treated with chlorambucil were followed. *The incidence of acute leukemia was increased in Comments/ Analysis • • • • 37 Polycythemia Vera Author & Year Sample & Size Design Measurement of Variables Key Findings Comments/ Analysis patients receiving 32p over those recelvmg phlebotomy alone but it was not statistically significant. *Overall survival was shorter for those treated with chlorambucil. Berk, et at. (1995) PVSG protocol 05 Patients older than 21 years of age who had the diagnosis ofPV. This diagnosis had to have been made in the preceding 4 years. They could not have received any other therapy other than phlebotomy. In Prospective randomized, non placebo controlled, after only phase III clinical evaluation of two treatment anns. Patients were randomized to receive phlebotomy (to maintain their hematocrit :s Incidence of thrombotic complications and incidence of major hemorrhagic complications requmng hospitalization and transfusion of at least 2 units of blood. *The study was stopped in April of 1981 due to seven severe thrombotic complications on the phlebotomy, aspirin and persantine ann compared to 2 on the 32p ann. *There was also a significant increase Although this study did not show a reduction in the incidence of thrombotic complications in patients treated with this specific anti-thrombotic regimen it does not prove that antithrombotic therapy does not work. . • • • ' 38 Polycythemia Vera Author & Year Sample & Size Design addition, they could not have any chronic disorder requiring long-term aspirin therapy . They also could not be planning to have additional children. In addition they had to meet the PVSG PV diagnostic criteria. 178 patients were enrolled into the study, 88 were randomized to receive phlebotomy, aspirin and persantine and 90 were randomized to receive 32p. 45%), aspirin 300 mg three times a day and persantine 75 mg three times a day, or to receive 2 32p (2.7 mCi!m ) as often as every 12 weeks. Measurement of Variables Key Findings Comments! Analysis in severe hemorrhagic complications in the phlebotomy, aspirin and persantine arm requmng hospitalization and transfusion. There were not any hemorrhagic events in the 32p arm. *The overall cumulative failure rate was eight times greater in the phlebotomy, aspirin and persantine arm than the 32p arm. Other studies need to be under !aken to further evaluate an effective regImen. • • ., • 39 Polycythemia Vera Author & Year Sample & Size Design Measurement of Variables Key Findings Comments/ Analysis Donovan, et al. (1984) PVSG08 All patients who had been diagnosed with PV per the PVSG criteria were eligible. If they had been previously treated, they had to wait 4 months after the last treatment before they could begin hydroxyurea. 118 patients were enrolled. 59 patients had received no prior myelosuppressive therapy. The other 59 had been treated with either 32p and/ or other myelosuppressive agents. Phase III nonrandomized, noncontrolled after only efficacy clinical trial evaluating the efficacy of hydroxyurea in treating PY. Patients were started on hydroxyurea 30mg/kg/day x 1 week as a loading dose. It was then reduced to 15mg/kg/day. Initial response to hydroxyurea and long-term control ofPV. Patients were considered to have failed treatment if their hematocrit was> 50% for more than 12 weeks, if they required more than six phlebotomies in any consecutive 52 week period or if they experienced a major disease related complication: thrombosis, leukemia, solid tumor or death or when a drug reaction caused the *Due to the fact that most patients had received phlebotomy prior to entry into the study, only 21 patients \vith an elevated hematocrit and 26 patients with an elevated platelet count could be evaluated for initial response. *Of the 26 patients with a pretreatment platelet count of> 1,000,000,65% had a reduction in platelet count to < 600,000 in 3 weeks. 88% responded by 12 weeks. *Of the 21 patients with elevated *This study did determine that hydroxyurea is effective in creating an initial decrease in platelet counts and/or hemoglobin levels. The incidence of acute leukemias and thrombosis were low. *Due to moderate and severe cytopenias the recommended dosage was reduced to 15-20mg/kg/day. . . • • 40 Polycythemia Vera Author & Year . Sample & Size Design Measurement of Variables Key Findings discontinuation of treatment. hematocrits, 80% had normal values and 51% of the previously treated patients remained controlled on hydroxyurea. *Major toxicities were seen in both previously treated and previously untreated patients. They included thrombocytopenia, leukemia, anemia, rash, fever, GI problems and malaise. *There were 2 leukemias reported. One was in the previously treated group and the other in the Comments/ Allalysis • • • 6 41 Polycythemia Vera Author & Year Sample & Size Design Measurement of Variables Key Findings previously untreated group. *Previously untreated individuals experienced thrombotic events. *Moderate toxicity usually was seen in the first couple of weeks of therapy. *It was found that the treatment must be administered continuously in a regular basis for it to remain effective. *The average daily dosage should be 500-1000mg per day. *Iftreatment is stopped, remission did not last and a Comments/ Analysis . . • • • 42 Polycythemia Vera Author & Year Sample & Size Design Measurement of Variables Key Findings Comments/ Analysis rebound thrombocytosis occurred. Fruchtman et al. (1997) 51 patients with PV who had received no prior treatment and who were then treated with hydroxyurea were compared to 134 patients with PV who were treated with phlebotomy alone. Retrospective comparison of patients who were entered into the efficacy trial of hydroxyurea (PVSG-08) to PV patients entered into the phlebotomy arm ofPVSG-OI Comparative incidence of acute leukemia, comparative incidence of spent phase, comparative incidence of spent phase and acute leukemia and overall survival. *5.9% of hydroxyurea patients developed acute leukemia compared to 1.5% of the phlebotomy patients at the same point in time (795 weeks) *7.8% of the hydroxyurea patients developed spend phase by 795 weeks compared to 11.2% of phlebotomy patients at 795 weeks. *Combining the incidence of spent *The use of historical controls may have compromised the studies internal validity. *This study indicates that although there is an increase in the incidence of acute leukemia in the patients taking hydroxyurea, the increase is not statistically significant. Overall survival (though not statistically significant) • • • & 43 Polycythemia Vera Author & Year Sample & Size Design Measurement of Variables Key Findings Comments/ Analysis phase and acute leukemia over 795 weeks the two groups were similar. *Overall survival was not statistically different between the patients treated with hydroxyurea or phlebotomy (although there is a trend for improved survival with the hydroxyurea patients due to the decrease in lifethreatening thrombosis). improves when hydroxyurea. is used. . • • • 44 Polycythemia Vera Author & Year Sample & Size Design Measurement of Variables Key Findings Comments/ Analysis Fruchtman et al. (1997) Additional longterm update on the PVSG08 data compared to a historical control 51 patients who were enrolled in PVSG 08 who had not received prior myelosuppressive therapy prior to being enrolled into the trial and had to received hydroxyurea. They were followed for an additional maximum 795 weeks. These patients were compared with 134 patients who were assigned to the phlebotomy arm of PVSG Oland had been followed for a maximum of 795 weeks. Phase III nonrandomized controlled after only efficacy clinical trial with results compared to a historical control group for PVSG 01. Comparative incidence of acute leukemia, comparative incidence of spent phase, comparative incidence of spent phase or acute leukemia and overall survival. *At 795 weeks the incidence of acute leukemia in onstudy hydroxyurea treated patients was 5.9% and in the phlebotomy alone patients it was 1.5%. However, this was not statistically significant. *At 795 weeks, 7.8% of the onstudy hydroxyurea patients had developed spent phase compared to 11.2% of patients treated with phlebotomy. *The incidence of spent phase and *In this very long term analysis of two patient groups there appeared to be no statistical difference in the incidence of acute leukemias, the development of spent phase or difference in overall survival in patients treated either with long term hydroxyurea or phlebotomy. This is likely due to the natural history of patients with pv. *The control arm which was a historical group of patients treated with phlebotomy is • • • ~ 45 Polycythemia Vera Author & Year Groupo Italiano Studio Policitemia (1995) . Sample & Size 1213 patients with PV from 11 Italian hematology institutions. Design Retrospective cohort study of patients with PV who had been followed for 20 years. Measurement of Variables All causes of mortality. Incidence of venous and arterial thrombosis, hematologic and nonhematologic Key Findings Comments/ Analysis acute leukemia in both the hydroxyurea treated patients and phlebotomy treated patients was very similar and not statistically significant. *There was not a statistically significant difference in overall survival between the two groups. a criticism of the study. There also maybe inherent differences in the two groups that cannot be accounted for. *There are newer agents used to treat PV such as interferon that should be tested against hydroxyurea in a randomized prospective controlled clinical trial. *PV is more common m men than women 1.2: 1. *PV is most commonly diagnosed between The objective of the study was to reassess the natural history ofPV, gather reliable estimates of • • • • 46 Polycythemia Vera Author & Year Sample & Size Design Measurement of Variables Key Findings Comments/ Analysis neoplastic disease the ages of 50-75. *14% of patients had a thrombotic event before dx and 20% had a thrombotic event as the presenting complaint. *After diagnosis of PV, MJ and TIA's were the most frequent nonfatal arterial complications. *MJ's accounted for 1/2 of all fatal thrombotic events. *The rate of thrombotic events increased with age: for those <40 the rate was 1.8/ 100 pts/yr; for those >70 the rate was incidence of thrombosis and survival data to be used to develop future clinical trials. This study provided data that supports treating patients with different approaches depending on age and risk profile. It re-evaluated current therapeutic strategies and tested new therapeutic approaches. This study provided concrete complication and survival data which is important in planning future • • • • 47 Polycythemia Vera Author & Year Sample & Size Design Measurement of Variables Key Findings Comments/ Analysis 5.1/100 pts/yr. *The cumulative median survival was more that 15 years; this decreased with increasing age. *The most frequent fatal complications were thrombosis and cancer. *Those treated with myelosuppressive therapy died of cancer four times as often as those treated with phlebotomy or other pharmacological treatment. *The overall risk of mortality and nonfatal thrombotic events was greater clinical trials to evaluate therapeutic approaches to PV. • • & & 48 Polycythemia Vera Author & Year Sample & Size Design Measurement of Variables Key Findings in those receiving more aggressive therapy. Kaplan, et aI. (1986) Update ofPVSG 08 51 patients who were enrolled in PVSG 08 who had not received prior myelosuppressive therapy prior to being enrolled into the trial. They had received hydroxyurea for a median period of 245 weeks on PVSG08. These patients were compared with 134 patients who were assigned to the phlebotomy arm of PVSGOI Phase III nonrandomized controlled after only efficacy clinical trial with results compared to a historical control group on PVSG 01. Patients were started on hydroxyurea 30mg/kg/day x 1 week as a loading dose. It was then reduced to 15mg/kg/day. Long-term disease control as previously described in PVSG 08, thrombotic events, drug intolerance and occurrence of acute leukemia. Comments/ Analysis - *Long-term therapy *The 51 patients with hydroxyurea treated with hydroxyurea and effectively controlled the the 134 patients hemoglobin and treated with platelet count in phlebotomy alone patients with PV. in the historical *During the first control group were 389 weeks, not identically matched. This is a thrombotic events were less in the big criticism of the hydroxyurea treated study. There were group than those younger females in managed with the hydroxyurea group, the phlebotomy alone from PVSG 01 hydroxyurea group (13.7% vs 38. 1%). had a stronger *During the first history of previous 378 weeks of the thrombotic events, there was a studies, acute difference in mean leukemia occurred • • • 6 49 Polycythemia Vera Author & Year Sample & Size Design Measurement of Variables Key Findings Comments/ Analysis in 2 hydroxyurea patients and in 2 phlebotomized patients. lab values in both groups and the hydroxyurea group initially presented with a higher platelet count. Using a historical control carries the risk of some outside influence affecting the data which cannot be accounted for. However, patients were diagnosed in the same way, they were referred by and cared for by the same group of physicians (PVSG members) and the administration of the studies were similar. • • • ~ 50 Polycythemia Vera Author & Year Sample & Size Design Measurement of Variables Key Findings Comments/ Analysis Landolfi & Marchioli (1997) 3500 patients with PV. In these patients the risklbenefit ratio of aspirin therapy was not clear. Prospective Placebo controlled double blind randomized clinical trial to assess the risklbenefit ratio of low dose aspirin in patients with PY. Patients are randomized to either 100mg of aspirin daily or placebo. The endpoints of the study are all fatal and nonfatal arterial and venous thrombotic events. Information will be gathered at baseline and every 12 months until the end of the study. *Pilot study is completed showing that low dose aspirin is well tolerated and that a large-scale efficacy trial is feasible with this patient population. Results of interim analysis after the first 2 years of follow-up have not been reported as of yet. Messinezy, Westwood, Woodcock, Strong & Pearson (1995) 42 adult patients with PY. Correlational Research Blood was drawn for serum Epo estimation. *A single Serum Epo estimation provides a reading that is below the lower limit in 64% of patients with PV. *If two serum Epo estimations are taken on two Sample size is small but demonstrated high specificity and moderate sensitivity of this test. , • • • 6 51 Polycythemia Vera Author & Year Sample & Size Design Measurement of Variables Key Findings different occasions, 72% of the patients have at least one result below the lower limit. *Comparison patients with either secondary polycythemia or idiopathic erythrocytosis had serum Epo estimations and only 2 patients out of88 had Epo levels below the reference range. Petitt, Silverstein & Petrone (1997) 942 patients with myeloproliferative thrombocythemia: 546 with essential thrombocythemia, 113 with PV, 179 with chronic Prospective, nonrandomized, non controlled, after only clinical trial evaluating the effectiveness of Anagrelide in Complete response (CR), reduction in platelet count to less than 600,000/~L or to 50% or less of pretreatment level *Overall response rate was 79%. *Responses varied according to the underlying myeloproliferative disorder: In PV Comments/ Analysis . Study primarily summarized the experience with Anagrelide in 942 patients with myeloproliferative thrombocytopenia. • • • • 52 Polycythemia Vera Author & Year Sample & Size Design Measurement of Variables Key Findings Comments/ Analysis myelocytic leukemia, and 108 with other or undifferentiated myeloproliferative disease. reducing platelet counts in patients with myeloproliferative thrombocythemia. for at least 4 weeks~ Partial response (PR), 20% to 50% reduction in platelet count from pretreatment level for at least 4 weeks~ or failure to respond, less than 20% reduction in platelet count. there was a 66% CR, in essential thrombocythemia there was a 73% CR, in chronic myelocytic leukemia there was a 63% CR, other myeloproliferative diseases showed a 73%CR *Adverse events included headache, palpitations, diarrhea and fluid retention. Patients were accrued from a variety of settings and the patient's physicians had varied experience with Anagrelide. Patients whose physicians had a great deal of experience with the drug did better than those whose physicians had little expenence. The dose varied from patient to patient and physician to physician. However, this is often what occurs in the community. This study .' • • • 53 Polycythemia Vera Author & Year Sample & Size Design Measurement of Variables Key Findings Commentsl Analysis provides information on use in a variety of settings with physicians with a variety of experience with Anagrelide. Silver (1997) 28 patients with PV with a median age of 51 years. There were 12 men and 16 women. The median disease duration for the group was 36 months before the start of interferon. 10 of the 28 patients had received hydroxyurea before the start of interferon and the Prospective nonrandomized, nonplacebo controlled, after only, clinical trial evaluating the effects ofrIFN-a in the treatment of PV. *The number of supplemental phlebotomies needed to maintain the HCT :5 45% in all patients on rIFN-a *The dose and % dose change needed at 1 and 2 years. (All patients received interferon therapy and after reaching a target dose of 3 MU of interferon 3x week, *Striking decrease in the need for phlebotomy in both patient groups (prior phlebotomy treatment group and prior hydroxyurea group). *Doses of interferon varied for all patients at the end of the second year from 2.4 MU/wk to 31.5 MU/wk with This study had no control arm due to the fact that it would not be ethical to not treat patients with PY. However this study does not directly compare treatment with interferon to treatment with hydroxyurea. This maybe due to the fact that other studies have already demonstrated • • 54 Polycythemia Vera Author & Year Sample & Size remaining 18 had received prior treatment with phlebotomy alone. These groups were evaluated separately. Design Measurement of Variables Key Findings Commentsl Allalysis the doses needed to control HCT~ 45% varied from patient to patient.) * Change in platelet counts at year 1 and year 2. *Change in spleen size at year 1 and year 2 *Types of toxicity seen in patients receiving interferon was noted. *Development of malignancy or thrombohemorrhagic events. a median of7.5 MU/wk. *Platelet counts decreased in all patients. *Spleen size diminished in all 13 patients who had initial enlargement. * No patient developed any malignancy or thrombohemorrhagic event. *Most toxicities were influenza type symptoms. Only 2 patients discontinued interferon therapy due to side effects. beneficial results with interferon and the purpose of this study is to demonstrate long term response to interferon alone. This study evaluates a small number of patients and but represents a study with long term follow-up of patients treated with interferon and replicates previous work. • • • • 55 Polycythemia Vera Author & Year Sample & Size Design. Measurement of Variables Key Findings Comments/ Analysis Stasi, et al. (1997) 18 PV patients who ha a median age of 47 years. There were 11 men and 7 women. The median disease duration before interferon therapy was 7.5 months. All patients had active disease and required treatment with phlebotomy, cytoreductive therapy or both. cytoreductive treatment had been discontinued for 2 months and patients had their HCT brought to"near normal" range by phlebotomy prior to the start of Prospective nonrandomized, nonplacebo controlled, after only, drug evaluation clinical trial. Comparison of clinical and hematologic parameters: HCT (%), Spleen size (cm), platelet count (103/ml), Leukocytes (103/ml), Ferritin (mg/L), MCV (fl) and Pruritus score. The number of phlebotomies required to maintain HCT .s45%. *Although malaise and flu-like syndrome was seen during the early phase of therapy, symptoms responded to acetaminophen and these symptoms did not require discontinuation or dose reduction. *The total response rate (CR and PR) was 94.4% (17 out of 18 patients). *Phlebotomy requirement was reduced from 5.2 during 6 months prior to interferon to 1.6 during the first 6 months of treatment with Results of this study confirm that interferon is an effective agent for controlling myeloproliferation in PV. The sample size is small. Larger studies with longer follow-up are necessary to determine the natural history of patients with PV who are treated with interferon therapy and whether or not the incidence of myelofibrosis or leukemic transformation is altered. Since placebo control . • • • ~ 56 Polycythemia Vera Author & Year Sample & Size interferon therapy. Design Measurement of Variables Key Findings Comments/ Analysis interferon therapy. *Splenomegaly resolved in 6 out of the 10 patients with splenomegaly, 57.1% of the patients achieved a normal platelet count and 62.5% of the patients achieved a normal leukocyte count. *Serum iron and ferritin concentrations increased, MVC and pruritus complaints decreased. *Two patients continued their response after discontinuation of treatment. 5 would be unethical, . a long term study of patients receiving interferon cold be controlled with a retrospective matched control arm of patients who were treated with hydroxyurea. • • • • 57 Polycythemia Vera Author & Year Sample & Size Design Measurement of Variables Key Findings Comments/ Analysis patients could not tolerate having their dose reduced. *During the study period, no thrombohemorrahgic complications or occurrence of malignancy was seen. Tararsky & Sharon (1997) Site specific data on PV 08 from Rambam Medical Center in Israel 71 patients who were treated with hydroxyurea from May 1980 to December 1995. Some of these patients began the hydroxyurea treatment after the PVSG closed accrual to the study in 1984. Phase III nonrandomized controlled, after only efficacy trial. The control group was made up of the patients who received phlebotomy alone from PVSG 01. The occurrence of complications, thrombotic events, acute leukemia, malignant tumors and incidence of myelofibrosis. Survival was not a measured outcome. *6 out of71 patients experienced late complications which included leg ulcers, elevated creatinine, jaundice, hypothyroidism and impotence which resulted in discontinuation of treatment. *Most patients were of Ashkenazi Jewish origin so the population was homogeneous for this ethnic background. There may have been agenetic predisposition for PY. *Myelofibrosis is • • • • 58 Polycythemia Vera Author & Year Sample & Size They were treated off study but data collection occurred in the same manner as the study patients. 33 patients had received prior treatment with phlebotomy. 38 patients were only treated with hydroxyurea and supplemental phlebotomy. Design Measurement of Variables Key Findings Comments/ Analysis *5 patients expenence a thrombotic event after 6-10 years of therapy. This was much less than any of the arms in PVSG 01 as well as patients in PVSG 08. *4 patients (5.6%) developed acute leukemia which was much less than all arms ofPVSG 01 as well as patients in PVSG 08. *7 patients developed a malignant tumor. *2 patients (2.8%) progressed to myelofibrosis after 9 and 13 years of a late complication ofPVand i~ expected. A randomized clinical trial is needed to evaluate the prevention of this complication. *The two solid malignancies occurred soon after treatment so it is unlikely that they are connected with the use of hydroxyurea. *This study confirms that hydroxyurea is an effective agent in controlling complications associated with PY. *Long term , • • ~ 59 Polycythemia Vera Author & Year Sample & Size Design Measurement of Variables Key Findings Comments! Analysis treatment. When compared to data in PVSG 01, the incidence overall was much lower in patients receiving hydroxyurea. survival however was not a variable that was measured.