Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Starting Where We Are: A Neurobiological Understanding of Scapegoating and Transformative Possibilities Cindy Miller Aron, LCSW,CGP, FAGPA and Paul D. Cox, MD,CGP AGPA Annual Meeting 2016 New York City Who is the Scapegoat? *A member who in some way is different, plays a divergent role. *Repository for disowned material.(Malcus 1995) *In groups, particularly new groups, people monitor the environment for safety. *Difference creates nidus for irritation/resentment, anxiety can ensue, brain limitations reflect issues of survival. *Amygdala hijacked as group members err on the side of caution; skeptical of difference. Why does this occur? *First stage of group is ‘survival and attachment’ (Rice, 1992). The establishment of commonalities, differences minimized and therapist idealized. *Undifferentiated bonding helps cope with object anxiety. *Second stage of group is “establishment of individual identity and safety”(Rice 1992) the unconscious issues in the first stage become apparent; people begin to see difference, conflicts emerge, comfort of conformity is gone, therapist no longer idealized, structure of group threatened. *The hijacked amygdala errs on the side of caution, imagining worst case scenarios(projection), perception of fears and intentions of others(mirror neurons, non-verbal communication). *Template for interpersonal trust dependent upon how secure is the individual’s attachment; insecure attachment can exacerbate fears and avoidance. *This is the juncture at which scapegoating is most likely to occur. How is the scapegoat maintained? *Groups’ expectation that if the scapegoat would change or leave, group would return to previous state of calm and comfort. *Reflection of brain limitations, as fear and feelings between the scapegoat and scapegoaters increases cementing both sides more firmly into their polarized positions. *Maintenance of the scapegoat relieves anxieties of uncertainty knowing that the scapegoat is ‘THE’ problem. *The scapegoat protects members from perceived inadequacies of the leader. *As long as the scapegoat can be blamed, the group issues go unexamined and unchanged. (Gemmill, 1989) *Fortunately brain-mind limitations can be transcended. Starting Where We Are: A Neurobiological Understanding of Scapegoating and Transformative Possibilities Cindy Miller Aron, LCSW,CGP, FAGPA and Paul D. Cox, MD,CGP AGPA Annual Meeting 2016 New York City Leadership Considerations *Leaders need to maintain a sense of composure and hope.(Tuttman, 1992) *Therapists neutrality often lost as countertransference issues emerge. *Group as a whole interventions tend to be most effective, focusing individuals on being part of a ‘whole” (Kibel, 1992) *Help manage the quality of limited working memory by giving members opportunities for ‘chunking’ each other (having a sense of one another. *Keep aware that there likely is an unfortunate mix of insecure attachment styles that might be repeated triggering members. Interventions *Reestablishment and maintenance of a theraputic environment. *Maintain an empathic connection with the scapegoat and other members, specifically requesting eye contact by encouraging healthy attunement between members. *Shift members from an active mode to one of investigation and understanding perhaps considering the explicit naming of the scapegoat dynamic, including an explanation of the neurobiological underpinnings. *Remind the attackers that it is not the behavior of the scapegoat that is troubling but what it evokes in them. Scapegoating can be usefully viewed as a compromise dynamic version of the brain doing the best it can under challenging circumstances. Negotiating limits and transformation is easier if one has an accurate understanding of what is causing the problem and that it is not simply about being ‘flawed’ but reflects the strengths and limitations of all members’ brains. Addressing who the scapegoat is and role he/she plays is a remarkable opportunity to move the group towards greater individuation and autonomous functioning among members while retaining a deep sense of connection. Starting Where We Are: A Neurobiological Understanding of Scapegoating and Transformative Possibilities Cindy Miller Aron, LCSW,CGP, FAGPA and Paul D. Cox, MD,CGP AGPA Annual Meeting 2016 New York City