Download to view or the Teacher Guide for Module II

American Precision Museum
Industrial Revolution Kit
Module 2
Invention and Technology
Essential Questions:
How did new inventions happen?
What is “precision manufacturing”?
American Precision Museum
196 Main St., PO Box 679
Windsor VT 05089
[email protected]
www.americanprecision.org
802-674-5781
802-674-2524 (fax)
Module 2: Invention and Technology
Essential Questions: How did new inventions happen? What is
“precision manufacturing”?
A. Richard S. Lawrence, Vermont innovator—Biography and Industrial
Timeline activity
B. Invention and Technology Activities
• Machines in the Shoe Shop Essay
• Precision Measuring nuts and bolts with dial calipers activity
• Fork vs. Spoon activity
• Invention Diary
• 1841 British quotation*—understanding a written primary source
C. Other Resources
• 7 matted images, including advertisements
• 3 books:
Barbara and Hetty Mitchell, Shoes for Everyone: A Story About Jan
Matzeliger;
Tom Tucker, Brainstorms: The Stories of Twenty American Kid
Inventors; and
Carrie Brown, Pedal Power: The Bicycle in Industry and Society
American Precision Museum Industrial Revolution Kit
Module 2: Invention and Technology - 1
Module 2 Background and Opening Activity
Richard S. Lawrence
This Vermonter helped make the
U.S. an Industrial Power
Richard Lawrence was born in Chester, Vermont,
in 1817—just 40 years after the signing of the
Declaration of Independence. When he was still
very young, his family moved to New York State
to find new farmland. His father died when young
Lawrence was only nine years old, and the boy
had to give up going to school and help his mother
and grandfather run the farm. When he was 15, he
went to work for one of his uncles, making
carpenters’ tools. In his spare time, he learned how
to repair guns. He did not yet know that gun
making would become the “high tech” industry in America in a just a few years, and that he
would become one of the important developers of that industry.
As a young man, Lawrence worked in a window and door factory. He also worked at a hotel,
caring for the horses of hotel guests and of traveling stagecoaches. When he was 21 years
old, Lawrence spent three years in the army, helping guard the frontier. He then returned to
Windsor to visit relatives, and there he finally had a chance to develop his skill as a gun
maker.
Interchangeable Parts
In 1844, Lawrence joined with Nicanor Kendall and Samuel Robbins to form a company and
bid on a government contract to build 10,000 rifles for the army. At that time, most gun
shops made guns one at a time by hand. Every gun was different from every other gun. When
they won the contract from the army, Robbins, Kendall and Lawrence built a brick factory
building and put together a large collection of the newest gun-making tools available. They
American Precision Museum Industrial Revolution Kit
Module 2: Invention and Technology - 2
also invented many new machines of their own. With the
new machines and with very careful use of measuring and
testing, they were able to build 10,000 guns that were all
alike. All of the parts for every rifle fit every other rifle.
Robbins, Kendall, and Lawrence helped perfect the system
of “Interchangeable Parts.” Soon experts from England
were traveling to the United States to learn about the new
“high tech” American methods.
How new ideas spread
When large orders came in for another type of gun, the Sharps rifle, Lawrence moved to
Hartford, Connecticut and opened branch factory for making the new rifle. He stayed at the
Sharps factory through the Civil War, but gave up gun making in the 1870s. At that point, a
new company took over the Hartford factory. They made sewing machines using the tools
that Lawrence had helped develop. They hired many of the workers that Lawrence had
trained.
After the Civil War, Col. Albert Pope hired a section of the sewing machine factory for
building high wheel bicycles, using those same machines and many of the same workers.
Eventually, Pope also made gasoline-powered cars there. The development of
interchangeable parts made it possible to build many new products at very low prices. In
addition to the timeline activity below, there is an advanced activity related to the spread of
ideas using the Robbins and Lawrence Family Tree on pages 11 and 12.
Timeline Activity
Unroll the timeline included in the box. Ask students to work in three groups, and provide
each group with three or four photographs of “new products”, provided in the envelope. Ask
the students to agree where on the timeline they think each card should be attached. (Cards
can be attached using the Velcro circles on the back.)
As optional activities, have each student write a short paragraph for one of the cards,
describing what events or technological innovations made their “new product” possible; or
have students research a product that is not included among the cards, find or draw a picture
of it, and explain where on the timeline it would fit and why based on their research.
Further Activities and Resources:
More activities that go with the contents of Module 2 are listed on pages 3 and 4. In addition,
there is an essay called “Machines in the Shoe Shop”, eight mounted photographs, and three
books (Pedal Power, Shoes for Everyone, and Brainstorm!).
American Precision Museum Industrial Revolution Kit
Module 2: Invention and Technology - 3
Invention and Technology Activities
1. Machines in the Shoe Shop
•
•
•
•
•
•
The “Machines in the Shoe Shop” essay (pp. 5-8) provides background information for
teachers and for advanced students.
Give students a chance to handle and study the wooden shoe last. What do they think it is?
Explain that a shoe could be shaped and put together around a shoe last. In the early days of
shoe making, middle class and wealthy people had their shoes custom made by skilled
cobblers (shoe makers). Inexpensive shoes were made in bulk—still by hand—but there
were no uniform sizes. You would go to the local general store, dig through a barrel of
shoes, and try to find some that fit.
Show a video recreation of the Blanchard gunstock machine in operation. (Go to:
http://www.forgeofinnovation.org
and click on SITE MAP. Scroll down to THEME 1, #7: "Successful achievement of
mechanized interchangeable production [1822~1842]."
VIDEO - Operation of Blanchard Lathe
and
VIDEO - Demonstration of Blanchard Lathe.
Once shoe lasts were made on machines, a “size 7” could be the same, from one shoemaker
or one shoe factory to the next. Now you could order the right size shoe from a Sears
Catalogue.
The kit contains two photographs from the Ascutney Shoe Factory, which was near
Windsor, Vermont. Let students examine the two shoes in the kit. Can they tell which
stitching was done by hand and which was done by machine?
2. Precision Measurement
To make things from interchangeable parts, you must begin with parts that are very nearly
alike. To make sure they are accurate, you must test and measure parts. This activity lets
students learn how to use a precision measuring tool.
The dial caliper
The marks on the face of the dial caliper represent thousandths of an inch.
• Place a sheet of notebook paper between the large jaws of the caliper and turn the
wheel until the jaws completely close on the paper. What reading do you get on the
dial?
• Now do the same thing to measure a sheet of newspaper. How different are the
measurements?
• Now measure the thickness of a single strand of human hair. The early guns made
with interchangeable parts had many parts that were accurate to within a hundredth
of an inch. Today, many products are made that require accuracy within a
thousandth of an inch.
American Precision Museum Industrial Revolution Kit
Module 2: Invention and Technology - 4
Nuts and Bolts
The two sets of nuts and bolts look very much the same, but they are actually different sizes.
• Can you match up the sets?
• Does the smaller nut fit onto the larger bolt?
• Using the dial caliper, measure the outside diameter
of the two bolts. How much different are they?
• Can you figure out how to use this measuring tool to
measure the inside diameter of the hole? (Hint: use
the smaller jaws on the other side of the caliper.)
The parts for this gunlock were made by
Robbins, Kendall and Lawrence in 1848. They
made 10,000 rifles in two years. Every lock
screw had to fit every lock plate, and every lock
plate had to fit every gunstock.
4. The fork as an invention
Compare the shape and the uses of a fork and a spoon. Create a grid showing the benefits and the
drawbacks of the fork. What is it good for? What is it not so good for? How was it an
improvement over the use of a spoon or fingers? Students may also want to compare the fork
with chopsticks.
5. Invention Diary
Ask students to keep a diary for one week, recording everyday problems and frustrations and
their own ideas for inventions or innovations that might solve the problems. For example, a
student who has trouble getting up in the morning might decide to “invent” a timer that will open
the bedroom curtains in the morning.
American Precision Museum Industrial Revolution Kit
Module 2: Invention and Technology - 5
Machines in the Shoe Shop
CONSIDER the shoe last: a block of wood carved
into the shape of a human foot. It can serve two
purposes. First, you can make a pattern for cutting
shoe leather by placing damp pieces of tissue
paper on the shoe last and marking where the parts
of the shoe will come together. Second, you can
wrap the cut pieces of leather around the last and tack them in place while you shape and
stitch the shoe. Now imagine that each shoemaker must carve his own shoe lasts by hand.
Unless he is your personal shoemaker and has made the wooden last to represent your
individual foot, how will you find a pair of shoes that fit? In a world of hand-carved shoe
lasts, how can there be any such thing as a standard women’s size 9 or men’s size 11½
shoe?
For several hundred years, going back at least to medieval times, cobblers had made
shoes using handcrafting techniques and simple tools: the knife for shaving and cutting
leather, the awl for punching holes, the needle for stitching, the hand-carved last for
shaping. Then, about the time of the American Revolution, shoe making began to change,
as part of the broader industrial revolution.
Whether the early shoemaker was a professional cobbler or a farmer making shoes for his
family beside his fire in winter, each shoe was made by one person, from start to finish.
Or, at most, it might be made jointly by a master cobbler and his apprentice. But in the
second half of the eighteenth century, entrepreneurs in New England began to break the
process down into separate parts. The first task to be isolated was the cutting of leather.
Leather cutters at a central location could make far more efficient use of leather, creating
fewer scraps by cutting many pairs of shoes at the same time. The shop owner would then
send the cut parts out to smaller shops to have the uppers stitched together. They might
be moved to a second shop to have the insole and the outer sole fastened to the upper.
The tools and techniques were the same as they had been for hundreds of years, but the
movement toward a factory system created efficiencies that made production higher and
prices lower. In little one-story shops all over New England, and in kitchens where
women did piece work at home, workers stitched quickly the one or two parts that they
had practiced over and over again. And from these shops, finished shoes went out to
communities around the northeast, and to the southern colonies and the West Indies.
During the American Revolution, New England supplied all of its own shoes and those of
the other colonies—boots for soldiers, fine shoes for ladies, and cheap shoes for southern
slaves.1
Around 1810, change became more rapid. First, some unknown Yankee genius came up
with the idea of using wooden pegs, instead of thread, to fasten the sole, insole, and
upper. Laborious stitching through several thicknesses of leather could be replaced by a
swiftly punched hole and a quick tap with a hammer. When one pegger could outproduce two or three stitchers, the obvious next step was to build a machine that could
make the pegs, which were originally carved by hand. Such a machine was developed by
Paul Pillsbury of Newburyport, Massachusetts.2 About the same time, William Edwards,
American Precision Museum Industrial Revolution Kit
Module 2: Invention and Technology - 6
in Northampton, Massachusetts, established a water-powered grinding mill for grinding
bark used in tanning leather, and a water-powered rolling mill that replaced the hand
pounding that softened shoe leather.
As often happens with advances in technology, at about this time military research and
development led to changes in consumer goods—including shoes. During the
Revolutionary War, the government had established an arms storage site in Springfield,
Massachusetts, and in 1794 that site became an official armory making weapons for the
United States army. The government of course wanted to find ways to make guns more
quickly. Military leaders also wanted to make firearms with interchangeable parts, so that
broken weapons could easily be repaired on the battlefield. For these reasons, leaders in
Washington and at the armory placed great emphasis on the use of machinery to
standardize and speed up production.
One of the mechanics
brought into the armory
was Thomas Blanchard,
who had developed two
important gun-making
machines. The first
allowed a metal-shaping
lathe to create not just a
cylindrical barrel (which
lathes had been capable
of doing for many years),
but a barrel with a
flattened section on one
end, where it would be
attached to the gunstock. Blanchard’s second major development, patented in 1819, was a
wood-cutting lathe that could turn the irregular shape of a gunstock. Before Blanchard’s
innovation, making gunstocks involved time-consuming hand shaving, boring, and
chiseling. Blanchard’s lathe had a cutting tool connected to a tracing wheel. While the
tracing wheel ran over the surface of an iron gunstock pattern, it controlled the movement
of the cutting tool, which moved in and out of the wood being cut, creating the shape of
the gunstock. By 1827, Blanchard had developed 14 different machines for making the
entire gunstock, from cutting the crude blank, to turning the final shape, to carving out
the indentations that would receive the gun lock.3
By 1827, Blanchard’s lathe had also found its way into other industries. It was quickly
adapted for making ax handles, wheel spokes, oars, hat blocks, and shoe lasts. Shoe
manufacturers had already created efficiency by sub-dividing shoe making into quicklymastered small tasks and by bringing workers together into shops. That greater efficiency
helped create cheaper shoes and increased the market size for New England shoemakers.
Given the large market opportunities, it now made sense to invest in machinery that
would create even more efficiency. A Blanchard lathe could carve a shoe last in a minute
and a half, and by 1840 most shoe lasts were being made by Blanchard-style machines.4
American Precision Museum Industrial Revolution Kit
Module 2: Invention and Technology - 7
By the late 1850s, shoe factories commonly contained a great variety of new machines
for making heels, stitching together uppers, and attaching insoles and outer soles.
The new methods created not just more shoes, but better shoes for the general public.
Where low-priced shoes had often been shaped the same for right and left foot, they now
came in matched sets. Where shoes had once been
delivered to the general store in a barrel to be
pawed through in an effort to find something that
fit, now they came in standard sizes, and in newlyinvented shoe boxes. Once you knew your size,
you could order shoes after seeing only a sample in
a store or a picture in the new Sears Roebuck
catalog. High quality shoes had previously come
only from England, but by 1830 they also came
from shops in New England.5
And still mechanization increased. By the late
1850s, the machines in American shoe factories
were more often powered by steam than by water.
Here again, machines originally developed for military use helped create the change. If
steam power is going to be useful and efficient, the cylinders that drive it must be made
of pistons and cylinders that fit tightly together so that steam does not escape.
Englishman John Wilkinson, developed a new, more precise method for boring holes in
cannon in 1774, and in the process made it possible for James Watt to manufacture a
steam engine efficient enough to be practical. After half a century of gradual
improvement, steam engines began to power American industry.6 Once steam engines
could power factories, the factories no longer needed to be sited beside falling water.
Cities with easier access to outside markets began to dominate New England industry. In
the shoe industry, steam power replaced water-powered mills for machines that ground
bark for tanning leather, and that pounded and split leather.
By 1860, there were about 74,000 shoe workers in New England. The workers in Lynn,
Massachusetts, alone produced about six million pairs of shoes that year.7 Lynn was by
far the largest and most productive American shoe town, but there were smaller boot and
shoe shops in Vermont and New Hampshire as well. In 1829, Abdiel Kent established a
small shoe shop in Calais, Vermont. At any one time, he had about nine employees,
mostly unmarried young men who boarded with him and who frequently took days off
from the shoe shop to go home and plow or cut hay on the family farm. Kent operated his
shop year round, selling both locally and in Montpelier, which was the closest
commercial center. The men in Kent’s shop were not traditional apprentices, but hired
laborers who often left the trade after a few years. Although Kent’s establishment was
part of the transition from the old style of shoe making to the truly industrial model, he
stayed in the business for more than twenty years and had, over those years, more than
fifty men working for him.8
Census records for Windsor, Vermont, also show a transition in the shoe industry. The
census forms from 1850 list a fifty-seven-year-old “shoemaker” named David Lawrence.9
American Precision Museum Industrial Revolution Kit
Module 2: Invention and Technology - 8
He lived in a household that included his wife, six children aged 16 to 26, a daughter-inlaw, a granddaughter, and four boarders. One of David’s sons, Lauren, is also listed as a
shoemaker. Another son is listed as a farmer. The four boarders were a butcher and three
“artisans.” David Lawrence’s 1850 establishment was probably one of the transitional
shoe-making shops where day workers and boarders assembled shoes using a
combination of ancient methods and newer tools, and where to some extent the work was
still combined with the running of a farm.
By the 1870 census, there is no record of David, although his 73 year-old wife and three
single adult daughters still lived in Windsor along with three boarders. In the next
household interviewed, the census taker found Lauren, now 46, his wife Elizabeth, and
their daughter Kate. Lauren is listed not as a shoemaker but as a “manufacturer of boots
and shoes.” He had become a manufacturer who lived alone with his family while his
workmen lived elsewhere.
In the same 1870 census, Ebenezer Lamson is listed as a manufacturer of machinery. The
Jones & Lamson Company was about to become one of the most important machine tool
manufacturers in the world. While machine tools were not directly used to make shoes,
they were used to make many of the machines that made the shoes. Cutting and rolling
machines, shoe lasts, and sewing machines all contain parts made on the machine tools
perfected in the machine tool companies of the Connecticut River Valley.
Food for thought: In the 1950s, it was common knowledge that shoes made in Italy
and France were made on narrower shoe lasts than those used for American shoes.
The average Anglo-Saxon American simply had larger, wider feet than the average
European. Today, most of the shoes that you wear are made in India or China. Why
do they fit your feet?
1
Diana Muir, Reflections in Bullough’s Pond: Economy and Ecosystem in New England
(Hanover:University Press of New England, 2000), 90-91.
2
Ross Thomson, The Path to Mechanized Shoe Production in the United States (Chapel Hill: University of
North Carolina Press, 1989), 34-35.
3
Edwin Battison, “Muskets to Mass Production: The Men and the Times that Shaped American
Manufacturing” (Windsor, Vermont: The American Precision Museum, 1976), 14.
4
Thomson, 42-43.
5
Thomson, 38.
6
Muir, 173.
7
Brooke Hindle and Steven Lubar, Engines of Change: The American Industrial Revolution, 1798-1860
(Washington, D.C.: Smithsonian Institution Press, 1986), 214.
8
Mudgett, 108.
9
I have not been able to determine whether this Lawrence family was related to Richard Lawrence, one of
the founders of the Robbins & Lawrence armory in Windsor. But we do know that when Richard Lawrence
arrived in Windsor in 1838, he had relatives living there.
American Precision Museum Industrial Revolution Kit
Module 2: Invention and Technology - 9
PRIMARY DOCUMENTS ACTIVITIES
The British Point of View
On page 10 is a quotation from the Official Descriptive and Illustrated Catalog of the Great
Exhibition 1851 that describes American industry from the British point of view. Have students
work in groups or individually to put this quotation into their own words. What does the
quotation suggest about the differences between American and British life (and attitudes toward
wealth and ownership) in these two countries?
Article One of the Constitution
Article One of the United States Constitution describes the legislative branch of the government
(Congress). The powers of this branch are listed in Section Eight of Article One (see page 11).
Distribute copies of section 8 to students. Have them work in groups or individually to answer
the questions: Which of these powers do you think would help increase manufacturing and
encourage innovation? Why?
***ADVANCED ACTIVITY***
The Robbins & Lawrence Industrial Family Tree
Distribute copies of the Robbins & Lawrence family tree on page 12. Ask students to pick one of
the companies in the middle or lower half of the diagram, and put the company name on the back
of their copy. Ask them to try to find out what products the company made and who founded it.
Ask the students to create something to place on the back of the family tree—perhaps a picture
of the product made, some information about the workforce, or a paragraph describing what the
company was known for. Students may want to use primary documents such as old newspapers
for their research.
American Precision Museum Industrial Revolution Kit
Module 2: Invention and Technology - 10
American Democracy and Industry, from the British Point of
View, 1851
“The absence in the United States of those vast accumulations of wealth…and the general
distribution of the means of procuring the more substantial conveniences of life, impart to the
productions of American industry a character distinct from that of many other countries. The
expenditure of months or years of labour upon a single article…is not common in the United
States. On the contrary, both manual and mechanical labour are applied with direct reference to
increasing the number or quantity of articles suited to the wants of a whole people.”
From the Official Descriptive and Illustrated Catalogue of the Great Exhibition 1851 (London,
1851), 1431, quoted in Hindle and Lubar, Engines of Change, p. 256.
Bicycle manufacture at the Weed Sewing Machine Company
Scientific American, March 20, 1880
Collection of the American Precision Museum
American Precision Museum Industrial Revolution Kit
Module 2: Invention and Technology - 11
Article One of the United States Constitution
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
The congress shall have Power To lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises, to
pay the Debts and provide for the common Defence and general Welfare of the United
States; but all Duties, Imposts and Excises shall be uniform throughout the United States;
To borrow money on the credit of the United States;
To regulate Commerce with foreign Nations, and among the several States, and with the
Indian Tribes;
To establish an uniform rule of Naturalization, and uniform Laws on the subject of
Bankruptcies throughout the United States;
To coin Money, regulate the Value thereof, and of foreign Coin, and fix the Standard of
Weights and measures;
To provide for the Punishment of counterfeiting the Securities and current Coin of the
United States;
To establish Post Offices and Post Roads;
To promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts, by securing for limited Times to
Authors and Inventors the exclusive Right to their respective Writings and Discoveries;
To constitute Tribunals inferior to the supreme Court;
To define and punish Piracies and Felonies committed on the high Seas, and Offenses
against the Law of Nations;
To declare War, grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal, and make Rules concerning
Captures on Land and Water;
To raise and support Armies, but no Appropriation of Money to that Use shall be for a
longer Term than two Years;
To Provide and maintain a Navy;
To make Rules for the Government and Regulation of the land and naval Forces;
To provide for calling forth the Militia to execute the Laws of the Union, suppress
Insurrections and repel Invasions;
To provide for organizing, arming, and disciplining the Militia, and for governing such
Part of them as may be employed in the Service of the United States, reserving to the
States respectively, the Appointment of the Officers, and the Authority of training the
Militia according to the discipline prescribed by Congress;
To exercise exclusive Legislation in all Cases whatsoever, over such District (not
exceeding ten Miles square) as may, by Cession of particular States, and the acceptance
of Congress, become the Seat of the Government of the United States, and to exercise
like Authority over all Places purchased by the Consent of the Legislature of the State in
which the Same shall be, for the Erection of Forts, Magazines, Arsenals, dock-Yards, and
other needful Buildings; And
To make all Laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into Execution the
foregoing Powers, and all other Powers vested by this Constitution in the Government of
the United States, or in any Department or Officer thereof.