Download Annex A6.14 Debriefing and summary (Thomas Bie)

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts
no text concepts found
Transcript
Debriefing and Summary
EU Twinning Project
Support to the Israeli Central Bureau of Statistics
Activity A.6, Jerusalem, 8-11 July, 2013
>>
>>
Findings (1)
Decision (cf. the Twinning contract):
 Only planning for development of FDI statistics and
investment income from FDI
Overall findings
 the Israeli BoP system is in rather good shape, and
the work is well distributed and managed by CBS and
BoI
 the methodologies (IMF/OECD) are well understood,
and only in rather few cases Israel is not in
compliance with the manuals
 the data collection to a large extent meets the data
requirements from the manuals
 in particular, the FDI questionnaires are consistent,
but the different forms constitute a complex system
2
>>
Findings (2)
ITRS is a cornerstone in Israel’s BoP system, and in
some ways ITRS causes problems:
 ITRS data supplements the directly reported FDI data
 Elimination of directly reported FDI from ITRS is not easy,
implying a risk for double-counting/under-counting (?)
 ITRS generally provides only limited information –
difficulties in meeting OECD and IMF requirements
 For 15% (outward) and 37% (inward) only aggregated data
– ITRS code and currency
 The ITRS codes are often used incorrectly by the banks,
implying time consuming data quality work internally in
BoI
 The ITRS codes generally are not detailed enough (1985
system)
3
>>
Findings (3)
ITRS serves (other) purposes:
 Maintainance of populations and samples
 Data on a daily basis from the banks provide
important analytical information for the surveillance
of the foreign reserve / the money market / the
monetary policy

distinguishment between the ITRS and the FX systems –
possibly the monetary policy needs can be served by the FX
system
4
>>
Findings (4)
Real estate in the BoP and IIP
 Real estate definition: i.e. private/non-commercial
purposes
 Currently, Israel is not reporting stock data (IIP) regarding
real estate, but only transactions, based on the ITRS
 Accumulated flows as basis for estimation is not an
attractive solution



Non-residents, with Israeli real estate, becoming residents
What year to start?
ITRS problems - precision, coverage
 Other possible data sources that could be investigated


Data on transactions from tax authorities
Information from other bodies, e.g. central registrations on
land and buildings
5
>> Conclusions and recommmendations
 Joint Working Group (WG): Bank of Israel and CBS –
monthly meetings
 Time plan toward final plan 1 August 2014


The WG controls and details time plan
First deadline 15 October 2013: outlining of topics to be dealt
with in an overall plan and report – e.g.
- Future coverage of FDI
- Co-ordination of BoI survey on FDI and possible, supplementary CBS survey
- Design of new questionnaires based on a number of existing forms plus
(new) manual requirements
- Integrated reporting: Opening stock + transactions + revaluations =
Closing stock
- How to use the ITRS for statistical purposes in the future
- Identification of problem areas: Ultimate Investing Country, Ultimate
Control Owner, reverse investments, real estate => and how to solve
these
- Additional Israeli requirements?

Budgeting at the level of sub-items (separate parts of the
project)
6
>>
BoP/financial account: Assessment (5)
The FDI database (CBS):
 In theory, the FDI database is a possible gold-mine of
information
 A clear strategy of its maintenance is needed
 Exactly, what data should be in the data base?
 … and what data sources should be fed into the database?
 … at what intervals?
 … and so on!
 What IT solution would be adequate?
 How many resources should be be devoted to the
maintenance?
The statistics ordinance currently does not allow for the
business register to be utilized optimally
7
>>
BoP/financial account: Assessment (6)
What are the Twinning project’s actual possibilities? What kind of
plan, i.e. how extensive (and expensive!) a plan can we work
toward? Basically, two possible paths:
1. Improvement of the ITRS based system – i.e. a relatively
limited plan
2. A total, or almost total (cf. the monetary policy needs)
replacement of ITRS with a full direct reporting system
In principle, a decision on this would be good to have soon.
This is probably not realistic.
Instead – the Twinning might focus on locating ”the low-hanging
fruits”, i.e. the most easily attainable improvements within the
current system
And – at the same time - the Twinning project might produce a
general report for the managements of CBS and BoI as part of the
end-product of the component work. This document would
describe the pros and cons of the alternative solutions and their
statistical and financial consequences.
8