Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Changes Afloat at the Harvard LMA IRB: what you need to know for smooth sailing Outline • Who we are • What’s new with ESTR • Recent federal guidance/NIH policy & IRB review • Quality Improvement Program initiatives • Questions Office of Human Research Administration IRB Operations Grace Bullock, BA IRB Coordinator Jada Dixon, MJ, MPH, CIP IRB Review Specialist Paul Hryvniak, MS, CIP IRB Review Specialist Keren-Nicole Insalaco, MS, CIP, CIM Sr. IRB Review Specialist Kimberley Serpico, MEd, CIP Sr. IRB Review Specialist • Employs “one-stop-shop” model • Regardless of type of submission, mode of review • Department-assignments available at http://www.hsph.harvard.edu/ohra/department-assignments/ Keisha Turner, BA IRB Review Specialist Quality Improvement Program (QIP) Stanley Estime, MSCI, CIP Sr. QA/QI Specialist QIP Team Lead Lisa Gabel, BA, CIP Sr. QA/QI Specialist Alyssa Speier, MS, CIP Assistant Director, Regulatory Affairs & Research Compliance • Ensures compliance of IRB and investigators through for cause and not for cause audits, selfassessments, etc. • Education and training (schedule available here) • Human research support services, e.g., IRB submission/grant writing assistance; study management tools; routine onsite monitoring, and external audit preparation What’s New with ESTR • In mid-October, ESTR will be upgraded (expect more updates) • Users expected to experience minimal change • Changes will not alter any IRB policies or application requirements • During the upgrade, users with an active submission pending review may be asked to supply additional information • Questions • LMA IRB ESTR representative: Kim Serpico at [email protected] • ESTR Help Desk: [email protected] ESTR Changes: Submitting • Parallel Ancillary Review(s) • Required reviews by Faculty Sponsors and/or Department Chairs will occur in parallel with the IRB review • PI Proxy • A PI with an approved study may designate one or more proxy to submit modifications and continuing reviews ESTR Changes: Communicating • Comment with Email Notice • Comments can now trigger an out of system email to a member of the study staff or IRB reviewer, e.g., a coordinate can use a comment to notify the PI that an application is ready to submit • Withdraw to an Editable State • Study staff members can transition the submission back to an editable state after submission (helpful when changes are necessary) ESTR Changes: Streamlining/Clarification • Automated Conversion to Clean Copies • Upon approval, ESTR will automatically convert all track-changed Word documents to clean PDF versions • Redundancies Removed • Unnecessary questions have been removed from the SmartForm • Question and attachment prompts have been reworded and rearranged Recent federal guidance/NIH policy 1. OHRP Engagement Guidance • E.g., Harvard LMA School is considered engaged if the prime awardee of HHS-funding regardless of where human research activities occur (even off site) 2. PHS Newborn Dried Blood Spots • All research funded pursuant to the PHS Act using newborn dried blood spots is considered human subjects regardless of whether specimens are de-identified • An IRB cannot waive informed consent 3. NIH Genomic Data Sharing • All NIH-funded research generating or using large-scale human or non-human genomic data requires data sharing plans and Institutional Certification Obtaining Institutional Certification (no prior Harvard LMA IRB review) • Log into ESTR (https://irb.harvard.edu) and “Create New Study” • Add a “comment” in ESTR to denote request for Institutional Certification • Under “Study Scope,” upload applicable application, which includes: • A description of all data fields (genotype and phenotype) to be submitted to repository • A plan for de-identifying datasets and how the key will be maintained • Written confirmation that the coding system or “key” will never be shared with NIH • Upload a copy of the consent form(s) • Under “Consent, Assent…” page, if collecting data/specimens prospectively • Under “Supplemental Documents” page, if collecting existing data/specimens Obtaining Institutional Certification (prior Harvard LMA IRB review secured) • PI to email department-assigned Review Specialist • Use subject heading “GDS Institutional Certification Requested” to facilitate prioritization • Reference Harvard LMA IRB protocol # outlining underlying data/specimen collection/analyses • If not available in ESTR, “Create a Modification” that includes: • IRB approval notification (if Harvard LMA IRB didn’t review/approve) • A description of all data fields (genotype and phenotype) to be submitted to repository • A plan for de-identifying datasets and how the key will be maintained • Written confirmation that the coding system or “key” will never be shared with NIH • A copy of the underlying consent form(s) Some “life vests” for Investigators and Study Staff • New Resources • Investigator Portal featuring Self-Assessment and Onsite Review FAQ pages • Electronic Regulatory Binders, e.g., REDCap and SharePoint • 2015-2016 Education Series • Offers a variety of topics, featuring guest speakers • Revamped Auditing Program • Required for new/transfer/“exception” PIs • Revitalizing QIP’s Onsite Review and Support Service offered at the department level • Human research training refresher credit earned for participants Questions?