Download Changes Afloat at the Harvard LMA IRB: what you need to know for

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts
no text concepts found
Transcript
Changes Afloat at the Harvard LMA
IRB: what you need to know for
smooth sailing
Outline
• Who we are
• What’s new with ESTR
• Recent federal guidance/NIH policy & IRB review
• Quality Improvement Program initiatives
• Questions
Office of Human Research Administration
IRB Operations
Grace Bullock, BA
IRB Coordinator
Jada Dixon, MJ, MPH,
CIP
IRB Review Specialist
Paul Hryvniak, MS,
CIP
IRB Review Specialist
Keren-Nicole Insalaco,
MS, CIP, CIM
Sr. IRB Review
Specialist
Kimberley Serpico,
MEd, CIP
Sr. IRB Review
Specialist
• Employs “one-stop-shop” model
• Regardless of type of submission, mode of review
• Department-assignments available at
http://www.hsph.harvard.edu/ohra/department-assignments/
Keisha Turner, BA
IRB Review Specialist
Quality Improvement Program (QIP)
Stanley Estime, MSCI,
CIP
Sr. QA/QI Specialist
QIP Team Lead
Lisa Gabel, BA, CIP
Sr. QA/QI Specialist
Alyssa Speier, MS, CIP
Assistant Director,
Regulatory Affairs &
Research Compliance
• Ensures compliance of IRB and
investigators through for cause and
not for cause audits, selfassessments, etc.
• Education and training (schedule
available here)
• Human research support services,
e.g., IRB submission/grant writing
assistance; study management
tools; routine onsite monitoring, and
external audit preparation
What’s New with ESTR
• In mid-October, ESTR will be upgraded (expect more updates)
• Users expected to experience minimal change
•
Changes will not alter any IRB policies or application requirements
• During the upgrade, users with an active submission pending review may be
asked to supply additional information
• Questions
•
LMA IRB ESTR representative: Kim Serpico at [email protected]
•
ESTR Help Desk: [email protected]
ESTR Changes: Submitting
• Parallel Ancillary Review(s)
• Required reviews by Faculty Sponsors and/or Department
Chairs will occur in parallel with the IRB review
• PI Proxy
• A PI with an approved study may designate one or more proxy
to submit modifications and continuing reviews
ESTR Changes: Communicating
• Comment with Email Notice
• Comments can now trigger an out of system email to a member of the
study staff or IRB reviewer, e.g., a coordinate can use a comment to notify
the PI that an application is ready to submit
• Withdraw to an Editable State
• Study staff members can transition the submission back to an editable
state after submission (helpful when changes are necessary)
ESTR Changes: Streamlining/Clarification
• Automated Conversion to Clean Copies
• Upon approval, ESTR will automatically convert all track-changed Word
documents to clean PDF versions
• Redundancies Removed
• Unnecessary questions have been removed from the SmartForm
• Question and attachment prompts have been reworded and rearranged
Recent federal guidance/NIH policy
1. OHRP Engagement Guidance
•
E.g., Harvard LMA School is considered engaged if the prime awardee of HHS-funding
regardless of where human research activities occur (even off site)
2. PHS Newborn Dried Blood Spots
•
All research funded pursuant to the PHS Act using newborn dried blood spots is
considered human subjects regardless of whether specimens are de-identified
•
An IRB cannot waive informed consent
3. NIH Genomic Data Sharing
•
All NIH-funded research generating or using large-scale human or non-human genomic
data requires data sharing plans and Institutional Certification
Obtaining Institutional Certification
(no prior Harvard LMA IRB review)
• Log into ESTR (https://irb.harvard.edu) and “Create New Study”
• Add a “comment” in ESTR to denote request for Institutional Certification
• Under “Study Scope,” upload applicable application, which includes:
•
A description of all data fields (genotype and phenotype) to be submitted to repository
•
A plan for de-identifying datasets and how the key will be maintained
•
Written confirmation that the coding system or “key” will never be shared with NIH
• Upload a copy of the consent form(s)
•
Under “Consent, Assent…” page, if collecting data/specimens prospectively
•
Under “Supplemental Documents” page, if collecting existing data/specimens
Obtaining Institutional Certification
(prior Harvard LMA IRB review secured)
• PI to email department-assigned Review Specialist
•
Use subject heading “GDS Institutional Certification Requested” to facilitate prioritization
• Reference Harvard LMA IRB protocol # outlining underlying data/specimen
collection/analyses
• If not available in ESTR, “Create a Modification” that includes:
•
IRB approval notification (if Harvard LMA IRB didn’t review/approve)
•
A description of all data fields (genotype and phenotype) to be submitted to repository
•
A plan for de-identifying datasets and how the key will be maintained
•
Written confirmation that the coding system or “key” will never be shared with NIH
•
A copy of the underlying consent form(s)
Some “life vests” for Investigators and Study Staff
• New Resources
•
Investigator Portal featuring Self-Assessment and Onsite Review FAQ pages
•
Electronic Regulatory Binders, e.g., REDCap and SharePoint
• 2015-2016 Education Series
•
Offers a variety of topics, featuring guest speakers
• Revamped Auditing Program
•
Required for new/transfer/“exception” PIs
•
Revitalizing QIP’s Onsite Review and Support Service offered at the department level
•
Human research training refresher credit earned for participants
Questions?