Download Discussion for Keep Alive Source /Auxiliary Positron Source KURIKI

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts
no text concepts found
Transcript
Discussion for Keep Alive Source
/Auxiliary Positron Source
KURIKI Masao
Hiroshima U. /KEK
1
10/25/2011
ILC Technical Baseline Review, 2011, DESY
KAS/APS central region integral
KAS/APS share a common target, capture,
booster.
500 MeV linac for KAS/APS is in e- BDS
tunnel.
KAS/APS operation conflicts to maintenance in
e- BDS, e- RTML (upstream), and e- DR.
KAS/APS is compatible with maintenance for eRTML (downstream), e- ML, and undulator.
2
10/25/2011
ILC Technical Baseline Review, 2011, DESY
BDS DOGLEG and AUX SOURCE
Electron Beam
For Aux. Positron
3
10/25/2011
ILC Technical Baseline Review, 2011, DESY
TGT, OMD, etc and Vault
Aux. Positron
Electron Beam
For Aux. Positron
4
10/25/2011
ILC Technical Baseline Review, 2011, DESY
125 MeV Capture Accelerator, Beam separation
and Dumps
Aux. Positron
(Injector Linac)
5
10/25/2011
ILC Technical Baseline Review, 2011, DESY
5 GeV Booster and BDS Optics
Aux. Positron
(5GeV Booster)
6
10/25/2011
ILC Technical Baseline Review, 2011, DESY
Continued BDS and E+ transport past the MAIN 20
MW E+ DUMP
Aux. Positron
7
10/25/2011
ILC Technical Baseline Review, 2011, DESY
Separation of E+ Beam to DR and E- BDS to IR +
E- RTML
8
10/25/2011
ILC Technical Baseline Review, 2011, DESY
Concept of “Auxiliary” or “Keep Alive Source
1. RDR Keep Alive source: 10% nominal intensity.
1.
Dedicated 500MeV e- linac
2.
Dedicated e+ target (W or W-Re) and capture section.
2. SB2009 Auxiliary source: 2% intensity
1.
Dedicated 500MeV e- linac
2.
A common e+ target (Ti alloy) and capture with undulator.
3.
Placed in BDS tunnel.
3. Is SB2009 Auxiliary source useful?
9
10/25/2011
ILC Technical Baseline Review, 2011, DESY
KAS/APS yield
500 MeV driver with 0.4X0 target makes ~2% intensity.
The same driver with 3X0 target makes ~20% intensity.
0.4X0 Ti alloy and 4X0 W has same thickness .
10
10/25/2011
ILC Technical Baseline Review, 2011, DESY
Two Scenarios
Start up e+ source is very important in MD phase.
In the initial phase, 3X0 W-Re instead of 0.4X0 Ti
alloy improves the e+ intensity.
500 MeV single bunch S-band accelerator (30m) can
generate 20 % intensity e+ beam.
The target can be replaced when undulator is ready for
the commissioning. KAS becomes a small backup with
a few % intensity.
Could W-Re (or W) and Ti alloy be implemented in a
same target ? (Hybrid).
11
10/25/2011
ILC Technical Baseline Review, 2011, DESY
Mosaic target
A target assembly consists from
Ti
W-Re and Ti-alloy.
The target should be assembled
symmetrically for smooth rotation.
The rotation is controlled, so that electron
electron hit W-Re part and photon
hit Ti-alloy part.
photon
The target is compatible both for
physics run with undulator and
commissioning run with eauxiliary source, without target
exchange.
10/25/2011
ILC Technial Baseline Review, 2011, DESY
W-Re
12
Summary
Any conflict with other system in operation?
Does it work really as KAS/APS?
Is 2% bunch intensity enough?
Target replace after commissioning phase seems
to be efficient and reasonable.
Mosaic target can be a technical solution to
avoid the target exchange.
13
10/25/2011
ILC Technical Baseline Review, 2011, DESY