Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Grade 12 World Issues – Unit 3 – Lesson 10 Malthusian Catastrophe Malthusian Catastrophe – Population increase would outpace increases in the means of subsistence. In 1798, Thomas Malthus wrote Essay on the Principle of Population. In nature, Malthus observed that plants and animals produce far more offspring than can survive. He suggested that humans also are capable of overproducing if reproduction is left unchecked. He concluded, unless family size was regulated, human population would increase faster than its food supply resulting in famine, and eventually, the downfall of humans. Among other names, this idea is called the Malthusian Catastrophe, Malthus Theory or Malthus Principle. To understand the Malthusian Catastrophe, it is necessary to look closely at the logic of the underlying argument. Malthus suggested the human population grows geometrically or exponentially. That is, the population doubles with each new generation (i.e., 1, 2, 4, 8, 16, 32, 64, 128, 256…). The subsistence requirement, in this case food, increases arithmetically. The change is linear (i.e., 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14…). The idea is illustrated in Figure 1. Figure 1. Malthusian Catastrophe showing Exponential Population Growth and Arithmetic Subsistence Resource Change. If population exceeds the capacity of the Earth’s food supply (i.e., Point of Crisis), the population must decrease. In the Malthusian Catastrophe, the subsistence resources are finite. In biology, the theory asserts that the reproductive potential of most organisms or species greatly exceeds the Earth’s capacity to support all possible offspring. Consequently, species diversity is preserved through mechanisms and checks that work to keep population sizes at levels below capacity. An example of a check is predation. For humans, Malthus identified a number of checks that would regulate or limit population growth. The human checks included war, famine and disease. Malthusian population theory was eventually dismissed for (1) its pessimism and (2) its failure to take into account technological advances in agriculture and food production. Despite its inaccuracy, the Malthusian Catastrophe does raise concerns regarding the limitations of the Earth’s resources to sustain increasing human populations. Neo-Malthusians (i.e., modern believers in the principle) would consider birth control as an acceptable solution to reduce and control human population growth.