Download Geochronology Short Course

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts
no text concepts found
Transcript
Introduction to Geochronology
Part 2: Framing the problem (1) - what and why?
Geochronology & Tracers Facility
NERC Isotope Geosciences Laboratory
British Geological Survey
Framing the problem (1)
•
•
•
•
Fit the geochronology to the research question
Which rocks and minerals?
Which methods?
Sampling strategy
Framing the problem (1)
• Fit the geochronology to the research question
Hypothesis
Sampling &
analytical
strategy
Interpretation of
geochronological
data
Framing the problem (1)
• Fit the geochronology to the research question
• Which rocks and minerals?
–
–
–
–
Provenance
Magmatic evolution
Metamorphism
Deformation
SCALE
Framing the problem (1)
• Fit the geochronology to the research question
– Provenance
Spencer et al., 2015, Geoscience Frontiers
Framing the problem (1)
• Fit the geochronology to the research question
– Provenance
Spencer et al., 2015, Geoscience Frontiers
Framing the problem (1)
• Fit the geochronology to the research question
– Provenance
Spencer et al., 2014, Precambrian Research
Framing the problem (1)
• Fit the geochronology to the research question
– Provenance
Spencer et al., 2014, Precambrian Research
Framing the problem (1)
• Fit the geochronology to the research question
– Magmatic evolution
Spencer et al., 2015, Precambrian Research
Framing the problem (1)
• Fit the geochronology to the research question
– Magmatic evolution
Spencer et al., 2015, Precambrian Research
Framing the problem (1)
• Fit the geochronology to the research question
– Magmatic evolution
SCALE
Schoene et al., 2012, EPSL
Framing the problem (1)
• Fit the geochronology to the research question
– Magmatic evolution
SCALE
Schoene et al., 2012, EPSL
Framing the problem (1)
• Fit the geochronology to the research question
– Magmatic evolution
SCALE
Schoene et al., 2012, EPSL
Framing the problem (1)
• Fit the geochronology to the research question
– Metamorphism
SCALE
Framing the problem (1)
• Fit the geochronology to the research question
– Deformation
SCALE
Framing the problem (1)
• Fit the geochronology to the research question
• Which rocks and minerals?
–
–
–
–
–
Provenance
Magmatic evolution
Metamorphism
Deformation
Mineral deposits
Lithology/Mineralogy
Framing the problem (1)
• Fit the geochronology to the research question
–
–
–
–
–
Provenance
Magmatic evolution
Metamorphism
Deformation
Mineral deposits
•Sedimentary units – across or along stratigraphy
•Mature versus immature
•Representative or looking for variation
•Meta-sedimentary
Lithology/Mineralogy
Framing the problem (1)
• Fit the geochronology to the research question
–
–
–
–
–
Provenance
Magmatic evolution
Metamorphism
Deformation
Mineral deposits
Lithology/Mineralogy
•Single versus multi-mineral
•Zircon
•Rutile
•Titanite
•Apatite
•Monazite
•Garnet
•Model age
Framing the problem (1)
• Fit the geochronology to the research question
–
–
–
–
–
Provenance
Magmatic evolution
Metamorphism
Deformation
Mineral deposits
•Evolution of single suite – mafic to felsic
•Magmatic flux – batholith/terrane
•Volcanic-plutonic connection
•Cross-cutting relationships
Lithology/Mineralogy
•Magma mingling vs. mixing
Framing the problem (1)
• Fit the geochronology to the research question
–
–
–
–
–
Provenance
Magmatic evolution
Metamorphism
Deformation
Mineral deposits
Lithology/Mineralogy
•Minerals:
•Zircon ubiquitous in felsic rocks
•Baddelyite in some mafic rocks
•Titanite & allanite
•Monazite
•Primary magmatic, alteration, metamorphic
Framing the problem (1)
• Fit the geochronology to the research question
–
–
–
–
–
Provenance
Magmatic evolution
Metamorphism
Deformation
Mineral deposits
Dating ‘metamorphism’, a fallacy?
Regis et al., 2014, Lithos
Lithology/Mineralogy
Dating a particular mineral reaction,
or cooling path, or fluid event.
Framing the problem (1)
• Fit the geochronology to the research question
–
–
–
–
–
Provenance
Magmatic evolution
Metamorphism
Deformation
Mineral deposits
Lithology/Mineralogy
Dating a particular mineral reaction,
or cooling path, or fluid event.
Janots et al., 2008, J Met. Geology
Framing the problem (1)
• Fit the geochronology to the research question
–
–
–
–
–
Provenance
Magmatic evolution
Metamorphism
Deformation
Mineral deposits
•‘Dating a shearzone’
•New mineral growth vs. disturbed isotopic systems
•Low-temp – illite
•Med-high temp – titanite
•High-grade - monazite and zircon
•Lead-loss
•Resetting above closure temp
Lithology/Mineralogy
•Cross-cutting relationships
Framing the problem (1)
• Fit the geochronology to the research question
–
–
–
–
–
Provenance
Magmatic evolution
Metamorphism
Deformation
Mineral deposits
•‘Dating a shearzone’
In general, deformation does not produce
mineral growth or isotopic disturbance.
Heat ± fluid
Linked to shearing?
Lithology/Mineralogy
Framing the problem (1)
• Fit the geochronology to the research question
–
–
–
–
–
Provenance
Magmatic evolution
Metamorphism
Deformation
Mineral deposits
Lithology/Mineralogy
Mahan et al., 2006, J. Met. Geology
Framing the problem (1)
• Fit the geochronology to the research question
–
–
–
–
–
Provenance
Magmatic evolution
Metamorphism
Deformation
Mineral deposits
Lithology/Mineralogy
•Dating an economic mineral?
•Dating a hydrothermal event?
•Dating host and/or cross-cutting rocks?
Framing the problem (1)
• Fit the geochronology to the research question
Lithology/Mineralogy
Framing the problem (1)
•
•
•
•
Fit the geochronology to the research question
Which rocks and minerals?
Which methods?
Sampling strategy
Framing the problem (1)
• Fit the geochronology to the research question
• Which methods?
What is the precision required to answer the hypothesis?
Framing the problem (1)
• Fit the geochronology to the research question
• Which methods?
What is the precision required to answer the hypothesis?
10%
2%
0.2%
Framing the problem (1)
• Fit the geochronology to the research question
• Which methods?
cost
cost
10%
cost
What is the precision required to answer the hypothesis?
2%
0.2%
Framing the problem (1)
• Fit the geochronology to the research question
• Which methods?
Can two high precision dates answer the
same question as five low precision dates?
Framing the problem (1)
• Fit the geochronology to the research question
• Which methods?
Restricted spatial resolution
High precision
e.g. ID-TIMS
High spatial resolution
Low precision
e.g. LA-ICP-MS
Framing the problem (1)
•
•
•
•
Fit the geochronology to the research question
Which rocks and minerals?
Which methods?
Sampling strategy
Framing the problem (1)
• Fit the geochronology to the research question
• Sampling strategy
Material can be dated in thin sections, thick sections, or after separation of minerals.
Some techniques are limited (i.e. isotope dilution requires separated minerals).
Is the context of the mineral crucial?
Micro-drilling
Framing the problem (1)
• Fit the geochronology to the research question
• Sampling strategy
Laser microsampling
FIB
Selfrag
selfrag.com
Pollington & Baxter, 2011, Chemical Geology
Wirth, 2004, Eur J Min.
Take home messages
• Fit the geochronology to the research question
Hypothesis
Sampling &
analytical
strategy
Interpretation of
geochronological
data
What scale?
Which rocks?
Which minerals?
Which methods?
Related documents